The message is clear, if you use my data without paying, prepare your lawyers

The Internet business model has been based on a tacit agreement for decades: If something is free, the product is probably us. For years, this logic was assumed without major shocks, but the emergence of artificial intelligence is changing the rules. Platforms that store human conversations have become gold mines for training models, and that has reopened old questions about the value of data. In the midst of this new scenario, Reddit has planted itself strongly. Although its millions of users do not receive any compensation for the content they generate, the company has made it clear that it will not tolerate others using it without paying for it. Reddit’s firmness has materialized in a new lawsuit filed before US justice. The company accuses Perplexity AI and three data scraping service providers of having circumvented its protection mechanisms to access copyrighted content. In its complaint, Reddit describes “scraping on an industrial scale” and maintains that the objective of these companies is to illicitly obtain the material that feeds artificial intelligence engines. It’s a new chapter in a strategy to control the use of your content. A rather particular case. At the center of the complaint are Perplexity AI and three mass data scraping intermediaries: SerpApi, Oxylabs and AWMProxy. Reddit describes them as “wannabe bank robbers,” a metaphor with which the company illustrates the attempt to access their content through indirect means. Instead of signing a licensing agreement, the lawsuit claims, these companies would have chosen to use third-party services to collect posts, comments and copyright-protected data. The conversational search engine is listed as a customer of “at least one” of those providers. The court document details a pattern of behavior that, according to Reddit, has been repeated for months. The accused companies would have used automated methods to extract information from the platform despite the restrictions imposed on their public file. The result, the company denounces, was a constant flow of publications that ended up integrated into the defendant’s artificial intelligence engine. For Reddit, it is scraping “on an industrial scale” and for clearly commercial purposes. The test that turned it all on. One of the most relevant episodes of the complaint is an experiment that Reddit considers key. In May 2024, the company ordered the defendant to stop collecting its data. However, shortly thereafter he saw an increase in Reddit mentions within the Perplexity answer engine. To verify this, he published an entry designed to be visible only by Google. According to the complaint, a few hours later the full text of that publication already appeared in the results generated by the accused company’s system. Perplexity does not hide. Perplexity noted on Reddit’s own platform. In that message, it explained that it is an “application layer” company and that “it does not train artificial intelligence models with Reddit content.” “He has never done it,” the text added. According to the company, this difference makes it impossible to sign a licensing agreement like those that Reddit has reached with other companies. “A year ago, after explaining this, Reddit insisted that we pay anyway. Giving in to these types of tactics is not the way we do business,” the statement concluded. When there is an agreement, there is money. Reddit’s position against Perplexity contrasts with the agreements it has signed with other technology companies. In February 2024 it expanded its collaboration with Google to allow access to its content through the data API, in a structured and licensed manner. Three months later, announced a similar alliance with OpenAI: ChatGPT and other company products can display recent Reddit posts in their responses. What we accept (many times) without reading. Behind all this debate there is an element that many users overlook: the Reddit Terms of Service. By creating an account, each person grants the platform a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable and sublicensable license to use their content. This license allows you to copy, modify, distribute or publish any contribution, including making it available to other associated companies. The text also specifies that Reddit can use this material to “train artificial intelligence and machine learning models.” In other words, permission is already granted. Something we have already seen, and what remains to be seen. Reddit has been drawing a clear pattern of action for some time. In 2023 it toughened its conditions for access to the APIwhich led to widespread protests and the temporary closure of thousands of communities. A year later, in May 2024, it sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity for unauthorized use of its data and subsequently filed a lawsuit against Anthropic for similar reasons. The current litigation fits that same logic: protecting the value of your content and tightening your control over who can use it. The case between Reddit and Perplexity is still in its initial phase, but its implications are evident. What the courts decide could set a precedent for future disputes between platforms and artificial intelligence developers. On the one hand there is the defense of free access to information; on the other, the right of companies to protect the content generated in their communities. The result will define the extent to which platforms control the material that users share daily. Images | Reddit | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 | Perplexity In Xataka | The race to put a humanoid robot in our house has begun. It’s an absurd race

Vlex, the startup that has created “the chatgpt of lawyers”

Oakley Capital has sold Vlexthe Spanish legal platform, to the Canadian Clio for more than 1,000 million dollars, according to Expansion. This operation makes the company founded by the FAUS brothers a quarter of a century ago in the sixth active Spanish unicorn. Why is it important. This sale represents the greatest success of Oakley Capital in Spain and confirms the unstoppable boom in the sector LegalTech. The valuation involves multiplying the VLEX value in less than three years, since Oakley bought it for 70 million At the end of 2022. In detail. Vlex operates as the “chatgpt of lawyers”: It offers access to more than 1,000 million legal documents from one hundred countries through its AI ‘assistantVincent ai‘. Its 2.8 million users include from Harvard Law School to Legal Deloitte. Every day incorporates 350,000 new documents to its platform. Oakley Capital, the British manager who in Spain controls idealistic and has invested in Seedgdemonstrated its smell to detect opportunities before boom. When it was done with VLEX control, the company barely generated five million Ebitda. Between the lines. He Timing Oakley has been impeccable: he invested just before the generative AI put the world up, including the legal sector. The pandemia had already accelerated the digitalization of the offices that were still behind, but Chatgpt changed the story. And tools like Vincent ai ceased to be a curiosity, something complementary, to become fundamental. The threat. For its rivals, this operation is a turning point. Cliovalued at 3,000 million and backed by Goldman Sachs, has suddenly been made with the largest digitalized legal library in the world. The consolidation of the sector accelerates. Deepen. The ecosystem LegalTech It continues to attract a lot of money in investments. The best example is Harvey, American competitor from Vincent AI. It was valued at 5,000 million A few weeks ago, when he got heavyweight as investors such as OpenAi or Capital Sequoia. And there is Vlex, demonstrating that Spain is able to compete in the First Technological Division. Not in fundamental models, but in more specialized products, more than niche. Like the new unicorn. In Xataka | Spain is no longer the ugly duckling of the European technological ecosystem. Now has the opposite problem Outstanding image | Vlex, Mockuuups Studio

Musk’s lawyers want to change that law

Elon Musk has not lost the salary bonus that agreed With Tesla in 2018. Before The refusal of justice To grant it, he has made a determination: change the law to give him right. His lawyers are writing a proposal for bill that will change the rules of the game for companies in Delaware and compensation to their managers. If a law does not prove you right, change it. The law firm that represents Elon Musk and Tesla in their salary dispute with the company’s investors has been writing a bill aimed at changing corporate legislation in Delaware, as has confirmed the firm to CNBC. However, and despite the fact that the bill stops tailored to the case of Elon Musk, the buffet claims not to act on behalf of any specific client. “The statutory changes are necessary to restore the basic principles that have been the distinctive seal of Delaware for more than a century and ensure that Delaware remains the preeminent jurisdiction for incorporation,” said Lisa Schmidt, president of the law firm in statements to statements to the North American medium. Salary bonds do not touch. He bill that is proposed seeks to modify the Title 8 of the Delaware Code related to the fiduciary duty of executives and members of the Board of Directors that includes the General Corporations Law. The main approach of the proposal is to limit the demands related to executive compensation packages, as with the billionaire Bono that Elon Musk agreed with Tesla. This law proposal comes at a critical moment, since Musk faces the appeal of trial in the state of Delaware, where justice already has denied twice The payment of that bonus for considering it an “unfathomable and unfair sum.” Ready for vote. The bill written by the firm Richards, Layton & Finger that represents Musk and Tesla, has already been presented at the General Assembly of Delaware. It must now be voted in the two state chambers, and ratified by Democratic governor of Delaware, Matt Meyer. Brian Quinn, a corporate law professor at Boston College, assured CNBC that this proposal has not gone through the usual channels of the bills, which for decades have been debated and written in the Corporate Law Council of the State Bar Association of Delaware, not in a private law firm. Doubts about its retroactive effect. State senator Bryan Towsend, assured to ABC News that the effect of the new law “is not retroactive and would not affect the litigation related to the Elon Musk compensation package in Tesla.” Sarath Sanga, professor of corporate law at Yale University, does not coincide with this diagnosis of retroactivity and assured that: “It is possible. There is nothing in the law that demands it and there is nothing that prevents it.” Ann Lipton, a law professor at the University of Tulane, agreed with Sanga, noting that “this sends a strong signal to the Supreme Court of Delaware that we want this to interpret this to return to Elon his salary.” Brian Quinn also aligns with the opinion of his two colleagues in Yale and Tulane. “It is totally possible that the court revokes the opinion of the trial for reasons not related to this amendment and the Salary Package of Elon Musk is restored.” The new standard leaves shareholders unprotected. “The true role of corporate law is to protect minority investors. With this bill, the legislature is saying: ‘Do you know what? You have to protect them less,” explained Quinn to CNBC. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a higher rank member of the Senate Banking Committee, described the new bill as the “Musk’s last plan to cheat the US people and enrich themselves and their multimillion -dollar companions. Musk wants to write their own laws To snatch tens of billions of dollars from Tesla’s shareholders, after the courts said they could not do it, ” The senator declared for Massachusetts. In Xataka | A government “Extremely Hardcore”: Elon Musk is applying to the US the same recipe that has applied to all its companies Image | Flickr (Steve Jurvetson), Pexels (Towfiqui Barbhuiya)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.