Generating electricity using earth rotation seemed impossible. These physicists have shown that it is not

In July 2016, two American physicists, Christopher F. Chyba, from Princeton University, and Kevin P. Hand, from the NASA jet propulsion laboratory, published in Physical Review Apply A very exotic scientific article. In his text they defended the possibility of generating electricity taking advantage of The Earth Rotation Movement. His proposal required to build a device that was able to interact with The magnetic field of our planetbut at that time very few scientists took it seriously. Despite the bad initial reception that his job received, Chyba and Hand have spent the last nine years trying to build his electricity generation machine with the purpose of demonstrating that, indeed, his proposal works. However, during this period they have joined a third physique, Thomas H. Chyba, who investigates in Spectral Sensor Solutions, an Albuquerque company (New Mexico). It is dedicated, among other things, to develop electrooptic sensors to detect chemical, nuclear, biological and radiological threats. Chyba and Hand were right from the beginning On March 19, these three physicists published in Physical Review Research A new scientific article in which they experimentally demonstrate that, as suggested in their 2016 text, it is possible to generate electricity taking advantage of The rotation movement From Earth. To carry out their demonstration they have built the apparatus capable of interacting with The Earth’s magnetic field of which they talked in their 2016 article. Interestingly, this device is very broadly speaking a manganese and zinc ferrite cylinder that behaves like a magnetic shield. The experiment of these three physicists has shown that 18 electricity microvolts were being generated through the cylinder Once they had it ready, they guided him in a north-south direction with an angle of 57 degrees with the purpose of being perpendicular to both to the Earth Rotation Movement as to its magnetic field. And then they placed electrodes at each end of the cylinder to be able to measure the voltage of the electric current that they expected to be generated. And they succeeded. His experiment showed that they were being generated 18 electricity microvolts through the cylinder without any other energy source. According to these physicists, the only plausible possibility is that, as they expected, the land rotation movement is responsible for the generation of this small amount of electricity. When Chyba and Hand proposed their idea in 2016, other scientists criticized it by arguing that any voltage caused by a device similar to that they have finally built would be canceled at the time when electrons were repositioned during the generation of an electric field. But your experiment shows that it is possible to capture that voltage. An 18 microvolt voltage is insignificant in practice. It’s true. However, this is not important; The relevant thing is that, apparently, the proposal of these three physicists works. In fact, your plan goes through climb this technology To generate much more electricity, enough at least to be useful. In any case, there is something important that we should not overlook: its experiment still has to be replicated by other scientists and in other test scenarios to verify that this voltage has not really been generated by any other external source that, perhaps, the protagonists of this article have not taken into account. Image | POT More information | Physical Review Research In Xataka | NASA has made the calculations: China can slow down the earth with a filling of the three throats

Manus is the new sensation of China after Deepseek. Is generating as many expectations as doubts

Last week voices began to hear in the AI ​​segment. We theoretically had a new Deepseek phenomenon. It was Manusa theoretical AI agent who raised especially striking options. However, in social networks there have been doubts and suspicions about the real capacity of this model. The unknown about its real value is there. Manus is not an AI agent. Those responsible on its official website is “a general agent who connects ideas with actions: not only thinks, delivers results.” It is actually more a “deep research” mode – like the ‘Deep Research’ of OpenAi – about the data that we give. Thus, Manus is theoretically capable of creating you a detailed 7 -day travel plan by Japanhelp you perform a deep analysis of the Value of Tesla’s actionscreate for you a presentation for a class on the conservation law of the momentFor example. Expectations in style. One of the product managers in Hugging Face He described it as “the most impressive tool I have ever tried.” His Official Discord server He has attracted almost 170,000 users since his creation a week ago. The expectation is remarkable, but as they explain In TechCrunchthere are doubts about their true capacity. Manus is based on Claude and Qwen. There are users who They have already indicated that manus seems not to have been created from zero, and apparently it is Totally based in varied models such as Claude 3.7 and Qwen (Alibaba). One of his co -founders, Yichao “Peak” Yi, confirmed that are in effect based on other products and they are a layer that relies on these models. In the presentation video Yichao stressed that In some benchmarks Manus was superior to Deep Research already OperatorOpenai products. It is? Errors and inconsistencies. Some experts such as Alexander Doria, co -founder of the startup of the Pleias, have indicated that manus makes mistakes and infinite loops When using it. Others point out how Make mistakes With questions with clear answers and Do not cite sources consistently. Beta by invitation. For now it is not possible to access manus options, and it is only possible to use it if any other user invites you. In TechCrunch they have managed to have access, and the tests performed, explained the editor who tested it, “have not been especially positive.” None of the agerentic tasks that he tested – seek table in a restaurant, take out plane tickets – worked. In The Register they have also had access and Nothing have been impressed with the results. “They tried to create a Mario clone that turned out to be quite terribleFor example. Other users who have tried or They praise it or They believe that despite its lights and shadows is a special promising product. At the moment this is not a Deepseek. The truth is that the rapid popularity of Manus contrasts with that of Deepseek, which was available from the first moment as an Open Source development that anyone could download and use. The company may want to take advantage of that expectation generated by betas with invitation access and prefer to avoid greater infrastructure expenses. In Xataka | China has a plan to achieve scientific supremacy in full struggle with the US to lead in AI

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.