AI flat rates for programming are mathematically unsustainable

A Claude Max user, who pays $100 a month, generated $5,600 in actual API costs in a single billing cycle. It is just an (extreme) example of the enormous gap between the price of such a plan and its spending potential. Other analyzes place it on the range of between 1,000 and 5,000 dollars. Anthropic has just cut off access to third-party tools (such as OpenClaw) to your subscription plans. In addition to for protecting your fenced gardenis also the inevitable arithmetic consequence of selling tokens at open buffet prices when real consumption has skyrocketed between 10 and 100 times. Why is it important. The business model that has financed the explosion of AI for programmers (flat rates, unlimited access, subscription model) has been built on a statistical fiction that development agents have destroyed. What is assumed when a flat rate is sold in any area is that light users subsidize the most intensive ones and the averages are sustained. That works in the data rates of a telecom, in the gyms, in Netflix and in an all-you-can-eat buffet. But it doesn’t work when any user can become, from one day to the next, a beastly consumer of computing. And that’s exactly what happens when an agent comes into play. And since December we are in the era of the agents. Between the lines. The person who has best explained this problem is Luo Fuliresponsible for the team MiMo model on Xiaomi and ex-DeepSeek, who has published a long tweet which has moved especially in Chinese technological circles. Your diagnosis is that third party tools like OpenClaw are not optimized to reuse Claude’s context cache, so each query regenerates context windows of over 100,000 tokens from scratch. The actual number of requests per query is several times higher than what Claude Code himself would generate. “That’s not a gap. It’s a crater,” Luo said. The backdrop. In China, AI programming plans have become one of the most sought-after technology products on the market. Alibaba Cloud quotas They usually sell out in the first hours of the work dayand Tencent’s appear as “unavailable” permanently. Developers go so far as to set morning alarms and write scripts self-purchase to get monthly access. The demand is real, but the underlying economics point in the opposite direction: subscription plans, designed for a world where each interaction consumed a few hundred tokensnow absorb agent workloads that consume 10 to 100 times more per task. Yes, but. Anthropic has not closed access to third-party agents. You have moved them to another invoice: from flat rate to pay-as-you-go API. The measure includes a one-time credit equivalent to the monthly price of the plan and discounts of up to 30% for those who pre-purchase “extra use” packages. The problem is that for many independent developers, the jump in costs, potentially tenfold, makes the use of agents no longer economically viable. Some have already announced that they will migrate to other models. Someone has to pay for that party, and until a new, more efficient solution arrives, no one knows who it will be. The big question. If flat rate can’t survive actual agent usage, what pricing model can? Luo Fuli believes that economic pressure will eventually force third-party tool developers to optimize their context management and maximize cache reuse. He may be right and his approach is logical. But in the meantime, the entire industry is operating with a business model whose math doesn’t add up, and the question of who will absorb the difference (suppliers, developers or end users) remains unanswered. In Xataka | Companies have been investing in AI for years. The problem is that many projects are not producing results. Featured image | Fotis Fotopoulos

A hero without a cape recorded the same shot for a year. Along the way he left the flat earthers without arguments

Intrigued by the phenomenon, Eratosthenes decided make an observation in Alexandria, located about 800 kilometers north of Siena. There, on the same day and at the same time, he noticed that a vertical stick did cast a definite shadow. The discrepancy led him to a fundamental question: how was it possible that in one place there was no shadow and in another there was, at the same time? Eratosthenes deduced that the only explanation was that the earth’s surface was curved. A lot of time has passed since then, but the flat earthers are still among us. The home experiment. For centuries, the idea of ​​a flat Earth has outlived telescopes, satellites and lunar missions. Despite the overwhelming evidence, from the images taken from space and the established physical principles from Aristotleflat earthers have continued searching for the edge of the planet, organizing expeditions to Antarctica or navigations to the supposed “end of the world” that invariably end with the same discovery: that the edge does not exist. Be that as it may, an anonymous Reddit user has dismantled once again his entire creed without leaving home. Armed only with a security camera, the shadow of his garage and the patience of an entire year, he managed to record a test as simple as it was incontestable: the movement of the Sun drawing a figure of eight perfect on the ground. The footprint of the Sun. Between March 2024 and March 2025, this user (under the alias RedditorofReddit07) marked daily, at the same time, the position of the end of a shadow cast by a corner of his garage. After twelve months, the yellow dots traced on the cement an asymmetric curve in the form of infinity: an analemma. This phenomenon, documented by astronomers for centuriesis the direct result of the 23.5 degree tilt of the Earth’s axis and the planet’s elliptical orbit around the sun. In the summer months, the star reaches the highest point of the analemma; in winter, the lowest; and during the intermediate seasons the rest of the figure is drawn. Each latitude generates a slightly different shape, but they all share the same essence: an Earth that moves, rotates and tilts, not a motionless disk under a celestial lantern. The physics of time. The analemma not only reveals the movement of the planet, but also the difference between solar time and time measured by clocks. In theory, noon always occurs at 12 o’clock, but the Sun does not reach its highest point at exactly the same time every day. This variation, a consequence of the inclined axis and the unequal speed with which the Earth travels its orbit, is the reason why the analemma adopts a figure-eight shape. Science sums it up in a formula called the “Equation of Time,” an adjustment that explains why solar days vary in length and why the apparent position of the Sun advances or lags throughout the year. This mismatch is as predictable as it is beautiful, and can only be explained by a spherical planet that orbit a starnot by a flat disk with a wandering Sun that rises and falls without altering its size. The impossible refutation. In the flat earth modelsthe Sun moves on a plane, like a lamp on a table, projecting its light in circles on the surface. If that were true, the end of a shadow always observed at the same time should remain fixed throughout the year. However, the garage experiment shows exactly the opposite: a harmonic displacement that only fits the heliocentric model. Reproducing this effect in a flat world would require, in addition to an act of faith without a network, that the Sun change its trajectory, height and speed in an absurd way, violating the very laws of optics and gravity that its alternative model allows. The flat earthers themselves, faced with such evidence, barely manage to develop new explanations that are more imaginative than scientific. The method. He merit of the experiment It lies not in its complexity, but rather in its humility. Without telescopes or laboratories, a simple fixed camera and a daily routine were enough to record the annual dance of the Earth in front of the Sun. Each shadow point marked on the cement is a slap to the conspiratorial noise that floods the internet. In times when science is forced to defend the obvious, an ordinary garage has become an observatory and an anonymous user a popularizer. He already said it Carl Sagan himselfalthough he only needed a stick to dismantle conspiracies. Image | reddit, jailbird In Xataka | 48 people went to Antarctica to prove that the Earth is flat. They confirmed what can be done with a simple stick In Xataka | Astronomers cannot define this object. They only know that it is heading at two million km/h to the center of the Milky Way

The obsession with flat belly and radical thinness

As every summer, aesthetic pressure marks the pattern again, and this year social networks have found a new goal: the flat belly. Although it seemed that the ideal of the perfect body It was fadingthe viral content has demonstrated otherwise Social networks mark the pattern. A movement It has emerged under the name of “average complexion”. In many videos It can be observed To people, mostly women, showing their body under the pretext of being “neither skinny nor fat”, thus perpetuating unrealistic beauty standards. Influencers Like Carla Flila They have pointed out That this type of content “only generates unnecessary insecurities” by promoting a standard that, far from being inclusive, continues to be exclusive and harmful. Beyond Trend. This phenomenon is nothing more than the tip of the iceberg, since There are many other videos how to “deflate the belly” or “routines to have flat belly.” In them you can visualize express exercises, miraculous diets and advice without scientific basis. All for the insatiable search for an ideal of beauty: the flat belly. Deeper. But what seems like a simple aesthetic tendency has deeper repercussions. A study by the University of Malaga analyzed How within the apparently harmless content you can find publications that actively encourage eating disorders. This duality has highlighted how difficult it can be to distinguish between content that simply promotes exercise and one that, under the disguise of healthy recommendations, encourages dangerous food behaviors. In addition, other research published in Behavioral Psychology showed How brief exposure to representative images of the ideal of thinness has a negative effect on the self -esteem of the participants, increasing anxiety. A persistent stigma. And if the discourse in networks reinforces little inclusive standards, Gordophobia continues to feed body dissatisfaction from another front. A recent UNIR report entitled “Between the healthy and the cult of the body”He revealed that 43.8 % of the boys and 34.7 % of the girls have high levels of Gordophobia. In fact, such as They have detailed In CTXT, Gordophobia is not an isolated prejudice, but a tool that keeps people in a state of constant body dissatisfaction, promoting harmful behaviors for physical and mental health. An endless cycle. This aesthetic pressure is not a new phenomenon. For centuries, the bodies have been molded and controlled by the prevailing aesthetic ideals. The idea of ​​a flat belly in the most recent history began in the nineteenth century, when women They were pushed To use Corsés to get the iconic “Wasp waist”, a symbol of femininity that deformed its ribs and hindered breathing. Almost arriving at this century, in the 90s and early 2000s, the beauty ideal turned towards extreme thinness, popularized by models such as Kate Moss and the call “Heroin Chic“Today, social networks have taken over, perpetuating that cycle of unattainable standards that transform bodies into shaped objects. Outside the networks. Aesthetic standards seem to take another way again, have we returned 20 years ago? The issue is that after a parenthesis in the 2010 decade marked by the rise of movement “POSITIVE BODY“, which included a diversity of bodies, now fashion derives Towards extreme thinness. With the reappearance of the Victoria’s Secret parade, which has bet again by hyperdelled models after years of criticism for their lack of diversity, as well as The reintroduction Of aesthetics and 2k in haute couture brands, they make it clear where the aesthetics wants to return. While social networks continue to amplify these restrictive canons, it is worth asking what will be the impact on the mental and physical health of those who are dragged to pursue unattainable aesthetic standards. Image | Cyril A. and Tiktok Xataka | During millennia, humanity has eaten what it played. Now he has started eating what he wants and that has consequences

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.