When a mountaineer experiences extreme experiences on the mountain, his brain begins to imagine something: a “third man”

Not all adventures have to be successfully resolved to become epic. It happened with what is known as Imperial Transantarcticthe expedition that left England in August 1914 under the orders of explorer Ernest Shackleton with an enormous purpose and not for the faint of heart: cross Antarcticafrom Vahsel in the Weddell Sea to Ross Island at the other end. Due to the harsh conditions at the South Pole, the ship Endurance ended up trapped between ice and Shackleton saw how his plans became complicated until they dragged him into a real feat that took his endurance and that of his colleagues to a limit level only achievable between icebergs, glacial temperatures and extreme exhaustion. The explorer’s feat also served something that he probably did not even suspect: coining the expression “third man factor or syndrome”. Well known by mountaineers and which is, even today, a fascinating phenomenon. “Who is the third person walking beside you?” Ernest Shackleton (left) with Robert Falcon Scott and Edward Wilson in Antarctica, 1902. The phenomenon was described by Shackleton when he recalled the very hard two and a half days during which he advanced—along with Frank Worseley and Tom Cream—towards a whaling station located on the northern coast of South Georgia. The group walked 36 long hours between terrible conditions, with hardly any material and avoiding death. On their shoulders they also carried the responsibility of having to help the rest of their companions from the ill-fated Imperial Transantarctic. Only the three of them, Ernest, Frank and Tom, wandered through the desolate Antarctica, although if someone had asked them how many people made up that desperate entourage, they would probably have answered something different: that with them was another person, a fourth member, nameless, faceless… but undeniable. “I know that during that long and stormy march over nameless mountains and glaciers, it often seemed to me that there were four of us, not three,” the explorer wrote. That common feeling, precise Guardianoverwhelmed the three men who undertook the journey: the presence of a “fourth” that accompanied them. Such an expression must have surprised the poet. T. S. Eliotwho some time later, in 1922, after reading Shackleton’s story, picked up the idea to capture it in his popular poem The Waste Land: “Who is the third one who always walks by your side? When I count, there is only you and me together, but when I look ahead on the white road there is always another walking at your side.” Eliot’s license, which changed Shackleton’s “fourth” man for a “third” was successful and since then we usually talk about the “third man syndrome” to refer to that: the feeling of a ghost companion, a presence that in a way comforts people who face a borderline sensation. Shackleton was not the only one to describe it. Several years after his death, in 1933, Frank SmytheBritish and explorer like him, recounted an experience similar while trying to summit Mount Everest. “The whole time I was climbing alone I had the strong feeling that I was accompanied by a second person. It was so strong that completely eliminated all the loneliness I might otherwise have felt,” the explorer wrote in his diary. So vivid was the sensation that, Smythe explains, at one point during the ascent he searched in his pocket, took out a piece of Kendal Mint Cakebroke it and turned to offer one of the halves to that companion who felt so close. He didn’t see anyone, of course. You don’t have to go back that far in time. Not that far. The Madrid mountaineer Fernando Garrido wrote in his notebook the feeling that came over him when, at the beginning of 1986, he spent more than two months on the lonely summit of the Aconcaguaat almost 7,000 meters, to achieve the altitude survival record. “Today, like other times, I woke up with the feeling that there was someone outsidenext to the store. Have you spent the night there? Why didn’t he call me to let him in? (…) —said the mountaineer in statements collected for him The Confidential—He’s my brother, my brother Javier! Javi, wake up, come on, wake up! I turn it towards me. “He is dead, his head is a skull.” “A solid science” A good handful of articles and references have been written about the phenomenon, some in media within the reach of Guardian either NPRand in 2008 the writer John Geiger dedicated a monographic book to him, ‘The Third Man Factor: Surviving the Impossible’ after spending five years tracking down similar stories. It is more complicated than collecting experiences, however, to give them a plausible explanation. Years ago, during a chat with the journalist NPR’s Guy Raz, Geiger reported that there are those who turn to spirituality, although he insists that the syndrome can be explained by “a solid science”. “Many skeptics and non-believers have had this experience and attribute it to other causes,” claims the author, who in his volume even includes the case of a 9/11 survivor. In 2009 Geiger pointed out explanations such as biochemical reactions or simply failures in brain activity. “If we understand that the third man factor is part of us, like adrenaline is… then we can access it more easily. It is not a hallucination in the sense that hallucinations are disordered. This is a very useful and orderly guide,” he reflected. Years ago, researchers Ben Alderson-Day and David Smailes commented on the phenomenon and they explained that “strong feelings of presence” do not occur only in dramatic circumstances. Cases have been recorded after bereavement, during sleep paralysis or in cases of neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease or brain damage. “The different contexts in which they occur give us some clues about what could be happening,” they say. “Understanding more about how and why felt presences occur has the potential to tell us many things about ourselves: how we react under intense mental or physical stress, how we deal with danger and threat, … Read more

five experiences to celebrate Valentine’s Day as a couple

Flowers, chocolates, that accessory or that device that you had been looking for for so long… What are you going to give for next Valentine’s Day? If you don’t have it yet, you don’t know very well what to give or you are simply considering different options, today we want to give you some ideas with five different gifts, experiences as a couple to surprise on Valentine’s Day. The Lion King, the musical from 27 eurosa live experience to enjoy the iconic musical based on the Disney film. luxury hotels by 249.90 eurosa gift box with two nights. Spa and massage by 47.40 eurosan experience for couples to relax. Les Miserables, the musical from 34.89 eurosanother quite interesting musical at the Teatro Apolo. Puy Du Fou by 130 eurosa couples experience with a visit to the Toledo theme park. The Lion King, the musical It may not be the most original gift, but it is an experience that is certainly difficult to forget. ‘The Lion King‘, the musical is available with the option to choose the date and time, even on Valentine’s Day if you want to go that same day. The price of tickets varies depending on the time or day, but is from 27 euros and the place is at the Lope de Vega Theater in Madrid. Of course, the musical will be available until March 29. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links luxury hotels Traveling can be a totally pleasant experience, especially if we treat ourselves a little and choose a great hotel. At Carrefour, for example, we can find a gift box for 249.90 euros about two nights in four and five star luxury hotels for two people. There is plenty to choose from with locations in Madrid, Asturias, Alicante and much more. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Spa and massage There are also many experiences that focus on relaxation, something that can be very interesting if we are looking for a moment of peace. On Amazon we found another gift box of spa and massage for two people with a great selection of spas, oriental massages and more. Its price is tighter than the previous experience, since it is available for 47.40 euros. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Les Misérables, the musical If you have already seen the musical ‘The Lion King’ and want a similar experience, at the Teatro Nuevo Apolo in Madrid you can enjoy the musical ‘Les Misérables‘. There are also many dates and times to choose from, and prices vary with the 34.89 euros the most economical. It is a musical that has received very good reviews, partly due to the adaptation of Victor Hugo, but also due to its cast and quality. Les Miserables, the musical The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Puy Du Fou If you want to take advantage of the gift so that you can travel as a couple, Carrefour has 130 euros a gift box Puy Du Fouthe iconic, and quite spectacular, theme park located in Toledo. The box includes two tickets and a night show, as well as many others that take place during the day. It is, in this way, a great idea to visit Toledo, get to know the theme park and enjoy one or more shows at the same time. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Becca Tapert in UnsplashDisney, Smartbox, ATG Entertainment In Xataka | The 34 best apps and websites to organize your Easter holidays In Xataka | The best islands to visit or enjoy a vacation, organized in a beautiful graph

we have normalized that experiences degrade

Netflix has just eliminated one of the most basic, useful and veteran functions of its service: the ability to send content (cast) directly from your mobile phone to most televisions and Chromecast-type devices. They have also done it quietly, without press releases or major announcements. It’s another straw that breaks an increasingly terrible camel’s back. what has happened. Netflix no longer supports the transmission of its content from a mobile device to the vast majority of TVs or Android TV-type devices. The solution they offer is for you to find your TV remote control and navigate through the native Netflix application on it. According to several users, the change was applied with zero warnings around on November 10, and Netflix did not announce it, although it has updated one of their support pages to indicate that that feature is no longer active. It’s unfortunate. The most embarrassing thing is not only the removal of the feature, but the fine print that accompanies it on that support page. According to the new regulations, support for this casting function is restricted to Third generation Chromecast (or previous ones) that did not come with a remote control can continue to receive that signal. And you can only take advantage of this function in plans without advertising: if you have the plan with adsthe feature will be locked even with that supported hardware. It is a move reminiscent of the one they made in 2019 when they eliminated AirPlay support in 2019 under the excuse of “guaranteeing the quality standard.” Traditional corporate phrases that today sound emptier than ever. A sign of something more disturbing. But let’s not let a tree stop us from seeing the forest, because this is actually another drop in the glass of users’ patience. The journalist and writer Cory Doctorow created the term “enshittification” to define this phenomenon that we are experiencing with streaming platforms: First, the platforms are good with their users to attract them They then abuse them to improve business for their commercial clients. Then they abuse everyone to capture the value for themselves From bad to worse. If we look back, using Netflix in 2018 was objectively a much superior user experience than today. The interface was cleaner, the catalog was not so fragmented by licensing wars, the cast worked universally and pay attention: the company itself I encouraged you to share your password on Twitter as an act of love and technological goodness. Sharing was living until it stopped being so and Netflix began its particular crusade with shared accounts. We have encountered the Inquisition. This is out of control. This time it has not happened like in 2019 with AirPlay, and there is no explanation or argument behind this elimination of the feature. What is clear is that Netflix has decided that your comfort in using your phone as a controller is acceptable collateral damage. With this they manage to force you to use their TV interface, where they control much better the visibility of their original content and advertising. Netflix is ​​not alone in this boat. The degradation of the user experience is a transversal trend in the market, and affects other streaming services. Amazon Prime Video, which was born as a premium service free of interruptions, began to display advertising and has been increasing its appearance gradually and consistently. You can only get rid of it unless you pay extra, thereby somewhat breaking the basic promise of the service: what was previously an added value for being a Prime customer is now an advertising showcase for which, paradoxically, you are already paying an annual fee. Noise. We are seeing the same thing in two services that dominate our leisure time: both YouTube and Spotify have been filled with advertising and the user experience is objectively worse than it was a few years ago. In Spotify, the strategy has also been even more bloody, because there now appear vertical videos in the TikTok style and an absolute visual intrusion. Functionality and minimalism have been sacrificed because what matters is the engagement. Users do not react. The alarming thing about this situation is not that companies try to maximize their profits; that is what is expected. What is truly disturbing is how quickly we, the users, have accepted that that user experience has gone and is going back without us doing anything to prevent it. We have normalized the loss of rights and functions, and although there have been some ephemeral reactions on social networks, these have not gone beyond an anecdote. The elimination of shared accounts from Netflix in 2022, for example, sparked a lot of criticism and comments from users who boasted about leaving the platform. There was certainly a fallbut it didn’t last long: Today Netflix has more users than ever. The philosophy of less gives a stone. This collective passivity is what allows these changes to occur without companies even announcing it. Companies have been training us for years to be grateful that the service simply works. The shittification continues its course, and our lack of protests and actions in this regard is like the gasoline that fuels this terrible trend. In Xataka | Not a Christmas without Netflix Christmas fireplaces. These are this year’s, and they come with gamification included

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.