exit Google search

Europe has proposed let depend on the US in technology and now is taking real action to get the desired digital sovereignty. According to Politicalone of these measures will come into force tomorrow and consists of something very specific: saying goodbye to the Google search engine. what’s happening. According to an internal email to which Politico has had access, as of Thursday, June 4, “Qwant will replace Google as the default search engine on the European Parliament’s computers.” The reason for this change is to continue “Parliament’s commitment to digital sovereignty and the protection of users’ personal data.” Why is it important. The European Union has realized (too late) that The US is not the reliable partner I thoughtand that depending on their technology is a problem. Changing the search engine on parliament’s computers is a symbolic measure, in the sense that it is one of the easiest to execute and will not have a real impact on technological independence, but it is important to send a message: it is possible. Qwant. It is a search engine that focuses on privacy protection, in fact its slogan is “the browser that knows nothing about you.” Qwant does not store search history or resell browsing data, has an extension for Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari and comes with built-in AI to summarize web pages. And most importantly, it is European, specifically French. Yes, but. When an MEP searches from the address bar in the browser of one of the parliament’s computers, Qwant will be the default search engine. However, they will be able to both access Google to search and change the settings to make it the default search engine. That is, there is no prohibition or block to use Google or any other search engine. More measurements. A few days ago we learned that the European Union is preparing a “technological sovereignty package” with four key measures to reduce its dependence on the United States. These measures focus on four critical areas: Cloud: audits and stress tests for suppliers. Chips: the European Commission will review the Chips Act to be able to cancel contracts and centralize emergency purchases. Software: creation of a strategy to promote European free software. Data centers: 200 billion for the construction of data centers and 20 billion for digitalization and AI in energy. It’s going to be complicated. The EU’s dependence on US technology is enormous. According to Synergy data70% of the European cloud market is owned by just three American companies (AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud) and only 15% is controlled by European companies. In the field of chips, although there is ASML, the external dependency is enormous as evidenced with the case of Nexperia and China. Not only is Europe late, its ability to compete in these critical sectors is negligible compared to that of the United States or China. Image | Guillaume Perigois and Alex Dudar on Unsplash In Xataka | The CEO of Mistral sends a message to Europe: the end of being the technological vassal of the United States

guide them to the exit one by one… with a surprise

In the late 80s, during the call “tanker war”the United States even escorted civilian ships in the Persian Gulf under flags changed in a hurryin an operation so delicate that any error could have triggered a direct conflict between powers. Even so, the simple transit of each ship became an almost surgical operation. A blocked strait that paralyzes half the planet. Since the start of the war in Iran, the Strait of Hormuz has become a critical bottleneck for the global economy. It is estimated that at this time there are around of 1,000 ships who remain trapped since the beginning of the conflict and about 20,000 sailors They remain on board with increasingly limited supplies. Not only that. The blockade imposed by Iran after the outbreak of war with the United States and Israel has reduced traffic at minimum levels and has stressed energy markets. The situation is such that analysts warn of a possible breaking point if the situation continues, since a fifth of the world’s oil normally circulates through this route. The US plan. In this scenario, Washington has launched the so-called as “Project Freedom” with an idea as direct as it is risky. Free trapped ships guiding them one by one outside the strait, yes, through coordination between countries, insurers and logistics operators. However, after the announcement it was learned that the key to the plan is what it does not include and that has become its great “surprise”: in reality there will be no naval escorts traditional boats accompanying each ship, according to Washington officials. Although the United States deploy destroyersaircraft and thousands of troops in the region, traffic will rely more on traffic management and indirect deterrence than on direct armed protection. Diplomacy, threats and an extremely fragile balance. The movement also occurs in parallel to indirect negotiations between Washington and Tehran. The messages at the moment are rather mixed, combining diplomatic optimism on the one hand… with strong warnings from both sides on the other. On one side, the United States insists that it will respond forcefully to any interference in the process. Iran, for its part, has just made it clear through its news agencies that any foreign military presence in the strait will be considered a direct threatso the United States “plan” threatens not to occur. A military deployment present but contained. There is no doubt, despite the absence of escorts direct, the environment remains heavily militarized. The United States maintains a wide presence with aircraft carriers, aircraft and unmanned platforms ready to act if the situation escalates. At the same time, naval mines have been detected and specific attacks against ships in the area. In other words, in the current scenario, transit has become an operation of calculated risk where coordination replaces direct protection. The real pulse: control, pressure and global economy. Beyond the movement of ships, what is at stake is the control of one of the most important energy arteries of the world. Iran uses the blockade as a pressure tool in the midst of negotiations, while the United States tries to unblock the situation in its own way and with one caveat: without legitimizing that control. The result is an intermediate solution that summarizes well the tension of the moment: intervene just enough so that the boats leave without causing an escalation that blows everything up into the air. Image | Iranian Media In Xataka | After gasoline, the war in Iran is about to skyrocket the price of something just as painful: your Zara clothes In Xataka | Iran has pulled out a “trick” to sell to China while avoiding the US: turning the ocean into its secret gas station

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.