the battlefield is divided between camera yes or camera no

“Morons with a camera in their faces”, this is how Will Wang described the users of Ray-Ban Meta glasses during a interview with Financial Times. Who is this man and why does he say that? Wang is the CEO of Even Realities, a Shenzhen-based startup that (surprise!) also sells AI glasses, but with an important difference. No cameras. It is Even Realities’ commitment to differentiate itself in the emerging market for glasses with artificial intelligence. His glasses do not have a camera to avoid “social friction”, something he Meta’s glasses can’t boast so much. Furthermore, recently we learned that Ray-Ban Meta records when you take them off and everything recorded was viewed by contractors in Kenya. It is the perfect marketing campaign for Even Realities, which boasts that its glasses only collect essential data, they do not store data in the cloud unless the user explicitly consents, and when they do, the data is always encrypted and sensitive information is eliminated. Why is it important. If Even Realities’ proposal succeeds (and with the controversies that Meta is accumulating, it has options) we may be facing a division of the AI ​​glasses market into two categories: On the one hand, glasses with cameras, like the Ray-Ban Meta, which see and record what is happening around us. On the other hand, tubeless glasses like those from Even or Mijia that function more as an extra help for the user and that does not affect the rest of the people we come across in any way. Even G2. This is the name of the latest model of the Chinese brand. The Even G2 have microphones, speakers and a screen integrated into the glass so that only the user can see it, similar to that of Meta Displaybut in this case it is a panel of monochromatic (green) micro LEDs. Among its functions are real-time translation up to 35 languages, voice-controlled teleprompter, GPS navigation notifications with visual indications and a voice assistant with AI. The Even G2 now They can be purchased for 700 eurosmuch more expensive than the Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 which costs 419 euros. Wang has an explanation for this price difference: “They are losing money (…) the only way it makes sense to them is if they can really benefit their model by collecting data,” he assured the Financial Times. This is what the internal screen of the Even G2 looks like. Image: Even Realities What does Meta say about all this? Regarding Even Realities they have limited themselves to describing it as a “Chinese competitor wannabe” and insists that the data does not come out of the glasses unless the user gives permission. What they do not say is that, by agreeing to use the AI ​​assistant, we are also agreeing to give up voice, text, image and video. That is, if you want to use Meta AI, you have to jump through the hoops and the fact that it is specified in its terms of use does not make it any less questionable. The market already has a leader (for now). Despite the controversies, Meta continues to lead this new category at a great distance from its adversaries. According to the consulting firm OmdiaMeta has 85% of the market and has already sold 7.4 million units of its glasses. There is an important fact and that is that the vast majority of glasses with AI are in the US, so perhaps the ranking could change if this product becomes popular in another country, especially China, which is already registering the fastest growth. Image | Even Realities, Meta. With own edition In Xataka | The Oakley Meta Vanguard promise to be the athlete’s glasses. Three weeks later, my nose has a different opinion

Science has divided us into two types of brewers

He beer taste It is certainly quite peculiar. We are many people who agree that the first time we tried this drink, the taste Not that we would like muchbut that in the long run ended up. But tastes go further: there are people who He likes a beer guy and others prefer to opt for another type. Science wanted to give light on this. Confirming what was suspected. A recent study Made by a team of scientists from Ohio State University, it has shed light to what many thought, not everyone perceived the taste of beer in the same way. The investigation, presented at the meeting of the American Chemical Society in Washingtonreveals that whoever consumes beer is divided into two different fields, and everything is reduced to chemistry. An investigation as objective as possible. To get to this conclusion, the researchers recruited 135 beer enthusiasts and gave him 18 different types of beer Lager In three tasting sessions. These beers are characterized by using yeasts to Ferment at low temperature and that need a longer time to give the final result. The result is the characteristic transparent gold color. To guarantee objectivity, all beers had a similar percentage of alcohol and a similar level of bitterness. The participants evaluated in this characteristic case as the sweetness and intensity of the aroma, while the researchers used mass spectrometry to identify the chemical compounds that predominated in each of the beers. From here it was only crossing the data collected. Two divided factions. The results were surprising, since the tasters were divided into two very clear groups according to their preferences. A group preferred beers with more intense and complex flavors, while the other opted for the softest and most subtle. Interestingly, the beers that one group described as their favorites, the other placed them in the last positions of their ranking. A great disparity, which in the end makes sense in chemistry. What differentiates these two groups of ‘brewers’? The answer is in your sensitivity to certain chemical compounds. Intense flavors lovers showed a preference for the Furaneolwhich is a compound associated with the aroma of strawberries and jam. On the other hand, those who preferred the softest flavors bowed to the ETYL-3-methyltiopropionato that provides pineapple notes. This second group, in addition, showed an aversion at high doses of α-terpineol, a compound with pine aroma. Good news for the beer industry. These findings are not just a curiosity for beer fans, but also open a world of possibilities for the beer industry. According to Devin Peterson, researcher at Ohio State University and study director, “this research allows us to better adapt the products to the different consumer cohorts.” In this way, brewers could develop beers specifically designed to satisfy the palates of each of these two groups. The rise of craft beer in Spain. In a market like Spanish, where Artisanal beer is increasingly present in our day to daythis type of studies takes on a special relevance. Artisanal beer producers, which are characterized by their innovation and their search for unique flavors, could use this information to create new variables that fit consumer preferences. Although, the artisanal beer sector in Spain still represents a small portion of the total market, Its constant growth It shows that there is an increasingly interested audience in trying new things and getting out of traditional industrial beers. The key to success for these small brewers lies, to a large extent, in their ability to connect with consumers’ tastes and science can be a great ally in this regard. There is science behind what we know. The perception of flavor is a much more complex phenomenon than might seem to the naked eye. The neurogastronomya discipline that studies how our brain creates the perception of flavor, teaches us that this is a multisensory experience. Not only does taste influence, but also smell, sight, touch and even the ear. Our past expectations and experiences also play a crucial role. For example, the same wine can know different if we drink it in a plastic glass or in a glass, or if we know its price in advance. In the same way, the way we perceive a beer can be influenced by its label, the shape of the vessel or even the music we are listening to at that time. Images | Elevate In Xataka | The last extreme idea in beer fermentation has nothing to do with alcohol. It has to do with murderous bees

satellites that are divided into more satellites to harass the enemy

The orbit of the earth is gradually becoming A tense chess board. The last play has been starred by Russia with the deployment of an unknown object by the spy satellite Kosmos 2558. Short. On June 26, a Russian military satellite who had been chasing an American spy satellite for three years has decided to open up and release a new object. It is not the first time that this behavior is observed in a Russian ship. In fact, “it is the third time that happens in five years, and the second this year,” according to An analysis of the expert Marco Langbroek. A Russian doll in space. The protagonist of this story is the Kosmos 2558, a military satellite that Russia launched to space in August 2022. Since its orbit, its mission has been an open secret: closely and without rest the ship uses 326, a spy satellite of the National Office of Recognition of the United States (NRO). Now, almost three years after starting its persecution, Kosmos 2558 has released a subsatellite, designated ‘object C’. Langbroek’s observations in Sortrackcam from Leiden (Netherlands) confirmed this behavior. Your telescope captured the new ‘object C’more dim, the night of June 28, two and a half days after separating from his nodriza ship. It appeared 16 seconds after Kosmos 2558, already at a distance of 143 kilometers. Langbroek has compared this behaviorin which a satellite generates other satellites, with a Russian ‘matrioshka’. The orbital harassment of the levelir program. This has not been an isolated incident, but the last piece of a Russian space program known as ‘levelir’. Judging by their history, the objective of these “inspector satellites” is to periodically approach interest ships of other powers, especially American, to demonstrate certain capacities in orbit: In May 2025, Russia placed the Kosmos 2588 satellite in an orbital plane almost identical to the US 338 American satellite and began to perform periodic approaches What if they were latent weapons? Russia describes these launches as “inspection missions”, but for the Pentagon, the explanation falls short. What remains to be inspected after three years? What these satellites do demonstrate is their ability to maintain a latent system to activate it years later with some of the most important spy assets in the United States in space, something that makes US military planners nervous. If we add to these matrioshkas, potential “latent anti -attack weapons”, the intricate series of maneuvers he has been performing The trio of Russian ships Kosmos 2581, 2582 and 2583it is seen that Mother Russia is still able to check her opponents in the terrestrial orbit. Image | Toño Ortiz (CC by-C-SA 2.0), Marco Langbroek (Sattrackcam) In Xataka | Russia does not want the enemy to fit its territory. The solution is Kalina, a laser weapon to blind satellites

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.