a soap opera of dirty laundry in which no one comes out well

He Elon Musk lawsuit against OpenAI (or rather, against Sam Altman) is being the soap opera of the year in the tech universe. The main accusation is that OpenAI violated its founding agreement to be a non-profit organizationbut the rivalry between its two protagonists goes far beyond business, it’s personal. The trial was intended to be a spectacle in which all kinds of dirty laundry were going to be aired and it is not disappointing. Two versions very different. Or rather, completely opposite. Elon Musk’s version is that OpenAI has betrayed the founding agreement of being a non-profit organization, whose goal was to achieve AGI that would benefit humanity, all because of the greed of Sam Altman. “This lawsuit is very simple: it is wrong to steal from a charity,” he said in his opening statement. The OpenAI version It’s just the opposite: the one who intended to profit was Elon Musk and, when the rest of the founders did not want to follow his plans, he left angry. According to OpenAI’s lawyer, Musk’s anger began when the ChatGPT boom occurred in 2022. “That’s when the resentment arises,” he declared. I didn’t read the fine print. The main reason for the lawsuit is, as we said, that OpenAI changed its founding commitment to achieving AGI to serve humanity. Although there are emails that agree with Musk, in 2017 he signed a document detailing the transition to a for-profit company. When asked why he signed said document if he was against it, Musk said that “I didn’t read the fine print, just the headline,” a statement that doesn’t play in her favor, especially when she has tried to sell the role of deceived victim. Desperate Altman. Both parties have provided evidence to defend their position, among which all types of annotations and private conversations that leave both in a very bad place. One of those conversations is an exchange of messages between Sam Altman and Mira Murati in 2023when Altman was removed from the companyin which he has a desperate attitude, even suggesting that Microsoft buy OpenAI to be able to return. The exchange shows a very non-transparent and chaotic internal climate, closer to a power negotiation than an organization with an altruistic mission. burning man. Part of the defense strategy of OpenAI’s lawyers is to paint Elon Musk as an unstable and unreliable person. Among the questions they asked him, one stood out in which they questioned whether Musk had attended the Burning Man music festival and whether he had consumed ‘rhino ketamine’. The CEO of SpaceX denied it and the judge vetoed further questions about substance use. The informant. One of the key witnesses is Shivon Zilis, who between 2020 and 2023 was part of the OpenAI board. At the same time, Zilis was in a romantic relationship with Musk and had four children with him. The problem, according to OpenAI, is that none of this was communicated and Zilis was actually acting as an informant of Musk, who tried to influence the company’s decisions from outside. Brockman’s Diary. Greg Brockman, one of the co-founders of OpenAI, kept a diary in which he wrote down all kinds of thoughts. Brockman saw the break with Musk as “the only opportunity” to remove OpenAI from its orbit, while he openly considered how to reach $1 billion. For Musk’s team, the diary is gold because they present it as proof of their intention to get rich. For OpenAI, it is simply the internal dialogue of a Brockman concerned about the tension between its mission and economic sustainability. Cover image | Village Global and Gage Skidmorevia Flickr In Xataka | Sam Altman has been searching for a revolutionary device for the AI ​​era for some years. That device is… a cell phone

The dirty reality of what we throw

“The waste is history. The bodies break down, the paper is raised and undone, the treasures can get out or the conquering forces can melt them. But no one steals in a landfill and, therefore, for centuries archaeologists (…) They have rebuilt our history from waste “, Oliver Franklin-Wallis told us And, if he is right (he carries it), one thing can ask us: what will our garbage say? And, even if it seems, that is a key question. Because the image that these waste returns us is terrible. The great cheat of garbage. “Every year We produce 2,000 million tons. They are everywhere, but since it is disgusting, we don’t think about it. ” Franklin-Wallis held A few weeks ago talking about ‘Dump‘(Captain Swing, 2025), but that is to fall short. As he recognizes, it is not a ‘natural and understandable forgetfulness’; on the contrary, “The (international) industry of waste has been an opaque business on purpose“With the accomplice collaboration of governments, management and media companies. Before, in 2028, China I decided to stop buying waste In the middle of the world, everything seemed like a haven of peace and good management. But it was a lie. As Cheryl Katz explained years ago in Wireddeveloped countries that had recycling systems for many years, took advantage of the facilities that gave them countries like China to make the most accessible and cheap waste management. A trap in which we got alone. The negative side is that this pressure dismantled the local waste management industry. To get an idea of ​​the problem dimension: Before that year 201895% of European plastics and 70% of Americans ended up in China. But that “treatment” ended. China decided that it no longer brought to continue importing waste and the international garbage system convulsed. The developed world was found that all structural solutions They were too complex and faces To implement: they required, ultimately, rebuild an industry that had almost completely relocated. Given that, the alternative was to look for new countries that want that garbage: during the last years, millions of tons of garbage have redirected Towards the Gulf of Guinea And, above all, towards Southeast Asia looking for “new landfills.” Nothing has changed substantially and what least obscurantism. In the shadows the monsters grow. And when I use the term “monster” I am not using a metaphor: I am describing reality. Garbage -related crime is already the fourth most important criminal activity in the world (after drug trafficking, human beings and forgery). Moreover, According to the Civil Guardthis type of crime grows at a rate of between 5% and 7% per year. How to get out of this spiral? In which perhaps it is the most valuable part of ‘landfill’, Franklin-Wallis explains what he himself experienced when he finished his very long investigation for “the dirty realdiad of what we threw.” Several of the people I have met in the waste business have shared similar stories: once you really start looking at the waste, you see them everywhere. They become an obsession. After a while, start my mood. After all, as Heather Rogers wrote in 2005“garbage is the visible interconnection between everyday life and deep horrors, and often abstract, of ecological crises.” Therefore, when we talk about these issues, the first temptation is asking “What can I do?” And the answer is complicated. In most cases, all the options we have at our disposal have problems: there are no strategies – and less at the micro – that are fully positive. That, of course, does not mean that initiatives such as the circular economy or responsible consumption strategies do not have a role. Simply, it means that you have to understand the dimension of what we are talking about (and not put more hopes in them than are reasonable). We need macro strategies, Franklin-Wallis says; But above all, we need to get the garbage in light, we need to discuss waste, we need to think about waste. And we need to do it in a way that drives us to improve. It is the only way to find something valuable among so much because. Image | Jilbert Ebrahimi In Xataka | Someone who wants to be the landfill in the world is sought: the global recycling crisis shows no recovery signs

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.