Big Tech are already dedicating up to 70% of their ebitda to AI. The same figures prior to the outbreak of the points

The most powerful technology companies are immersed in A frantic career for mastering artificial intelligence. Therefore, the investment in infrastructure and technology that allows them to advance in that race is crucial. From its operational benefits a very high percentage is destined in the construction of data centers, buy chips, expand your computational capacity and the like. For some experts and analysts in the sector, this expense level is already reaching Typical levels of past bubbles. Echoes of the Puntocom. Big Tech are already allocating between 50% and 70% of their EBITDA (Operating Benefit before Tax) to fixed asset investments, mostly from AI and cloud infrastructure, according to the GQG Partners analysis. This resembles AT&T behavior in the Puntocom bubble (a company that before the debacle allocated 72% of its benefits) or Exxon in the energy bubble 2014 (allocating 65%). Percentage of operational benefit that Big Tech are spending against the level of AT&T and Exxon before bubbles. Image: GQG Partners Issues. For GQG Partners and as Share Also Tobias Carlisle, founder of Acquirer’s Funds, this high proportion is usually a sign of structural risk, with many expensive investments, assets that can be obsolete, and delay in seeing real returns. In the image we can see the percentage of total operational benefit that Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Oracle invest in fixed assets (CAPEX) In detail. There is a huge investor appetite, and the figures reflect it. Alphabet has raised its forecasts and Plan to spend more than 85,000 million dollars This year, almost everything destined to reinforce your cloud and your services. Goal, meanwhile, provides A range of between 66,000 and 72,000 million In 2025, promising to invest a total of 600,000 million dollars By 2028. On the other hand, Microsoft has also announced tens of billions in new facilities to accelerate the training of AI models. Together, Financial Times esteem That the annual capex added of the large technological will exceed 300,000 million dollars, an unpublished figure in the sector. That level of investment worries analysts. Goldman Sachs He pointed out Recently, Hyperscalers (AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud) have already committed hundreds of thousands of millions in Capex and R&D, which implies that, to justify it, they must generate much higher income in the coming years. On the other hand, Bank of America warns That the costs of depreciation and amortization of these infrastructure can grow even faster than the income that companies manage to extract from them, which could put their operational margins at risk. Morningstar, meanwhile, remember That the semiconductor industry, a centerpiece of this race, remains prone to boom and fall cycles, at risk that the current euphoria due to AI derive in a cooling in 2025-2026. Even Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAi, He has admitted That there is a “bubble” around AI, although it clarifies that technology itself will have an immense long -term value. Between the lines. Investing a lot in infrastructure does not guarantee on its own that future income will compensate for such high expense. If the euphoria between investors is maintained, perhaps yes, but if subsequently penetrates doubt and uncertainty, things can change. He GQG Partners analysis It also talks about “hidden” costs, accelerated depreciation, technological obsolescence, Huge maintenance of data centersenergy, and other factors that could erode much faster than real benefits are believed. Cover image | Generated by AI with Freepik In Xataka | “Psychosis by AI” does not exist, it is only another invented diagnostic label: one that has come to stay

China has been hoarding copper for months. And the rest of the world are dedicating ourselves to look

After the Rare earthChina has made copper its new geopolitical weapon. It only produces 4% of world reserves, but already controls 49% of the world refining and is buying raw materials at an industrial scale. Why is it important. More than accumulating raw materials, China is building an intentional bottleneck in the most strategic metal supply chain of the 21st century. Copper is indispensable for AI data centers, electric cars, solar panels and electrical networks. Who controls your refining will control the technological transition worldwide. In figures. The numbers are overwhelming: This mathematics is only possible to buy into mass abroad: import minerals from Chile and Peru, and junk of the United States. Then he processes everything in its low -cost melters. The general panoramic. The Chinese strategy shows sophistication that goes far beyond commercial opportunism. He has created a refining infrastructure distributed throughout the country (Jiangxi, Anhui, Guangxi, Shandong, Jiangsu) that can process any type of copper mineral at prices that no competitor can match. USA is exporting concentrates and scrap metalbut it does not have that refining capacity. Instead, China imports them, processes and turns finished products. Between the lines. He Timing This accumulation is not accidental. It coincides with the escalation of commercial tensions with the United States and the strategic approach to Afghanistan, which has large copper deposits. For China, controlling copper refining is an insurance policy in the face of a possible naval block of its commercial routes with Chile, Peru and Australia. Afghanistan thus becomes its only safe terrestrial source of copper. Yes, but. This strategy has a hidden cost that is already being manifested. Chinese foundations operate with negative margins due to the scarcity of copper ore and excess refining capacity. Some have already closed or suspended operations. The Syomine company has paralyzed its Namibia plantGlencore closed its foundry of the Philippines. China is paying a high economic price to maintain its dominant position. At stake. The commercial war is spreading to copper. Mexico has imposed 50% tariffs on Chinese products After Trump’s pressures, and China has threatened with reprisals. Mexico contributes 5% of Chinese copper mineral imports. If China cuts these imports, Southern Copper and the entire Mexican sector will suffer. But China needs each ton of available mineral. The money trail. Investors They have put 2.3 billion dollars in copper funds this year45% more than in 2024. They recognize the obvious: there is scarcity and China controls the refining tap. Accumulating copper is also a financial commitment in a deficit market. China has played a master letter. He turned his lack of own deposits in industrial domain: controls the refining, the link that adds the most value. But it has an Achilles heel that is to depend on importing minerals from countries that can become enemies. It is the dilemma of power in a fractured world: you need those who can betray you. In Xataka | Baidu is no longer satisfied with being the Chinese Google. His new AI model also wants to turn it into China Openai Outstanding image | Joanna Kosinska

Almost all startups are dedicating themselves to it

If you are a startup in the US and look for financing, it is almost mandatory And combinator. This accelerator has become a unique barometer of the technology industry, and what the candidates present there is a clear indication of where technological innovation moves. And now it moves towards the AI agents… and above all, towards AI in any sense. AI agents everywhere. Of the 144 startups that were part of the 2025 spring batch in and Combinator (YC), 67 were recorded in the accelerator database Within the group of “AI agents”. That means that almost 50% of the candidates work in one way or another in this type of technology, and demonstrates that technological startups in the US see this specific segment of AI as the most promising in the short (and perhaps long) term. Source: pitchbook Climbing to the car. As they point out In pitchbookthe evolution of the candidates that were presented to each of the annual editions of and Combinator (one per station) has been clear, and there are more and more that focus on developing agents of particular AI and in the AI ​​in general to solve a problem. In the last 2024 winter edition of the 260 startups that were presented, more than half were or developing an AI solution or using it for their projects. Diversity Tech, dep Artificial intelligence sweeps everything, and that is also true for those who seek to create new successful companies. Previous trends such as mobile applications, social networks or cloud services pass to the background or are already only components of the central focus, which is AI. Technological diversity, betting on other ways of solving problems, seems to be reduced to the minimum expression: everything can be (should it?) Resolve with artificial intelligence. Now is AI, before it was something else. And Combinator, created in 2005, soon became an oracle of technological investors. If something left there, their options to succeed were older. The trends followed, and while in the first decade of the millennium the startups bet on mobile applications and social networks (Dropbox and Airbnb left there at that time), in the last decade the ones that triumphed were Startups of Fintech, Health and B2B (stripe, doordash). New bubble in view? The expectations generated by AI are even greater than those generated in the past with mobiles and before with the Internet. The bubble of the Puntocom caused a huge correction in the market, but at that time what is happening in this happened: all startups wanted to point to the Internet (and then to mobiles) because they understood that these technologies could solve many problems. The reality is that they ended up transforming our lives, but in many cases these projects failed because they were not solutions to real problems, but solutions to a problem that did not even exist. The question is with this technology something similar will happen. And of course it is inevitable to talk about a potential bubble of AI. Many illustrious names. In addition to those mentioned, Twitch (which was born as Justin.TV), Coinbase, Cruise, Instacart, Reddit, or Helion Energy They took their first steps in and Combinator. One of the last examples is especially notable: Scale AI left and combinator in 2016, and a few hours ago an investment of 13,000 million by Meta has been announced, which in addition has signed its founder, Alexandr Wang. The startup success rate is Very modestbut the “durability” of those that leave YC is much higher than the average: more than 50% of the companies that leave there They are still alive After 10 years, compared to 30% usual in other environments. But that is not necessarily bad. As Andy McLoughlin, of the Uncork Capital investment company, indicated every year the same thing usually happens and “people complain that YC is oversatured with an X technology, but everything now is AI: all the companies in which we invest, which we look for and that it is going through yc is using AI, and the question is if they are good or if they are JOD ****** THE PROBLEM OF THE VALACIONES TRIBUTED. The AI ​​fever has done these startups quickly lift spectacular rounds even without having visible product. YC is a good example of this, and has become an elite event for startups, because there they usually get more financing than in any other event. These emerging companies – pequeñas and unknown – have initial assessments of about 70 million dollars, a spectacular amount for projects that always have a complicated future. Some investors even refuse to “play that game.” Others think otherwise and know that although many can fail, others end up having a spectacular success and it is worth investing “more expensive.” Image | And combinator In Xataka | Soon it will not matter who has the most advanced AI model: the authentic battle will be fought by AI agents

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.