The Jarama Circuit resurrects amid neighborhood complaints

It is 8:30 in the morning and a light rain is falling on the Jarama Circuit. Those who already know the area expect a less than peaceful day. The Madrid circuit seems to have one of those microclimates that is governed by its own laws. There is no AEMET or weatherman to anticipate what is about to happen in the 3,850 meters through which the circuit extends. Here, you either freeze or cook, there is no middle ground. Perhaps that is why we have been able to park with complete peace of mind. Problems expected on Friday. Full house at the Jarama Circuit to see the first Formula E race in Spain in its entire history. 30,000 people packed into a circuit from the 60s that has barely been able to grow in width, constrained by the urbanizations that grew almost at the same time as the fame of Madrid’s asphalt. On Friday we had taken a first walk through the paddock thanks to the invitation of the DS Penske team. The company announced there that will leave Formula E next yearafter supporting the competition in its first twelve years of life in which it has added four championships (two for the team and two for drivers in the 2018-19 and 2019-2020 seasons), 18 victories and 55 podiums. It remains to be seen if in the remainder of the year they can scratch any more records before make way for Opel, the company that will take its place. DS will set sail. Specifically to Rolex SailGP Championship where they will take part by associating with the SailGP Team France, the team with which they will share knowledge to take an unprecedented step in their competitive vocation. Nothing indicated, at the moment, that DS Penske or any other team in the championship would have to take the lifeboats to the track but the weather, as we say, was not pleasant. Perhaps that is why the stands took time to fill on a historic day for the circuit. A new life for the Jarama Circuit The Jarama Circuit is a peculiar space. The route was born in 1967 when the land was nothing more than a wasteland still far from Madrid. But almost immediately Ciudalcampo began to be built next to it, an exclusive urbanization in which millionaire villas are collected. For decades, there have been neighbors who have had an open war against the circuit. Between 1968 and 1981, Formula 1 was a regular feature on the Madrid track. The motorcycle championships also met on a circuit that has become too small to safely host these competitions. Without major championships, the circuit has been seeking its survival in other types of events. Is the home of the Royal Automobile Club of Spain (RACE) and it has stayed alive by carrying out some federation competitions of greater or lesser significance such as some stages of the Spanish Rally Championship and some of great tradition such as the Spanish Grand Prix of the European Truck Championship. During this time, the neighbors have been denouncing that the noise generated by competitions far exceeds that allowed for rest. But they emphasize that since the pandemic, events that generate noise have multiplied from early in the morning to late in the afternoon, such as drift events or rallies and private events of car brands. The prosecutor’s office, for now, has already agreed with the neighbors Therefore, the activities on the circuit are more committed than ever in recent years. Formula E is not another headache for them. This time less noisy but with all the inconveniences of having a circuit with capacity for tens of thousands of people within an urbanization without a good connection by public transport. The three hours it took us to leave the circuit at the end of the day attest to this, forced to leave the parking lots along a single street full of roundabouts without the capacity to absorb so much traffic. Upon arrival, however, we realized that noise would not be a problem. Not, at least, the one about cars. “But they do look like my Scalextric cars“They sound the same,” I heard next to me when we passed under the tunnel that separates the outer area of ​​the circuit from the paddock, in the inner ring. And, certainly, the sound of these electric cars is very similar to what modeling fans find. Free Practice 1 had started, a difficult time to get out onto the track. Unlike Formula 1, Formula E cars do not have specific rain tires. The tires here have tread so they can perform enough in the rain to stay on the track but, yes, they do not offer as good results as the slicks when the asphalt is dry. The DS Penske team working on the car Added to this is a true truism: cars are electric. And it seems like bullshit but that says a lot about his behavior and how fine you have to be with your hands. These cars are the third generation in the history of the championship. Next year they will be more powerful and their regenerative braking will be even greater. All in all, right now they are cars that you have to be very careful with on dry asphalt. Very little developed aerodynamics, tires, as we say, that are not specific and a mechanics of up to 400 kW (536 HP) with a minimum weight of 863 kg including the driver. With acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in less than two seconds and instant torque, the crossovers at each corner exit delighted a crowd that filled the stands and the pelouse of the circuit. From the terrace of the main straight, we could already see the enormous traffic jam that was forming to enter the circuit on the neighboring A-1. By the time qualifying started at 10:40, there were still many people left to enter. Of course, the rest were already enjoying the first Formula … Read more

The National Police had been using ia for six years to detect false complaints. His real reliability was very debatable

In October 2018, the National Police published a press release in which everything sounded great. There was talk of A new artificial intelligence tool called Veripol that promised an accuracy of 90% when detecting false complaints. Six years later we have discovered that this promise was very debatable. The Technical Cabinet of the General Police Directorate He confirmed Civio that this tool ceased to be operational in October 2024, six years later. This decision, as this media points out, was not accidental. Three months before BOE was published with the new artificial intelligence regulation. In section (59) it is indicated to the polygraphs of AI as high -risk AI tools and the following is precisely indicated: “(…) It is appropriate to classify several systems of AI destined to be used for the purpose of guaranteeing the law when their precision, reliability and transparency are especially important to avoid adverse consequences, conserve the confidence of the population and guarantee accountability and effective resource roads. the risk of a natural person being a victim of crimes, Like polygraphs and other similar tools. “ Not only that: a group of law and mathematics experts from the University of Valencia highlighted In a study How Veripol was a tool that information was barely available, which made an especially complicated audit. Even indicating that this made them conjecture their conclusions, they stressed the situation was “very poor in terms of compliance with the minimum standards of transparency” necessary for the use of tools of this type. Do certain specific words are enough to detect lies? Civio conducted a study of the reliability of the tool. After analyzing 1,122 allegations of theft in Spain of 2015, Veripol’s behavior was singular: if a complaint contains the words “day”, “lawyer”, “safe” or “back” it is more likely to be false, but that probability increases If words like “two hundred” are used several times or “barely.” Veripol began to be evaluated in a pilot program in June 2017, and He won an award Investigation of the Spanish Police Foundation. There was talk of its success even In Scientific American. Little by little, its use was extended until officially activated in the aforementioned October 2018 nationwide. Its use was notable until October 2020 (about 84,000 complaints), while apparently in 2022 it was used only in 3,752 complaints, of which 511 were detected as false. In the development of said project The Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), the Carlos III University of Madrid, the University of Rome “La Sapienza” and the Interior Ministry of the Government of Spain. A UCM advertisement Point out How the initiative began in 2014, and began to be tested with apparent success in 2017. Preliminary tests, yes, were executed with a sample that The experts described as scarce. In this statement, it was highlighted how “it is the first time worldwide that a tool of these characteristics is developed” and that Veripol performed an “automatic analysis of the statements of complainants using natural language processing techniques and automatic learning, with a success rate of 91%, fifteen points higher than that of expert agents.” In the description of its operation the following was pointed out: “For example, it is known that in cases of theft, true statements are presented more details, descriptions and personal information, in the face of the exclusive insistence on the extracted object and the omission of details about the attacker or how the incident of the false happened. From this linguistic analysis, Veripol is able to create an effective pattern.” “In just one week, 31 and 49 false theft cases were detected and closed, while between 2008 and 2016 they were 3.33 and 12.14 in Murcia and Malaga, respectively. The effectiveness of the pilot study was 83%.” A doubtful reliability He Complete study of the University of Valencia reflects a debatable functioning of the tool. They indicate how Veripol designers claimed that false complaints in relation to theft are “extremely common” and the crime is “generally carried out by citizens who have no criminal record.” They have no clear figures, but even unable to estimate the real figure of false complaints “they suggest that it could be around 57%”, a figure that It rests interestingly in non -solving cases. In Damn.es They carried out in 2020 an analysis of the evolution of the use of veripol and indicated how “the fact that the total registered crimes remains constant as the veripol use figures decrease, can be an indicative that the algorithm It is not used so much among the police officers. “For some agents, they pointed out,” the program is not very precise “, and that although in theory it could work well, its application in police stations was complex because training was needed to do so. Algorithmwatch, a non -governmental and non -profit agency based in Berlin and Zurich, often performs algorithms analysis and AI systems to try to evaluate their reliability and validity. In October 2020 They evaluated Veripol’s behavior And his conclusion was already overwhelming: “It is not clear if it works as it is intended”. They also explained that lies detectors – which is in essence what Veripol is – have a long trajectory of bad operations. In this concrete algorithm, he worried for example how some specific words had too much weight in the decision. One of the agents interviewed at that time indicated how it was enough that the word “knife” was in the report to be considered true. We are therefore before a technological tool, in this case theoretically supported by AI, which raised doubts from the beginning for transparency about its true functioning and development, and that it began to be used without preliminary evidence being completely conclusive by the size of the samples. In recent times We have seen for example how the Ábalos ‘case’ served to demonstrate that There are many risks here and that it is necessary to evaluate well the application of algorithms before applying them in public bodies of … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.