Spain has 46 million cubic meters of unused biomass. They are a crucial shield against summer fires

The summer of 2025 left us a scar of ash and a lesson that we continue refusing to learn. European forests are burning with unprecedented ferocity, but the answer is not to accumulate more firefighters in August, but to return to inhabit and manage the forest in January. The Copernicus satellite balance from the last summer campaign It was, simply, terrifying: more than 403,000 hectares burned in Spain and over a million in all of Europe. However, the truly disturbing information was provided by the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS): 217 fires were recorded in Spain, less than half of that in 2022 (493). The burned area, however, was dramatically larger. Fire has not become more frequent; He has become a much more ferocious monster. By the end of 2025, the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) confirmed the disaster: Europe had recorded its highest fire emissions on record in 2003, releasing almost 13 megatonnes of carbon into the atmosphere. Faced with this scenario, the institutional response remains stuck in the same loop: more seaplanes, more retardation, more summer troops. An emergency strategy that ignores an incontestable reality: the problem does not begin when the spark ignites, but long before, in the silence of the mountains, throughout the year. The diagnosis that no one wants to hear. Every year, Spanish forests add 46 million new cubic meters of plant biomass. Of that amount, according to data from Expobiomassonly around 40% is used. The European average is between 65% and 70%. The rest stays on the ground: branches, bushes, dry leaves, weeds. Year after year. Decade after decade. The result is what foresters have long called “fuel loading.” It is not a literary metaphor, it is pure physics: in the face of a heat wave or a dry storm, this accumulation turns an attempt into an uncontrollable inferno. Galicia, Extremadura and Castilla y León already suffered it firsthand last year. As the Spanish Biomass Association (AVEBIOM) warnsthe origin of this powder magazine is historical. Decades of rural exodus and the abandonment of traditional uses – such as grazing, extensive livestock farming or firewood collection – have left the forests orphaned by the management that, for centuries, kept them safe. Nature didn’t do the dirty work, and we stopped doing it for her. A proposal that reaches the European Parliament. This week, that diagnosis landed in Brussels with its own name. Bioenergy Europe presented in the European Parliament the documentary Fuel the solution, not the fire —in Spanish, “Feed the solution, not the fire”— with a central message: preventing large forest fires involves acting long before the flames arrive. The initiative, supported in Spain by AVEBIOM, shows experiences developed in Greece, Italy and Spain that show how the sustainable use of forest biomass can simultaneously contribute to three objectives: reducing the fuel load on the mountains, generating local renewable energy and boosting rural economies. The proposal is not new in the sector. But that it reaches the European Parliament, at the start of a new high-risk season, gives it a political dimension that it did not have before. The model: from the mountain to the caldera. The idea is, in its structure, simple. When pruning, clearing or forestry treatment is carried out, the remaining plant remains – what was previously abandoned or burned in the forest itself – are collected, crushed and converted into chips or pellets. This material fuels boilers in municipalities, hospitals, sports centers or industries. The mountain is cleaner. The town, hotter. And the energy bill is lower. “Sustainable forest management is part of the response to fires. And bioenergy can help provide an outlet for part of the biomass that needs to be removed from the mountains,” explains Pablo Rodero, head of certifications at AVEBIOM, in statements collected by Energies Renewable. Rodero insists on an important nuance so as not to confuse the discourse: “It is not about ‘cleaning the forest’. It is about managing the territory better, with technical planning and sustainability. When the remains of pruning, clearing or preventive work are transformed into renewable energy, prevention stops being a cost to generate economic activity, employment and energy savings.” The specific actions defended by AVEBIOM range from forestry treatments and the maintenance of firebreaks to the recovery of extensive livestock farming and the promotion of sustainable forestry exploitation. Active management, all year round, that does not depend on the urgency of summer. Real numbers on the ground. Beyond the theory, there is concrete data that illustrates the potential. Veolia Biomass In 2024, it transformed more than 300,000 tons of forest biomass—material accumulated in the mountains—into 700 GWh of clean energy. To get an idea: that is equivalent to the annual electricity consumption of more than 200,000 homes. The company already operates in several Spanish provinces: it works in Moros (Zaragoza) and in the Sierra de la Culebra (Zamora) in the elimination of vegetation on 500 and 400 hectares respectively; carries out thinning and thinning in Mayorga (Valladolid), Barcial, Castropepe and La Hiniesta (Zamora) and Cilloruelo (Salamanca); and has restored 200 hectares in Andalusia affected by the fires of the previous year. He CRECEMOS report on Forest Fire Managementpublished in May 2025, adds another dimension to the equation: sustainably mobilizing one million tons of forest biomass per year would avoid the emission of 580,000 tons of CO₂. In regions such as the northwest of the peninsula, where biomass potential is still underutilized, this approach would combine fire risk reduction with economic reactivation of currently depopulated areas. The European lifeline. It is important to put into perspective what is at stake. Bioenergy is neither an experimental technology nor a niche bet: according to the GROW reportrepresents 60% of all renewable energy produced in the European Union. And 96% of this biomass is produced in European territory itself: it is not imported, it does not depend on foreign regimes, it is not exposed to the vagaries of the global gas market. It is, in other words, the most autonomous … Read more

León wants to start a biomass macroplant to heat 28,000 homes. The neighbors are afraid of something: the wind

“Mayor! Where are you?” The cry echoed this Wednesday in the central Plaza de San Marcelo. According to local chronicleshundreds of people responded to the call of the Barrio de la Lastra Neighborhood Association to try to stop the construction of the gigantic biomass plant planned in the south of the city. The point is that this is not an isolated march: the residents of La Lastra and Puente Castro have joined forces in a joint mobilization that reflects the fatigue of the southern neighborhoods in the face of an imminent environmental impact. But beyond the noise of the banners, there is a very specific fear. As Ruth Sanz explainsneighborhood spokesperson for La Lastra, the big hidden problem will come “when the wind changes direction.” The citizen warning is blunt: if the plant comes into operation, not only will the smell reach other neighborhoods in the capital, but the air will carry harmful substances. For this reason, with the motto of “our health is not for sale”, the neighbors demand that the excavators be stopped. The beginning of the indignation. To understand this social outbreak you have to look at the offices. As detailed in the specialized magazine Rethemethe project promoted by the Junta de Castilla y León and the City Council aims to create a “Sustainable Heat Network”. Through Somacyl, the regional administration seeks to build a thermal power plant that supplies heating and hot water to more than 28,000 homes and 150 buildings in the capital. However, the outrage also has a political component. As emphasized by Herald of Leonresidents directly accuse the socialist mayor, José Antonio Diez, of serious inconsistency: they remember that, when he was in the opposition, he led protests against a similar biomass plant in Cantamilanos, and now allows an installation that is seven times larger. Furthermore, the neighborhood anger lies in how it has been created. As revealed elDiario.esthe Board has processed this immense 22-hectare complex – located at the foot of the city, next to the municipal cemetery and the Torío and Bernesga rivers – under the controversial figure of ‘Regional Project’. This administrative movement serves, as this medium explains, to “shield” the complex, unify contracts through urgency, accelerate expropriations and avoid local urban planning obstacles. Green energy or environmental risk? Green energy or environmental risk? The project stages a head-on clash of realities. In the official discourse, it is the definitive ecological initiative since the administrations They defend that the infrastructure It is key to decarbonization. They promise that it will allow more than 1,200 fossil fuel boilers to be progressively turned off, will prevent the emission of 35,000 tons of CO₂ annually and will allow neighboring communities to save between 20% and 30% on their bills. The dark side of this “green promise” is provided by environmental defenders. As argued Ecologists in Action in their allegationsinstallation of these dimensions near inhabited areas is environmentally unsustainable. The entity warns that combustion at an industrial level will cause highly dangerous emissions, releasing “benzopyrene, heavy metals and particles” into the air. Furthermore, environmentalists throw down the argument of resource sustainability. The complex will swallow up to 128,000 tons of forest chips annually – a volume that threatens to overexploit the forests – and will consume a whopping 35,000 cubic meters of water from the urban network, without the City Council having issued technical reports that guarantee that this will not affect the population’s supply. Pharaonic figures and legal mud. The size of the project is difficult to assimilate without looking at the pure data. According to the technical data provided by Leon News, The horizon of southern Leon will be modified by the installation of four enormous chimneys 35 meters high (a level equivalent to an eleven-story residential block). At a logistical level, the activity of the furnaces will generate 4,480 tons of ash, slag and dust each year, and will cause an incessant daily movement of up to 20 heavy trucks through the neighborhood. With such an impact on the horizon, the battle is no longer only in the street, but in the courts. As reported Herald of Leonthe project is deeply judicialized. Neighbors and environmentalists are waiting for the Court to resolve a contentious-administrative appeal filed against the municipal licenses granted for the pipeline network. The opacity of the process has fanned the flame of suspicion. The neighborhood spokesperson denounced in the Plaza de San Marcelo that the works began “without the relevant licenses,” calling the operation a “business of two.” The indignation and distrust reach such a point that the neighbors have come to predict that in the future this case will “blow through the air” just as the well-known ‘Wind Plot’ did, demonstrating that everything responds to “the interests of certain people and not to a common good. León’s countdown. While the judges deliberate and the mobilizations do not stop, the clock is ticking. An unappealable countdown has begun: there is a legal limit of five years for the infrastructure to take shape or, on the contrary, the project to decline definitively. The city of León thus appears at a historical crossroads. On one side of the balance, the institutional dream of establishing itself as a pioneering city in Europe in energy transition and thermal independence. On the other, the terror of thousands of families who see an industrial monster installed at the door of their homes. In the coming years the outcome will be decided; Meanwhile, the southern neighborhoods will continue taking to the streets, looking askance at the sky and hoping that justice will act before the wind changes. Image | Wikieditorarigurosa and La Lastra Neighborhood Association Xataka | Europe’s secret weapon to win the electric battery war is not in the mines: it is in the garbage

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.