For centuries, sailors around the world died from scurvy. Everyone except the Basques

A 16th-century sailor did not fear shipwrecks—or storms or pirates—as much as he feared a certain silent illness. It wiped out entire crews, it took months to kill you and the medicine of the time couldn’t explain it. The gums softened until they bled and the teeth fell out. Old wounds, already healed, were reopening. The skin would become covered in purple spots and, eventually, the heart would fail. Exactly: we are talking about scurvy, the severe deficiency of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) that caused more deaths than all naval combat and shipwrecks combined. A condition from which the Basque whalers were saved. But to tell it well you have to allow me to take a couple of steps back. Specifically, six centuries ago. How much scurvy killed. The figures are difficult to sustain because they are difficult to believe. When Vasco da Gama completed the first voyage to India in 1498, he said an unknown illness had claimed half of his crew. “The plague of the sea,” they called it, and they believed that it was contagious, that drinking coffee minimized the effects, that eating fireflies provided relief, and, the most amazed, that it was a divine punishment for the sins on board. It is 1740. Commodore George Anson sets sail from Portsmouth at the head of eight Royal Navy ships with almost 2,000 men. The mission: attack Spanish possessions in the Pacific. Four years later, in 1744, he returned to England with 188 survivors, 10%. The rest died of scurvy. The expedition is classified as a victory because they captured a Spanish galleon loaded with silver. And the Basques, where were they? The Basques had been in the North Atlantic for centuries when Anson set sail. The whalers left the Bay of Biscay, each time with better tools. There are records from the 8th and 9th centuries, although its great era begins in the 13th. When the whales disappeared from the Cantabrian Sea, the Basque whalers followed their trail north: Iceland, Greenland. Then Newfoundland. There are historians, among them García Camino and Orella Unzuéthe guardian of the Basque language A. Irigaray or the researcher Robert Loture, who place the arrival of the Basques on the American continent in 1375, more than a century before Columbus. There is no conclusive archaeological evidence of that date, but there is evidence of its consolidated presence in the 15th and 16th centuries. Canadian researcher Selma Barkham spent decades in the archives of Oñati and Tolosa documenting contracts, insurance and crew lists. The curious thing about it all is, why didn’t these die on the high seas? The fact is that towards the middle of the 16th century the Basques controlled the world market for whale oil, the oil of the time, the ingenuity that illuminated the houses of Europe. One hundred ships sailed to Newfoundland each year. Red Bay, in Canadian Labrador—which the Basques called Butus or Buytes—, it was their base of operations. And in that bay, in October 1565a storm sank the ship San Juan, that mythical Basque whaler which several centuries later was rebuilt. The ship carried a thousand barrels of whale oil in the hold. There were no casualties and the crew returned home. The boat? At the bottom of the sea for four centuries. Cider? Did someone say cider? But without pouring. In 1978, Canadian archaeologists from Parcs Canada found the wreck of the San Juan. And it was like a time capsule. Every plank of the hull, the cargo, the crew’s personal belongings, an entire whaling boat, everything was there. Let us keep in mind that the San Juan ship is the best researched 16th century ship in the world. And among the remains, barrels appeared, many barrels. Some of whale oil… and many others of cider and txakoli. The whalers, through insurers, always detailed their contracts well and everything stipulated was recorded due to the very dangerous nature of the matter. And it is known that sailors were entitled to between two and three liters of sagardoa – Basque cider – per day. According to Xabier Agote, president of the Albaola association, up to 50,000 liters of cider could be carried on such an expedition. Because the water on the high seas was corrupted: wine was for the officers and cider, cheaper, was the crew’s drink. Saving lives with grapes and apples. Popular history lies a little. There is more reasons. It has a certain logic: the Basques drank cider, they did not die of scurvy, so cider protected them. The Basque doctor Vicente Lardizabal already suggested in 1720 in his book ‘Political-medical considerations on the health of sailors‘—where detailed diets are dictated—that some vitamin deficiency was the origin of the disease. He didn’t connect it to the cider, but he was on the right track. On May 20, 1747, Scottish physician James Lind divided twelve scurvy-stricken sailors into six groups aboard HMS Salisbury. He administered a different treatment to each couple: vitriolic elixir, vinegar, sea water, a purgative mixture, oranges and lemon and, here is the key, cider. A daily quart of cider for one of the groups. Only the two sailors who took citrus improved visibly. Those who drank cider did not improve. Lind published his results in 1753 in A Treatise of the Scurvythe first controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine. Cider was in the experiment, but it didn’t work. Cider is fruit juice, yes, the problem is chemistry. Basque cider is fermented cider and the fermentation destroys vitamin C. The researcher Daniel Zulaika published the following article in the Bulletin of the Royal Basque Society of Friends of the Country in 2020: Cider did not prevent scurvy on ocean crossings. The nutritional composition tables made it clear that the amount of vitamin C in fermented cider is zero. So why didn’t the Basques die of scurvy? For a more prosaic reason: scurvy takes time to kill and the first symptoms appear after four to six weeks in the … Read more

allowed to kill Basques in the country

Iceland is known for its Thermal waters, volcanoes, aurora borealis and glaciersall between coastal landscapes and villages worthy of the best postcards. Until not so long, however, it was not the best destination if the visitor came from a very specific region of the planet: the Basque Country. Although it sounds extemporaneous (which was) and crazy (idem) until a decade ago Scarce the island kept in force a seventeenth -century edict that gave white letter to its inhabitants to assault, steal and even kill Basque sailors. The law is interesting for its content, but also by its context, which connects with the past whale of the region and one of the most terrible episodes in Icelandic history, if not the one that most: the massacre Spánverjavígin. A peculiar diplomatic trip. In April 2015 Martin Garitano, then General Deputy of Guipúzcoa, starred in the one that may have been the most rocambolesco trip of his political career. Not so much for fate, Hólmavika people west of Iceland, as for what There it was done. As part of An institutional act With local authorities during which a commemorative plaque was discovered, they sang songs and recited a marine sentence, Jónas Guðmundsson, commissioner of the region of the region Western Fjords Icelanders, he revoked An edict of the seventeenth century. Why’s that? Very simple. Because the edict in question was probably one of the most rocambolesque, extemporaneous, delusional and cruel of international legislation. The norm He had his origins in 1615 and stressed that if an Icelandic was with a Basque sailor on the island, he could assault him, snatch everything he had on top and even, if necessary, kill him without mercy. Of course, in 2015 on the island, other laws that neutralized that old edict and prohibited the Icelanders from killing Basques just like the slaughter of any other neighbor’s son. But the truth, being felling, is that in 400 years nobody had bothered to repeal the decree of the seventeenth, so technically remained in force. When asked about it, Guðmundsson He joked: “At least now it will be safe for them (the Basques) come.” Of politics and economy. To understand the “Anti Vascos” edict of 1615 you have to know its context. From the outset, the Iceland of the early seventeenth was quite different from that of now. It was not an independent country (status that did not in fact achieve centuries later, In 1944) and his control was in the hands of regional governors protected by the king of Denmark, a position since 1588 exercised Cristián IV. With regard to the economy, at the time there was a lucrative business that especially interested the Danish crown: whale hunting in the North Atlantic. Of the huge cetaceans captured in the sea, meat, bones, sperm and even beards were used, highly appreciated for the elaboration of rods for umbrellas, umbrellas and corsets. If there was an appeal of the appreciated whales it was however its oil. Among other purposes, it was used to illuminate houses and the manufacture of soap, lubricans and drugs. So appreciated was the fat of the whales that There are those who match it To our oil. And what does it have to do with the Basques? Well, they stood out in that company, as Imanol Sánchez explains in detail in An essay Posted in Riev on the Basque whales in the Iceland of the XVII. Their sailors soon look at the possibilities of the Eubalaena glacialthe huge cetaceans that inhabited between Iceland and Mauritania and navigated the North Atlantic during their migrations. And that encouraged them to enter more and more in the ocean. It is known of incursions by the Basque coast to capture cetaceans already in the XI, between the XII and XIV the hunters expanded along the rest of the Cantabrian coast and around the 16th and seventeenth centuries, Sánchez recallsBasque whales were already looking for prey in the waters around Greenland and Iceland. There are evidence that places them there at least in 1604 and before they had already left a mark on Terranova and Labrador. A business played. The problem is that Basque sailors were not the only ones interested in whale oil, a very valuable appeal that also ambitioned the king of Denmark and Norway. And of course, friction emerged. “The Danes were sent by Christian IV to hunt whales to the seas in northern Norway and for the islands Spitzbergen In 1615, and his encounter with the Basque sailors created the first disputes “, He recounts The researcher of the UPV/EHU. In April of that same year, the sailors of Euskadi hunt whales in Aguas de Iceland was prohibited. And to make it clear that the Danish authorities were seriously issued the famous (and terrible) edict that gave a white letter to pursue, assault, steal and kill Basque navigators. Of course, Icelanders were also prohibited to get friendship or trade with the whales of Spain. A MAZAZO FOR RELATIONSHIPS. The belligerent posture that Denmark adopted in 1615 must have been a mazazo for the Icelandic rulers, to say what the Danish law said did allow the islanders to do business with the Basques … as long as the latter passed before box to pay the commissions to pay the commissions corresponding, of course. Sanchez recalls in fact that the relationship between the two peoples was “largely good” and was based on a “close commercial relationship.” His link was narrow and frequent enough to give rise to a Pidgina kind of mixed language, Basque and Icelandic mixture. In the fall of 1615, with the relations with the sailors of Euskadi tensada and Copenhagen especially belligerent, there was nevertheless an episode that would end up advising a severe hand about the relations between both peoples. Of paper … to the baskavígin massacre. The seventeenth century edict that allowed to hunt and kill Basque sailors in Iceland could have remained in a legal eccentricity without more if it were not because, … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.