The amazing proposal of the Emirates-Indian Tunnel

When the United Arab Emirates is treated, the pulse does not tremble. There are to prove it Burj Khalifathe largest skyscraper on the planet, or projects such as the Luna -shaped resort of Dubai u One Za´abelendowed with the largest cantilever building ever built. Any of the three pales if compared, however, with the structure proposed by National Advisor Bureau Limitedcompany based in MASDAR. A gigantic underwater tunnel that would cover around 1,800 kilometers that separate two port areas from Arab Emirates and India. The infrastructure is in the concept phase, but stands out for its ambition, dimensions … and the interesting possibilities that it would open in the region. What does it propose? A draft mega -structure. The proposal by National Advisor Bureau consists of building a huge submarine tunnel that allows direct United Arab Emirates (EAU) and the remaining countries that make up the remaining. Cooperation Council of the Arab states of the Gulf – organism that integrates half a dozen nations from the Middle East – with India. To be more precise, the project is drawn between two coastal points separated by about 1,800 kilometers: Fujairah and Mumbaion the west coast of India. And what would the duct be like? Submarine, drawn under the waters of the Arabic sea and entering the Gulf of Oman. To better illustrate the infrastructure in mind, National Advisor Bureau elaborated several years ago A series of videos and infographics in which the proposal clearly appreciates: formed by two concrete ducts that pass in parallel and remain submerged, although in suspension, tied to a series of floating structures. Another alternative would go to tie them with fasteners to the bottom of the sea. The idea of ​​its designers is to keep the tunnels at a depth that does not interfere with maritime traffic and keep them safe from inclement. His pontoons would also be separate enough to allow the passage of surface ships, through the waters of the Indian. As for the tubes, they would be built to be resistant to the corrosion of salt water and pressure. What would the tunnels be used for? For the transport of passengers, tourists and workers who wish to move between United Arab Emirates and India, but also merchandise and strategic supplies. The infographics of National Advisor Bureau show that each duct would be divided in turn into four large compartments: one for trains, another for goods and two lower, as a pipes, which would be dedicated to oil or gas and water flow. The objective is to export oil from the Emiratí port of Fujairah to India through the pipeline and import the excess water of the Narmada river, north of Mumbai. Its authors argue that Narmada usually overflows during the monsoon season. The project does not rule out that oil or gas can be used beyond India, China or Pakistan, or the construction of a floating fuel station to supply ships between pontones. What kind of train do we talk about? One fast. Very fast. The authors of the project explain that within the tunnel a vacuum would be created that would allow the use of “ultra -granted” railroads, capable of reaching speeds between 600 and 1,000 kilometers per hour (km/h). It is an ambitious objective, taking into account that Chinese Maglev trains point to 600 km/h and 1,000 km/h It is the objective of its modern Hyperloop, still in the test phase. Since the distance between Mumbai and the Fujairah station is around 1,800 kilometers, the journey could be made between two and four hours. The company even speaks of another possible route, between Fujairah and the port of Gawader, in Pakistan, that the submerged infrastructure would allow to cover in one hour. At what point is it? In the concept. The idea was released a few years ago National Advisor Buerau, behind others equally media projectsas UAE-Fergwhich raises IACEBERGS towing From Antarctica to the coast of Fujairah to take advantage of them as new fresh water sources in the region. The proposal of the submarine tunnel began to sound before the pandemic, towards 2018 either 2019as a concept, and achieved attract interest of International media. Since then his information flow has gone less. Of one of the latest news They echoed in 2021 #Swajya or India Infrahubwho collected how Abdulla Alsehhi, director of Nationa Advisor had defended the advantages of the structure in a strategic conclave focused on relations between Arab Emirates and India. The entrepreneur and engineer The potential stands out of the submarine project to improve bilateral trade between both nations. Image | PRNEWSFOTO In Xataka | The construction of The Line, the “skyscraper” of 170 km from Saudi Arabia, advances: a new video shows it In Xataka | Nicaragua has a project to revolutionize global maritime trade: a channel that almost four -year -old

50 years later the amazing thing is not that Microsoft continues to exist. The hallucinating thing is that it remains (Tan) relevant

Does 50 years Two young people called Bill Gates and Paul Allen They created the one that has become the largest software empire in history. That April 4, 1975 was born Micro-Soft. The name occurred to Allen, what years later I didn’t remember why he used the script and that capital. The detail has remained in anecdote. One of the thousands which are already part of the history of a company that has managed to be relevant and toe for half a century. There are not many in the world of technology that can boast something like that. How did you do it? Windows 10: 9 very useful and little known tricks Reinventing himself. Microsoft has been lifted after each fall. And there have been many. And very important. But it was not so at the beginning. Microsoft, like all the big ones, was loved long before being (deeply) hate. Gates and Allen were in the right place and moment, but they also knew how to take advantage of their opportunities. The first arrived in 1980, when they reached an agreement with IBM to provide the operating system for its PCs. It is curious how history is repeated again and again, because that is just what would happen to that operating system that would end up calling themselves. Gates and Allen did not create that operating system: they bought the original, QDOS/86-dos, for $ 50,000, and modified it so that it could be used on the IBM PCs. Apple did the same with Nextstep (based on FreeBSD) When he bought Next and ended up turning that operating system in Mac OS X. years later Google would buy a small startup called Android Inc. to take advantage of an operating mobile system that he had created. That said. The story ended up. But those are other stories. That agreement with IBM was a turning point, but above all it was for its terms. Microsoft received $ 430,000 for that product – very less than Ibm hoped to have to pay – but Microsoft maintained the ability to sell its operating system to other companies. From that moment Microsoft was a rocket. One controlled by a Gates implacable and fierce. With their lights and their (many) shadows, Gates and his company would soon begin to achieve the goal that They had marked and that a priori seemed impossible: put a computer in each home. It did not matter others doing things in a different or better way: Microsoft always managed to impose itself. He did it with MS-DOS and of course he did it with his long and erratic Light of Windows operating systems or with its office suite, Office, today maximum expression of the intention of how everything can (but should not) become a service in the cloud. For 25 years, Microsoft was no one to cough him, but then the earthquakes began to arrive. First, Internet, browsers, search engines and social networks. Then the smartphone. Redmond’s company lost all those wars. Always late and bad, and he was convicted of that Innovative dilemma in which David wins the game to Goliath. But there is the really amazing. Microsoft fell and lost those wars, but he got up again and reinvented. Even those that had won – like that of the browsers, With Internet Explorer– He ended up losing them, but we insisted: it didn’t matter. There we saw the true strength of Microsoft. It didn’t matter if the general public hated her: they did not give up and tried one, and another, and again. They failed with bing in search engines, they had to spend 26.2 billion dollars to “compete” on social networks and also shipwrecked (Too bad) With Windows Phone. And once again, it didn’t matter. Faced with these failures, new successes. Not only that: definitive reinvention. After the arrival of new contendliere NadellaMicrosoft changed the image and of strategy. Of being hated and almost ignored it was relevant and even loved. He got it shyly In the mobile segment, but where he has achieved an exceptional triumph has been in the cloud, where Azure marks the pattern with his great rival, AWS. And since then and along the way, many more stories, many smaller and large failures and also many small and large hits. It is impossible to put them all here, but it is also inevitable not to mention legendary products. Among them the Xbox, pillar of a very forty bet But not especially fortunate For the video game segment. Or also the successes that the company also achieved with the devices of the Surface family. The Hololens were Another failureYes, but one that at least showed that the company always tried to reinvent himself. In those is precisely now Microsoft, but this time not to lose what may be the most important train in history: The artificial intelligence. His reaction thus has been faster and more ambitious than on other occasions, but still the unknowns about the result of that bet are enormous. Whatever happens, it will probably give the same. And it will give the same because Microsoft will end up doing what you have always done. Reinvent yourself. Happy 50, Microsoft. In Xataka | Bill Gates has told how he made Microsoft into the giant that is now: “I focused my life only on a single job”

All the great AI have ignored the laws of Copyright. The amazing thing is that there is still no consequences

French publishers are fed up and They have just sued a goal by copyright violation. They are not the first nor will they be the last, but the problem is not that: the problem is that AI companies have used copyright content to train their models, and it is as if nothing happened. Everything remains the same. More years have passed since Getty will report Stable Diffusionwhich he accused of stealing his photos to train his model of image generation. That was the first of a great list of demands for exactly the same, but despite the time that has elapsed, there has been no news about it. It is as if what Stable Diffusion did – like the others – ended up in the background for the courts of justice. I copy? The suspicion about this type of behavior has been constant, and it was already before Chatgpt was launched in November 2022. Months before, in June, Dall-e was accused of based on images with the author of creators that they received nothing in return. Microsoft, Openai and Github were also sued a few weeks before the launch of Chatgpt, but this time because Github Copilot had been trained Without permission with code of various developers who had not given their permission. A Judge of California dismissed practically all claims of the plaintiffs in July 2024. Few sentences punish AI companies. For now, the sentences that have occurred, such as the aforementioned, give the apparent victory to the companies of AI. It happened for example with a lawsuit against Openai, which The company managed to win. Of course, this victory can be expensive in his other great pending demand with The New York Times, which can claim that he suffered a demonstrable damage. Fair use? The New York Times case against Openai It started in January 2025 and is undoubtedly one of the most important in this area. The company led by Sam Altman – who has used all the data that has been able– It shields what They make a “fair use” of the contents to be able to train their models. The funny thing is that on the one hand they say that, and on the other they have been reaching millionaire agreements with platforms like Reddit and means or editorials like the country precisely to license its contents and avoid new demands. Meta is another level. The ends to which companies are reaching quality data with which to train their AI models are extraordinary. Perplexity The barriers jumped From the Internet, but the goal was even more striking: we recently knew they had Used more than 80 TB of books downloaded via Bittorrent To train your model. Many of them with copyright, something that has caused many criticism and recent demand of some French editorial groups. There seem to be punishment. But as we say, that historical theft of intellectual property seems to be assumed: there are no sentences that have punished those violations of the copyright for the moment, and it is as if collectively those violations had been ignored because the AI ​​offers interesting advantages. But we are forgetting how they have obtained them … or so it seems. In Xataka | 5,000 “tokens” of my blog are being used to train an AI. I have not given my permission

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.