alarmed

There is a revival of the two thousand aesthetics in Tiktok. And that includes something that has alarmed the EU: extreme thinness

by

Social networks They have become In the main mirror of society, reflecting obsessions and beauty ideals. If less than ten years ago It was celebrated The rise of the “postive body” movement, which fought for the inclusion and acceptance of all kinds of bodies, the current reality It seems to go back until the beginning of the century. What seemed to be a closed stage has revived under a new format that is worrying experts, governments and digital platforms: the phenomenon Skinnytok. The viral trend. The hashtag #Skinnytok accumulates more than 57,000 videos in Tiktok, in which young girls appear mainly giving advice on how to lose weight quickly, often through extremely restrictive diets either Excessive exercises. In all of them, most women are visibly thin, promoting these behaviors as if they were healthy practices. This type of content has been associated with an increase in eating disorders among the youngest, generating a growing alarm around the harmful effects of these trends, According to Libération. One more background problem. When you are looking for the hashtag, the first thing that appears is a message that says: “Your weight does not define you”, but then all the videos are observed where you can listen to phrases such as: “If you want to be skinny? You have to do skinny activities” either “Fat trauma”the latter accompanied with photographs of how they were before. In short, it is another sample of the normalization of eating disorders. Charlyne Buigues, nurse specialized in eating disorders, He explained For The Guardian that this type of clips not only encourages restrictive diets, but also creates a culture that glorifies physical suffering as a synonym for success. Also Dr. Also Chema, specialist in internal medicine, has detailed For Forbes that the advice of Skinnytok They can teach young people to interpret hunger as a sign of success, which is actually a natural biological signal. Eating disorders, such as anorexia, are having an alarming prevalence among adolescents, and this type of content exacerbates an existing problem. The target audience. The main problem is that the Tiktok base is teenagers. According to data from the Spanish Society of General and Family Physicians1 in 20 young people in Spain may suffer a problem of eating behavior. In addition, a study has demonstrated that visualizing this type of videos can cause damage to self -perception, only with eight minutes of Thininspiration It is enough to increase body dissatisfaction in young women. This adds to what He explained For Forbes, the mental health expert Stephen Buchwald: “Constant bombardment with unattainable beauty standards can create a vicious circle of self -criticism and low self -esteem, seriously affecting mental health, especially in adolescents.” The responsibility of the platforms. Before the growth of #SkinnytokEuropean governments and institutions have begun to take strict measures. According to politicianthe Arcomen France regulator, together with the European authorities, is investigating the phenomenon to determine if Tiktok is complying with current regulations for protection for minors, especially the EU Digital Services Lawthat forces platforms to mitigate the risks of harmful content. As mentioned, the social network has added a warning when looking for the label. However, some experts They have assured That these measures are not enough, since the algorithms of the platform continue to prioritize the most viral contents, without considering the consequences of spreading dangerous messages on body image. The 2000s revival. It is not just a phenomenon of social networks. The resurgence of the beauty canons of the 2000s has returned to the catwalks with the figure in the purest Kate Moss style: Ultradelgada. From The return of the Victoria’s Secret parade last year, with Adriana Lima’s transformationto the change of celebrities like Christina Aguilera, who recognized Using Ozempic to lose weight, reappear the aesthetic codes that dominated two decades ago, where extreme thinness is associated with success and glamor. It is not just about being thin, but about adjusting to a set of trends that prevails the image on health. The dangerous cult of extreme thinness. One of the central concerns around the Skinnytok phenomenon is the perpetuation of the Gordophobia in society. Social platforms, like the fashion and advertising industry, continue to promote thinness as the only ideal of beauty. This biased vision of aesthetics leads many people to be ashamed of their bodies for not adjusting to an unreal standard. Before this trend there was a filter known as “Chubby Filter”which ends up being deleted from the platform after numerous complaints of users who denounced humiliation. Now, with #skinnyTok, the effect is inverse: extreme thinness stands out as a personal improvement goal showing the long road that must be traveled again. Image | Tiktok Xataka | People are fed up with Skincare’s thousand steps so the last Beauty trend is just one thing: exosomes

There are alarmed people because fruits are increasingly sweet. It is a more complicated phenomenon than it appears

by

A few years ago, Melbourne Zoo decided that he would stop giving fruits to some of his animals “because they were too sweet for their own good“In recent years, red pandas and primates had gained weight and some even had signs of decay. The reason tells a greater story about our relationship with the fruit. Too much sugar. “The problem is that cultivated fruits have been genetically modified to have a sugar content much greater than its natural ancestral fruits,” Michael Lynch explainedVeterinarian Chief of the Zoo, to the Sydney Morning Herald. It seemed a curiosity without much route, but it wasn’t. The idea that “fruit is not healthy because it has much higher sugar levels than in the old days” It has been circulating for years Online. In fact, come back again and again … But is it? The answer is complicated. If we go to the data (for example, to Central fooddataa database of nutritional analysis of food in the US), we can find some fruits in which that is seen growth. For example, “wild blueberries” would have 6.46% of sugars, while commercial “blueberries” would be at 9.96%. Growth is considerable, yes. What happens is that this effect disappears when, instead of comparing with primitive varieties, we analyze whether the fruit has been raising its amounts of sugars in recent decades. Angela Dowden He reviewed the United Kingdom data since 1946 and found no significant differences in the sugar content of apples, white grapes or strawberries. Giovanni Stanchi. This makes sense. For years, human beings have gone improving Fruits and vegetables to the point that they don’t look at anything. Giovanni Stanchi was an Italian still life of the seventeenth century. At some point between 1645 and 1672, Stanchi painted a picture full of peaches, pears and watermelons. Watermelons that do not look anything like ours. And it’s not that it was anything new. The watermelon was a plant of Africa that for 1600 (via al-Andalus) It was already extremely popular in the orchards throughout Europe. Bodegons give us An unbeatable opportunity To see how the watermelon has changed until today. By 1860, the watermelons They were acquiring an appearance more recognizable. It is not just a matter of appearance. Also of flavor. We have seen it With tomatoes (Although, in this case, Often for worse) and we could see it with almost all fruits and vegetables. For example, Brussels cabbage They are much less bitter That 20 years ago. The point is that, when we talk about sugars in fruits, we will see that growth has a limit. A physical limit. In general, As the botanist James to Wong explainedfruity sugars levels tend to converge in a very similar range because, as with tomatoesplants can not manufacture more sugar without becoming much larger or produced less (and none of that interests us at a commercial level). But there is something else. Let’s go to nutritional data to see it clearly: following Dowden’s data, super sweet “modern” strawberries contain only 4.89% of sugars, while Kiwis have 8.99% and bananas have 12.23%. This gives us an interesting key. As Wong points out, what fitomejoradores do is that “the fruit has a sweeter flavor not increasing sugars, but reducing acid and bitter chemicals that mask their sweetness.” And there is the explanation of what happened with Melbourne’s animals. The problem was not so much the level of fruits sugars (which, Rememberbeing “fiber -packaged fructose” cannot increase blood sugar levels as refined sugars), but were so good that pandas and primates stopped eating other things and their diet was unbalanced. It does not seem a problem that affects us human beings. Hopefully the fruit would gain weight in our diet because that would mean that, on average, the feeding of society would improve. What we are seeing is, in fact, it is just the opposite: the weight in our processed food diet tripled between 1990 and 2010 (from 11% to 31.7%) and that led to the added sugars added will pass from 8.4% of our daily energy intake at 13%. Within our dietary concerns, the sweet fruit is not among the worst problems. Image | Evie Fjord In Xataka | “We looked at the US with condescension and now we are almost the same”: the unstoppable degradation of food in Spain

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.