The Virgen de la Macarena now has more eyelashes and more makeup. For Sevillians it is an unforgivable affront

Much trajín for the Virgen de la Macarena in recent days: the popular Sevillian image was restored for four days last week. However, the action has encountered the protest of many members of the Brotherhood, who did not tolerate certain changes in some aspects of the face. The basilica where the size was had to close before planned this Saturday, and all for these changes that have been defined as social networks YASSIFICATION of the Virgin. Falling restoration. Between June 16 and 20, the team of the professor Francisco Arquillo carried out a restoration of the macarena that included “radiological analysis already through CT as well as analysis of polychromies through non -invasive techniques; cleaning of polychromías, consisting of the elimination of superficial dirt derived from cultural and devotional use, and chromatic reintegration of the existed polychrome uses ”. And although it has been carried out following the usual techniques in these cases, little invasive, its effects have not been desired. They have brought certain changes, for example, in the expression of the figure, which have disliked the faithful. In the mail of Andalusia Many of these complaints were detailed, which included cries and categorical statements that the changes in the figure had led to a state of “duel”. “Something has been lost.” While the Governing Board gathered urgently inside the basilica, accompanied by the restorer and different positions of the Brotherhood (which had already asked for forgiveness), the images that compared to the Virgin “before” and “after” of the intervention of the intervention They ran like Internet gunpowder. There was a change in the difficult expression to describe, but very obvious. Some described him as YASSIFICATION (The aesthetics derived from the use and abuse of the Botox To appear on social networks, which involves not only a certain possessive, but a grip of expressiveness and an exaggeration of traits). New look. Finallythe macarena was removed again, the eyelashes were checked and the face was slightly retouched, as the Official account of the Brotherhood of the Macarenafrom the moment it was “replaced again to the cult after correcting an unwanted effect caused by the tabs replaced during the intervention.” And he added: “The brotherhood includes, and shares, the signs of concern of brothers and devotees, hence he has acted with the greatest possible diligence, and guided by technical criteria, to repair this unwanted aesthetic alteration.” Double check. From yesterday 22 and until tomorrow the 24th, the Virgin will be exposed extraordinarily at the ground level in the Basilica Pre -Bystery, so that all devotees who wish can verify that the new changes are more consistent with the desired. Meanwhile, Complaints continue on social networksin endless comparisons between what was and what is now this virgin of anonymous authorship of the seventeenth century. A lot of devotion. Undoubtedly, the most striking of this event with the macarena is not so much the depth of change, in details that perhaps only detect the most devout, but the reaction of the Sevillians, syncopes included. Perfectly connects with how Catholic devotion feels in Andalusian cities like this, and that is reflected in events as indicated as Holy Week. Opinions have taken to the extreme, in videos such as This commentator specialized in news brotherand where it is clear how macarenism is lived. To scream. It is not difficult for us It was already reflected in documentaries such as ‘Prew Dolores!’where the line between Catholic devotion and hyperexpressivity of the LGTBI world is drawn. Although in this new controversy the gay component of devotion is not so marked, it is inevitable to remember a phrase of that documentary: “There are two religions: that of Rome and that of Seville”, referring to the multiple ways of understanding Catholic iconography. The Virgin Mary is pure femininity and maternal symbol, and at the same time a diva to dress like a folkloric and whose minimal variations in the gesture are the result of controversies. Restore as you can. Although it has not reached the limits of monstrosity of previous restorations, it is inevitable He got international fame And that is still remembered, 13 years after the disaster. But he hasn’t been the only one: after him came the San Jorge de Estella in 2018the Sizes of Radadoiro That same year or the Palencia shepherd in 2020. An authentic museum of horrors with which you have to set distances: La Macarena has been restored by a team of professionals, while many of these disasters were the work of fans or decoration companies. In Xataka | The “natural wine” has become fashionable. There is a place where he takes centuries without so much hype: Mass

Elon Musk has said that Mars will be part of the United States. It is an unusual affront to the outdoor space treaty

See Elon Musk on stage in a political event is already a guarantee that In the morning the bread will upload. But this time his words have resonated beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. The echo has felt up to Mars. The phrase. During a political rally in Wisconsin, with a gigantic American flag projected behind him, and dressed in his Spacex blue jacket, Elon Musk pronounced The following phrase: “I will die in the United States. I’m not going anywhere. I could go to Mars, but it will be part of the United States.” The affront. He Treaty about outer space From 1967, signed today by 115 countries, it establishes that “the ultra -resort space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriations by claim of sovereignty, through use or occupation, or by any other means.” Musk’s statement, individually, does not directly violate the agreement, which is only binding for governments. But his words are an unusual affront if they are interpreted as a suggestion that the United States will claim Mars as his, violating international law. The contradiction. Interestingly, Spacex, Elon Musk’s aerospace company, keeps in the Starlink service terms A legal notice about Mars that contradicts the treaty and in turn the recent statements of its founder: “For the services provided on Mars, or in transit to Mars through Starship or other spacecraft, the parties recognize that Mars is a free planet and that no land government has authority or sovereignty on Martian activities. Consequently, disputes will be resolved by principles of self -government, established in good faith, at the time of the Martian resolution” What is the plan. Since the foundation of Spacex in 2002, Musk’s long -term vision includes the Colonization of Mars. Its objective is to establish a self -sufficient settlement on the red planet that would guarantee the survival of humanity as a multiplaneary species if something happened on earth. Spacex is developing the Gigantic Rocket Starship To give logistical support to this titanic project, and plan launch the first unmanned missions At the end of next year. But at the time of truth, only governments and hundreds of thousands of volunteers willing not to return They would have the ability to carry out a permanently inhabited colony on Mars. Political pressure. NASA marked as a priority objective the return to the moon, but Musk, which Consider the moon “a distraction”he is pressing the agency with its political power and its enormous resources to accelerate the missions with astronauts to the red planet. You have already got Donald Trump Declare Mars the “manifest destiny” from the United States, and things could get even more on their part if Jared Isaacman, Spacex’s commercial partner, assumes NASA administration after being nominated by the president. Against the law. Of course, one thing would be to plant the American flag on Mars, something that also China intends to do with yours in 2040and another very different would be to claim the independence of a Martian colony. Any property claim on Mars, does NASA or Spacex, would be considered an American claim, due to its continuous jurisdiction, and would be prohibited. If Musk’s declaration is interpreted as a territorial claim, It would be incompatible with the principles of the international treaty. On the other hand, it is true that Musk has no problem changing his opinion. Until recently, he argued that Martian settlers would directly legislate the planet with a political self -government system for direct democracy. The laws would be voted by the people, without political intermediaries, the businessman proposed. Images | POT, Wisconsin Young Republicons In Xataka | It is not that Elon Musk has managed to introduce its influence on NASA. Is that he has entered sweeping

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.