Historians have been trying to understand Hitler for decades. DNA just gave us a clue about your sex life

“We didn’t know what we were going to find. It could have been the most boring genome on the planet, but it turned out amazing.” As if the promise of new (and morbid) revelations about Hitler weren’t enough to grab the world’s attention, that phrase of Turi Emma Kinga famous geneticist, has helped the documentary ‘Hitler’s DNA’ generated a huge stir even before its premiere. Logical. After all, the work is based on scientific research that reveals that the Nazi leader suffered from a genetic disorder that affected his sexuality. And that is just one of his many conclusions. Yes, Hitler again. The 20th century was prolific in wars, milestones and historical figures, but probably few arouse the fascination of Adolf Hitler. For his disastrous role as fuhrer but also because of the enormous amount of conspiracy theories and hoaxes that surround his figure. About his death, your habits and tasteshis supposed Jewish ancestry and his equal alleged offspring So many pages have been written that they would cover (several times) the bunker in which he committed suicide on April 30, 1945 with a sip of cyanide and/or a bullet. So it’s no surprise that any new revelation about him generates considerable excitement. Especially if it is one like the one that promises ‘Hitler’s DNA’a documentary produced by Channel 4 and which boasts of having thoroughly studied the DNA of the Nazi dictator. The piece premiered yesterday, Saturday, but its authors have taken it upon themselves to air their main conclusions in advance to warm things up. And although there are those who question their rhetoric or the solidity of some of their statements, one thing is clear: they have not done badly in their endeavor. Adolf Hitler’s DNA? Exact. To understand how the producers obtained a genetic sample from Hitler, we must go back to May 1945, shortly after the Nazi leader’s suicide. Among the allied soldiers who were able to access the Führerbunker There was one especially clever one, Roswell P. Rosengren, who came up with an idea: Why not take proof of the very couch on which the dictator had taken his life? No sooner said than done. The American officer cut off a blood-stained scrap and took it home. The piece was guarded by his family until 2014, when it passed to the Gettysburg History Museum. There the producers of Channel 4 found him, who had to face the following challenge: Was that really Hitler’s blood? Was there some way to establish the link, beyond Rosengren’s story? The answer was yes, although it forced them to take a new time jump (this much shorter one) to 2008, when the journalist Jean-Paul Mulders obtained a DNA sample from a relative of Hitler, a person with whom he shared paternal ancestors. Mulders’ purpose was to investigate the rumor of an alleged illegitimate son of Hitler, but in the end it served the creators of the documentary to compare the sample with the blood on the couch. The result: a perfect match. Double check which reinforced the conviction that the cloth contained Hitler’s DNA. “I thought about it a lot”. The next mission was to sequence that DNA to find out everything it hid about its owner, another far from easy task. Not so much because of the technical complexity itself but because of the enormous controversy that accompanies Hitler. In fact The Times assures that there were several laboratories that refused to collaborate in the documentary. Professor Turi Emma King, the lead geneticist on the research, also had her reservations when it was proposed. “I thought about it a lot,” recognize to the British newspaper the scientist, known for identifying years ago the remains of King Richard III. If he decided to embark on the project it was for two reasons: first, why not do it when the DNA is already being used for historical research it would mean giving a prominent role to Hitler; second, by the conviction that sooner or later someone would do it. “We wanted to make sure it was done methodically and rigorously.” So King decided to join the other main expert in the investigation, Dr. Alex Kayexpert on Nazi Germany and professor at the University of Potsdam. Clearing up unknowns. The experiment did not disappoint. As King acknowledges, the team risked not getting convincing results or anything substantial to justify the effort. Quite the opposite happened: the DNA analysis yielded some surprising conclusions that help debunk myths and expand the keys to understanding the Nazi leader. “We didn’t know what we were going to find. It could have been the most boring genome on the planet, but it turned out incredible,” relates. One of their most interesting findings is that the rumors about Hitler’s Hebrew ancestry appear to be basically that: rumors. At the time, there was speculation that the dictator’s paternal grandfather could have been Jewish (Hitler’s father, Alois, was an illegitimate son), a theory so deep-rooted that in 2022 it came to light. share it publicly Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. He was wrong. Channel 4 analysis reveals that Hitler was of Austro-German descent and supports the family tree drawn up by the Nazis. “Confirms that the story of Jewish ancestry through his parents is false,” concludes King on CNN. Kallman syndrome. If there is a revelation that has generated interest and grabbed headlines, however, it is the one that tells us about a much more personal aspect of Hitler: his physiology. Scientists claim to have found solid evidence that Hitler suffered from some form of Kallman syndromea genetic disorder that affects the development during puberty and of sexual organs. The most common thing is that the syndrome causes hypogonadism (insufficient production of testosterone during adolescence), but as the British press has been responsible for reminding these days, it has another peculiarity: up to 10% of those who have the disorder have micropenis. Beyond the obvious morbidity of this revelation, the data is interesting because of the stories that … Read more

The Opus schools decided to keep up with the government and continue segregating by sex. His students are running away

When it came into force in January 2021 the new education lawno one missed that in its provisions there was a direct missile to the waterline of dozens of schools and institutes throughout the country: segregation by sex was prohibited; Only mixed schools could continue to be chartered. What we discovered a couple of weeks later is that the missile came with a timer. Five years later, the timer is reaching zero and many centers are preparing to stop being chartered. Immediately afterwards, a wave of students are trying to leave those schools. What did the law say? The LOMLOE, which is what the law is called, demanded that educational centers that receive public funds “develop the principle of coeducation in all educational stages.” That is, they were prohibited from “not separating students by gender.” However, as competition is regional and each place has different regulations, many of the attempts to apply this point they have been delayed. In Catalonia, for example, when the ERC department tried to eliminate agreements with differentiated education centers, the courts stopped the measures until the agreements were renewed. That period begins at the beginning of 2026. And why does it affect Opus Dei? Strictly speaking, talking about “Opus schools” is a bit inaccurate. It is true that there are many centers in that orbit, but the relationships between them are complex and that means that they are not a uniform whole. However, this group of centers (which in Catalonia number a dozen and receive 35 million each year) are the spearhead of the “anti-coeducational” movement. Thus, many Catalan schools linked to the Prelature are doing the math. Continuing to be concerted would mean losing one of its hallmarks; Not losing it means becoming private (with the increase in fees that this entails). For this reason, the steps they were taking in two schools in the Sant Cugat/Bellaterra area (La Vall – for girls – and La Farga – for boys) were seen as the great privatization experiment. The area is one of the richest and most exclusive in all of Catalonia and, in that sense, it seemed logical to think that they would be two of the schools that would suffer the least from the jump. But the flight of students has begun. El País requested in July (through a complaint to the Commission for Guarantees of Access to Public Information) the data from the official pre-registration process and what these data show is a complete leak. 63 students from La Vall and 96 students from La Farga tried to go to other schools. Finally, only 38 of the first and 74 of the second achieved it; but it is a warning to sailors. Applications for admission also decreased (between 10 and 14%). All this, while a group of families try not to abandon the concert. However, the decision seems firm. Last week, two schools in L’Hospitalet de Llobregat also linked to the Prelature (Xaloc – for boys – and Pineda – for girls) announced that they were going to begin preparing for a more than possible non-renewal of the agreement and the problems that this will entail. According to data from El Paísonly those two schools (with more than 2,800 students) receive seven million euros from the Generalitat. And what situation does all this leave us in? In recent years, the debate about whether single-sex or mixed education it has become more intense. In fact, in some countries like the US, differentiated education It has been experiencing a real boom for a decade. However, the current conversation makes it clear that research on the topic is the least of it. The opposing positions at an ideological, economic and social level They make these investigations become ammunition with which to attack the opponent. For this reason, what everyone in the sector is wondering is how long the legislature will last and what will happen if, eventually, a government of the opposite direction arrives. Meanwhile, what is clear is that differentiated education is going to verify, for the first time in many years, the commitment of its families to the project. Image| Vazovsky In Xataka | The generation of parents who feel guilty because their children spend a lot of time looking at screens

why more and more couples schedule sex

Wake up at seven, work eight hours, answer thirty emails, do the shopping, take the dog out, have dinner… And at 8:30 p.m., sex. On the calendar, with alert included. It seems like a joke, but it’s not. More and more couples do it: they schedule their sexual encounters as if they were a work meeting or a yoga class. In times of stress, screens and endless days, intimacy seems to have become another pending item on the agenda. What once came from a spark now requires planning. The sexual recession. Desire, experts say, has less and less space to appear. The sexologist and couples therapist Nayara Malnero He details it for eldiario.es with a phrase that condenses the feelings of many: “We have lives in which there is no time for intimacy, for ourselves or for our partner.” Working too much, sleeping too little, taking care of children or caring for the elderly, checking social networks before going to sleep… All of this leaves little room for contact. The consequence, according to various studies cited by Atlantic and British Medical Journalis part of a global trend: the so-called “sexual recession”, a sustained decrease in the frequency of intimate relationships in both young people and adults. And given this lack of space, many couples opt for what was unthinkable a few years ago: scheduling sex. According to The Knot’s Relationship & Intimacy 2024 study14% of married couples admit to doing it, and they report a much higher level of sexual satisfaction than those who do not do it. In another more recent survey, quoted by Dazed41% of those surveyed say they schedule their meetings several times a week, especially the youngest ones. And why do they do it? For some couples, scheduling sex is not an imposition, but a way to reserve space that would otherwise disappear. A 28 year old woman he told Dazed magazine who and her husband began writing their “intimacy schedule” on a white board. Not as an obligation, but as a way to reserve real time for each other: “It wasn’t ‘it’s Tuesday, it’s time to do it,’ but to make sure that that week we had a screen-free moment, just for us.” another couple reported something similar in Glamor: After months of routine, they decided to schedule intimate dates. “Desire begins in the morning: we send provocative messages, we flirt at dinner… And anticipation does the rest,” both pointed out that planning does not kill passion; wakes her up. Therapist Heather McPherson details it in a simple way: “Scheduling sex is adding intention and emotion to the relationship. It’s making sure you prioritize the bond with your partner.” For her part, Dr. Kelly Casperon compares it to something as everyday as sport: “It’s like exercising. We could do it at any time, but if you don’t schedule it, it doesn’t happen.” However, not all experiences are positive. Some people, interviewed by eldiario.esconfessed that trying to fit intimacy into the agenda became another source of pressure: “It became an obligation. Desire cannot arise where there is control or anxiety,” said one of them. Between therapy and cheating. Most specialists agree: planning can be useful, but only if it does not become a requirement. “It’s one thing to plan a date with enthusiasm—a dinner, a getaway—and another very different thing is ‘we have to do it because we have to’. Desire doesn’t work with pressure,” warns Malnero. Along the same lines, sexologist María Victoria Ramírez points towards this vision: scheduling “purely genital” encounters can be counterproductive, but scheduling intimacy without expectations can strengthen the bond. “You can schedule time free of obligations to chat, enjoy together and give space to physical contact,” he suggests. At Laurel Therapycouples therapists put it this way: “The key is to understand that intimacy is not always sex. It can be a deep conversation, a massage, or just laughing together. It’s not an obligation, it’s a protected space to connect.” And science supports this view. A study from York University in Canada has shown that planned sex is no less satisfying than spontaneous sex. In fact, for those who understand planning as a show of care and not as a task, sexual satisfaction even increases. Are we fading? Perhaps the problem is not a lack of desire, but a lack of time. We live in a culture that idealizes spontaneity: movie sex, passionate and improvised. However, reality, with its schedules and responsibilities, leaves little room for instant magic. The therapist Inma Ríos explains it like this: “Pretending that everything will arrive by magic is a way of condemning sexual life. The anticipation of the moment is already pleasurable: it activates our fantasies and feeds the libido.” For the sexologist Núria Canodesire does not disappear: it transforms. “When the infatuation wears off, desire works in a different way. Waiting for it to arise can be the real problem,” he points out. And he adds: “Thinking about the encounter in advance can fuel fantasy, even creativity. If we organize parties, why not plan sex?” The frenetic pace of modern society—work, screens, multitasking—seems to push couples toward organization. In that context, scheduling sex would not be so much an anomaly as a cultural adaptation. How to maintain balance? Therapists agree on one key point: the success or failure of planning depends on the approach. If done with pressure, it becomes a burden. But if done with humor, play and consensus, it can rekindle the relationship. From specialized portals They recommend taking care of the details: planning romantic dates, creating atmosphere, using anticipation as part of the pleasure or changes of scenery to maintain excitement even within a planned schedule. A British couple who have been together for 40 years tells The Guardian who has sex “every three days, always to the rhythm of Madonna.” And they assure that this routine, far from extinguishing desire, has kept them connected for decades. “Counting the days until the next meeting is exciting to me,” he confesses. … Read more

Pleasure, homosexuality and STDs in the animal kingdom. A specialist dismantles myths on how sex works outside our species

Forget about the idea that animals only have sex to reproduce. Dolphins, bats, rams, bonobos or lions show that homosexual pleasure and behaviors are also part of nature. And not only that: there are species that change sex, that transmit diseases such as chlamydia or that transform their body to imitate genitals. All this composes a panorama as unexpected as fascinating. Science and apartthe Xataka section that was born to look at science with magnifying glass and do it in the company of experts, Return with a new episode in Our YouTube channelalso available on Spotify and Ivoox. On this occasion, Ángela Blanco interviews Ricardo MoureBiologist and Doctor in Biotechnology, with a very clear purpose: to explore what biology has discovered about sex in animals and leave aside the myths that we still drag. One of the points of the conversation is homosexuality in the animal kingdom. Moure clarifies from the beginning: “To be correct at a technical level, in animals we cannot talk about homosexual individuals or homosexual animals. We talk about homosexual behaviors“And add concrete examples:” Among the rams, one in five has sex with both males and females, and one in 10 only with other males. “ Another of the issues raised by the interview is that of pleasure in animal sex. Moure recognizes the difficulty of measuring it: “In the case of whether animals feel some kind of sexual pleasure, this is complicated because, of course, we cannot get into the mind of an animal and know its subjective perception, but it is true that it has been investigated if there are species in which there is sexual pleasure.” The clearest examples appear in social species, from primates to cetaceans, where relationships do not always seek offspring. Among the most graphic examples mentioned by Moure is the relationship between sexual behavior and the size of the testicles. “The size of the testicles depends a little on this,” he says. The contrast is striking: “Gorillas can reach 200 kg, they have testicles that are like two olives (…) but instead bonobos (…) They have very large testicles”The key is in sperm competition, which favors species where females maintain relations with several males. It also stops in the biological mechanisms that allow some species to change sex. “When a male clown fish is widowed, it changes sex and becomes the female,” Moure details, remembering that all these fish are born males and that their role depends on the structure of the group. But there are more factors that alter the proportion of sexes: “humans also greatly affect the distribution of sexes because of climate change,” he says. The interview also addresses a less known aspect: sexually transmitted diseases in animals. “A case that draws a lot of attention is that of the Koalas. The Koalas in Australia have a CLAMIDIA EPIDEMIA that the species is being loaded, ”says Moure. The problem is serious because it causes infertility and is very difficult to treat. What we have advanced here is just a fragment of an episode loaded with data, anecdotes and explanations that show this aspect in the animal kingdom. In Science and apartRicardo Moure provides keys that invite you to think otherwise the relationship between biology and sex. The chapter is now available. Choose the platform you want to enjoy it. Images | Xataka In Xataka | Zoophilia is the last great sexual taboo of our societies. And there are voices that want to discuss it

What would football be adapted by sex

If something is demonstrating the Eurocup 2025 is that women’s football has more and more followers, something that has already been seen in the World Cup of 2023. The ‘king sport’ in its female version shakes stigmas, raises passions and feels thousands of people before the TV to follow the matches that are played in Switzerland; But also does something else: reopen old debatessuch as whether men and women should play with different norms and fields, adapted to their physical conditions. A study has just suggested that debate with new data. What happened? Than in full Women’s Eurocup The public company of Swiss broadcasting, SRF, has just published A study that the melon of the melons of football reopens: Should women and men compete in different fields, adapted to their different physical abilities? If a Spanish male (and the calculation is transferable to other nationalities) measures on average 14 centimeters and weighs 16.7 kilos more than its countrymen and those factors influence aspects such as The jumps either The speedWould you have to adapt the game conditions per sex? METER AND KILOS QUESTION. The study SRF starts from an interesting premise: if we accept that women should perform more physically than men when playing in the same fields, how relevant is that extra effort? What would he mean for a male? The Swiss chain responds to both issues with a theoretical exercise: it has imagined what a pitch would be like if the men meet the level of demand that their companions now assume. Their conclusions are fascinating and affect such basic issues as the balls. FIFA establishes that the regulatory balls must have a minimum weight of 410 grams and not exceed 450. As for the size, the circumference has to be between 68 and 70 cm. SRF’s study suggests that for men to play “under the same conditions” that women their balls should be much larger, with a circumference of 76 cm. “It would be the same size and weight as a basketball”, duck. And that is the first of many adaptations. Gatestroads, fields and XXL areas. The report is based on the work of researchers from the University of Trondheim and answer some curious questions. For example, how great they would have to be The goals so that men face the same conditions as women? Starting from the base that on average players are higher than the players, the study concludes that their goals should be 0.55 m longer and 0.13 higher. “An adequate goal would measure 8.4 m wide and 2.72 m high. Even a 1.9 m goalkeeper would have few possibilities for precise shots,” he concludes. The same logic moves to the pitch. Right now the fields suitable for international competitions must move between 100-110 meters long and 64-75 wide, although the standard measurement of the majority of first fields is 105×68 m. “For a clean play in male football, the field would have to be bigger,” collect SRF: “20% larger: 132×84 m”. More kilometers. The players would not only have to compete in more extensive fields with larger and more heavy balls. It would also have a lot more run. How much? According to the study, the most players would go through about 10 kilometers per game to cover between 12 and 13. In practice, Authors abound of the report, that equals much more play time and “enormous physical effort, both for resistance and physical condition” of athletes. The same barriers? Another aspect that would vary if we redesigned the fields for men and women to face the same level of demand is that of barriers in cases of faults. Due to the size differences, the female are narrower and more low, so they cover a vertical angle of 10.4 degrees. In the case of men, 11.25 are reached. That affects the possibilities of a successful stop. “The chances of a successful free kick increase.” The debate, served. Although SRF data is interesting, it is not the first time that the debate about whether women and men should compete with goals, fields and balls equal. In 2021 the University Campus of Football Business (UCFB) published An article in which he stressed that issue and recalled that different balls, networks or fences are already used in other sports depending on whether male or women compete. “Why don’t you do in football?” I left driving UCFB, a question that has arisen On more occasions In recent years. “Any opinion that defends the change in the size of the goals is received with accusations of sexism, but there is an argument against: passively accepting the measures originally designed for the male game is a form of sexism in itself,” Reflect. “If the emotion is neglected and pure logic is pursued, the change in the size of the goals can improve the game.” Would you favor or harm women? That is the key question. Despite the calculations disseminated by SRF, there are those who warn that applying ‘corrections’ for men and women to face the same degree of demand on the grass would harm the latter. The reason? Beyond the accusations of “sexism”, some voices warn that they would complicate the expansion of women’s football. “It is already quite difficult to find a field to play! There are not enough teams with a budget to have its own field, so now they share it with the masculine. Are you going to measure the land on Saturday for the male match and change all the measures then for Sunday’s female meeting?” warns The player Rachael Yankey In an interview with UCFB. Images | James Boyes (Flickr) 1 and 2 In Xataka | 150 years ago the English played the first football matches in Spain. Now there is a fierce fight for finding out where

38% want to have sex at work

At this point, we are clear that the Z generation conceives working and personal life from a very different perspective How previous generations did. For newcomers to the labor market, the balance between work and private life not only includes a better balance between working and personal lifea survey reveals that it also seeks to normalize sex in the office, something that until recently was taboo in the professional environment. Teleworking made everything easier. A survey Prepared by Edubirdie, he asked 2,000 young people from generation Z about how their sexual relations were in the current context of change of teleworking model just around the office. 47% of respondents assured that teleworking He had improved his sex life. Being at home, they could better combine their sexual encounters with the workday. On the other hand, 36% said that the return to the office was going to harm their sexual life because they were going to lose that time flexibility for coincide with their partners. In contrast, 14% said just the opposite, that working from home had reduced their sexual encounters. 37% confessed that teleworking had not changed anything in their sexual life. We do not know if that is good or bad. Return to the complicated office. Daily displacements have not turned out the hardest From the return to the office. 30% of the young people surveyed said that having to go to the office conditions the schedule For their sexual encounters and forces them to schedule their sexual appointments in advance, while 70% are not worried in this regard and prefers to leave these experiences at random of the moment. On the contrary, 29% of the youth of the Z generation they have responded, consider that coinciding with other colleagues around the work environment Increase your options To have sex. Greater social interaction. The data show that 42% of respondents feel more confident and attractive when flirting with their classmates while working, while 18% confess that the socialization options provided by the face -to -face contact helps them to lift the mood. On the other hand, being out of home and away from their partners can also impact on their sexual appetite. As for frequency, 40% of young employees do not expect changes with the return to face -to -face work, while 16% claim to be too much Tired when you return home And that reduces the number of relationships. 20% confirms that going to the office does not share so long with their partner, which reduces the time they dedicate to having appointments. “Private” spaces in the office. However, the most surprising fact of the study is that a wide 38% of the young people would want to have a private space in the office for intimate meetings or, say, “Self -care“ This indicates that, to attract and retain younger workers, companies must offer more than free fruit or coffee. The paradox: they are the least “affectionate” generation. Beyond the sexual aspirations demonstrated by the participants in this survey, the paradoxical is that Other previous studies They have shown that gene generation maintains less sexual relations that the previous generations. According to the data collected by the National Family Growth Survey (NSFG) that is carried out periodically, asexuality shot between 2017 and 2023. The data suggests that 10% of men and 7% of women between 22 and 34 years old, that is, of generation Z, never have had sex. 24% of men and 13% of women in that age strip did not maintain sexual relations in the last yearfigures that are much higher than a decade ago with 8% and 9% respectively. If the abstinence period is limited to the last three months, 35% of men and 31% of women say they have not had sexual encounters. Sexuality without taboús. The data of both studies lead to think that although it is possible that generation Z can have less sexual activity than previous generations, seeks to integrate sexuality into their lives at all levels (including the work environment) in an open way, reflecting a deep cultural change. However, the normalization of sex at work can contribute to setbacks in the fight against sexual harassment in the workplace that still records very worrying levels. In Xataka | Norway is giving 2,500 euros in tax cuts to its young people. In return they have to work Image | Unspash (Luke Miller)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.