Netflix decided to kill sending content to the TV. Apple has taken advantage of the gap to score a great goal

Netflix decided to start the month of December by eliminating one of the most basic and useful functions of its mobile application: the ability to send content (cast) from our smartphone to any television with Android TV either Google TV. An essential tool to find content quickly on your mobile and send it to your TV. What we did not expect is that, in less than two weeks, Apple has responded indirectly by bringing its Apple TV for Android the feature that Netflix has decided to kill. Better late. Goodbye to Netflix Cast. It was easy to realize this. At home I have a Google Chromecast with Google TV and a Google Nest. Every time I wanted to send content from my mobile to my television… only the Google Nest appeared. That’s when I read the confirmation of the disaster: Netflix had loaded the Cast without any explanation. The exceptions. In the Netflix support page An exception is specified to continue using the Cast function: having a third-generation or earlier Chromecast device. In other words, versions without remote control. The second, have a plan without ads. If you don’t pay, you can’t send content to TV. Cast icon on Apple TV, make a wish. Given the gap in the squad, great goal. Since yesterday, a couple of weeks after Netflix’s move, the Apple TV application for Android is compatible with Google Cast, a function that was missing since the launch of the app at the beginning of the year on the rival platform. It is necessary to have the app updated to version 2.2 to be able to send our content to the television on any Chromecast. Apple being less Apple. Apple has had to respond to Netflix in the face of an undeniable reality: its service is a minority within the ecosystem of streaming platforms. Netflix is ​​the absolute king, followed by Prime Video and Disney+. And one of the reasons was one that we know quite well: using Apple is using a product tied to its ecosystem. Despite this, Apple TV+ is dangerously close to HBO Max, about to take fourth place in the ranking, according to data from JustWatch. In this context, the introduction of Cast goes beyond a minor function: It is a surrender (more) from Apple towards a more open ecosystem. And this works in your favor Allows Apple TV+ to sneak into homes with Android phones and tablets Reduces friction of use Reduce dependence on Apple’s hardware ecosystem What are you doing to win in Spain. Apple’s strategy to continue growing in Spain is clear: swim against the current with a strategy that does not introduce advertising in the app, a small catalog but with a large presence of proposals (expensive) and own and, now, simplifying the use of its app to reduce friction that had been artificially introduced. It won’t be enough. We told it a year ago and the numbers reaffirm it: there is hardly any war in streamingsince most of the content is converging on Netflix. The post-pandemic stage forced platforms to fight to distinguish themselves, while Netflix went public at the end of December 2024 at pre-pandemic levels. Be that as it may, given the growth of Apple TV in 2025, fight head to head against an HBO focused on quality It is great news for the company. Image | Xataka In Xataka | The best streaming platforms 2025 | Comparison of Disney+, Netflix, HBO Max, Prime Video, Movistar Plus+, Filmin, Apple TV, SkyShowtime and Rakuten TV: catalog, functions and prices

The new Meta Model took a very good score at the benchmarks. Maybe too good

We had been waiting for the new family calling 4 artificial intelligence models for a long time. Last weekend the company finally revealed those models and Everything seemed promising. The problem is that the way of announcing them is generating some controversy and an uncomfortable conversation: that perhaps they have cheated in the benchmarks. Call 4 seems great. As soon as they appear on the scene, the new models call 4 goal surprised by their excellent performance in Benchmarks. They were second in the ranking LMARENAonly below Gemini 2.5 pro experimental. However, suspicions soon appeared, because the flame 4 version that is available to all audiences was not the same as it was shown in that ranking. Trucada version? As indicated in the advertisement As a finish line, that flame 4 version was an “experimental” that obtained a 1,417 points in LMarenawhile Gemini 2.5 Pro experimental had obtained 1,439 points. Some experts pointed out that this experimental flame version 4 was a version that cheated and had been specifically trained with data sets used in Benchmarks to be able to score well in them. We have not cheated.Ahmad al-Dahle is the head of the generative division in the finish line, and therefore is in charge of the flame launch 4. This manager has denied sharply The rumors that point to what goal would have cheated to get better scores in the benchmarks. These rumors “are false and we would never do that,” he said. But it was “optimized”. As indicated In TechCrunchin that official announcement Meta did pointed to the experimental flame 4 model that had scored very well was “optimized for conversation.” In Lmarena They indicated What a goal should have explained better what type of model had sent to include in the ranking. The same calls 4 is not so good. Some experts who They analyzed flame performance 4 with synthetic or conventional tests They already warned that performance It didn’t seem so good As they claim in goal. The publicly available model showed a behavior that He did not adjust to the quality that pointed its score in LMarena. Not quite consistent. Al-Dahle himself confirmed that some users were seeing “different quality” results of Maverick and Scout, the two flame versions 4 available, depending on the supplier. “We hope that some days are late when public implementations are adjusted,” and added that they would continue working to correct possible errors. A rare release. What a goal this model will launch a Saturday is strange, but when asked about it Mark Zuckerberg He replied that “is when it was ready.” That also the model used in LMarena is not the same as people can use is also worrying, and it may begin to distrust us from benchmarks and companies that use them to promote their products. It is not the first time that This happens Not much less, and it will not be the last one. In Xataka | Openai is burning money as if there were no tomorrow. The question is how much can endure like this

“If our hands unleashed, we will score goals”

The top managers of Telefónica, Vodafone, Orange and Deutsche Telekom have joined forces in the MWC 2025 With a clear message: or Europe allows the consolidation of the European sector or telecos will die slowly against American and Asian giants. A cry of help that intensifies last year’s tone and raises the debate from the business to geopolitical. According to its unanimous message, Europe is trapped in a contradiction that is gradually suffocating its telecommunications sector. While regulators applaud the multitude of operators as a sign of healthy markets, financial figures tell something very different: a fragmented, weakened and unable sector to compete on a global scale. The new president of Telefónica, Marc Murtra, It had already been direct about it in the inaugural session of the Mobile World Congress 2025: “It is time for large European telecommunications companies to consolidate and grow to create technological capacity,” he said a few hours before. And during the CEOs panel of the sector, it was even more graphic: “We operated in a fragmented market, it’s like playing football with a hand tied to the back. If we unleash our hands, we will score a few goals.” From the regret to strategic warning It is not a new theme, but has reached a critical point. The combined stock value of all European telecos has been joining while that of the Americans, such as AT&T, have been growing for years. Meanwhile, giants such as Microsoft, Apple or Alphabet – which use telecommunications networks as highways for their services – exceed them alone the billion dollars of valuation. Long The change in tone is evident to the MWC 2024, when the CEOs of these same telecos also demanded regulatory changes, but With a more focused approach to asking for contributions to Big Tech. This year the speech has hardening and reoriented towards the existential need for consolidation for survivaltransmitting more urgency and appealing directly to European technological sovereignty. The Vodafone CEO, Margherita Della Valle, said it without windows: “Europe needs a new pact, which passes through a European regulatory framework.” And he added that “the time has come to move from Marmota to the European Digital Renaissance,” in allusion to repeated regulatory change requests that make year after year without results. The European regulatory trap European rules have created A perfect trap: They prioritize the immediate benefit for the consumer (low prices) sacrificing the future viability of the sector and its ability to invest. This vision, anchored in ideas of the 90s about competition, ignores that the world has completely changed. Murtra, in his first public act as executive president of Telefónica, has been devastating in his diagnosis: “We must be aware that the excessive fragmentation of European TMT, excess regulation and insufficient profitability of the sector have weighed Europe, which has been technologically lagging behind.” The CEOs of the four major European operators during the panel in the MWC 2025. Image: Telefónica. Tim Höttges, CEO of Deutsche Telekom, was the most explicit when putting numbers to the disadvantage: “In the US, the average income per customer is at 42 euros per mobile and 58 euros for the fiber, while in Europe 15 euros are entered for the mobile and 13 euros for the fiber.” And he added a rather revealing fact about the bureaucratization of the sector: “I have told how many regulators served as Deutsche Telekom. Do you know how many? 270 regulators. We have media regulation, cybersecurity, privacy, telecommunications … at the local level and European level.” In the United States, consolidation has left three major national operators that compete with each other, but with enough size to spend massively in infrastructure. In Europe, with 34 main and 351 virtual operators, no company reaches the size necessary to compete globally. Each European country has 3 or 4 average operators, but the problem is another: each operator is usually strong only in some markets. The result is a European industry with tight margins, little investment capacity and a constant drop in its value. Deutsche Telekom has only been able to grow thanks to his American T-Mobile subsidiary. “Today we make 65% of our income in the US,” Höttges revealed, admitting that his company’s solution has been precisely “to fold the bet” in the American market. Consolidation: inevitable but blocked The consolidation of the sector is mathematically inevitable. Technology markets tend naturally towards structures with few actors due to economies of scale. Resisting this only delays the inevitable while weakens everyone. However, European regulators remain firm: in the last five years They have blocked or imposed very hard conditions to almost all important fuses proposals. The operation between O2 and Three in the United Kingdom It was rejectedthe TPG and Vodafone fusion In Australia it took years to approve, and here in Spain we saw how The Orange-Másmobo union only crystallized after concessions that risked their profitability. Della Valle highlighted the British case as an example of what should be: “In the United Kingdom, Vodafone has just launched a massive investment plan to build one of the best networks in the world. 11,000 million invested. Why could we do this? Because we had managed to scale through a fusion.” This resistance comes from European institutional cultureto. The commission has built its reputation as a consumer defender, maintaining seemingly competitive markets, mainly measured by the number of companies competing. Changing this would mean that the policies of the last two decades have been counterproductive. The price of doing nothing The effects are already noticed. Investment in new networks per inhabitant in Europe is much lower than in the United States. European 5G coverage (81%) It is delayed with respect to the American and China (More than 95%). Christel Heydemann, CEO of Orange, has stressed that “today our investors punish us when we invest more. What we want are investments that we know that they will boost scale, and the scale brings a smaller cost for jigwhich means lower prices for consumers and ability to … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.