The most surreal is not that a Patricia Fernández has supplanted another Patricia Fernández in the Royal House: it is her flight forward
A confusion of identities that seems out of a classic comedy of briefcases, portzos and persecutions, and that in principle might seem anecdotal, has become the most attentive Internet soil at the fauna influencer. The reason not the reputation of those involved, nor the ultimate reason after confusion, but the posterior reaction of one of them. A reaction that perhaps says quite a lot about how the sector is mounted. The mess. Last Friday, the 40th anniversary of the Signature of the Spanish and Portugal Adhesion Treaty to the European CommunityEvent through which both countries entered what today is the European Union. King Felipe VI and Pedro Sánchez were present at the event. Among the guests was the content creator Patricia Fernándezspecialized in culture, human rights and the European Union (more than 200,000 followers, from now on Patricia 1). However, the event was another Patricia Fernández, influencer that focuses its posts on issues related to lifestyle, fashion and decoration (almost 2 million followers, Patricia 2 hereinafter). The Royal House was to blame. The cause of confusion is very simple: as both creators are called the same, the Royal House was confused by sending the invitations. The curious thing about the situation is that Patricia 2 did not find especially strange to invite him to such an event, but he enjoyed it and even chatted for a while with the king. Patricia 1 has counted on their networks His point of view about the situation: “I have not wanted to speak before because, above all, I am a journalist. I wanted to talk to the primary source, which has already told me the error; they have apologized.” And the thing is still more complicated with the arrival of a Patricia 3. In Xataka Lola Lolita’s controversy and the 4,000 euros bag reveals something else: influencers have stopped having normal lives This third Patricia Fernández is Patricia Fernández VicensSpanish lawyer specialized in childhood, situations of social exclusion and migrations, and National Human Rights Award in 2022. Although it is a more notorious possibility to have been present at the act, the truth is that the invitation was for a influencer So, for now we stayed with the option of Patricia 1. “The statement has been worse than usurpation.” What has really caught the attention of networks It has been the reaction to the erroneous guestand that justified his presence in the event in the most pilgrim form: “I have created content for Europe and about sustainability and I was also born in 1985, the same in which the Spanish adhesion treaty was signed to European communities.” He also affirms that “human rights I do it phenomenal because I don’t get into anyone, I respect everyone (…) not to incite bullying, not destroy the image of a person, not insult, all that kind of thing also has a lot to do with human rights.” {“Videid”: “X8CVU8H”, “Autoplay”: True, “Title”: “How to eliminate a Tiktok account forever”, “Tag”: “Webedia-Prod”, “Duration”: “184”}} Patricia 2 also states that “given this uncomfortable done, I have also made my checks with the royal house and what is informed of my invitation was correct and that they were delighted to receive me, in addition to sending me a big hug for seeing me wrapped in this controversy without meaning.” Of course, commentators in networks They have been primed in error And in his refusal to recognize that there was perhaps a more appropriate Patricia Fernández for the event. The bonfire of vanities. For years, more or less since the profession of influencer He settled without problems in public normalitywe know that the dynamics of the popular content creators are based on APPEAR A STATUSa social status or a rise. Something with An unattainable point that make them desirable for his followers, and that generates situations as absurd as Anna Allen, the actress who invented for their social networks that had attended the Oscars, pure dynamic of desire to give carnaza to their fans. In Xataka The Prado Museum closed its doors so that Dua Lipa could create content. That has generated a furious debate In this context it is in which confusions such as the two (or three) Patricia Fernández are given: an event in the Royal House is an exhibition, which is the currency of change of social networks, and there we have two Influencers fighting in the post, no matter how much one of the two seems unquestionably more appropriate than another to appear. A situation that brings the grief due to the confusion of the royal house and that leads us to the usual question: is it worth in exchange for a Care space in an account of only a few seconds? In Xataka | Inés de Robles: The phenomenon of the year in Tiktok Spain is an influencer dressed in the nineteenth -century maiden (Function () {Window._js_modules = Window._js_modules || {}; var headelement = document.getelegsbytagname (‘head’) (0); if (_js_modules.instagram) {var instagramscript = Document.Createlement (‘script’); }}) (); – The news The most surreal is not that a Patricia Fernández has supplanted another Patricia Fernández in the Royal House: it is her flight forward It was originally posted in Xataka by John Tones .
