Jordi Wild has the most controversial podcast in Spain. And precisely that is what waves have rewarded

Jordi Wild, one of the undisputed stars of the podcastfera in Spanish, has won a wave In recognition of his career. Of course, Wild is not the first successful podcaster, born completely in the Internet sphere, self -produced outside the radio tradition, which wins the prize. But it is the first that has taken as references to iconic Anglo -Saxon names of the environment and has adapted them to its own style and very well, controversies included. Therefore, that waves is more than recognition of unquestionable success: it is also corroboration by the STABLISHMENT of the radio of one of the most peculiar personalities of the environment. Jordi Wild’s meteoric ascent. The YouTuber and Podcasts created its YouTube channel ‘in 2013The Rincón de Giorgio‘, which initially focused on a derivative and usual content by the time: gameplaysreaction and parodies videos. Soon he began to enter other issues, such as current debates and issues related to criminal psychology. In 2020 He started his podcast ‘The Wild Project‘. Although it is a bit complicated to calibrate its reach, On YouTube It approaches the 7 million subscribers, more almost 90,000 in podimo. His possible millions of listeners make him one of the most influential and followed podcasts in Spanish. Joe Rogan’s shadow. Jordi Wild has several times that One of its greatest influences To create and develop The Wild Project is Joe Rogan and his podcast ‘The Joe Rogan Experience‘. It was he who inspired him in the search for a format of long, deep interviews and without censorshipwhere the guest is the protagonist and all kinds of topics are addressed, not necessarily linked to its knowledge area. Other influences that Wild has cited in its programs, notoriously always American, are Howard Stern, David Letterman or Johnny Carson, of which he values his ability to face all kinds of guests. Podcasts in the waves. Since 2016 the podcasts have a presence in the waves, the awards to the media, programs and those responsible that since 1954 delivers the SER. That year The award for the best program, radio or radio online broadcast platform was given to Podium Podcast (hurry owned). Since then, programs such as ‘Xrey’, ‘Weekly deform’, ‘stretching the gum’, ‘Titania’ or ‘La Ruina’ this year have been awarded. But in addition, podcasts began to be specifically rewarded in Podcast Global Wave Wave Awards From 2022, an initiative in collaboration with Spotify to recognize and give visibility to the podcast industry in Spanish. The first delivery gala was held in May 2022 in Malaga. It is in this context that Jordi Wild has received a Special Recognition Prize for his career. Opening of sights. In this way, the waves open the door to a completely Anglo -Saxon style of influence, without equivalents in Spain at the level of success and scope, and that distances themselves from the winners so far, which enter into fields (audioficctions, humor and conversational, sound trials) that have always been present on the radio. The in -depth and uncensored interview style that Wild represents is Pure Podcasta land where There are no time limits and the programs They do not have thematic clippers and of format that does have traditional radio. The bleaching of Giorgio. But Jordi Wild’s program is not devoid of controversy, and has received abundant criticism, especially for the freedom of expression he presumes, and that has earned him criticism of both conservative and progressive sectors. He has been accused of giving voice to characters of controversial ideologies, which has generated debates about whether your whitish space extreme right speeches or spread Fake News under the appearance of open debate. Wild has always defended his decision to invite people of all ideologies and reject any attempt of external censorship or pressure. Some of his guests have given him controversies who have had a deep impact on his image, as was the Presence of former Villarejo Commissioner or the recent presence of A lifeguard Tiktoker which presumed to attract bathers to dangerous areas to get the hero. What waves wants. And this controversial image is the one that waves have rewarded, because it is what is most distant from the traditional radio. The search for the cut that is viralized in networks is what distance to programs such as The Wild Project of traditional radio, and it is what makes this prize especially relevant: the waves give visibility to a typology of podcast that until now had not had official recognition for being especially controversial and controversial. Podcast awards. In general, the prizes of the mainstream (In any field of creation) to their representatives less pigeonholed by traditional formats they usually reach the wrong (that’s why Jordi Wild receives an award for his career: he has been working for years: his style has been working for years). But they are always a sign that something moves within the traditional mass media: we cannot expect them to recognize the avant -garde, but it is still a warning that at least they are looking in the same direction as the public and the creators who carry the lead. Header | Chain ser In Xataka | The great surprise of the Pódcast is not that people are listening to them. Is that he is seeing them

They have rewarded them with 5.3 million dollars

The artificial intelligence drivers They have not been warning that this technology The world will change at levels of what did the arrival of electricity or internet. Two 21 -year -old girls named Chungin “Roy” Lee and Neel Shanmugam have created an AI tool to “cheat in everything.” With her, Lee surpassed a technical test without problems In the selection process For practices on Amazon, but it also cost him the expulsion from Columbia University for “having cheated.” Now, Shanmugam and Lee have created A startup To develop their “cheat” tool of AI and some investors have believed that their idea was so brilliant, that it was worth giving it a vote of confidence. A vote of 5.3 million dollars, nothing less. A “help” of AI Such and as he collected CNBCLee was a student at Columbia University who was looking to do practices in some technological. The student considered that the technical test during the interview was a proceeding completely unnecessary for the position he was running. Therefore, he decided to create a tool based on AI that he called Interview Coder. This tool was installed in the browser and analyzed everything that happened on the user’s screen, passing totally unnoticed by the interviewer. In this way, the AI ​​tool offered solutions to the programming problems that were raised during the test and answered questions so that Roy Lee did not have an immediate answer. With that help, Lee got practices on Amazon. According to The published By the University newspaper of the University of Columbia, Lee and his partner Neel Shanmugam were expelled as a disciplinary action for using Interview Coder in their work interviews. Something that the university considered as unusual, as can be seen from the disciplinary document that the student himself made public In his X profile. Far from hiding their invention and outside the ethical dilemmas that the tool raised for the university, the young people obtained unexpected success with their application, which in principle was sold for a quota of between 25 and 60 dollars per month and openly promoted it on social networks. Given their success, both ex -studies constituted a startup called Cluely to develop the project professionally. They are not traps, it is the future Despite the controversy arising from ethical interpretations about the use of the AI ​​tool, Roy Lee and Shanmugam’s vision seems to have excited investors. As read confirmed Since their LinkedIn profile, the capital funds Abstract Ventures and Susa Ventures have supported the project with an initial investment of 5.3 million dollars. The reasons are explained by their founders in a manifesto published on the Cluely page. “Every time technology makes us smarter, the world panic. Then adapt. Later it is forgotten. And suddenly, it is normal,” wrote the creators of the application. The financial support of these investors reveals that they share the idea that the use of AI to expedite processes It should not be considered cheatbut a natural evolution towards greater efficiency at work. In their manifesto, the ex -studies emphasize that AI is not a trap, but a tool to obtain better results faster, equating its use to the calculators, the spelling concealer and even Google. The ethical debate about AI The case of Lee and Shanmugam reflects the ethical dilemma that is slowing down the adoption of AI at workwhere employees still feel that when using AI to expedite their productive processes They are cheating. However, as the founders of Cluelly highlight, today nobody questions the use of calculators to solve complex operations on a day -to -day basis or the use of Google to look for information quickly. Surely, that idea is the one that has led investors to deposit their trust (and their money) in the idea that Cluely proposes. When that “normality” that reads and Shanmugam arrives in their manifesto, they will be there to collect the benefits. Without a doubt, the difference could be in context. It is reasonable that the use of calculators, spelling or Google correctors is limited, when it is about evaluating real knowledge that they have. Using it during an examination of mathematics or language, whose objective is to see the ability to perform the calculation process or the knowledge of grammar and spelling, would be to make an ethical use of these tools. The same could be said of a technical test in a job interview. In Xataka | Someone used AI to overcome an interview on Amazon. His success has made Google see his candidates face to face Image | Cluely

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.