The tip makes the employee poorer and customers end up paying their salary

In Spain there are A debate above the table. In the country he had always looked at the “optional tip” of 10% as an exotic custom of the United States, but lately something seems be changing In the hospitality. On the contrary, in the United States someone has opened the melon of one of the great traditions of the sector. And anyone has said it. McDonald’s has put in question The American tips and system. Context. It We count A few weeks ago. In the United States, tips are not mandatory by law, but it is customary, we would almost say that “obligation”, leaving a tip between 15 and 20%. The logic behind the behavior has to do with the fact that the US minimum federal minimum wage for workers with tips is 2.13 dollars per houran amount that has not changed since 1991. Somehow, that very small amount that the waiter receives on duty has turned the “American” tip into a kind of help to the worker who has no other way to increase his income. In practice, more forced than the theory, when eating in the United States in groups of between a minimum of four and six people, most establishments impose a 18% tip (free) without giving option not to pay it. By the way, although the practice is so settled there, it has European origin. It is estimated that in England in the 16th century. McDonald’s opens the melon. And this is where the almighty company appears. The CEO of McDonald’s, Chris Kempczinski, has criticized A television interview The restaurant model that rely on tips to cover the salary of their workers, qualifying it as a system that “transfers the responsibility of payment of the workforce to the client.” According to explainedwhile McDonald’s does not allow tips and directly pays the salaries of its employees, other premises can pay only 2.13 dollars the time under federal law as long as the final income, adding tips, reaches the federal minimum wage of $ 7.25. With the recent approval of “Big Beautiful Bill” promoted by Trump, which exempts tips from taxes, that scheme It reinforces and generates (In Kempczinski’s opinion) a “inequality of conditions” in front of fast food chains that do not benefit from such practices. The background of the phenomenon. The system of “Tipped Wages” It has been extending beyond traditional restoration towards multiple sectors of precarious work and platform economy. They remembered In Insider That appos of apps such as Uber Eats or Dordash depend on tips to complement income, and the pressure on customers has intensified with notifications that suggest that the speed of the service can depend on the initial generosity of the order. Practices like The “Tip Baiting”in which a consumer promises a high tip to encourage rapid delivery and then withdraws, have generated conflicts and distrust. At the same time, recent surveys reveal A growing social fatigue towards the proliferation of tip requests in all types of establishments, which reopens the debate on whether this form of compensation remains sustainable and fair. The giant proposal. Kempczinski, on behalf of the multinational, suggested that the solution passes through force everyone restaurants to pay the same base minimum salary, regardless of the tips received. States such as California, Alaska or Minnesota already demand it, eliminating the figure of the “subminate by tips” and guaranteeing more stable direct salaries. According to the manager, extend this federal model It would reduce poverty and labor rotation without implying loss of jobs, while leveling competition between fast food chains and traditional restaurants. In his vision, the current disparity favors those who rely on a Externalized Compensation System In customers, while companies such as McDonald’s directly assume staff costs. The vision of a “double cheeking.” There is much more, since Kempczinski described The current American situation as a “two -level economy”, marked by the gap between high -income consumers, who continue to spend on premium products and home deliveries, and those of average and low income, which reduce their visits to restaurants, jump meals and choose to cook at home. From the inflationary wave of 2022, the chain has faced an increasing discomfort For the increase in their menus, which led to the combos exceeding ten dollars since whole strips of customers see fast food as an occasional luxury rather than as a daily option. Price readjustment as a strategy. To stop the traffic drop between these segments, McDonald’s He relaunched a package Five dollars and reinforced promotions in their main markets, relying on advertising campaigns focused on value. The strategy aims to maintain the brand as a reference for accessibility in an environment in which the smallest competition lacks the scale to absorb the costs of the reduction. However, franchisees (responsible for most premises in the United States) They show concern For the impact on margins in a context of wages, rentals and upward inputs, although Kempczinski assured that the consensus in favor of these measures was “almost unanimous.” A conflict between models. If you also want, the debate also contains a deep cultural shock: in the United States, tips have historically worked as salary complementbut the rise of digital platforms and inflationary pressure have intensified wear of this model. While the restoration industry defends its flexibility and ability to attract customers with lower apparent prices, critics They point That it is a undercover subsidy form in which consumers, and not employers, finance a good part of wages. The McDonald’s intervention It reflects how great global corporations see in this imbalance not only an ethical and social problem, but also a competitive disadvantage, reviving a debate that touches the essence of US labor policy and its relationship with salary justice. Image | Crusier, Tomwsulcer, Ramon Fvelasquez In Xataka | Spain had always looked at the “optional tip” of 10% as an exotic custom of the US. Until now In Xataka | The Trojan horse that the US “expats” are introducing in Spain: the culture of the … Read more

If you think you are poorer than your environment, you are not alone. It is income perception bias and it is a problem

The human brain comes with a standard “bug”: assume as true what their eyes see. The problem is that What those eyes see And what really happens They do not always coincide. There the cognitive biases arise. A recent study jointly conducted by economists from the universities of Uppsala (Sweden), George Mason (USA) and University of Toronto, reveals that most people tend to believe that their economic situation is worse of what the data really shows. According to researchers, this perception not only affects personalbut also influences collective decisions and the way in which public policies for wealth and services are designed. The tendency to look poorer than you are Regardless of the income level, most people tends to be located in an immediately lower economic stratum to which it really belongs. The study data is based on a sample of more than 1,200 people with different income levels. The results show a common pattern in all of them: the perception of income is usually below reality. Each point shown in the upper graph represents the average perception of the different income percentiles, while the diagonal line represents when the perception of income coincides with reality. That is, those points that are below that diagonal indicate that Income perception is underestimated. It is striking that the vast majority of points are below that “real line” of perception of income, being the usual norm from the 50th percentile as they highlight in The salmon blogit is statistically impossible. Interestingly, in the lower percentilesthe majority perception is the opposite, a perception of income greater than the real one. I’m worse than my neighbor This phenomenon is explained, in large part, by social comparison. People do not have a clear vision of income distribution, so they evaluate their economic situation based on the closest environment, such as friends, family or co -workers. In urban areas, where there is a greater concentration of people with middle-income, It is easier to feel than one is below the averagealthough statistical data indicate otherwise. This distortion is amplified with the effect of social networks and media, which open windows to people with more accommodated living levels, which reinforces that underestimated perception of their own income. Income perception bias is so common that the OECD has created a toolIn which, answering a series of questions about how the user perceives their economic reality, the tool shows that deviation based on the data that the economic body annually collects in their economic reports. Nevertheless, A study Made in Germany, he discovered that being aware that this bias is suffered on income does not imply a change in his perception. Although the study provided precise information to participants about their true position on the global income scale, this correction did not have a significant effect on their support for policies that seek reduce global inequality. That is, even knowing that they are richer than they thought, their willingness to support global redistributive policies did not change relevantly. Consequences on public policies When the perception of income is distortedpublic policies can be designed on erroneous assumptions. If the majority of the population is considered part of the low sectionsthis could generate a Social and fiscal pressure Excessive about the richest, and implement redistributive measures that may not be aimed at people who really need it. As indicated A report of the Carolina Foundation, not taking into account the subjective perceptions of the distribution of income leads to economic and social policies less effective Already an inadequate allocation of resources. From the psychological point of view, this erroneous perception cause dissatisfaction generalized and distrust of institutions. Many people feel that they cannot progress, even if the data show that their position is better than they believe. In Xataka | The two Spain: 7% poorer since 2008 but the number of millionaires will be increased by 12% in the coming years In Xataka | “I am a millionaire and I do not know what to do with my life”: a millionaire is looking for ideas because money has not given him happiness Image | Pexels (Ahsanjaya, kaboomps.com)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.