Charlie Kirk’s murderer made him motivated by a memes labyrinthine subculture

The most media news of the week has been the murder of the star of American conservative thought Charlie Kirk, while participating in an act at Utah Valley University on September 10. Although Kirk’s strong and controversial political convictions led to think about a crime of political dyes, reality has ended up revealing himself as much more twisted. Undoubtedly, politics had an important role in the murder, but if we look out to the rabbit burrow of internare abdicates we will find a much more absurd and complicated reality of understanding. Who was. Charlie Kirk was an influential conservative political activist. Founded Turning Point uses at 18, an organization that mobilized thousands of students in defense of conservative ideals and the Maga Movement. Near Donald Trump, Kirk stood out as One of the main spokesmen of youth conservatism In the United States. Under his leadership, Tpusa expanded to more than 850 universities (the act in which he died was from the organization) and raised millions in donations. He was the author of several books on traditional politics and values, and his thought was controversial since under a seemingly reasoned defense of freedom of expression, he spread misinformation on issues such as The COVID-19 or the Climate change. He has also been accused of popularizing leisure positions to groups such as LGTBIQ+people, especially Trans peopleand the African American. Who shot him. Although the initial conjectures were oriented, with all logic, towards the idea that it could have been a leftist activist, the truth is that the detention by the FBI of Tyler Robinson, a man of 22 of Utah, has opened a box of thunder with much more subtle political nuances. Some of its characteristics enter a conservative profile, such as the fact that it was raised in an environment of defenders of firearms, and thus looked in A series of photos on the Facebook of Robinson’s motherwhich were eliminated. The most radical conservative media They have tried to poison public opinion Speaking of a shooter of leftist trends, but the FBI has declined to pronounce on the subject. The Groypers. Many had not heard of this Internet subculture until this moment, and it is not uncommon: it is a American extreme movementmainly integrated by cyberactivists and social media trolls, often very young. They are characterized by their white, conservative and anti-Semitic nationalist ideology, with openly homophobic, misogynistic and anti-LGBTQ positions. They emerged around influencer Nick Fuentes and use provocative tactics to radicalize the conservative discourse, confronting republican figures considered “soft” or not sufficiently radical, among which Kirk would find (this rivalry would be the Core of the “Groyper Wars” of 2019). The bullets. To understand to what extent the main weapon of the Groypers is the mistake, radicalization and chaos, you just have to Analyze recorded memes in the projectiles that Robinson used. The most striking is the phrase “Oh Bella Ciao Bella Ciao Bella Ciao Ciao Ciao”, chorus of the anthem of the Italian anti -fascist partisans of World War II ‘Bella Ciao’, which was used profusely in the Second Groyper Warswhich faced the group with Trump. “Hey Fascist, Catch” and a combination of buttons, is a game code ‘2‘Famous because it triggers a comically ex -devastic bomb, and the combination of buttons has also worked as an independent meme. “*Bulge*, Owo What’s This?“It is also a hate meme used to harass another internal subculture, the Furry community. The intention is so much to sow confusion and blame the Furries of crime such as the use of a meme that only makes sense in a sector very foreign to the mainstream cultural (online game). Finally, “If you read this you are gay Lmao” is also a usual insult in online competition games. A meme killed him. As the always successful Ryan Broderick and Adam Bumas claim In his Newsletter Garbage DayCharlie Kirk was killed by a meme. Or as with much more forcefulness the memes expert Aidan Walkerthe equivalent of a Shitpost In a forum (an internet publication created intentionally to be of low quality, absurd, incoherent, aggressive or ironic): this murder is made to be “incomprehensible and disruptive to the maximum.” It is a nihilist position because no policy will not be advocated, except to leave behind any type of red line (except when the shootings begin, of course: a sources visibly terrified in case the next bullet bears his name, apart from a meme of 2015, he has already said that Vamo to Calmarno). Famous snapshot. Gargabe Day leaves us two additional reflections, very important to understand the phenomenon thoroughly. First, it is not the first time that a murderer uses Internet culture to configure crimes of political dyes. The 2019 killing in a mosque in New Zealand was broadcast live and started with the criminal saying “Subscribe to Pewdiedie“. In 2022, a white nationalist started and broadcast a shooting In a greengrocer in Buffalo, and previously planned it without hiding in 4Chan and Discord. Luigi Mangionelast year, he killed the CEO of Unitedhealthcare with bullets where he read “Deny”, “Defend”, “Depose”also sentences with roots in the meme world. And second: the intention of all these murderers cannot be calibrated with a traditional knowledge about the desire for notoriety or the mental processes that take 4 channel to take a rifle. It is a new era of the homicidal motivations, and if Algó is highlighting this crime it is to what extent the media and traditional analysts lack tools to interpret reality. A reality that no longer dictates political parties, but murky and cryptic ideologies born in the abysses of the Shitposting. Image: Gage Skidmore In Xataka | Imgur was everything to house images on the Internet: now he faces his users in a memes war

Google has opened the door to its employees so that whoever is not motivated to go voluntarily: Zuckerberg rubs his hands

Google used to be the place where all software engineers They dreamed of working. However, in recent years that dream It has vanished. The company, known for its conciliatory culture, now surprises with a strategy that invites some workers to leave the company voluntarily To save costs in dismissal, according to an internal email published by The Verge. New voluntary output strategy. As you can read in the memorandum to which you have had access The VergeGoogle is offering a voluntary exit to the employees of its “Knowledge and Information” department (K & I, for its acronym in English), the area that includes those responsible for the search tool, engineering, marketing, research and communications. This document signed by Nick Fox, current responsible of the department, raises the possibility that, those who want to leave the company voluntarilythey can do it with economic incentives, in what is known as the “Voluntary Exit Program” (VEP), a pilot program of voluntary exits that Google put to the test in some departments after the dismissal of 12,000 employees in 2023. In Xataka Of engineers to keyboard operators: AI is converting software programming into a mounting chain Google is only for motivated. In Your statement, Nick Fox, it has been very clear: “If you are excited about your work, full of energy because of the opportunity that you present to you and you yield well, I really hope (really!) That you do not accept this. We have ambitious plans and much to do.” At the same time, Google offers “an exit path with support for those who do not feel aligned with our strategy, do not feel vitalized for their work, or are having difficulty fulfilling the expectations of their role within the company.” Said otherwise, The door has taught them. Welcome to the offices. Since 2022, Google has carried out different rounds of layoffs massive, and has progressively hardening the flexibility to telework through pressures in employee assessments. The filtered document does not let the occasion escape and also remember that employees living less than 80 kilometers from a work center must go to the office three days a week to the office, and encouraging to move closer to them to Those who live further. {“Videid”: “X919SE0”, “Autoplay”: False, “Title”: “The AI ​​and the future of our work Silvia Rivela | 100 years, 100 visions Ep.3”, “Tag”: “”, “Duration”: “2630”} Template reaction. The reaction of the workforce to the new “non-descent” policy It has not been waiting. When associated with a hardening of teleworking policy for that department, many see in it an undercover dismissal that seeks to save dismissal costs. The discomfort has been fed because, while the dismissals and founders were happening demanded 12 -hour daysPichai sundar The salary climbed And the company announced Milmillonarios benefits. Risk leakage risk. Google is running a very high risk that, when opening the door to their employees, the best qualified decide to take the floor and lose their best talent in this operation of Costs. The announcement, in addition, occurs in a delicate moment. Companies as a goal are willing to Offer millionaire figures To capture that talent, especially in areas such as artificial intelligence, so this movement could have unexpected consequences for the competitiveness of the company. In Xataka | A figure shows that the problem is not to find qualified talent, but knowing how to retain it: 24.1% labor rotation Image | Unspash (Adarsh ​​Chauhan) (Function () {Window._js_modules = Window._js_modules || {}; var headelement = document.getelegsbytagname (‘head’) (0); if (_js_modules.instagram) {var instagramscript = Document.Createlement (‘script’); }}) (); – The news Google has opened the door to its employees so that whoever is not motivated to go voluntarily: Zuckerberg rubs his hands It was originally posted in Xataka by Rubén Andrés .

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.