There is no “epidemic” of egomaniacs but of a misuse of psychology

Decades ago, the term narcissism rarely came out of a clinical manual or a psychiatric consultation. Today, you only have to open TikTok to find an army of self-proclaimed experts giving advice on how to identify a narcissist based on cues as vague as a “dead stare” while applying makeup, or warning about “passive aggressiveness.” We live in the age of couch diagnosis. “Lately ‘being narcissistic’ is one of the most used words on social networks and among conversations among friends,” Sandro Espinosa confirms us in an interview for Xatakapsychologist specialized in therapy focused on emotion and trauma. However, what we use today as a trendy insult to describe a “bad person” or a “selfish ex-boyfriend” is actually far from its original clinical meaning. According to Espinosa, in classical psychotherapy, the word narcissism does not refer to anything negative. per se. “It is understood as the value we assign to our own image”, a kind of self-concept that we develop throughout life. Virgil Zeigler-Hill, professor cited by New York Timesagrees: the term has become a “general label for a wide range of unpleasant or frustrating behaviors,” losing its scientific nuance. The era of the psychological “meme” The leap from the clinic to pop culture has come at a price. For Sandro Espinosa, the popularization of these terms has caused them to be distorted until they lose their psychological connotation, becoming “a meme or a moral label.” The phenomenon is tempting. As the psychologist explains, we use the label “narcissistic” to define “someone who has hurt me and did not know how to love me.” This offers immediate relief to the alleged victim. Sara Pallarés, psychologist at the Enric Corbera Institute cited by The Vanguardwarns that “it seems to be fashionable” to put this type of labels. “Everyone has a narcissistic partner, a narcissistic father… They all use it to justify their current traumas,” says Pallarés, warning that this position often hides a lack of courage to resolve one’s own issues. The danger of this mass self-diagnosis is twofold. On the one hand, Espinosa warns about “false positives”: believing that someone has a disorder based on a 60-second video. On the other hand, statistical reality is stubborn: Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is rare. According to data collected by Mayo Clinic, It is estimated to affect only 1% to 2% of the adult population. However, on social media, it seems like we are surrounded. So why are we so obsessed with labeling the other as a sick monster? The answer, according to experts, has more to do with us than with them. “Seeing the world in black and white will always offer us relief and a feeling of control,” explains Sandro Espinosa. By labeling the other as a narcissist, we turn a complex relationship into “a simple story of a villain and a victim.” This simplification has a very powerful psychological function: the total moral innocence. Espinosa details that, if the other is “sick” or a “monster”, then “I don’t have to review my relational dynamics.” It cleanses me of guilt and turns the other into an aggressor, allowing me to “continue in the world without the need to engage in healthy self-criticism.” Psychologist Sara Pallarés poses an uncomfortable question to those who take refuge in this label: “Hey, what do you have to do with this? What responsibility do you have?” According to Pallarés, by blaming exclusively the narcissistic profile, the person loses the opportunity to heal and understand why they ended up in that situation. Furthermore, there is a phenomenon of mass identification. Espinosa alludes to Forer effect (the same principle that makes us believe in horoscopes): Any vague, emotionally charged description of being a “victim of a narcissist” appeals to us because it offers us a narrative in which we are morally innocent and deserving of care. Being an “asshole” is not the same as having a disorder. It is crucial to distinguish between a bad character and a pathology. Sandro Espinosa offers a key to differentiate them: intensity, frequency and duration. “We can all sometimes be selfish, cruel, immature and we don’t have a disorder,” he clarifies. The psychologist uses a visual metaphor to describe the true structure of narcissistic disorder: imagine a glass sculpture. From the outside, the image is seen as grandiloquent, arrogant and charismatic. But “within that figure, at the core of it, we would see a child who is covering his eyes or ears with his hands, who is ashamed, who feels humiliated.” Grandiosity is just a compensatory mask to cover up unbearable pain. In the report of New York Times They break down that not all narcissists They are the same. There are subtypes such as grandiose narcissist (safe, status seeking), the vulnerable narcissist (hypersensitive, anxious, defensive) and antagonist (competitive and hostile). However, a key point is empathy. While in networks it is said that they lack it, mention is made of the concept of “Splenda-type empathy”: an artificial or instrumental empathy. Espinosa agrees and clarifies that, in consultation, it must be distinguished whether the person really feels the pain of the other or if they use empathy instrumentally, “at the service of their need to be desired.” Furthermore, in Thought Catalog mention specific tactics such as “jealousy induction”, where these profiles deliberately provoke jealousy to gain power and control over the partner. Espinosa adds that, in fact, people with this disorder tend to be “very envious” and that this envy is born from a “defensive rage.” Far from demonization, experts advocate humanizing the spectrum. “Narcissism is always a dimension. We all have narcissistic traits,” Espinosa recalls. We all sometimes need to be looked at and recognized. Even those with the diagnosis suffer. In a report by Eldiario.es They collect testimonies from people diagnosed who describe the illness as living in an illusory world to protect oneself from feeling “the worst.” The stigma is such that many hide their diagnosis for fear of being seen as abusers, when they are often vulnerable … Read more

The misuse of agricultural machinery is behind a surprising number of events

We are in full heat wave and extreme precautions. Reminders we do not lack and one of the last ones has given the Agrarian Association Young Farmers (ASAJA), for a good reason: the danger that these days supposes The misuse of agricultural machinery. 131 fires. The use of machinery and engines, especially in the agricultural context, has been triggered 131 forest fires in Castilla y León so far this year. Are ASAJA datathat cite a letter from the General Director of Natural Heritage and Forest Politics, José Ángel Arranz, in which the increase in forest fires of agricultural origin was alerted. This implies, Asaja points out, an increase of 37.9% compared to the average of the last five years: 95 fires. In a statement, Asaja details that these fires would have burned 750.57 agricultural hectares and 52.53 hectares of forest soil. The Administration indicated that 17 causes of fire by harvesting had been identified, but that the investigation continues in other cases. One third. According to data of the Ministry of Environment, Housing and Planning of the Territory of the Board of Castilla y León, this year (on July 30, the latest data we have) have occurred in the Autonomous Community 391 fires, most of them, 313, conatos (fires in which the burned surface is of a hectare or less). This implies that around a third of the fires produced in the Castilian-Leon territory would have their origin in this type of machinery. The 17 fires caused by harvesting would represent more than 4% of the total. A double risk. This type of fire has a double impact on the agricultural sector. First, when producing in agricultural farms, these fires disproportionately affect the field, putting at risk not only harvests and facilities, but also the workers themselves. In second place, Asaja remembers that to the risk of fires must add the sanctions, which can take different, administrative or criminal. The fact that the event is accidental and even complying with the regulations does not exempt from civil liability derived from the fire caused. The last alert of the Board. In this context, the Junta de Castilla y León has made a special appeal To the citizens to extreme caution. It also published a resolution of the General Directorate of Natural Heritage and Forest Politics in which certain actions are prohibited. Among them “the use of machinery that, in its usual functioning, dismisses sparks or electrical discharges such as torch, welders and radials, both in the mountain and in a strip of 400 meters of the terrain that surrounds it.” The resolution also prohibits lighting fire in open spaces in the mountain, as well as in recreational and camping areas, “even in areas enabled for it”; also the use of barbecues located in open spaces of the mount or nearby areas; and suspend events such as fireworks, other elements of pyrotechnics, and in general, the use of fire in activities. In Xataka | Turning Portugal into eucalyptus monoculture was a disaster. And the last fires do nothing but remind us Image | Asaja Castilla y León

The misuse of AI has made them a guirigay

With the ‘Abalos Case’ we are attending one of the most relevant corruption cases of recent years, but in the Supreme Court there has been a rocambolesque situation. The transcripts of the statements of Judge Leopoldo Puente or the former Minister José Luis Ábalos, among others, have become a division of the statement in a gallimatisms. Incomprehensible statements. He Diari de Tarragona or the Diario de Navarra They have had access to documents with the transcripts of the statements of those involved in the ‘Abalos Case’. These transcripts seem to demonstrate an “uncontrolled and without supervision” use, they say in the Diario de Navarra, the AI ​​tools to transcribe these texts. The lawyer of the Supreme Administration of Justice has sent those written copies, but in them there are incomprehensible paragraphs. Terrible transcripts. These documents show several examples of disastrous transcripts. When answering Ábalos about his alleged presence in flats related to prostitution, it seems to say “it really is that in Madrid not from Madrid.” In another question of the judge, he answers according to the transcription “I do not remember right now, because on that date he already has but regardless of this you do not remember that it is compressible that he cannot remember the dates.” To the question about the illicit use of a villa in the line of conception, the transcription indicates that the answer was “occasionally because a time of the time that we were not, but it was caused, it was fixed if that 2 with that I have completed my income did not have any other income.” AI or correctly identifies witnesses. This disaster extends to the identification of the witnesses. In the Diario de Navarras they comment on what happened with Claudio Rivas, “Víctor de Aldama’s greatest partner in the Macrofude de los Hydrocarbos.” The transcripts documents show that the AI ​​called this witness “Claudia Arribas”, “Claudia up” or “Claudio Arribas”. Also in one of his answers about his activity is equally absurd according to the transcription of AI: “A group of companies that is dedicated to the hydrocarbons of hydrocarbons, for the sale of hydrocarbons.” But the remedy that the disease. As indicated in the Diari de Tarragona, it was decided to use AI for transcripts when to avoid leaks, access to the original videos of those interrogations was limited. The misuse of AI has caused the only way in which parties can now analyze the statements is to request the court to vision of those original recordings. Misuse of AI. Here we have a worrying example of what can happen to a misuse of AI in official organizations. The problem is not known, and the AI ​​system may not be thought for transcripts in Spanish, for example, but what is clear is that no one reviewed the transcription made by AI, something that must be an essential part of the management of these systems. The propensity of the chatbots to invent data and hallucinar is already known, and here those limitations were clear. It cannot be left alone. A El País article From November it reminds us how these types of situations are common when using translation tools that often apply literal translations that make no sense. It happened with the embarrassous translation of the Official Tourism Website of Santander, which in 2018 translated the name of the Botín Center as “Loot Center” (center of the looting “or the historic center as” Historic Helmet “(Helmet It is a helmet in English, but referring to the protective helmet of the motorists, for example). Be careful with whisper and transcripts by AI. Researchers at the University of Michigan They analyzed Whisper transcriptsa popular and remarkable OpenAI application for audio transcripts. Hallucinations (errors and invented phrases) were detected between 38% and 80% of the cases analyzed. As they point out in the country, already an OpenAI spokesman recognized the limitations and stressed that “the tool should not be used in high -risk environments.” CLATIGPT CLAKES. A few months ago we attended another unique case of a misuse of AI. A lawyer He filed a complaintbut to save time and resources he turned to the use of chatgpt for his initial brief. The problem is that AI had included erroneous references to Colombian legislation instead of applicable Spanish regulations. The lawyer realized the error and quickly presented a letter assuming responsibility and excusing himself for that improper use. The Superior Court of Justice of Navarra decided not to impose a sanctionbut again that risk of using these tools in inappropriate forms and without reviewing the texts or content they generate was evident. Spain has Aesia precisely for this. Last year we talked about the Spanish Artificial Intelligence Supervision Agency (Aesia). This agency has precisely as a mission to investigate and fine those who misuse AI from 2025. Research began theoretically on February 2, and on August 2 this agency will assume full sanctioning power. We will see if they take letters in this misuse of AI in the ‘case Ábalos’, but of course it would be a clear example of a inappropriate and even dangerous use of AI. Image | Ministry of Transport In Xataka | The companies of AI have been jumping the copyright for years. They have just suffered a disturbing legal defeat

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.