School digitalization was full of mistakes, the same ones we are committing when undoing it

Madrid has decided to turn off the screens. And, as we have learned, the community of the community prepare a decree to prohibit Individual use in computer, tablets or mobile class more than half a million students from around 2,000 community and primary education centers of the community. That is, the intention of the Community of Madrid is to expand the veto to the smartphones that are in force to all digital devices. “Back to essence.” Those have been the words of Miguel Ángel García Martínregional government spokesman: “What is limited is individual use, it is not allowed in the classrooms of the Community of Madrid (…) We intend to return to the essence of books, notebooks, dictates, the care of spelling, calligraphy, and all that will be compatible with which Madrid students have those digital skills so necessary.” “There are many countries that once gave the way of introducing digital devices, and are reversing what we could call the essence of traditional education, adapted, yes, to today’s time,” explained (although without giving more details of how training will be articulated in the different digital competences that marks the curriculum). One step further. It is true that the decision of the Community of Madrid, at least apparently, is a step beyond The recommendations approved by the State School Board A year ago (and focused on the use of mobiles). And, indeed, it is something that connects with the general opinion state that has promoted prohibitions of digital devices in dozens of countries and regions around the world. However, that does not mean that everyone is in favor. While there is no lack of stands in favor of the measure (“the digitalization of the classrooms has been a carafal error that we will be recovering years”), neither are concerted schools lack rejecting the idea and calling her from ‘radical’. Changes! Changes? If we look at the content of the decisions it is impossible to deny that, indeed, the decision of the Community of Madrid is a change for many schools. However, if we look at more structural issues we will see more continuities than innovations. Above all, in something that Catherine L’Ecyer said in the worldthat we legislate following fashions and opinion states. It is true that it was not prudent when it comes to demanding solid evidence before implementing the use of tablets in the classroom. As true as we are now withdrawing them without having a strongly founded action plan. A scientific debate that does not end. For each report like that of the National Institute of Public Health of Quebec (“The results from recent scientific data suggest that digital devices in the classroom, used for personal or educational purposes, in the best case do not bet any benefit to learning and in the worst case they have a negative effect”) we find one as This Swedish research (“Mobile prohibitions have no impact on” school “performance). In this context, and beyond the concrete debate, it must be remembered that the true consensus is that The measures that really improve The academic performance and emotional well -being of students are others. The screens are still cosmetic measures, “while those that They could contribute To improve the mental health of our teenagers continue in some drawer. “ How to face the future. One of the historical complaints of the educational system is that the legislation does not stop giving bands: it is not only that the new laws arrive with problems, but does not give time to evaluate its effects before the next government changed them again. It happened with pedagogical approaches, With bilingualism. And is happening with the problem of digitalization of classrooms. For this reason, what begins to be unplayable is to look for ways to introduce changes guided by available evidence. Image | 야스민 ㄹㅁㅅ | Kelly Sikkema In Xataka | There are parents against prohibiting the use of mobile in schools. And science is right

Spanish: 7 of the most common mistakes we commit when it comes to speaking and writing

Image source, Daniel Arce/BBC Mundo Article information Author, Drafting Author’s title, There is festivalcartagena@bbcmundo January 27, 2025 If you receive such a message you can have several things for insurance, such as who writes it has confidence with you and belongs to the millennial generation. The phrase, which was originally part of a meme with a funny flame with chuecos eyes, is possibly the first with obvious errors that went viral. And it is more or less clear that, who writes it, knows that there are several spelling fouls – “Hello, what are you doing?” It would be the right phrase. But there are other grammatical errors that are also viral, only that they have sneaked in our day to day without being part of a meme. We talk to Mónica Helguera, better known in networks such as “La Profe Mónica”, a graduate in Castilian language and who is dedicated to the creation of educational content today With her we saw some of the most common mistakes we committed in Spanish, both when writing and speaking. 1. The verb to have If we could make a ranking of beaten and vilified verbs by the Spanish speakers, the verb would have won the first prize. It is one of the most used and, perhaps that is why, with which greater mistakes are made. “This verb has a very complex situation. It can function as the main and as an auxiliary and, at the same time, it can even accompany two verbs at the same time.” This, without a doubt, can generate a lot of confusion. In the first place, having, as auxiliary verb, is used to form compound times. To do this, all the simple ways of having are combined with the participle finished in -or of the verb that is being combined: he has bought, we wanted, he had come. Here comes one of the first errors, which is to use the form we have, archaic, to form the first person of the plural. ❌ We have seen your brother. ✅ We have seen your brother. Image source, Daniel Arce/BBC Mundo Its other use, as the main verb is, at the same time, impersonal. That is, it is a verb that is generally used in the third person of singular and, in this case, denotes the presence or existence of something, as in the phrase “there is bread.” In this case, errors are trying to make a concordance between the verb and the subject that has no place. “It is complex to think that a verb cannot pluralize, being that accompanies a plural subject, but in this case, it is a mistake,” says Helguera. ❌ There were several girls. ✅ There were several girls. Recently another meme became viral and, in some cases, the verb has appeared with this error: ❌ When I am a millionaire, I will say nothing, but there will be signs. ✅ When I am a millionaire, I will say nothing, but there will be signs. With the impersonal use of the verb having in the present there are also errors in the way of writing it. They have seen “ay”, “hai” or “there” where “there are”. A classic phrase that is usually taught to differentiate how it sounds about how it is written is as follows: There is a man who says Oh! There – adverb of place. There are – the impersonal form of the verb to have present. Oh! – Interjection to express many and different spirits, from pain to joy. The fourth of errors with this verb is perhaps the most curious and quite repeated and is born by confusion in pronunciation. Let’s see. In this case, the auxiliary verb is confused in infinitive, having, with the sequence constituted by the preposition and the verbal infinitive see. 2. Homófonas words What are homophones? Well, they are pronounced the same, but they are written differently. And here are great confusion that lead to errors, for example: The confusion between AS/has/beam .. and yes, here we have an example that includes the verb having. Have you looked for that AS of football? Look for it. Do what I tell you. Has – form corresponding to the second person of the singular of the present of indicative of the verb to have. AS – One of the cards of the deck or a person who stands out remarkably. Do – imperative form corresponding to the pronoun you of the verb make. “Especially in the difference between you and do, I always try to explain it in the simplest way for people to understand. And I usually do it by asking people to look at the participle. If there is a word that follows that ‘you have ‘or’ do ‘and it is observed that it ends in ado, gone, to, so and cho (as in erased, eaten, broken, printed and said), it will tell me that the previous word is (you have slept, you eaten , you have broken, you have printed, you said), “says Mónica Helguera. Another way to distinguish between you and do is see that the latter indicates an order. Other words that usually confuse because they sound the same are going, berry and fence. Go to the fence to collect berries. Go – third person of the imperative of the verb go. Valla – Cercado or Wall. Bayas – a type of fruit. Image source, Daniel Arce/BBC Mundo Another example of homophones are there, be there, find and aya. Find this detail: there, next to the tree, which is a beech, there are children with their aya. Find – Second person of the singular of the present of the verb find, which means finding. There – demonstrative adverb that place. Hay – a type of tree. Aya – person in charge of caring for children. Another problem with the homophones are those that go with V with B, both sounds that less and less Spanish -speaking people distinguish themselves by pronouncing … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.