The Divisumma calculator was the mechanical jewel of Olivetti. Now is an icon of retrofuturist design

Before making a mathematical operation as easy as Ask for a voice assistant either type it in chatgpT, the calculators They were an essential tool on any desk. Long before Light and dear Casiothere were others that seemed authentic desktop computers: huge, heavy, and mechanically amazing. The most iconic were the Olivetti, jewels of engineering that combined technical precision with an industrial design Retroputurist that resists dying. And among them, a name shone: Divisumma 26 GT. The divisumma. Mechanical calculators exist since the 18th century in the 18th First calculator capable of multiplyingand it was in the XX when the revolution arrived. At the beginning of the century the keyboards were simplified, they became somewhat more compact, easy to use and the electric models appeared. That’s where Olivetti began to stand out. Its first electrical model, Divisumma 14 of 1948, was baptized like this because it could do the four basic mathematical operations and not only had a characteristic design, but surprising mechanics. Twelve years later the Divisumma 24 arrived, and this was a revolution. Although the keyboard was still very simple and easy to use, it had a double totalizing system that allowed to change between two calculations without losing operations. In addition, he had memory for multiplication and mechanically began to complicate the thing. Seeing one of these machines without industrial cutting is a show: 26 GT, the culmination of mechanics. Since model 24, launched in 1956, the Italian company was launching other mechanical calculators focused on various users, but the true generational relief, and the culmination of electromechanical calculation, was the divisumma 26 GT of 1967. Apart from the basic operations, it had the ability to make calculations with powers and had a totalizer in this case, but with two memories. This allowed the machine to store intermediate values ​​to chain calculations. It was fed by an electric motor that consumed 50 W and that storage of values ​​was not done in a chip or a memory like the ones we currently have: but based on mechanical parts. It was that characteristic that allowed the 26 GT to overcome the previous models due to that most marked automation. Its weight of between 17 and 20 kilos (depending on the housing) for a 28 x 25 x 50 cm machine, evidence that the interior was an authentic metal jungle and a delight for sight. It was not the most advanced in the brand, since that same 1967 came the Logos 27-2but the reliability and maintenance problems of this put more value the work done by Teresio Gassino and Natale Capellaro In the mechanical part of the 26 GT. The divisumma 26 GT with the exhibition housing Fashion calculator. Inside, the Divisumma were a real virguería, but on the outside it was not far behind. Like Braun, he is remembered, among other reasons, for iconic Dieter Rams designsa very important part of Olivetti was Austrian designer and architect Ettore Sottsass. He began collaborating with the Italian company in 1958 and remained as a design consultant for 30 years. At that time he gave birth not only the Elea 9003 of 1959 (one of the first electronic computers in Italy), but the Olivetti Valentine of 1969 that was a symbol of Italian industrial design and some of the electric calculators of the house, “wearing” those good mechanical characteristics with housings that innovated in aesthetics. The Divisumma 26 GT also had bodies of Sottsass, being one of them translucent to be able to appreciate mechanics and exceeding the passage of time. They are one of those elements that, such as Braun’s polishing, could launch at any time saying that they are retrofuturists and would not disregard at all. He had the foundations of the Divisumma 24, but added those distinctive orange colors and more straight lines so that it would not go out of style. Divisumma 18, whose compact design is exhibited at MoMA next to Divisumma 14 Electronics arrived. But we are in 1969 and progress tightened. Since the beginning of the decade, the electronic calculators had begun to appear the leg, but they were huge (the Anita MK VII with vacuum tubes and cathode tubes of 1961, for example) and impossible to use away from the desk. They evolved with the Sharp CS-10A From 1964 that already used transistors, but at the same time that Divisumma 26 GT arrived the real revolution. Sharp launched its QT-8ba very compact battery calculator. Canon did the same with the Pocketronic that already pointed ways from the name and MK6010 Texas Instrumental had everything integrated into a chip, being smaller, cheap and energy efficient. All were on the electronics ship, so the old electric calculators had to think about retiring. That does not break… Today, with that wave of nostalgia, we see users in places like Reddit who continue to love their ancient electric calculators Olivetti. They will use them or not, but there are those who affirm that, with basic maintenance, they continue to function as the first day. Its sound is still very representative, the design has not gone out of style and are even a very interesting decoration piece on a surface. Now, seeing these veteran calculating I can only think about my CRT televisions to play old consoles. Not because of nostalgia -I do not have nostalgia for a calculator other than the casio that we have all had -but because, at the time they break, we will surely not find anyone who can repair them. It will be that day when these pieces are only as a museum meat, but although the mechanics fail, that Retrofuturist design It will survive. Images | Museo della Scienza e della technology “Leonardo da Vinci” (2), Museum, Hgrobe In Xataka | Transcribe at full speed with a keyboard of only 21 keys: the office of stenotipist, according to someone who has been in it for 35 years

The mechanical keyboards I had tried did not convince me. Until I found the ideal model for me

For years I have felt special predilection for low profile keyboards that are common in laptops and that for some time they are also available as peripherals for desktop PCs. I feel especially comfortable writing with them, and I like their silent behavior as much as the fact that I do not need keyboards with large tours. Membrane technology is in my opinion perfectly valid for many users, but the bug of working daily with a Mechanical keyboard. Although I tried models in the past and I came to buy some years ago – the Xiaomi Gaming Keyboard – it seemed quite noisy and I did not get used to the touch and route of the keys. That has made a vetusto used for years Logitech K800 which is wireless but whose rechargeable battery no longer left much maneuver. I ended up changing the rechargeable AA batteries, but the truth is that even with that change it seemed to recover its ancient luster. That made Christmas to consider other options. I raised a logitech mx keys s, but I didn’t have just convinced the format, and I thought it was perhaps the time for try a mechanical keyboard. One that will adjust to my preferences. And specifically, two. The first, that was low, or at least relatively low profile. The second, to use also relatively silent switches. In recent times, several models had appeared with these two characteristics, but I noticed especially in two. NUPhy Air 96 The first the NUPhy Air 96which seemed especially striking for its design and had very good reviews in forums such as Reddit’s. The second, the Keychron K5 Maxwhich was also highly recommended by users and had a more traditional design. In both cases I was looking for a keyboard that included the mechanical keyboard, something that I do not use too often but that I am used to having. However, the NUPhy has a problem: its keyboards are available with an ANSI keyboard maps, very common in the US, but not with ISO keyboard mapsmore common in Europe (Enter -shaped key of l inverted, or, for example, Eñe key in its Spanish version). Keychron K5 Max I would not have had special problems when working with an ANSI keyboard – you can always mapping Spanish without problems – but I preferred, having both options, not having to “think” about it and ended up deciding for the Keychron model. Once arrived, the truth is that at first I felt something strange. Despite being a low profile keyboard, the height and route of the keys remains higher than the keyboards such as the K800 to which it was accustomed. But of course what caught my attention was that touch and sound of the keys when they were pressed. Unlike other mechanical keyboards that I had tried, the sound of Keychron K5 Max is in my opinion totally bearable. Moreover: I would say that it is elegant and almost addictiveAlthough that I think it ends up being the feeling for many other users of these keyboards: that sound and touch make it really seem to be desired to write more. It is a curious sensation. The arrangement of the keys is something different from that of my old Logitech K800, especially in regard to the function keys, but the keychron has important advantages. It has PC mode (Windows) and Mac to automatically “map” the special PC keys (such as the Windows key) or those of Mac (Option and Command). More interesting is still the switch that allows you to connect to three different devices: I can use it with direct USB-C cable, with Bluetooth connection or with the RF adapter that is included in the form of a small USB-A small pendrive similar to the receptor of my logitech K800 . Although I started using the Bluetooth connection with the Mac, I have preferred to finish connecting it with cable to reduce latency and possible conflicts and interference in the Bluetooth connection. Another of the always striking elements of these keyboards is that of the backlighting options. Here the effects are numerous and almost more typical of a gaming keyboard. It is easy to activate and deactivate back+tab back+tab and change from one effect with the fn+q keys combination. It is curious that to configure the keyboard we do not even have to install an extra utility: it is enough to access A KEYCHRON WEB SERVICE To “connect” our keyboard and from there access to various options such as configuring the key map, background light or macros. It is also possible Update the firmware of the keyboard, although the manufacturer recommends not modifying it except that we have a problem we have installed with. The truth is that after a month using it, the Keychron K5 Max has become a great co -worker. As I say, their touch and sound have already ended up part of my routine and Now I better understand that attraction that usually cause mechanical keyboards among their users. I still believe that membrane keyboards are a good option, comfortable and quieter, for many people, but it is evident that mechanical keyboards have something special, and now the thing has been encouraged even more with the appearance and appearance and appearance and Popularity of the ‘Hall Effect’ keyboards. I am very happy with my Keychron keyboard. Keychron K5 Max Ultrafine Wireless Mechanical Keyboard, QMK/Via programmable, 3 Bluetooth modes/2.4 GHz/Cable with RGB LED, Low Profile Gateron Red Switch Hot-Swap, PBT Keys * Some price may have changed from the last review In Xataka | “Hello, computer”: the future that paints the AI ​​of Anthropic is now the same one that Star Trek raised in 1986

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.