Sam Altman and Elon Musk hate each other publicly, so Altman has attacked where it hurts most: Neuralink

Openai was totally focused on his mission of achieving an AGI, but now he doesn’t want to just. As indicated In Financial Timesthe firm is preparing to invest in Merge Labs, a startup that develops brain implants and that competes directly with Neuralink. Or what is the same: Altman has declared war on Musk. Again. A new startup against Neuralink. According to this economic newspaper, Altman and OpenAi will be the main valuables of this project, which will raise an investment round that will make Merge Labs have an assessment of 850 million dollars … without having a product in sight for the moment. Alex Bania will be involved in the project, which Direct the Startup World with which Altman has the ambition to scan the Iris to billions of people. The OpenAi CEO, yes, will not be responsible for the new startup and will remain focused on leading your AI company. Altman already showed interest in brain implants. This entrepreneur has already wrote A long article in his blog in 2017 in which he speculated on a possible “fusion” between man and machine in 2025. New advances made the theme resume Another entrance This year he pointed out that we could soon have “large bandwidth interfaces between the brain and the computer.” Merge Labs hopes to lift 250 million dollars, although at the moment the negotiations are just starting. Neuralink will have more competition. Although there were already companies working in this areaNeuralink – who Musk founded in 2016 – has gone winning notoriety. This year the company lifted $ 650 million and has an assessment of 9,000 million dollars. If the creation of Merge Labs is confirmed, a new battlefield between Musk and Altman will open. As if they didn’t have enough. Dialectical battle. In 2015 Musk and Altman, co -founders of OpenAi, were nail and meat. Both believed that AI had an extraordinary future, and united strength to make that future reality. Then the thing was twistedand since then They walk to cakes dialectics We have just lived the last of those fights, and the thing is already adopting a terrible tragicomic tone. But also yesterday Musk complained in x that there was a kind of business conspiracy that prevented Apps like Grok from reaching number one in the App Store. “Apple is the entrance door to the Internet for half America (USA). And when promoting OpenAi in all possible ways they are impossible for any other AI company to succeed.” It isn’t true. Like many other Musk statements, this era was false. They soon appeared Community notes in that post in which it was indicated that other apps of AI such as Perplexity or Deepseek had managed to reach number one in the App Store in some markets. But the thing began to be encouraged from that moment. Sam Altman enters the scene. OpenAi’s CEO wanted to replicate to Musk and answered his tweet indicating That “this is a surprising statement, taking into account what I have heard about what Elon does to manipulate X for their own benefit and their companies, and to the detriment of their competitors and the people who do not like.” Analysts such as Casey Newton analyzed the problem in the past and concluded that, indeed, Musk used a system in which His messages always had preference About the rest of the users. The fight returns. That message caused Musk’s rapid response, which He told Altman “You have achieved three million views of your shit post, liar, many more than I have received in many of mine, even though I have 50 times more users than you.” That was at that time: right now Altman’s post has 12.8 million visits. Musk, yes, had its point: if I control the platform, it could have minimized the impact of Altman’s message. Musk, confesses. In turn, the Openai CEO pointed out that many of Musk’s followers were actually Bots. And then proposed Something: “Will you sign a affidavit that you have never ordered changes to algorithm X in a way that has harmed your competitors or helped your own companies? I will apologize if so.” Grok betrays his musk. The tycoon did not answer directly, but that’s when an X user intervened, who He directly asked GrokX chatbot, what thought about the argument. And the funny thing is that Grok He put on Altman’s side: “According to verified tests, Sam Altman is right. Musk’s antitrust demand against Apple is undermined by applications such as Deepseek and Perplexity, which arrived (number one of the App Store) in 2025. On the contrary, Musk has a history of forcing changes in algorithm X to boost their publications and favor their interests, according to reports of 2023 and ongoing investigations. hypocrisy “. And chatgpt betray Altman. Shortly after, the Chatgpt app one shared Grok’s tweet and wrote: “Good bot”, but that is where Elon Musk intervened again, who shared a capture of a conversation with GPT-5 Pro. In it he asked the OpenAi chatbot who deserved more confidence, if Sam Altman or Elon Musk. After thinking a minute and 16 seconds, The answer was: “Elon Musk”. As A user said When you quote that musk tweet, these chatbots are not determinists, and if one repeatedly asks the same thing, both Elon Musk and Sam Altman could have answered. The problem is the media. In fact Musk defended his model again presuming that he had betrayed him because he was a “entire” chatbot, and also tried to explain why his chatbot had “betrayed him.” According to him“The fact that Grok is allowed to make false defamatory statements about me and not block them or eliminate them (what would be easy to do, do) speaks of the integrity of this platform. As you mention, Grok gives too much credibility to traditional media! This is a serious problem and we are working to solve it.” It is best not to believe anyone too much. This dialectical battle, the nth between … Read more

Spain has tired of Ryanair’s practices. And the airline is going to hit where it hurts the most: the provinces airports

“Before a clown uploads prices.” The communications escalation between the government and Ryanair has reached its peak. Or we imagine. Because we can imagine that it will be complicated to exceed the promotional campaign launched by the airline to sell tickets for less than 20 euros. Michael O’Leary, Ceo de Ryanair, has recorded a video To show his disagreement with the fine imposed by Spain, receiving an extra when carrying a hand suitcase in the cabin of the plane. All more or less normal if it were not because next to O’Leary there is a photograph of Pablo Bustinduy, Minister of Consumer, caricatured like a clown. The promotion of new low -price tickets has continued with an advertisement on its own website in which they encourage purchase and use the image of Bustinduy, again a clown dress, as the main cause of an alleged future rise in prices of the tickets. “It is not my style to participate in the eccentricities of a foreign millionaire,” said Bustinduy in what is the most media controversy but after which, without a doubt, a much greater problem is hidden that threatens the smallest and flows airports of passengers. A threat that empties airports To understand the whole Crossing statements between government and Ryanair You have to leave a few months ago. On November 29, a fine from Spain was confirmed to Ryanair, Vueling, Easyjet, Norwegian and Volotea with a sum of 179 million euros. Of that amount, 107,775,777 euros fell to the Irish company. The economic punishment came after the government understood that the collection for hand luggage and charging for selecting a seat with dependent people was an abusive practice. The complaint had been filed by Facua And in summer the General Secretariat of Consumption and Game has already proposed a sanction of 150 million euros. Then a period of claims was opened so that the airlines could defend themselves. All resources were dismissed and the government ended up raising the amount referring to that The practices had continued And, therefore, the illicit benefits had continued to grow. This reached the sanction of more than 100 million euros for Ryanair and the sum of 179 million euros for the total of sanctioned companies. The government’s decision was based on a resolution of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 2014 that has decided to apply the modified standard in 2022. That year, the Ministry of Consumer, then led by Alberto Garzón, modified the consumer law to be able to sanction the big companies incurred in fraud. Ryanair, obviously, It is disagreement of the application of the norm. Europe has called to declare Spain. Now, the government will have to give explanations in front of the EU Pilota mediating referee designed to resolve conflicts between the European Commission and the Member States. Which They allege from Ryanair It is that it is true that the European Union forces to guarantee a transport of luggage free of charge to the plane ticket but that regulation does not establish measures and that, as there is no “standard” cabin suitcase, so they charge for transferring this luggage It doesn’t fit everything on the plane. Goodbye Jerez and Valladolid While all this happens, Ryanair has acted with other pressure measures. Alleging that Aena rates They are too high and that they will rise in the future, the Irish company has already announced that He will leave for the airports of Jerez and Valladolid. In addition, it will reduce its activity by 61%in Vigo, Santiago de Compostela (-28%), Zaragoza (-20%), Asturias (-11%) and Santander (-5%). In total, the volume of travel it provides in these airports will be reduced by 18%, eliminating 800,000 seats in the total sum of the 12 affected routes. These rates, which are used to guarantee the basic services of airports, from cleaning and safety to the transfer to the plane itself, have a cost of 10.35 euros per middle passenger and They are “of the lowest in Europe”they point out from Aena. In 2021 this rate froze until 2026 but last year they rose 4.9%. In 2025, CNMC frozen prices again. Ryanair has used advertising contracts for municipalities and autonomous communities in exchange for keeping routes in the lowest traffic airports The pressure measure that Ryanair has exercised is to point to less busy airports but where his presence is essential to keep them alive. The company knows that Spain is a holiday destination in the mind of any European but also has in its hand to leave abandoned, or almost, cities with airports of less entity. For example, In Valladolid there are 15 flights counted In the next two weeks, seven of them are from Ryanair. His march endangers the use of a dozen workers. What the company offers on many of these flights from smaller cities are journeys abroad. In Santander Just a few flights are those that do not have Madrid or Barcelona. One of them is managed by Binter, to the Canary Islands, but the others (London, Dublin, Rome or Valencia) Ryanair lends them all. His departure leaves with hardly any possibilities of flying to the Cantabrians to other places that are not Madrid or Barcelona. From the government they defend themselves by ensuring that the operational rates in these destinations are very low and that they barely reach two euros per average passenger. In eldiario.es They explain well that the companies that operate in these spaces have used the money of the municipalities and the autonomous community to, without delivering direct aid, guarantee that the airport (born of the bubble before 2008) continues to function with strategies such as projecting local advertising in airlines airplanes. To give an example, in the digital medium they explain that last summer The Cantabria government delivered 18 million euros in public promotion to Ryanair. That same mechanism has been used by the company for years to serve new air spaces. At the moment, more than 60% of the travel … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.