disassemble three tesla model and

“It’s a great vehicle.” And that is why, Xiaomi has not had objections to take a Tesla Model and to disassemble it and be clear about what they could do so that their first electric SUV was as good or better as that of Elon Musk’s company. The words are from Lei Jun. The confirmation of that “disassembly” too. “Exceptional”. “The Model and is a very, very exceptional car” although according to the CEO of Xiaomi, front in interior space against its Xiaomi Yu7. That is what Lei Jun, CEO of the company, said in a public intervention of which they echoed in Business Insider. In it, Lei Jun did not hesitate to comply with the vehicle of the American company to, later, point out what his weak points were in front of Xiaomi’s car. Of course, according to him, Xiaomi’s option is broader, has greater autonomy and, above all, a very difficult value for ignorance. As they point out in Xiaomi worldthe CEO said that if you did not contemplate the Xiaomi Yu7 as your next purchase, the Tesla Model and is the best alternative. Three units. They are the ones Lei Jun has confirmed that bought from Tesla Model and with the aim of dismantling them and checking how cars made inside were. The intention was to take the leader of the segment (it is the best -selling electricity in the world) and shred it to verify what made it different. Xiaomi’s case is not, much less, the only one. A few months ago we knew that Toyota had opted for services of an advice to discover what made by the cars of Byd and Tesla. We also know that Mercedes did the same with Zeekr carsChinese company owned by Geely, to verify what was hidden under the body to show off 1,000 kilometers of autonomy. And Xiaomi. Although we now know that Xiaomi has been the one that bought cars from the competition, the Chinese company itself has been closely monitored by all kinds of rivals. Jim Farley, CEO of Ford, has repeated to satiety who bought an Xiaomi car and led him for months without getting tired of him. Hyundai also took it to South Korea. Even this summer a photograph at the door of Maranello, the Ferrari factory, showed An Xiaomi Su7 Ultra entering the plant. Although there is no official confirmation, everything indicates that it is the Italians have also been analyzing in depth Nürburgring faster electric car. Because? As we see, it is usual for companies to buy competition units to understand how they work, what makes them different and how they get the advantages over their own models. The Xiaomi case is not unique but it is significant to see who points to. The Tesla Model and has been the most purchased electric car in the world and, even, the first completely electric model with giving the award of the “best -selling car in the world”regardless of the technology used. But since the Xiaomi Su7 And, with the redoubled commitment of Yu7 (Electric SUV), Lei Jun’s company has focused on making it clear what makes Tesla’s car better. Xiaomi has presumed autonomous driving technology (although he omitted it for legal reasons with Yu7), autonomy and, above all, price, since Xiaomi’s versions are sold by a fraction of Tesla cars. A compliment. In addition, there is another important detail throughout this fight. When a Chinese manufacturer points directly to a rival and mentions it in its presentations, it is not a direct signaling strategy. In China, “Inspiration” (or direct copy) It serves to make clear who is the market leader and Who they want to look like and, of course, they want to overcome. It is a strategy that clashes with Western culture but is the reason why Xiaomi mobile presentations are full of references to Apple. Or why the presentations of Xiaomi cars were flooded with references to Tesla and Porsche. Because each in its field (value for money, the first, and example of sportsmanship, the second) are the market leaders. Disassemble Copy the good and try to improve it It is a strategy that is followed throughout the world but has more reason to be in a culture where “inspiration” is better seen than in the West. Photo | Tesla and Xiaomi In Xataka | I have climbed into the xiaomi car and now I am going to miss the Xiaomi Su7 Max every time I get on mine

Australia has analyzed teleworking since before pandemic. His conclusions disassemble the reasons for the return to the office

Although teleworking is no longer the preferred option by companies, or at least not their full -time variant, remote work continues to maintain much higher values that those who registered before pandemic. That shows that, in a way, teleworking does arrive to stay in Very specific contexts. Australia has been observing the real impact of teleworking for four years and consolidated data contradict old prejudices. “Working from home makes us happier,” The authors assure of a study by the University of Southern Australia, ciming a new more flexible and productive labor model. Time flexibility: the new office fruit. The Australian study is especially revealing because it began before the pandemic and the rise of teleworking and has been extended for four years, which leaves a much more defined photo of how remote work has impacted on the way of working and its consequences. According to the study, the possibility of choosing from where to work has allowed to improve both the mental and physical health of workers, although there is still a certain friction from corporate culture. According to A report of the International Labor Organization (OTI), the flexibility provided by teleworking is already equal to The emotional salary with which companies try to capture and retain the best employees, replacing other benefits. Most satisfied employees with their work. The data collected by the study reveal that before the pandemic, the Australian worker used about 4.5 hours per week only in displacements to the office. That time optimization It makes those who work from home enjoy “ten extra days of free time a year against those who go to the office”, dedicating 33% of that time to leisure, which implies “more opportunities to be physically active and less sedentary.” A factor that also highlighted the Academic Study which was carried out in Spain from the Lacaixa Foundation. According to the authors, these data “usually go hand in hand with worse mental health and with lower scores in the assessment of our own health.” Thanks to teleworking, employees have gained “hours of rest to sleep and, for example, breakfast more peacefully”, which helps reduce levels of template stress. In turn, this recovered time also has a reflection in healthier habits, such as home preparation or the increase in the consumption of fruits, vegetables and dairy. The result has been a more varied and healthy diet, with less dependence on ultraprocessed foods that require less preparation time. Positive whenever it is by choice. If something has shown us the experience of “forced” teleworking during the confinements of 2020 is that the teleworking It is not for everyone. Since this study allows to contrast the situation of employees before and after the massive arrival of teleworking, it also reveals how it affects that change of work model in workers The researchers found that the well -being and mental health They improved especially when teleworking was voluntarily chosen, while “when employees work from home for obligation, mental health and well -being tend to get worse.” Productivity in evidence. One of the main arguments of companies for the return to the office has been the alleged fall in productivity that was associated with teleworking. In this sense, researchers blame the problem more to an inability to assign tasks and New model management not in a direct casuistry of teleworking. “In many cases, managers who claim that teleworking reduces productivity responds more to a lack of management than a real performance problem,” says researchers in their conclusions. The conclusion after four years of monitoring is unequivocal: work performance and productivity seem to stay stable or, in most cases, improve when working from home. These results coincide With other research that They disconnect the decrease in productivity of the company with the teleworking. The distance does affect the cohesion of the equipment. Great corporations like Amazon wielded The argument of the cohesion of the equipment To impose The return to the office. In that sense, the study prepared by Australian researchers recognizes that “the connection with the classmates is difficult to reproduce at a distance,” admit those responsible for the study, and alert about the risk of loss of cohesion in the work teams. But, as has been demonstrated with some strategies back to the office, the problem can be mitigated by facilitating efficient communication channels. A Recent study Posted in the magazine Naturerevealed that this Team cohesion problem It currently persists with the hybrid day model, provided that consistent communication patterns are not established. In Xataka | A Barcelona company wanted to try the four -day week. He ended up firebaging an employee for having two jobs Image | Unspash (Rodeo Project Management Software)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.