Manus is the new sensation of China after Deepseek. Is generating as many expectations as doubts

Last week voices began to hear in the AI ​​segment. We theoretically had a new Deepseek phenomenon. It was Manusa theoretical AI agent who raised especially striking options. However, in social networks there have been doubts and suspicions about the real capacity of this model. The unknown about its real value is there.

Manus is not an AI agent. Those responsible on its official website is “a general agent who connects ideas with actions: not only thinks, delivers results.” It is actually more a “deep research” mode – like the ‘Deep Research’ of OpenAi – about the data that we give. Thus, Manus is theoretically capable of creating you a detailed 7 -day travel plan by Japanhelp you perform a deep analysis of the Value of Tesla’s actionscreate for you a presentation for a class on the conservation law of the momentFor example.

Expectations in style. One of the product managers in Hugging Face He described it as “the most impressive tool I have ever tried.” His Official Discord server He has attracted almost 170,000 users since his creation a week ago. The expectation is remarkable, but as they explain In TechCrunchthere are doubts about their true capacity.

Manus is based on Claude and Qwen. There are users who They have already indicated that manus seems not to have been created from zero, and apparently it is Totally based in varied models such as Claude 3.7 and Qwen (Alibaba). One of his co -founders, Yichao “Peak” Yi, confirmed that are in effect based on other products and they are a layer that relies on these models. In the presentation video Yichao stressed that In some benchmarks Manus was superior to Deep Research already OperatorOpenai products. It is?

Errors and inconsistencies. Some experts such as Alexander Doria, co -founder of the startup of the Pleias, have indicated that manus makes mistakes and infinite loops When using it. Others point out how Make mistakes With questions with clear answers and Do not cite sources consistently.

Beta by invitation. For now it is not possible to access manus options, and it is only possible to use it if any other user invites you. In TechCrunch they have managed to have access, and the tests performed, explained the editor who tested it, “have not been especially positive.” None of the agerentic tasks that he tested – seek table in a restaurant, take out plane tickets – worked. In The Register they have also had access and Nothing have been impressed with the results. “They tried to create a Mario clone that turned out to be quite terribleFor example. Other users who have tried or They praise it or They believe that despite its lights and shadows is a special promising product.

At the moment this is not a Deepseek. The truth is that the rapid popularity of Manus contrasts with that of Deepseek, which was available from the first moment as an Open Source development that anyone could download and use. The company may want to take advantage of that expectation generated by betas with invitation access and prefer to avoid greater infrastructure expenses.

In Xataka | China has a plan to achieve scientific supremacy in full struggle with the US to lead in AI