The Artemis program has been a source of news for a long time because of the many delays that have been accumulating their space missions. But now it has suffered the biggest turnaround in its recent history when the cancellation of the construction of the Gateway space station in its current form, as NASA’s own administrator has confirmed. Now the goal is to build a permanent base.
The initial plan. What until recently was the cornerstone of humanity’s return to the Moon has today been discarded. As reported by ABC, NASA has decided that building a toll station in lunar orbit is no longer a priority for them, or it is not a priority for Donald Trump’s plans.
This move represents a radical restructuring of the Artemis program, which shifts all attention to Artemis IVscheduled for 2028, which would lead to flights between the Moon and Earth being made every six months to have a permanent presence on our satellite.
The reason. The decision to destroy the Gateway was not born from a whim, but from the pure need to optimize the resources and time available. As noted, maintaining the development of a station that orbits the Moon was posing an internal barrier to the main objective they had set: establishing a permanent human presence on the Moon with regular flights.
But there is also politics involved, since Donald Trump himself put duties on NASA: we must accelerate the return of humans to the Moon, establish a permanent base and reinforce the country’s leadership in space. And it is something that has an expiration date, since Trump wants to see this accomplished before his term ends before 2029, to say that he was the president who achieved this achievement again. The problem is that China is after this same objective.
The private sector. You cannot understand this paradigm shift without them. The restructuring that Isaacman has announced seeks to make NASA much more agile in the face of fierce competition from giants like SpaceX and Blue Origin, which do not leave the federal agency in a good position.
These companies are developing vehicles, such as the Starship from SpaceX or the Blue Moon from Blue Origin, whose charging capabilities make the need for an intermediate station like the Gateway, from a logistical point of view, increasingly redundant. Isaacman seems to have understood that to maintain the agency’s relevance and speed, it must adapt to the new monsters in the aerospace sector that have created a large field of competition.
The existing hardware. Without a doubt, this is going to cause a lot of headaches for aerospace engineers. As space exploration experts had already been analyzing, the adjustments for missions like Artemis IV were going to require a large intermediate process. Now, Gateway’s cancellation raises immediate challenges about what to do with hardware and contracts that were already underway or in advanced stages of development. Adapting the lunar landing systems and Orion spacecraft for direct missions to the surface without the support of the orbital station will require a deep technical review in the coming months. And the problem is that the calendar does not stop putting pressure on us to have ever earlier results.
News on Mars. In addition to this big change to Artemis, NASA has announced the launch of the Space Reactor-1 Freedom, the first interplanetary spacecraft powered by nuclear energy, whose objective will be Mars and will be launched before the end of 2028. This project wants to make the United States stand out before the rest of the planet with the use that can be given to nuclear energy.
And it is no wonder, since this technology promises to offer power to reach distant regions such as, for example, Jupiter, where traditional solar panels lose effectiveness. But also, upon reaching the red planet this rocket will deploy ‘Skyfall’, a fleet of Ingenuity-class helicopters to continue exploration beyond.
Images | NASA (2)
In Xataka | In 2018, Elon Musk put his own car into orbit. Eight years later it is still circling the Earth
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings