wrong

‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’ has started off on the wrong foot

by

Seven years after ‘The Rise of Skywalker‘, ‘Star Wars‘ returns to theaters with ‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’, the first film in the franchise since 2019. The reception of the first critics and even the first screenings for fans is being, at best, very lukewarm. Right now, Disney needs a smash hit to revitalize the franchise, and early viewers seem to be simply shrugging their shoulders. Lazy notes. With nearly 120 reviews counted before its May 22 premiere, ‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’ it stands at around 60% on Rotten Tomatoes. That score places it in the same range as ‘Attack of the Clones’ (62%), although still above what is considered the great fiascos of the franchise: ‘The Phantom Menace’ from the prequel trilogy and ‘The Rise of Skywalker’ from the Disney era. Of course, as always on Rotten Tomatoes, opinions are debatable, but it is significant that a film that was going to function as a oxygen tank for the franchise has such a lukewarm reception. What do they say? All the reviews agree on common points: the film is entertaining, but it does not justify a return to the cinema of the saga. Or in other words: we are facing an extended episode of the series. There is talk of a nostalgic walkof the most boring installment of the franchisethat the film is essentially two episodes from the spliced ​​series. One of the most noted problems is that his commercial hook, Pedro Pascal, has ended up turning against the series: the Mandalorian never takes off his helmet, and most of the action scenes are performed by a stuntman. Why Disney needs the Mandalorian. Disney comes from a complicated 2025 at the box officewith the failures of ‘Snow White’ and ‘Elio’, and Marvel’s proposals (”Captain America: Brave New World’, ‘Thunderbolts’ and ‘Fantastic Four’) performing less than expected. According to experts, the excess of series and movies designed for Disney+ has eroded the cultural value of Marvel, Star Wars and Pixarwhich has led to falls such as loss of 700,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2025. Resurrect ‘Star Wars’. The strategy is now very clear: fewer films, more impact. Marvel’s imminent releases are the new Spider-Man movie (in co-production with Sony) and the long-awaited return of the Avengers. ‘Star Wars’ is betting on this ‘The Mandalorian & Grogu’ (2026) and ‘Starfighter’ (2027), starring Ryan Gosling and directed by Shawn Levy. For now, perhaps, the strategy has been frustrated (although the box office may respond as Disney hopes, in a new chapter of the renewed divorce between critics and public: After all, ‘The Rise of Skywalker’ grossed more than a billion; and there are cases of films like ‘The Last Jedi’, loved by critics, hated by fans). The key problem with ‘The Mandalorian’. When Grogu was still Baby Yodaconquered the internet at a very specific moment: with the inauguration of Disney+, in the days around the pandemic. But the phenomenon was not repeated neither in successive seasons nor in series like ‘The Book of Boba Fett’ or ‘Ahsoka’. The franchise has been trying to disassociate itself from the Skywalker family for years, and ‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’ could be a good solid step, although the film’s plot revolves around Jabba the Hutt’s son. That is, the surnames in the usual tiny galaxy. Another sign that the franchise does not know how to expand without resorting to the usual tropes. Given what we have seen, ‘Starfighter’ has an even more relevant challenge before it than performing at the box office. In Xataka | Disney needs to solve the biggest crisis in ‘Star Wars’ history. And he’s held on to Baby Yoda to get it

We have been going to the Moon the wrong way for decades if what we want is to save fuel

by

When you travel to the same place many times, little by little you learn which are the best routes. You don’t just need to know the shortest path. It is also good to locate the one with the most gas stations, the best road or the most beautiful landscapes. It all depends on your tastes and needs. If the trip is made in space, it is important to find the shortest path; but, above all, the main need is to locate the one that represents a greater fuel savings. We hope that in the future humans will be able to travel regularly to the Moon, but it would be very expensive and unviable to wait until then to find the best path through trial and error. Therefore, an international team of scientists has developed the formula that calculates the ideal path. Spoiler: it is not any of the ones that have been seen so far. Biggest savings so far. The study, carried out by an international team of scientists and directed from the University of Coimbra, points to a saving in delta-v of 58.80 m/s. This measure refers to the amount of effort necessary to carry out an orbital maneuver. In other words, the total change in speed needed to carry out said maneuver. The lower the delta-v, the better, since a high gear change means more fuel consumption. In the case of the complete trip from Earth to the Moon, the delta-v is 3,342.96 m/s. It may seem that reducing that figure by less than 60 meters per second is not much, but we must keep in mind that A single meter per second already represents a great waste of fuel. Therefore, the results obtained in this study are very positive. Theory of functional connections. When you are going to calculate the trajectory between the Earth and the Moon you need to leave the Earth’s orbit, with a certain speed and position and reach that of the Moon, also with specific characteristics. All those specific parameters are restrictions. When we are in a place as wide as space, there can be many different paths. An infinite number of them. Therefore, to locate them, simulations must be carried out. The problem is that, no matter how powerful the simulators are, if the restrictions are not reduced a little, the possibilities remain endless. This is where the theory of functional connections comes into play. This, basically, consists in changing the approach of the formulas so that the conditions are already included. Said with a more earthly analogy, if we want to find the best route from Madrid to Barcelona, ​​we can analyze absolutely all the roads in Spain or look only for the best option among the roads that start in Madrid and end in Barcelona. With this theory of functional connections you achieve just that. The restrictions are not eliminated, but are included directly in the mathematical approach. With Artemis II there was a moment when connections were lost Much fewer simulations. By changing that approach, more simulations can be done. No time is wasted simulating paths that do not leave Madrid and end in Barcelona. For this reason, the authors of this study have managed to go from 280,000 simulations to more than 30 million. This makes it easier to find an optimal route. A stop along the way. The optimal route includes a stop along the way, right at the Lagrange point L1, a place between the Earth and the Moon in which the gravitational attraction of both objects is compensated, so that the effect is similar to the absence of gravity. The ships could remain there as long as necessary without losing communication with Earth. In the case of Artemis II, for example, there was a point where connections were lost. That wouldn’t happen here. Finally, once everything is ready and the orbits are aligned correctly, the second part of the trip could be carried out, heading to lunar orbit. Better near the Moon. Previous simulations that looked similar to this one included entering this trajectory on a near-Earth branch. However, with this research it has been seen that fuel savings are better if done on the opposite side, closer to the Moon. The cheapest way so far, but not the cheapest possible. The authors of the study acknowledge that this is the cheapest path that has been calculated so far between the Earth and the Moon, but not the cheapest possible. And, in their calculations, they have taken into account the gravitational attraction of the Moon and the Earth, but not that of the Sun. If this were added, savings could also be improved, but the launch window would be restricted. That is, there would be fewer possible days to carry out the launches. That would make logistics difficult, so for now, the cheapest option so far has been chosen, but not the cheapest possible. That alone is a great advance. Image |Rfassbind In Xataka | We have not yet colonized the Moon and we have already filled it with garbage: there are even abandoned golf balls

If Europe wants to bet on its agriculture, it is doing it wrong

by

In the last decade, the European Union has lost three million agricultural holdings. That is almost 25% of all those that existed in 2013. And it is curious because, in its last cycle alone, the Common Agricultural Policy is spending 387,000 million euros. What are we spending all that money on? A poorly posed question. I recognize it. When one sees the enormous amount of money that the CAP moves and its central role in the Union’s debates, one tends to assume that this “silent” transformation of the European field is taking place. despite of Brussels policies. However, when we look at the data, doubts arise. According to the European Court of Auditors and the Commission20% of the beneficiaries take around 80% of the funds. To the extent that the CAP distributes direct payments based on hectares, we can say that those 20% are the large landowners. In Spain, for landing the datathe 1% that receive the most help concentrate 28%; 10%, 62%; and 20%, 79%. It is a scheme that strongly encourages concentration. And it shows. Continuing with the Spanish case, the country has lost 180,000 farms in the last 15 years. Only between 2020 and 2023, 12.4% were lost. In this he has had a lot to see about the pandemic and the Ukrainian Warbut everything takes on a new prism when we realize that macro agricultural holdings grew by 6%. The result is that that 20% that accumulates 79% of the CAP represents 7% of the agricultural area. We are seeing it in the crown jewel of the Spanish countryside: the olive grove. As Datadista and Greenpeace explained, the accelerated entry of investment funds has disrupted the sea of ​​olive trees. We are moving from a traditional dry-land olive grove to a super-intensive hedgerow olive grove on irrigated land. But… is this a problem? To answer this question, it is best to look at the Netherlands, the European “crystallization” of what is at the end of the trend that drives the CAP. Netherlands is second (or third, depending on the year) agri-food exporter in the world and it is in a territory smaller than Galicia, with 1.81 million agricultural hectares and only 52,106 farms. That is to say, its productivity per hectare is crazy. For this reason, the concentration of the CAP is also extreme: 1% takes 40% of the funds. The problem is that it is not environmentally sustainable: between 2022 and 2024, nitrogen emissions caused an unprecedented political crisis. Something that, with the slurry ponds either the crises of the Mar Menorwe are also seeing in Spain constantly. And now what? That is the central question. Because this CAP lasts only until 2027 and just now we are starting to discuss what we want for the future. Considering how quickly things have changed in recent years, that future may be completely different from anything we know. Image | Rob Mulder In Xataka | In California, the funds discovered that there is no investment more profitable than farmland. Now it’s Spain’s turn

Two men thought it was a good idea to lend their houses to a North Korean laptop farm. It went wrong

by

Teleworking has accustomed us to a very comfortable idea: if someone delivers work, attends meetings and responds to messages, perhaps it doesn’t matter too much where they do it from. The problem appears when that distance becomes an advantage to hide identities, move money and enter companies that believe they are hiring a legitimate professional. North Korea has been exploiting precisely that rift. And the case of two men convicted of hosting laptops in their homes shows the extent to which the plot could rely on domestic infrastructure. Two men condemned. Matthew Isaac Knoot, of Nashville, Tennessee, and Erick Ntekereze Prince, of New York, have been sentenced in the US to 18 months each in prison for their role in fraudulent schemes involving remote IT workers linked to North Korea. according to the Department of Justice. The house as a piece of the plot. The mechanism was more domestic than one might imagine. Companies shipped corporate laptops to American addresses because they believed the contracted workers were there. Once received, the computers were housed in those homes and configured with remote desktop applications installed without authorization. This allowed the fake workers to operate from abroad while, to the companies, the connection appeared to come from an address within the United States. What did each one do?. Prince, according to official information, facilitated at least three North Korean IT workers to obtain remote employment in US companies between June 2020 and August 2024, and used his company Taggcar Inc. to fraudulently supply “certified” workers, despite knowing that they were outside the US and using false or stolen identities. Knoot, for his part, operated a laptop farm from his Nashville residences between July 2022 and August 2023. Money, companies and damages. The Justice Department maintains that the two schemes together generated more than $1.2 million for North Korea and affected nearly 70 U.S. companies. In the Prince case, the companies paid more than $943,069 in salaries to IT workers linked to the file. In Knoot’s case, the payments exceeded $250,000. More than labor fraud. The US justice system presents the sentences as part of a specific line of action against facilitators located in the US. The note itself highlights that these are the seventh and eighth convictions of “laptop farmers” obtained in the last five months within their efforts to interrupt North Korea’s illicit generation of income. It is an important nuance: the focus is not only on those who connect from abroad, but also on the local network that makes the operation viable. Expansion into Europe. As we have seen in the pastthese cases are also present outside the United States. The Record discovered in April 2025 an investigation by Google Threat Intelligence Group according to which North Korean operatives had increased their activity in Europe following US police actions against laptop farms and financial networks. At the center were job searches linked to the United Kingdom, Germany and Portugal, in addition to the use of local facilitators to support the alibi of a work presence in the corresponding country. AI and fake identities. One of the most current layers of this story is not only in the laptops, but in the ease of building increasingly credible profiles. BISI points out that North Korean operations combine stolen identities, manipulated professional profiles and AI tools capable of writing localized CVs and cover letters. In the Old Continent, platforms such as Upwork and Freelancer are usually used, in addition to Telegram. The consequence is obvious: detecting the fake candidate can become much more difficult before the company even ships the equipment. What started with laptops housed in private homes ends up having something much bigger than a criminal conviction. The companies were not attacked from outside in the classic sense, but ended up opening the door to workers they believed to be legitimate. So everything seems to indicate that in these times it is no longer enough to protect servers, credentials or repositories, but rather to review the processes that we consider normal, such as the hiring of personnel. Images | Xataka with Grok In Xataka | The ‘vibe coding’ promised to democratize software. Your first gift is 5,000 apps with open sensitive data

We thought that domestication shrank dogs’ brains forever. Now we know we were wrong

by

When the first wolves began to approach human settlementsthey signed an evolutionary contract that would change their species forever. They gained easy food, warmth and protection, but in exchange they had to give up their brains, which have been reduced in size since we began to domesticate them, as science has pointed out. But this is changing now. From more to less. that the animals domestic have smaller brains than their wild ancestors is something already well known, but the “when”, the “how” and above all the “why” of this phenomenon were between two questions. But now a new study published HAL Open Science has managed to put a key date on this transformation, revealing that the brain “shrinkage” of dogs was already fully established in the late Neolithic. How it has been seen. To understand what happened inside the head of man’s best friend, the team of researchers did not limit itself to measuring the skulls with a tape measure, but used CT to analyze 22 prehistoric skulls dating from the Mesolithic to the late Neolithic in Western Europe, comparing them with 185 modern dog skulls, and using as a reference a 3D model of a wolf skull from the 19th century. The results. Here they were quite forceful when they saw that the Neolithic dogs already had an amazing 46% reduction in volume endoraneal compared to wolves. According to the data, these prehistoric French dogs had what we could call “miniature brains”, as a consequence of undergoing an evolutionary adaptation to new roles in agricultural settlements. And, by not having to hunt in nature, defend vast territories or be on constant alert against predators, the parts of the brain dedicated to extreme survival, which consume a lot of energy, simply ceased to be necessary. There are more culprits. Although this story sounds perfect, biology is more complex and that is why domestication is not the only factor highlighted here. Here, at do phylogenetic analyzes Comparing dogs to other wild canids, scientists found that older dog breeds fall within the “normal” brain size ranges expected for their body size. In fact, they suggest that there are ecological factors that can cause brain reductions even greater than domestication. The best example here is the raccoon dog, whose brain experiences drastic reductions linked to its hibernation periods to ‘save energy’. The script twist. If the story ended in the Neolithic, we would have an animal with an increasingly smaller brain without any type of limit. But here a recent study suggests that the modern dogs bred in the last 150 years They have relatively larger brains than their ancestors. That is, the downward trend has reversed. To understand this, we must keep in mind that humans have stopped using dogs solely as basic guardians or shepherds, and have begun to require them to perform more complex cognitive tasks, such as obeying orders, assisting humans with disabilities, drug detection, and other functions in our society. And it already shows. This has not only changed the size, but also the internal architecture of the brain, as seen in the MRIs performed on 85 dogs of different breeds that revealed abysmal differences between “primitive” and modern breeds. For example, dogs that are trainable have a much larger cut, and it makes sense because this is the area responsible for learning and decision-making. On the contrary, the most primitive and ancient races retain an expanded amygdala, which is the region linked to the processing of fear, instinct, and rapid survival responses. Some qualities that are essential to be able to hunt and respond to any type of threat. Images | Pauline Loroy In Xataka | We have been using our pets to relieve our anxiety. And now the stress is on them

“Experience never deceives; only our judgments are wrong”

by

When in 1482 Leonardo da Vinci wanted to offer his services to Ludovico Maria Sforza sent him a letter in which he basically presented himself as an engineer especially useful on the battlefield. Only at the end, almost in passing, does he mention his skills as an architect, sculptor, and painter (in that order). The letter It is written to capture the attention of Sforza, an aristocrat more concerned with wars than the arts, but it still reveals something valuable about Da Vinci: although today we remember him as a painter, he saw himself as a man of science. In fact, he left notes that make him one of the great precursors of modern science. There are even those who consider it “the first scientist”. Who was Leonardo Da Vinci? I know, in 2026 that question seems like a truism. Everyone knows who Leonardo da Vinci was, just as we all have a (more or less vague) idea of ​​who Beethoven, Newton, Vang Gogh, Galileo, Alexander the Great or Cleopatra were, to name just a handful of historical figures who have ended up becoming popular icons. However, it is one thing to place Da Vinci in a historical framework or cite his most famous paintings and another to peer into his enormous intellectual complexity, the same one that he allows to be glimpsed in a calculated way in the letter to Ludovico Sforza and in a much more clear and detailed way in his note books. Beyond the brushes. In his mirror writing notebooks, Da Vinci leaves an enormous number of designs that anticipate by centuries what would be the helicopterhe tank or even the submarine; but he also speaks on topics as varied as morality, theology, psychology, geology, anatomy, hydraulics, aesthetics… and that among a long, long etcetera. Some time ago the engineer Eduardo García de Zúñiga (1867-1951) helped us navigate that intellectual tidal wave bringing together a large part of the aphorisms written by Leonardo. The result can consult in the Miguel de Cervantes Library and it is interesting (among other issues) because it reveals something about Da Vinci: although he wrote profusely on topics such as aesthetics or morals, a large part of his annotations focus on purely scientific issues. And that includes everything from notes on geology and anatomy to reflections of an epistemological nature in which he reveals how he understood knowledge and the way to achieve it. Why is it important? Because the first (the notes on his observations) reveal Leonardo’s curiosity and intellectual acuity. The second (the epistemological ones) tell us about something more important: in the 15th century, even before the birth of Galileo, Da Vinci looked at the world with the eyes of a scientist, one who distrusted inherited authority (breaking with scholasticism) and advocated verifying knowledge based on experience. Hence there are those who consider it a pioneer of science. Reviewing your notebooks. Between his syllogisms There are many who point in that direction, including the one who heads this article: “Experience never deceives. Your judgments only deceive when it promises effects that cannot find their cause in our experiences.” What does Da Vinci want to tell us with that phrase? That our great crutch to know the world is experience, direct observation, not inherited knowledge that cannot be verified. “Whoever argues claiming authority does not apply ingenuity, but rather memory,” he emphasizes. Does that mean that we should deny the wise men who preceded us? At all. The key is not to accommodate ourselves to the detriment of rigorous observation, a critical spirit and empirical experimentation. Does it tell us anything else? Yes. Leonardo’s notes are full of reflections that insist on the importance of verification. Of all, the most popular may be “Wisdom is the daughter of experience”, but it is not the only one. In another part of his handwritten notebooks, we read: “Vain and full of errors seem to me the sciences that are not born from experience, mother of all certainty (…). Neither their origin nor their middle, nor their end pass through any of the five senses.” “The true sciences are those that experience has made penetrate through the senses, imposing silence on the arguers and not nourishing their researchers with dreams; those that, on the first known principles, proceed successively and with true unity to the end.” And in case there were still doubts, Da Vinci leaves us advice that is totally valid in 2026: “Flee from the precepts of speculators whose reasons are not confirmed by experience.” Images | Wikipedia In Xataka | Da Vinci’s last secret was not in his paintings or notes, but in his family: a direct link with Barcelona

For decades we have been told that seafood does not feel pain when boiled. We were seriously wrong

by

An action that can be quite common in the world of gastronomy and cooking in general is that of literally boil the lobsters and the crabs while they are alive. Something that was quite accepted, since it was thought that these animals were not aware that they were being boiled and did not even feel pain. But this is changing radically, although it does not transfer to kitchens. What we knew. This idea that the animals did not suffer any type of pain is something that could be doubted (a lot), since when you put them in a pot of boiling water they begin to have great shakes. But this is something that was pointed out as a mere reflex, but that did not have any type of awareness of the pain. A new study. A team from the University of Gothenburg has pointed out that this is not the caseand they have done so by focusing on Norwegian crayfish or lobsters. And to demonstrate that this is so, they have simply given him analgesics that humans take, such as aspirin (although it is no longer as prevalent due to its analgesia) and even local anesthetics such as lidocaine that is used in humans, for example, when they are going to give stitches to a wound. In this way, once the lobsters were anesthetized, they were placed in boiling water again and their movements, which were supposedly a reflex, were seen to be drastically reduced. What does it mean? Here logic tells us that if the animal’s behavior were a simple reaction due to the stimulation of a nerve, an analgesic should not affect it and would have to be generated in the same way. But the fact that drugs that block our own pain also work in crayfish suggests that there is more than a simple reflection when it comes to putting them in the boiling water, but they are really suffering. The ethical problem. The fact that it was thought that a crustacean with these characteristics could not be aware of pain was based on the fact that they have a very simple nervous system, so boiling them alive had no influence on animal well-being. But now researchers call for reflection and reopen the debate about whether we really should continue recommending this type of practices within the culinary world. This is not the first time this has been seen, since other studies analyzed the crabs through electric shocks given to them when they passed through a specific area. In this way, the crabs learned that they should not go through the area that gave them an electric shock, demonstrating that they did have awareness of this unpleasant experience and also memory. Now, with evidence of response to painkillers, the lobster’s “insensitivity” argument appears to have its days numbered. The legislation. Today, in many countries it is not considered that these practices are prohibited, as it is punishable, for example, to physically harm a dog or a cat. But the truth is that in some countries they are trying to adapt to the new reality, such as the United Kingdom, which recognizes lobsters, crabs and octopuses as sentient beings. Besides, in New Zealand This includes a requirement that animals going through the pot be declared desensitized through techniques such as extreme cooling or electrical stunning, to prevent them from being alive and conscious before being cooked. But the problem is that in much of the world it is still completely legal to cook them alive. Images | Monika Borys In Xataka | Batch cooking is taking off for a very simple reason: if you want to eat well, you can’t trust yourself.

everything that could go wrong went worse

by

In 2017, the technology company Plexcreator of the free streaming platform with his same namedecided to organize something that should be the event of the year for its employees: a whole week in Honduraswith a “Survivors” theme, to unite the company’s 120 remote workers. The budget that the company had allocated for that activity team building It wasn’t exactly modest: $500,000. The reality was, according to everyone who was there, something radically different. The experience was so “unique” that almost a decade later, the protagonists continue to tell it and even The Wall Street Journal has been echoed of that trip. And what they describe sounds more like a collective joke than a business trip. When chaos unites more than planning Corporate retreats have been gaining weight in human resources budgets for years, especially in companies with distributed teams to unite teams that do not see each other face to face throughout the year. According to IEBS data collected through the specialized portal Trafalgarpolo86% of companies that implement these corporate retreats report improvements in internal cohesion and talent retention, especially when your teams operate remotely. Plex is the perfect example: a streaming platform, whose employees work all over the world, that needed something to truly unite them. Something like a survival-themed experience, which in the end turned out to be more real than they would have liked. Keith Valory, CEO of Plex, acknowledged in the WSJ that the result was exactly what was expected despite the chaos: “You forge very strong bonds on these trips. It’s like the force that gives life to the company.” Almost a decade after that trip, many participants continue to work together and the adventures of Plexcon 2017 remain one of the team’s favorite topics of conversation. They even have a video of his adventure. Review by the CEO of Plex about his trip to Honduras The first signs that something was wrong on that trip came weeks before it began. Sean Hoff, founder of Moniker Partnersthe event’s organizing agency, told the WSJ that “about three weeks before arriving in Honduras, we received an email from the hotel’s general manager saying ‘I’m leaving. I wish you the best with your retirement.’ I knew something was wrong.” Three days later, another email: the head chef would no longer be at the hotel. Without a manager and without a chef, buses in Honduras began to fill with Plex employees. The adventure promises. The arrival did not reassure anyone. Scott Olechowski, product director and co-founder of Plex, said that they found the arrival disturbing: “Dirt roads. You approach and there are surveillance towers around the property and people with machine guns.” Many employees began to wonder where had they been taken. The first to fall was, precisely, the CEO who was supposed to lead the week with his team. Keith Valory disobeyed the unanimous advice of avoid raw vegetables and ate a salad. “I caught a E.coliwhich is the worst thing you can catch in your entire life. I lost between 8 and 10 kilos. The doctor came and they nailed an IV bag to the bedpost,” the manager told the American newspaper. Tarantulas, anthills and 38 degrees in the sun With the CEO prostrate, the tests with survivor theme They started under a blazing sun and at almost 38 degrees Celsius, led by an ex-Navy SEAL they had hired. In one of the tests, an employee had to eat a dead tarantula. He was from Texas and claimed to have eaten worse things. One of the survival tests consisted of eating spiders and insects In another test, another employee fell onto an anthill of fire antswhich forced give antihistamines urgently. There were no pills left, so they had to inject it directly into the affected buttocks. The infrastructure of the “luxury” complex didn’t help either. In the absence of the main chef (who had resigned weeks before the group’s arrival) the food came half cookedwater and electricity were cut off at any time of the day and the solar panelscovered by vegetation, could not charge the batteries and the premises were dark during the night. Sean Hoff, the person responsible for making everything go well on the trip, ended up with palpitations caused due to dehydration from running from one side of the complex to the other in high temperatures, trying to solve the problems that kept arising. “They had to call an ambulance and give me an EKG. They told me, ‘Sir, you need to slow down. You’re pushing your body to the limit.’” Stress tests for office workers devised by a special forces soldier One morning, a Plex employee found in his shower an animal similar to a porcupine which, apparently, had fallen from the ceiling during the night and became trapped in the screen. Stuck on an island with reggae and beer One of the nights they organized a dinner on one of the paradisiacal beaches on the premises. What should have been a pleasant evening with the sound of the sea as a soundtrack, ended with many attendees bitten by sand fleaswhich forced antihistamines to be distributed among employees. The next day, the group traveled to the neighboring island of Utila to visit the reconstruction of a baseball field that the company had financed. What no one had calculated was the return trip: the runway was very small and only allowed eight-seater planes. To make matters worse, it had no night lighting, so the planes could not operate at night. Despite hurrying as much as they could in the transfers, part of the group was trapped on the island without being able to return to the compound where they were staying until the sun rose again. One of the employees who was trapped wore out the antihistamines and had to notify a local doctor who improvised an intravenous line to administer it. Maybe karma wanted to wink at them, and the group that was stuck on the island spent the rest of … Read more

Japan sent the wrong creature to eradicate snakes from an island. The disaster was so big that it took half a century to solve it

by

Once again, desperate situations lead to extreme measures. Save a species sometimes it involves “exterminating” another. We have seen it in South Africa and his plan to annihilate miceeither injecting radioactive material into the horns of rhinosthe cases of hunt the wild cator the plan for exterminate half a million owls. However, sometimes things do not go as governments imagine. In Japan they know it perfectly. The incident of ’79. The story begins in 1979 on the Japanese island of Amami Ōshima, located in the Kagoshima prefecture. That year, Amami’s rabbit is rediscovered (Pentalagus furnessi), an endemic species and considered a “living fossil” due to its evolutionary antiquity. Before the discovery, the rabbit was thought to be on the brink of extinction due to habitat loss and hunting. The discovery marked a before and after for the conservation of the species and highlighted the importance of protecting the natural environment of the island, home to many other unique species. An event that also highlighted the need for greater conservation efforts at Amami Ōshima, for example trying to eradicate or control the snake population. A wrong “bomb”. Thus, a few months later, Japan launched a plan. Introduces around 30 mongooses to the island with the intention of ending the population of snakes, specifically the habu (Trimeresurus flavoviridis), which represented a threat to the local inhabitants. The idea, on paper, was a seamless plan: that the mongooses, which are natural predators of snakes, would reduce the number of habus and improve security on the island at all levels. However, that project was far from infallible. The mongoose was not the ideal creature to eradicate snakes. Firstly, because they are animals active during the day, therefore, they could not catch the nocturnal habu snakes, which continued to inhabit the following decades without problem. What happened as a result had an enormous ecological impact. A specimen of Trimeresurus flavoviridis Predation of endemic species. Thus, during the day, instead of focusing on the habu snakes, the mongooses began to prey on a wide range of native species, including several that had no natural enemies on the island until then. That seriously affected the local fauna, especially endemic and endangered species, like the same Amami rabbit that had just been happily announced months ago. Hundreds of thousands of mongooses. The situation reached such a point that the mongooses, brought in to eradicate one pest, had become an even larger and more dangerous one, one that It reached around 10,000 copies. at its peak around the year 2000. The truth is that Japan had already started a mongoose control project in 1993 that was expanded over time. As? Around 30,000 traps were set on the island to capture the animals and cameras with sensors were installed to monitor them. In addition, local residents formed the so-called Amami Mongoose Bustersa team specialized in capturing mongooses (they captured thousands). The end? In 2018, the last official capture of a mongoose on the island occurred. It occurred in the month of April, and since no creature has been captured for a long period of time, the expert panel, which is tasked with determining whether the animal is eradicated from the island, estimated that the eradication rate was between 98.8 and 99.8% in February last year, reaching a preliminary conclusion that it is reasonable to say/think that mongooses are eradicated from the island under the current circumstances. Finally, on September 3, 2024, Japan’s Ministry of Environment declared eradication of non-native mongooses on the island of Amami-Oshima, declared a World Natural Heritage Site by UNESCO. The statement was based on the opinion of the expert group on scientific grounds, taking into account that the capture of mongooses has not been confirmed for more than six years since the last one in April 2018. A unique case. The ministry itself did not hide the disaster that was the attempt to control the snakes in 1979. In fact, and as the administration has announced, it is one of the largest cases in the world in which non-native mongooses that had been established for so long have been eradicated. After the statement, the government explained that it will remove the traps that were placed on the island, although it will continue to monitor with cameras to prevent a new group of these small creatures from entering again. After all, if it took half a century to get them out of there, any contingency method is more than understandable. A version of this article can be foundlaunched in 2024 Image | Animalia, TANAKA Juuyoh, Patrick Randall In Xataka | “There are so many that you can hold them with your hand”: the daily nightmare of a town in Pontevedra with flies In Xataka | Salamanca faces its biggest environmental plague in decades. And the problem is that you can’t legally stop it.

Microsoft’s problem is not having lost a quarter of its value in three months. It’s just that he’s been wrong for a long time.

by

It seems like not so long ago when many celebrated Microsoft’s commitment to Azure. The decision of Satya Nadella Focusing on cloud computing soon began to translate into good financial results, propelling the Redmond company to achieve record revenue figures. But there was something more relevant in that movement: the realization that it could generate enormous benefits beyond Windows. That strategy, started in 2014ended up marking a before and after that became especially visible in 2019, when the firm reached for the first time a market capitalization of one trillion dollars. However, not even the most long-term oriented strategists, like Nadella, are free from errors. Microsoft has been chaining questionable decisions for some time that have ended up having a direct impact on its quarterly results. Specifically, the company has lost almost a quarter of its value in just three months. To put it in context, we are talking about its largest quarterly drop since the 2008 financial crisis. A decline of this magnitude, logically, does not go unnoticed. From cloud leadership to a strategy under pressure If we want to understand why the story has gone wrong, we have to start with the most obvious: the market has reacted harshly and, above all, selectively. In the first quarter of 2026, Microsoft lost about 23% of its stock market value, according to CNBCwhile the Nasdaq lost around 7%. It is not a minor movement, among other things because we are talking about a drop of a magnitude that has not been seen in almost two decades. This gap compared to the rest of the sector begins to point out problems that go beyond the general context. For a time, the commitment to OpenAI was seen as one of Microsoft’s great strategic successes, and it is not difficult to understand why. The company has invested around 13 billion dollarss to integrate this technology into Azure and into products like Copilot, which allowed it to place itself in a very advantageous position in the race of the artificial intelligence. However, with the passage of time we have also begun to see the other side of that decision: a very high technological dependence and a growing pressure to justify that deployment. As the months have passed, that close relationship has also quietly begun to change. Although Azure remains a key partner for OpenAI, the company led by Sam Altman has started to open your infrastructure to other actors to sustain the growth of its models, which increasingly require more computing capacity and energy. This does not break the alliance, but it does change its meaning, because Microsoft no longer concentrates with the same clarity all the strategic advantage that it had achieved in the first phases of the agreement. If we go down to the field of the product, where all these bets should materialize, the case of Copilot is especially illustrative. Microsoft has tried to make this assistant the axis of its new value propositionintegrating it into Microsoft 365 and a good part of its ecosystem, but the adoption It is not going at the expected pace. According to The Information, almost no one uses Copilot. What we have seen is that bringing artificial intelligence to the daily life of companies is more complex than it seemed on paper. Added to all this is a tension that is not always seen, but is very present in the backroom of this race: that of how to distribute resources in an environment of growing demand. Microsoft is investing massively in infrastructure to sustain the rise of AI, but at the same time it has to decide how it allocates that capacity between Azure and its own services. In January, CFO Amy Hood came to point out that Azure’s growth in the December quarter would have been even greater if the company had allocated more chips to the cloud instead of distributing some of that capacity among services like Copilot. Attrition is not limited to artificial intelligence, and that should also be taken into account. Also this year we have seen notable drops in income and in various areas of the Xbox ecosystemin a context also marked by previous price increases in Game Pass and on the consoles. It may seem like a minor front next to Azure or Microsoft 365, but it helps complete the picture of a company that has been opening too many flanks at the same time. What we have seen is that even in areas where it had a consolidated position, Microsoft is finding it more difficult to keep pace. Put all these pieces together, and what begins to emerge is an increasingly evident disconnect between Microsoft’s operational strength and the way the market is valuing its strategy. The company remains the fourth most valuable on the planetcontinues to grow, with revenue up close to 17% year-on-year in its last reported quarter and with Azure advancing 39% in the December quarter, but that strength is not translating to its price or valuation. Images | Xataka with Nano Banana 2 In Xataka | The ghost of IBM: Satya Nadella’s great challenge is to prevent Microsoft from becoming a technological fossil

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.