Los Angeles approves financial aid for workers affected by fires

Unanimously, Los Angeles City Council members approved a $25,000 relief fund this Tuesday for residents of the northeast San Fernando Valley who lost their income as a result of the fires that devastated the region since January 7. The authorization of the resources will allow providing economic relief to pool cleaners, gardeners, personal chefs, caretakers, drivers and other service workers who were left without the possibility of receiving income due to the devastation. The author of the motion, Councilwoman Imelda Padilla, recommended financial assistance specifically for the residents of District Six in her care (CD6), which spans areas of Van Nuys, Panorama City, Arleta and North Hills, among other neighborhoods. Keep reading: Risk in burned areas of Los Angeles due to upcoming rains This motion was supported by Councilor Mónica Rodríguez. The Los Angeles City Council authorized aid for workers affected by the fires.Credit: Damian Dovarganes | AP “A stark reminder that our local economy is interconnected, it means that a disaster in one part of the city still affects the most vulnerable in others“said Councilor Padilla in her motion. Keep reading: Fire victims in Los Angeles return home to find a desolate panorama “Not supporting this critical sector can lead to CD6 residents unable to pay expenses that can lead to homelessness, evictions or food insecurity“added the councilor. For this purpose, city ​​to partner with Initiating Change in Our Neighborhoods Community Development Corporationwhich is also recognized as ICON CDC, which operates the Los Angeles Business Source Centers of the North and South Valley regions. Keep reading: Second day of strong winds in Southern California The organization has operated since 2002 and offers free services primarily to entrepreneurs and small business owners with low and moderate income. Keep reading:· Firefighters put out two new fires that broke out this Monday in Los Angeles· Fake firefighters arrested in Los Angeles fire zone· Who will pay for fire damage?

Trump orders federal workers back to office or threatens layoffs

In one of his first actions as president of the United States, Donald Trump issued an executive order ending remote work for all federal employees, a measure aimed at reducing the federal workforce through attrition. The White House directed all US government departments and agencies in the executive branch to end remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work full time. Department heads may exempt some workers from this requirement, but in very specific cases. The executive order was one of multiple directives aimed at the 2.3 million-person federal workforce that, along with the return-to-the-office mandate, includes a hiring freeze, revamped hiring rules and other measures to make it more easy to fire high-level career employees. The White House said the measures were necessary to limit what Trump and his supporters consider a “deep state” that fought against his actions during the president’s first term. “There have been numerous well-documented cases of career federal officials resisting and undermining the policies and directives of their executive leadership.”states one of the executive orders signed by the president on Monday night “Therefore, the principles of good administration require that measures be taken to restore accountability to career officials,” he continues. According to the Office of Management and Budget, about 1.1 million federal civilian employees, that is, 46% of the civilian workforce, were eligible for some form of teleworking. Of those, approximately 228,000 workers, or 10% of the total workforce, had fully remote positions with no obligation to go to an office. Union reaction The return-to-office directive is expected to face a fight from federal unions, some of which have remote work written into their contracts. A union representing government workers criticized the mandate as representing a return to the patronage system thatthat oversaw the federal workforce until the end of the 19th century. “Every American has a stake in ensuring that federal employees remain free to carry out the mission of the agencies that employ them without fear of political interference,” Everett Kelly, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement. (AFGE), which represents 800,000 workers in the federal government and the government of the District of Columbia. Kelly, whose union represents employees of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies, also called Trump’s directives “a blatant attempt to corrupt the government.” federal law by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.” The National Treasury Employees Union filed a lawsuit against the president’s “Schedule F” executive order, a directive that makes it easier for the Trump administration to fire career government employees. Trump’s order is “contrary to the intent of Congress,” according to the complaint filed Monday night in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Keep reading: • Vivek Ramaswamy gives up his mission to try to save the government millions of dollars• Trump sets a date for charging 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada• Trump’s insistence on increasing defense spending to 5% worries NATO

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.