The soldiers of the Roman Empire crushed Hannibal and Viriatus, but they were unable to defeat a fearsome enemy: diarrhea.

If there is a civilization to which the Spanish collective imagination dedicates festivities and various events, that is the Roman empire. Nevertheless, they were more than six centuries in the Iberian Peninsula thanks to its magnificent expansion work. In its heyday, Rome It covered three continents: from Great Britain to the Carpathians in Europe, North Africa and Asia Minor. To carry out such an extension, his legions had great conflicts in the form of the Punic Wars, the battle of Cannae or the Battle of Pydna. The tough battle for intestinal well-being. As if life on the front was not hard enough, the soldiers guarding the northwest border of the Roman Empire had to confront a tough guerrilla war that is not epic enough to appear in the history books but that also caused casualties: that of intestinal parasites. More specifically, in the north of England, near Hadrian’s Wall. Because a team of researchers from the University of Oxford and Cambridge has discovered After analyzing the sewage system of the Roman fort of Vindolanda three types of intestinal parasites: intestinal worms, whipworm and giardia duodenalis. In fact, it is the first time that the giardia in Roman Britain. The three intestinal parasites, under the microscope. Intestinal worms, the whipworm or whipworm and the protozoan known as giardia lamblia, intestinalis either duodenalis They are three parasites of the digestive system that are spread by poor hygiene or by contact between infected human feces with food, drinks and hands. The intestinal worms They are a helminth that measures between 20 and 30 centimeters in length and lives in the intestine. The most common among humans are pinworms and ascariasis. Its presence in the intestine can cause abdominal pain, fever and diarrhea. The whipworms They are nematodes that are about five centimeters long. An adult whipworm can consume 0.0005 ml of blood per day, so a high presence of this parasite can translate into severe anemia. Likewise, they can cause rectal prolapse, appendicitis and diarrhea if accompanied by a bacterial invasion. A whipworm infection is more common in children and in warm, humid locations, as well as in places with poor sanitary and/or hygiene conditions. The giardia intestinal parasites is a type of microscopic parasite that still causes serious outbreaks of diarrhea today. Symptoms of a giardia infection are abdominal cramps, bloating, upset stomach, and loose stools. According to the Mayo Clinicgiardiasis is one of the most common causes of waterborne illnesses in the United States. The least they had was malnutrition and diarrhea. The three types of parasites, which today are easily diagnosed and treatable for a complete recovery, were not so so in ancient Rome. As explains Study co-author and University of Cambridge archaeologist Marissa Ledger: “Although the Romans were aware of intestinal worms, their doctors could do little to eliminate these infections or help those suffering from diarrhea, so symptoms could persist and worsen. These chronic infections likely weakened soldiers and reduced their ability to serve.” Vindolanda Fort is a true gem for history and archeology professionals. Located between present-day Carlisle and Corbridge, in Northumberland, it was built at the beginning of the 2nd century AD to protect the province from attacks by northern tribes and monitor the imposing Hadrian’s wallwhich extends from the North Sea to the Irish Sea, with forts and towers distributed along its length. In the fort there were infantry, archer and cavalry units from all over the Empire. Beyond the magnificence of the construction, the most interesting thing is the juice that Vindolanda has offered to history lovers because thanks to its water-saturated soil a large number of organic objects have been preserved: thousand wooden slats that served as a kind of logbook, more than 5,000 leather sandals and also fecal remains. Sediments from a 3rd century drain from a latrine in the thermal complex have been the source of this research. The wall watchers They defecated alive. From 50 sediment samples taken along the conduit, about nine meters long, they found everything from Roman beads to ceramics to animal bones. And under the microscope, a whole intestinal fauna. Approximately 28% of the samples had worm or whipworm eggs, and one of them had both. Using the biomolecular technique ELISA they detected the giardia. Likewise, they analyzed a sample from another fort built in 85 AD and abandoned in 92 AD, where they found worms and whipworms. Thus they deduced that the soldiers suffered from dehydration and became ill with outbreaks of giardia in summer, normally associated with contaminated and rapidly expanding water. It could be worse. The high load of intestinal parasites detected in Vindolanda is not an isolated fact, as they are similar to other Roman military enclaves such as Valkenburg (Netherlands), Carnuntum (Austria) or Bearsden (Scotland). And they even had to give thanks, because in urban sites like London and York the parasite diversity was greater, including tapeworms. It wasn’t as pretty as it looks.. While there may be preconceptions and romanticisations about what it was like to be a Roman soldier, Dr Andrew Birley, chief executive of the Vindolanda Charitable Trust is clear “Excavations at Vindolanda continue to uncover new evidence that helps us understand the incredible difficulties faced by those posted to this northwestern frontier of the Roman Empire almost 2,000 years ago, challenging our preconceptions about what life in a Roman fort and frontier town was really like.” In Xataka | The death of one empire is the birth of another: the graph that reviews the history of civilizations from 4,000 years ago In Xataka | We have been calling Christians ‘thieves’ for decades for taking Christmas from the Romans. But the story wasn’t exactly like that. Cover | Photo of 709am in Unsplash

Udio closed fronts with Universal. The creators were then left unable to download their own AI songs

Generative music applications have achieved something that seemed unthinkable a few years ago: allowing anyone, with just two prompts, to can produce complete songs with vocals, arrangements and structures that can sound surprisingly real to most who hear them. This experience, which is presented as magical and accessible, has a much less visible side, linked to how these models have been trained and their legal implications. Many of these platforms have turned to large volumes of content available on the weboften copyrighted, to build their systems. The user enjoys the result, creates and shares, until a legal change, an agreement or a lawsuit transforms the tool and the experience is no longer the same. Until just a few weeks ago, udio It was one of the services that best represented that promise of instant creativity. It had managed to attract both curious people and experienced musicians thanks to its simple system, the tools to extend, mix or remake songs and, above all, the possibility of downloading songs for use outside the platform. There was nothing to suggest that this model was about to change. The first indication came when the company began to talk about a “transition phase” linked to new agreements with record companies. It did not yet detail what was going to happen, but it made it clear that the platform was entering a different stage. The day the download button disappeared. Confirmation came when Udio announced thatas part of its transition, audio, video and stem downloads would be disabled for several months. It was a feature that many considered essential, but now they could only play their creations in Udio and share them using links from udio.com. In exchange, the company reported an increase in credits and more generation capacity, although that did not compensate for the feeling of loss. The message was clear: the songs still existed, but they no longer left the walled garden. Warner and Universal chose a different path than the judicial confrontation: turning Udio and Suno into partners rather than adversaries. Universal signed agreements for the next version of Udio to be based on licensed music and offer artists new avenues of income, while Warner did the same with Suno and also sold the Songkick platform to incorporate it into that new ecosystem. Record companies went from denouncing to collaborating, with a clear condition: at least in the case of Warner and Udio, artists and composers would have the possibility of deciding whether their voice, their image or their style could be part of the creations generated by AI. From defendants to partners. Once the content is within the legal space, what is relevant is not only that agreements have been signed, but how the industry’s priorities have changed. A year ago the goal was to put AI platforms on the bench for using protected music to train their models. Today, a growing part of the sector has understood that it may be more profitable to integrate them than to stop them. The move does not eliminate legal conflicts, but it opens the door to a model in which record labels oversee, license and participate in revenue, rather than reacting only through lawsuits. It is a change of focus that signals where the music business is moving. What nobody sees: scraping as the foundation of musical AI. For years, the actual functioning of many generative music models was far from transparent. Some startups, like Suno, admitted to having trained their systems with “virtually every quality music file available on the web,” trusting that such use would be protected by the fair use. However, when record companies began to examine that process, the conflict ceased to be technical and became legal. Images | Universal Music | udio | Unsplash In Xataka | AI has become the best example that if you don’t pay for the product, you are the product

Spain has received more rain than ever this spring. And yet it is unable to get rid of the ghost of the drought

Europe is not having a good time right now. Many weeks of warmer temperatures and rainfall in historical minimums, they are helping drought tentacles expand A wide strip that goes from the British islands to Crimea and the Anatolia. This is made clear by Copernicus’s latest report, the European land observation system. And yet, none of that has affected Spain. On the contrary, we have had months of unusual rains and whole weeks of temperatures below the average. The problem? In spite of everything, the vast majority of points in “alert” by drought They are on the peninsula. A ghost that comes to stay. If drought is a ghost (as we usually say, a little impossible, journalists), the southeast of the country is a delighted house. An Indian cemetery. With the exception of the coast of Malaga and Granada and the Catalan basins, the long Spanish Mediterranean arch is full of red dots (alert) and oranges (of concern for drought). But also of blue areas, of course. According to the report ‘Droough in EuropeApril 2025, the Tagus, Guadiana and Andalusian Mediterranean basins are the only ones in the entire continent that have had a positive rain anomaly. And there are the problem and the paradox. After all, this spring has become a perfect example to understand the problems that the country is going through: the problems to manage the hydrological reserves of the system in an integral way. Some problems that create distrust at all levels. Because, a few weeks ago, it was announced that the government changed the Tajo-Segura transfer game rules; But no special emphasis has been placed on the dirty war between both basins. In fact, no one is happy: while the Tagus Chair “See the proposal insufficient“Of the government, the Murcian irrigators They prepare mobilizations. All this while the Hydrological Confederation of the Safe It is immersed in controversies on manipulated data and lack of control. In what situation does all this leave us? As we commented a few weeks ago“After the rains of March and with the reservoirs of Half Spain to overflow” another battle began, who stays that water. It will not be an easy battle because, how has it been happening for 30 yearsIn the end we lose all. Image | Copernicus In Xataka | After the rains of March and with the reservoirs of Media Spain to overflow, another battle begins: who stays that water

AI is unable to detect them

Few creations? older, worked, explored and unfortunately linked to social networks and messaging apps that the Photopollas. There is studies that suggest that More than 40% of women who use networks have received photos of male genitals who neither want nor asked, although the percentage of men who recognize send them is quite lower. A while ago Yougov began to ask and only 5% From respondents he admitted to having done so. Now the genre seems to have found a particularly conducive land in one of the social networks with the greatest pull, Tiktok. Despite the strict Content policy of the platform and that in their Community standards It makes clear (and bold) that does not allow nudes, including of course images of genitals, there are users who have found a crack to show their penises. And they are doing it. So much, in fact, that they have made it A trend (“I don’t have Gloss Men Trend”) that already inspires a good handful of videos in Tiktok. Question of Photopollas Capture one of Tiktok’s videos. A quick search arrives to find two kinds of videos: those of men who teach their genitals and those of people who denounce, criticize and ridicule the trend. The most curious thing is that the pieces are circulating on the platform without the Tiktok filters or the Complaints other users prevent it. The videos are all more or less the same pattern, a very simple one and that seems to ridicule the pieces of Skincare With a sequence of two images. In the first one shows a man (many times only his body is seen, without the face) next to the message “I don’t have gloss for the trend, but I have … “ In the second one reads “… a nice lipstick”. The key, of course, is not what that text says, but the photos. That “cute lipstick” is accompanied by a photo that shows a shampoo boat, a perfume bottle or a hair removal gel (it actually serves any beauty product) with a background penis. The genitals do not appear in the foreground and it is not always possible to appreciate them in a quick look, but they are there. Clearly. Incontestable. A Photopolla of manual. The big question is … how is it possible? First because penises are unmistakable, explicit and breached the Content policy of Tiktok, very strict in regard to the nakedness and contents of sexual character. Second because there are users who claim to have denounced it to the platform. Another example of the trend. Another capture of Tiktok. “I have denounced the videos and it makes me not breach the rules of Tiktok. But Madam, that I see him the Nepe To this man! ” Ainoa_book laments. “How do I not breach the rules if I go out with a gutter and forthed the video.” Than in Tiktok are sharing videos of genitals without the images ended is more than a simple curiosity or a specific trend. The phenomenon is relevant because the platform, like Instagram, resorts to AI algorithms that are precisely dedicated to recognizing Explicit Content. These videos show that a simple trick arrives (the background) to make fun of them. In Xataka we have done A test which suggests that AI seem surprisingly seem to have a “blind spot” with this kind of Photopollas. The test has been very simple and we include several screenshots with the results: we have made catches of Tiktok videos in which they are clearly appreciated male genitals and then we have shared them with Chatgpt, Claude and Gemini To know what they see. An experiment with AI Claude’s response. Claude’s response. Claude’s response. Chatgpt response. Chatgpt response. Chatgpt response. Chatgpt response. Gemini’s response. Gemini’s response. Answer of See Your Photos’. As can be seen in the catches above, none has clearly detected the penis that appears in all images. Neither Gemini, nor Claude, nor chatgpt, who at most, when it is pointed out exactly where the Photopolla It is limited to recognizing that it cannot “confirm it with certainty” and the content may be “ambiguous”. “I understand why it might seem,” he explains on one occasion. To make it easier, we even ask them directly if they watched a penis or believed to distinguish it in the background. The result has always been negative. The AI ​​does not see it and focuses basically on Describe the bottle of gel, shampoo, deodorant, perfume … that focuses on the foreground. – Do you see a penis in this photo? “We ask.” Claude After attaching an image in which a man is appreciated holding a bottle with his penis behind. – No, the image shows a cosmetic product, specifically a facial serum. – And in this, not even in the background you see a penis? —We insisted with another similar image in which another bottle and another background penis are seen again. – The image shows a bottle of perfume or fragrance with a modern design. It is not a unique case. Similar responses throw chatgpt, gemini and even They see your photoswhich brings much more detailed descriptions of the images, but without any mention to the penises that sneak into each and every one of those photos. In one of them, in which a body cream is seen on an erect penis, the AI ​​clearly appreciates the product, explains what brand it is and even theorize about who can be the author of the image and who belongs who belongs The hand that holds the boat. But neither A single mention to a key detail: the Photopolla. The Achilles heel of the AI ​​was not at the end in the heel. Images | Tiktok In Xataka | If you are unable to trust that happiness lasts too long, Tiktok has the diagnosis: you see “weird lamps”

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.