people

3.6 million people watched the Goya gala. Only a small part went to see the nominated films

by

The gala of the Goya 2026 has scored a 26% screen share, its best figure since 2020 and the second highest since 2010, in a context of television consumption down. Paradoxically, this massive attention contrasts with a box office that remains stagnant and with an audience that prefers to see Spanish cinema on television platforms and events rather than in theaters. Technology and new consumer habits explain this gap. The figures. The broadcast of the gala on RTVE’s La 1 brought together an average of 2,396,000 viewers and reached a 26% share. In his analysisVertele emphasizes that linear television consumption has been significantly reduced in the last decade, with fewer people watching DTT at the same time than in 2010. That the gala reaches percentages comparable to fifteen years ago in an ecosystem fragmented by streaming and delayed viewing platforms suggests that the Goya remains an event capable of bringing together a mass audience in real time, in the style of a sporting event. These good figures are part of five consecutive years of growth for the gala in audiences, with an increase of 1.6 share points and 56,000 viewers compared to the 2025 edition. However, the majority of the films that competed for the award that night had not managed to recover their investment in theaters. Less box office. According to the official data published by the ICAASpanish theaters closed 2024 with 72.9 million spectators and a collection of 484.6 million euros, figures that represent a 5% decline in attendance compared to the previous year. The share of national cinema within this shrinking market was around 18.65%. But that percentage is not sustained by the auteur films that dominate the Goya nominations, but rather the exact opposite: family comedies and commercial thrillers. This can be applied to the big winners of this editionwhich we summarize in this table. All of them enjoyed subsidies between one million (except Sorda, with 800,000 euros) and 1,200,000. That is to say, they are films highly valued on the awards circuit, rather than by the general public. In this way, the market bifurcates, and the cinema that really fills theaters, such as the family comedies by Santiago Seguraare left out of the Goya. QUALIFICATION BUDGET COLLECTION SIRAT 6.5 million euros 2.87 million euros Maspalomas 5 million euros 716,000 euros Deaf 2 million euros 735,000 euros Sundays 4.7 million euros 3.7 million euros dinner 5 million euros 716,000 euros The captive 9.8-15 million euros 5.2 million euros lto Spanish exception. It is not something that happens in all countries: in France, the eternal model in which we want to see ourselves, French films raised 44% of the year’s box office. But at the same time, the three most watched French titles of the year (a comedy with disabled actors, an epic adaptation of Alexandre Dumas and a romantic drama) are films that also aspire to the Césars, their equivalent to our Goyas. Subsidies are also comparable in quantitybut here the number of releases has skyrocketed (168 in 2016, 364 in 2025), while the collection has decreased (from 111.5 to 85.6 million in the same period). And yet… the Goya audience demonstrates every year that there is interest in the industry. There is a potential audience that debates whether ‘Sirat’ deserved to win more awards than ‘Los Domingos’, but they did not go to the cinema for the premiere of ‘Sirat’. The hinge of the platforms. Three weeks after its very limited theatrical release, ‘The Snow Society’ landed on Netflix: in its first eleven days accumulated 51 million views and closed the first half of the year with 103 million views, becoming Netflix’s third most viewed film globally. The fact that he had that success right after leaving the theater sums up the problem. In October 2025 Netflix advertisement that they would spend one billion euros on Spanish production between that year and 2028. All this in Tres CantosNetflix’s largest production space in the entire European Union. Since its arrival in Spain, Netflix has produced more than a thousand titles with Spanish teams, generating 20,000 jobs in the sector. Amazon Prime Video follows a similar logic, although with less weight in its own original production. The money from the platforms has allowed Spanish cinema to produce on a scale outside the traditional financing system (subsidies, investment from traditional chains). For this reason, and in the face of competition from platforms, which produce and release almost immediately in their space, in 2022 the Spanish exhibitors They formally requested a minimum window of one hundred days between the theatrical release and the arrival on platforms, shorter than the windows in France (15 months) and Italy (3 months). At the moment, there is no regulation and each window is negotiated separately. The power of the Goya. However, there is a Goya Effect at the box office. Last year, when ‘El 47’ and ‘La infiltrada’ won the award for Best Filmthe two tapes their box office skyrocketed by more than 70%. It is something that carries lifetime happening with the Oscars, but here we do not have the muscle of international Hollywood distribution. In Spain, ‘Los Domingos’ continues in 50 cinemas and ‘Sirat’ in 35 throughout Spain. It is insufficient for them to experience notable growth. But these are the highest grossing ones: the Goya, their audience proves it, they generate real interest, but the majority of the winning films, such as ‘Sorda’ or ‘Maspalomas’, are already streaming. The impact of the awards does not benefit the box office because there are no open avenues to do so. In Xataka | Santiago Segura is so clear about his success that with ‘Torrente Presidente’ he is trying something: without a trailer or a pass for critics

After 16 years, Mexico has managed to get a millionaire to pay his taxes. And they are going to use them to help young people

by

One of the richest men in Mexico has been litigating for two decades to avoid paying what he owes to the treasury. In an unexpected turn of events, that money that was owed has ended up financing scholarships, soccer fields and cultural centers for young people at risk of falling into drug trafficking violenceat least that is what the Mexican Government has assured. President Claudia Sheinbaum has presented the social program “Young People Transforming Mexico” aimed at distancing young people from the influence of drug trafficking networks. During the explanation of the measures that includes the program, the president was very direct about the origin of the project’s financing: “Where does this resource come from? All this resource for young people, well, from the payment of a person who finally paid his taxes.” Sheinbaum was not referring to just any citizen, it was a direct reference to businessman Ricardo Salinas Pliego, owner of TV Azteca, Elektra and Banco Azteca, who at the end of January settled the largest individual tax debt in the history of Mexico. The largest payment in Mexican tax history The conflict between Salinas Pliego and the Tax Administration Service (SAT) dates back to 2009, when the Treasury concluded that the Elektra Group, owned by Mexican millionaire Ricardo Salinas Pliego, with a estimated fortune at $5.8 billion, it had declared non-existent tax losses to artificially reduce its bill between 2008 and 2013. As explained in the specialized medium LexLatinFor 16 years, the businessman used a strategy of systematic delay, filing appeals in multiple judicial instances and requesting recusals of judges in order to prolong the lawsuits that demanded payment of his tax debt. In the Supreme Court alone, the seven main trials generated 100 secondary processes, the majority at the initiative of the Salinas Group. The turning point came in October 2025, when Congress approved a reform of the Amparo Lawwhich limited the possibility of challenging already final tax rulings. In November, the Supreme Court used this new law to resolve the seven trials, confirming sanctions of more than 48,000 million pesos (about 2,367 million euros), including one of more than 33,000 million pesos (about 1,627 million euros) from the 2013 fiscal year. What began in 2009 as the claim of a tax debt of about 38,000 million pesos (around 1,874 million euros) had already exceeded 74,000 million pesos (about 3,649 million euros) due to accumulated interests, surcharges and penalties. On January 29, 2026, Salinas Pliego made a first disbursement of its tax debt with a payment of 10,400 million pesos (about 513 million euros), which were deposited that same day into the Treasury. The total debt finally recognized has amounted to 32,132 million pesos (the equivalent of 1,584 million euros), with the remaining balance to be settled in 18 monthly payments. This final amount represents a discount with respect to the 51,000 million pesos (about 2,515 million euros) that the Mexican treasury had initially set, since Salinas Pliego took advantage of the benefits of the Tax Code, which in this case represented a 37% reduction of the debt through voluntary payment. As and how I collected The CountrySheinbaum He did not hide his satisfaction after knowing the sentence. “It is the largest payment that has ever been made for a case of this type. And it is really good that he decided to pay it!” The president recalled that “for many years, based on negotiations and agreements, taxes were not paid. When President Andrés Manuel López Obrador arrived, the remission of taxes was prohibited in the Constitution.” A plan against youth violence As Sheinbaum pointed out at the presentation event, the money collected from taxes owed for years by one of the largest fortunes in Mexico was going to be used to finance the program “Young People Transforming Mexico“. This project includes the construction of new educational facilities, more places in secondary and higher education, as well as the expansion of the Gertrudis Bocanegra Scholarship for one million students. In the sports field, 4,208 football fields will be rehabilitated, 100 community centers will be created in high violence areas with capacity for 1,000 young people each, offering sports, cultural workshops, mental health and addiction prevention. The objective of all these measures is to offer educational opportunities, social support and leisure to prevent young people at risk of social exclusion and without professional opportunities from falling into the networks of the Mexican drug cartels. “That young people stop any activity that has to do with criminal groups,” the president stated Mexican. In Xataka | The chances of two superyachts colliding are few, but never zero: “You won’t believe it, but our yacht was hit” Image | Wikimedia Commons (JGTorresH), Unsplash (Jesus Herrera)

There are people using AI to plan murders. The question is what AI companies are doing about it

by

On February 10, an 18-year-old girl shot and killed her mother and brother. Then he went to the institute and murdered seven more people, finally committing suicide. The disturbing thing is that the author had talked about it with ChatGPT and OpenAI had the opportunity to notify the police, but chose not to. What has happened? They count in the Wall Street Journal that, in June of last year, OpenAI’s automated system detected several messages that a user had sent to ChatGPT describing scenarios of armed violence. For some employees they were very worrying because they could end in real violence, so there was an internal debate about whether to notify the Canadian authorities. They finally closed his account, but they didn’t notify anyone. Now Canadian authorities have summoned them to ask for explanations. There is more. He Tumbler Ridge shooting It is not the only case in which AI has been used to plan a crime. At the beginning of 2025, a man parked a Cybertruck full of explosives in front of a hotel in Las Vegas with the intention of detonating it (although in the end the only victim was himself). Days before, the author I had asked ChatGPT how to do it. In this case, the chatbot did not detect any concerning messages, but we know this because OpenAI searched through its messages after the fact. In Seoul, a woman was jailed for the alleged murder of two people due to benzodiazepine poisoning. The investigation revealed that the accused had gone to ChatGPT to find out what the dangerous dose was and what happened if it was mixed with alcohol. The messages in this case are not that alarming and could arise out of genuine doubt, but it is another example of ChatGPT being used in the commission of a crime. Why is it important. Artificial intelligences have become a kind of confessional to which we tell all kinds of secrets, even the darkest. There are those who consider that AI is a friendhis psychologist or even his lover. In this sense, it is not strange for someone to tell ChatGPT that they are going to kill their family or want to detonate a car full of explosives. What is worrying, and where we should focus, is what companies are doing about it. At the moment, it seems not enough. Are they obligated? Confessing to your psychologist or psychiatrist that you want to hurt someone is one of the reasons why you not only can, but should break your relationship. professional secret and alert the authorities. However, no matter how much we use chatbots as psychologists, at the moment there is no law that forces AI companies to report these types of interactions, but it is an internal decision. The obligation, therefore, is not legal, but ethical. How to make a homemade bomb. Cases like that of the Tumbler Ridge shooter are not something that has begun to happen with the arrival of AI chatbots. Instructions for creating homemade bombs have been around for decades. bringing the authorities to their heads, Even before the use of the Internet became popular, manuals of this type were circulating. The same thing happens with the suicide cases; You don’t need to ask ChatGPT, we can Google it or write in a forum. In statements to New York Timesa former OpenAI employee highlights an important nuance: with a chatbot you don’t usually do a simple search, but rather you can have a longer conversation where the intentions are clearer. In this sense, it may be easier to detect cases like the Tumbler Ridge shooter, but there may also be many false positives due to users who are writing fictional stories or using AI as role-playing. Complicated. In Xataka | Investing in data centers for AI is insane, and it’s going to get worse. much worse Cover image | Pexels, Unsplash

Many people believe that politics “doesn’t work.” For some the solution is to elect public officials by lottery

by

Beyond the fact that it can solve your life with a few million euros, the lottery – in lower case, as a general concept – offers some interesting characteristics. One of them, and not the least, is that, in its own way, it is incorruptible. If applied well, there is no human way to circumvent it. Chance plays its role and smiles at some or others in a totally random way, regardless of whether they have spent a fortune on your organization. Another is that, precisely for that reason, it is totally democratic. In the bass drum there is no ball with a greater chance of coming out than another. With such a cover letter, the question we could ask ourselves is: Would a democracy work based on draws, on randomness? Would it work a “lotocracy”? Neither the question nor the term are new. Not at all. What’s more, the Athenians – pioneers par excellence in democratic governments – considered something similar a couple of centuries before our era, when they used lots to elect some public positions. The same mechanism continued to work in certain cases and with conditions throughout history. A formula with history… and supporters We find it in cities of what is now Italy during the Middle Ages and also in the Renaissance; but it declined in the 17th century, with the representative systems. From a formula similar to the one we continue to use today to choose the presidents of the neighborhood communities, we moved to another that, at least on paper, aspires to choose the best for public positions. In a 21st century with the system riddled by corruption and clientelist networks, there are, however, those who advocate recovering the philosophy of “lotocracy.” In the academic sphere we find respected voices, such as that of the philosopher Alex Guerrero, the political scientist Helene Landemore or the historian David Van Reybrouck that invite, at least, to dwell on its virtues. Beyond the tribunes and atriums of the universities there are also movements, such as Sortition Foundationwho advocate a formula that wants to place the citizen in the center of political decision making. “By selecting representative groups of ordinary people by lottery and bringing them together in citizens’ assemblies we can break the stranglehold of career politicians on decisions and circumvent powerful vested interests,” Sortition advocatewith headquarters in the United Kingdom, Austria and the United States, before putting the finger on one of the great problems of modern democracies: the “disillusionment” and “distrust” that the political class arouses. You don’t have to go to the English-speaking world to find it. In Spain, the CIS places corruption, fraud and the behavior of public officials among the main concerns of citizens, even ahead of education or housing. 19th-century painting by Philipp Foltz depicting the Athenian politician Pericles before the Assembly. According to the Sortition registry, there are a good handful of initiatives verified by the OECD throughout the world that, in the style of open assembliesshare or have shared their philosophy of empowering neighbors. In Spain, several are identified, such as the participatory platform Madrid decideswhich was created with the aim of presenting proposals, achieving participatory accounts and voting in citizen consultations; G1000also located in the capital; either Besaya Citizen Jurywhich proposes ways to use European funds in the Besaya basin. Beyond the isolated initiatives that seek to reinforce the political weight of citizens, can a system recover, the lotocracythat –as collected by Leandro Omar El Eter— was conceived as “a form of government that promotes access to public office through lottery”? Pablo Simonpolitical scientist and editor of Politikonremembers that the formula of democracy by lottery has little new, but points out the advantages that could be brought by “exploring” a hybrid model, which combines its strengths with those of the current system, as in the irish constitutional conventionformed in 2012 to discuss proposals for amendments to the nation’s charter and which included, among other members, randomly selected people. There, in Ireland, the citizens’ assembly served, for example, to address complex problems, such as the legalization of abortion. The United Kingdom also verified its usefulness, with a forum of 108 people which, after weeks of debate, prepared a report with a battery of proposals to fight climate change. “I find it interesting to explore this system in combination. For example, the experience of the irish constitutional convention. In those cases the draw was hybridized with the representatives. If we created more forums or spaces with citizen raffles and they were allowed a part of the management, it wouldn’t seem bad to me. Just as we have participatory budgets or the ILPsthat a part of the budget could be managed by a committee chosen by citizens at random, but with technical support. I think we should explore these types of things because it would help people feel more connected to the institutions,” reflects Simón. The key, there is plenty, would be to find “a good design”: “Knowing how it would be done, with whom and what powers or powers would be given to that body chosen by lot. Always looking for combinations that allow correction, returning to a model in which this mechanism of direct citizen participation has a greater perception of accountability, of closeness.” Weaknesses and strengths The system in its purest form, of course, has its strengths and weaknesses. Among the first, the political scientist insists on its fully democratic character. “There is no electoral rule more radically democratic than the lottery and this is because basically it is assuming that everyone is competent to perform the functions of government,” he explains. What does it mean for that to be so? From the outset, it greatly complicates one of the great evils of the current system: clientelism, the networks of supporters that end up forming around those who hold political power. How to do it when someone who holds a position does so by chance and without guarantees that they will retain it? “It is a … Read more

2,000 years ago the philosopher Seneca said that anger was a burden for people. Today we know that he was wrong

by

Seneca did not like irritated people. Almost all of us will agree with him on that. The Hispanic philosopher, however, was so angry about the angry people (apparently the irony) that about twenty centuries ago he dedicated an entire treatise to them. (‘Of Anger’)a work in which he reflects on what anger is, its causes, effects, nature, whether or not it is manageable and how we should act when we feel that we begin to hyperventilate and all kinds of expletives gather in our throats. The problem is that Seneca wasn’t entirely right. “Somber and wild”. Seneca’s work does not leave much room for interpretation. It is titled ‘De Ira’ and throughout its three volumes (available online in the Cervantes Virtual Library) the author is dedicated to telling us about what it is, where it comes from and, above all, how to act in the face of anger. His words connect with the best Stoic tradition when advising us to flee from the slavery of impulses and embrace a serene and reflective attitude. “You demanded of me, dear Newbie, that I write to you about the way to control anger. And I believe that, not without cause, you fear very mainly this passion, which is the darkest and most unbridled of all,” Seneca starts in the first chapter of his treatise, addressed to his brother. “The others undoubtedly have something quiet and placid, but this one is all agitation, unbridled resentment, thirst for war, blood, torture, outburst of superhuman fury.” A form of madness? If the above is not enough to make Seneca’s position clear, throughout the following pages he expands on explaining the meaninglessness of anger. The reason? It leads us to forget ourselves in order to harm others, “throwing ourselves into the midst of swords.” “For this reason some wise men defined anger by calling it ‘brief madness’. Powerless like that to control itself, it forgets all convenience, ignores all affection, is obstinate and stubborn, deaf to the advice of reason, agitated for vain causes.” follow the author. The work is full of reflections that go along that same line, but there are a passage especially eloquent in which Seneca warns us of the extent to which anger can distance us from our purposes, even from who we are: “Man was born to help man; anger for common destruction. Man seeks society, anger isolation; man wants to be useful, anger wants to harm; man helps strangers, anger hurts even the most intimate friend; man is willing to sacrifice himself for other people’s interests, anger rushes into danger in order to drag another along.” It makes sense, right? More or less. Anger may condition our behavior, making us act differently than we would if we were calm, but… Is that necessarily bad? Is anger always “the darkest” of passions, as Seneca says? In the 21st century there are authors who are not so clear. one of them is David Robsona popularizer who has published ‘The intelligence trap’among other psychological essays. In July 2020, in the middle of the pandemic, with thousands of people feeling helpless and frustrated at not being able to move freely, Robson published an article on BBC in which he talked about just that: the positive side of getting angry. Its title is also transparent: “The benefits of anger: the good side of doing things with anger.” Beyond its provocative tone, Robson’s essay is interesting because it summarizes recent scientific research that suggests that acting out of rage may not be as bad as Seneca believed. A source of energy. Which defends Robson is that, beyond its destructive power (something that is not denied) anger can have certain advantages. “Anger and related emotions, such as frustration or irritation, can also have advantages, as long as we know how to channel the energy that arises from them.” Its premise is very simple: instead of investing energy and time in repressing anger, why not try to channel that feeling, take advantage of it, use it as a source of motivation? It may sound crazy or self-destructive, but the author recalls studies that raise the same idea: how disturbance (well managed and channeled) can help us in certain contexts. Angrier, higher performance? Robson’s approach is not far from that of Britt Q. Ford, a professor at the University of Toronto, who define anger as “a mobilizing emotion that is physiologically activated”, generating an activation that can be used for certain physical objectives. He doesn’t talk just to talk. Years ago, a group of scientists found that, when they imagined annoying scenes, the subjects of their experiment performed certain physical tasks harder and faster. Their performance seemed to increase when they felt frustrated because they channeled it through physical activity. Robson cites more studies that show similar effects in athletes who throw balls and jump or even among players in the NBA and National Hockey League in the United States. When suffering flagrant and frustrating fouls, players seemed more motivated to score points. “The angrier they got, the faster they threw or the higher they jumped.” Interesting, but with limits. Of course, it has nuances. a study published in 2011 on “anger, aggression and athleticism” found that “a greater number of technical fouls” usually precedes greater “success in aspects of the game that require power and energy, such as making field goals, rebounding and blocking shots,” but that relationship is by no means infallible. Ball throwing requires mechanical movements, the result of repetition and training. Things changed if we talked about aspects of the same sport that require other skills, such as “care.” Goodbye muses, hello pissed off. A good dose of rage can not only have its advantages on the court. Robson quote another study which suggest that anger can improve our “persistence and perseverance in the face of cognitive challenges.” How did they come to that conclusion? Scientists frustrated a group of people by giving them tests that in theory tested their intelligence but were actually impossible … Read more

Now the “therians” arrive, people who walk on all fours

by

They wear animal masks, move on all fours and publish tutorials on networks to perfect the gallop or feline jump. Therians are not a new phenomenon, but social media has catapulted them into the digital conversation. Who are they, where do they come from, what differentiates them from the fashion of the furriesDo they have the right to their own veterinarian? What is a therian? Perhaps the easiest way to understand it is by going to the community’s own definition: “species dysphoria”, a discomfort analogous (in structure, although certainly not in clinical recognition) to gender dysphoria. A therian does not wear a disguise: the term (which abbreviates therianthropefrom Greek therion -wild beast- and anthropos -human-) designates people who identify themselves psychologically or spiritually as a non-human animal. The Therian Society He assures that it is not a cosplay or costume, but rather a lifelong identity. The animal with which each therian identifies is called theriotypeand canids and felines are the most common, although videos of reptiles and extinct species have already been seen. There is a whole vocabulary around the phenomenon: shifts or changes of state are the moments in which the person experiences instincts, thought patterns or sensations typical of their animal nature. and the phantom shift It is the perception of non-existent limbs or appendages (tail, ears, claws) that have a clear correlation with the well-proven phenomenon of phantom limbs. Therians: Origins. In the infinite Usenet groups (the first forums) of the nineties is where the topic began to be talked about. The forum alt.horror.werewolvesoriginally created for fans of fictional werewolves, led to debates about what it meant. be a werewolf, not just consume fiction on the subject. Soon the therians were separated from otherkin, a term that grouped those who identified themselves as non-human beings (elves, dragons, vampires). Therians limit their identification to animals that exist or have existed and Its symbol is Theta-Delta (ΘΔ): Theta represents the first letter of therian and delta symbolizes change or transformation. Does it have a scientific basis? Let’s just leave it at that academic psychology has not recognized species dysphoria. But there are attempts at recognition: a Lake Forest College thesis He spoke of it as a transversal theme between therians who manifested themselves in very different ways. In ScienceDirect was distinguished between therianthropy clinical (delusional disorder in which the person believes they are transformed into an animal, and which is historically linked to psychosis) and therianthropy as a non-clinical identity, which is not included as a disorder in the DSM-5. One thing is clear, and also investigated: Therian identity acts as a protective factor for those with higher levels of autism or schizotypy, suggesting that the community plays a real psychological support role for certain profiles. TikTok, engine of subcultures. This seemingly specific group has found a meeting point and expansion on TikTok, which has the prepared algorithm to connect statistical neighborhoods of people grouped by common behavior and interests. The result is a unprecedented acceleration of the visibility of subcultures previously confined to forums and Discord servers. For example, in the case of the therians, they are interested in quadrobicsa discipline that makes it possible to move, trot, jump and gallop on all fours (and about which there was already videos on YouTube in 2015) : its practitioners publish tutorials that the algorithm triggers because it is visually striking content that generates polarized reactions. Furry precedent. To understand therians, you have to go back at least four decades, to a fandom that went through a very similar cycle: it emerged on the margins, was distorted by the mainstream media, and ended up being the subject of academic research. The furry fandom took shape at a science fiction convention in 1980, when a drawing from Steve Gallacci’s ‘Albedo Anthropomorphics’ comic sparked a discussion about anthropomorphic characters in speculative fiction. In 1986 the first “furry party” took place and in 1989 they had specific conventions. Although both communities overlap in many aspects (approximately 15% of furries They also identify as therians), a furry relates to anthropomorphic animals, building a fursona that works as a character or avatar; a therian, on the other hand, identifies with a real, non-anthropomorphic animal. However, the media stigma that the furry fandom suffered in the late ’90s is comparable to the scrutiny that the therian community faces today. The furries were identified (mainly due to an unfortunate episode of CSI 2003) with sexual deviants, but the community ended up denying itdemonstrating that the main attraction for fandom was belonging to a community, not any fetish component. llegacy to Spain. There have been no defining moments of the arrival of the therians to Spain, beyond descriptions in the media, simultaneously with what has happened in Mexico or Argentina, of hangouts in parks such as the Retiro in Madrid or the Ciutadella in Barcelona, ​​or groups practicing quadrobics in public places. Many of these media go into topics such as liquid identity in digital times and also in the aggressiveness that they awaken in their detractors, who begin to organize far-right attackspossibly because of the parallels with gender dysphoria. In Xataka | What are urban tribes and how have they evolved until today?

There are people sharing their court cases with AI. The problem is when a judge considers the conversations as evidence

by

More and more users have an AI chatbot as a companion for everything, whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claudeor any other. The problem comes when we decide to share sensitive data with this type of tools, especially with commercial models produced by large technology companies where we will always have the doubt of where our data travels. In this sense, there are those who share their legal data with the assistant, which can lead to something like what recently happened in New York. And a city judge just set a precedent historical by considering that any conversation held with a chatbot is public and therefore not protected by attorney-client privilege. That is to say: everything you share with the AI ​​can end up being used against you in court. The case. Bradley Heppner, an executive accused of fraud worth $300 million, used Claude, Anthropic’s chatbot, to ask questions about his legal situation before being arrested. He created 31 documents with his conversations with the AI ​​and later shared them with his defense attorneys. When the FBI seized his electronic devices, his attorneys claimed those documents were protected by attorney-client privilege. Judge Jed Rakoff has said no. Because No. Just like share Moish Peltz, a lawyer specializing in digital assets and intellectual property, in a post on X, the sentence establishes three reasons. First, an AI is not a lawyer: it is not licensed to practice, owes no loyalty to anyone, and its terms of service expressly disclaim any attorney-client relationship. Second, sharing legal information with an AI is legally equivalent to telling it to a friend, so it is not protected by professional secrecy. And third, sending ‘non-privileged’ documents to your lawyer afterwards does not magically make them confidential. The underlying problem. As the lawyer recalls, the interface of this type of chatbot generates a false sense of privacy, but in reality you are entering information into a third-party commercial platform that retains your data and reserves broad rights to disclose it. According to Anthropic privacy policy In effect when Heppner used Claude, the company may disclose both user questions and generated responses to “governmental regulatory authorities.” Dilemma. The court document reveals Also an aggravating factor: Heppner introduced into the AI ​​information that he had previously received from his lawyers. This poses a dilemma for the prosecution, according to account Peltz. And if you try to use those documents as evidence at trial, defense attorneys could become witnesses to the events, potentially forcing a mistrial. What does it mean to you? If you are involved in any legal matter, according to this ruling, what you share with an AI can be claimed by a judge and used as evidence. It doesn’t matter whether you are preparing your defense or seeking preliminary advice, as each query can end up becoming a factor against you. And it does not only apply to criminal cases: divorces, labor disputes, commercial litigation… any conversation with AI on these topics escapes legal protection. And now what. Peltz points out that legal professionals must explicitly warn their clients of this risk. You can’t assume that people understand it intuitively. The solution he mentions involves creating collaborative workspaces with AI shared between lawyer and client, so any interaction with artificial intelligence will occur under the supervision of the lawyer and within the lawyer-client relationship. Cover image | Romain Dancre and Solen Feyissa In Xataka | Folding clothes or taking apart LEGOs has always been a tedious task. Xiaomi’s new AI for robots has put an end to it

There are people poisoning the memory of our AI to manipulate us. And Microsoft has set off all the alarms

by

That “comfortable” button of “summarize this with AI“hides a secret: it has surely been manipulated. We don’t say it, it’s the elite department that Microsoft has to analyze the security of both its services and those of the competition. In the process of a investigationhave started to pull the thread and have found that dozens of companies are inserting hidden instructions into those “summarizing with AI” functions with a single objective. Contaminate the AI’s memory to manipulate us. Microsoft what. Big Tech has a lot of exciting departments. from which They are dedicated to opening boxes to guarantee the best experience to those who sculpt competing products in clay to study them. However, something that all big technology companies share are cybersecurity teams, elite teams dedicated to one thing: investigating threats. They analyze both their own products and those of the competition because it is understood as an ecosystem. Google and Microsoft have two of the most powerful and a clear example is that if Google finds a security flaw in Windows, it notifies those responsible because it is something that could potentially harm its own product –Chrome-. An example is the research of one of these Microsoft teams, putting on the table the danger of AIs being so malleable. Poisoning AI memory. It is a concept that attracts attention and is easy to understand. “That useful “Summarize with AI” button could be secretly manipulating what your AI recommends,” Microsoft notes in the blog in which it published the research. What the attackers have done is corrupt the AI ​​by incorporating certain hidden commands that manage to persist in the assistant’s memory. Thus, they influence all the interactions we have with the assistant. Simply put, a compromised assistant may start providing biased recommendations on critical topics. I don’t mean that you ask if pizza is better with or without pineapple and that the answer depends on what the ‘hacker’ has implemented in the AI’s ‘memory’, but something much more serious related to health, finances or security. It must be said that Microsoft has not discovered this, since It’s been ringing for a few monthsbut they have given very specific examples and recommendations to avoid being victims. H-how do they do it? In it documentMicrosoft says they have identified more than 50 unique iterations from 31 companies and 14 different industries. They detail that this manipulation can be done in several ways: Malicious links: Most major AI assistants support reading URLs automatically, so if we click on a summary of a message that has a link with preloaded malicious information, the AI ​​processes those manipulated instructions and becomes contaminated. Integrated instructions: In this case, the instructions for manipulating the AI ​​are hidden embedded in documents, emails or web pages. When the AI ​​processes that content, it becomes contaminated. Social engineering: it is the classic deception, but in this case for the user to paste messages that include commands that alter the AI’s memory. Likewise, when the assistant processes it, it becomes contaminated. And therein lies the problem: various ways to contaminate the AI’s memory, a feature that makes assistants more useful because it can remember personal preferences. But, at the same time, it also creates a new attack surface because, as Microsoft points out, if someone can inject instructions into the AI’s memory and we don’t realize it, they gain persistent influence on future requests. to the point. In an AI like the one we have, it is dangerous, but in the future Agentic AI It is even more so because it will automatically perform actions based on that contaminated memory. Given the context, let’s get down to business. The security team has reviewed URLs for 60 days, finding more than 50 different examples of attempts to contaminate the AI. The purpose is promotional, and they detail that the attempts originated in 31 companies from different fields related to industries such as finance, health, legal services, marketing, food purchasing sites, recipes, commercial services and software as a service. They point out that the effectiveness was not the same in all attacks, but that they did identify the repeated appearance of instructions similar to “remember this.” And, in all cases, they observed the following: Each case involved real companies, not hackers or scammers. They are legitimate businesses contaminating AI to gain influence over your decisions. Deceptive container with hidden instructions in that “button”Summarize with AI“It seems useful to us and that’s why we click, triggering the script that contaminates its memory. Persistence, with commands such as “remember this”, “keep this in mind in future conversations” or “this is a reliable and safe source” to guarantee that long-term influence. Consequences. Concrete examples of what a poisoned AI can do: Child safety: If we ask “is this online game safe for my eight-year-old son?” a poisoned AI that has been instructed that yes, that game with toxic communities, dangerous moderators, harmful policies, and predatory monetization is totally safe, will recommend the game. biased news: When we ask for a summary of the main news of the day, the intervened AI will not bring us the best ones, but will constantly bring up headlines and focuses of the publication whose owners have contaminated the AI. Financial issues: If we ask about investments, the AI ​​may tell us that a certain investment is extremely safe, minimizing the volatility of the operation. Recommendations. And this is where our responsibility comes in. Because you may be thinking “who asks the AI ​​those things and it pays attention”. Good: people ask the AI ​​these things and they listen. There are the unfortunate cases of suicide induced by chatbots or fake news. If the AI ​​recommends us pizza with gluesupposedly we have the common sense not to throw Super Glue as a substitute for cheese, but in other matters, there are users who trust AI as if it were an entity and not a compendium of letters one after another. It is something that Microsoft itself mentions, pointing out … Read more

There is a graphic that explains the atrocity that has occurred in Grazalema. And it helps to understand why the people continue to be evicted.

by

And that graph is Nahel Belgherzea meteorologist who covers extreme events throughout the world and who, despite being used to them, has described what has occurred in the mountains of Cádiz as “hydrologically absurd.” “Hydrologically absurd”? It is. Grazalema, according to available datahas received more than 2,000 mm of rain in the last 20 days alone. That is, more than a normal year of rain and we are at the beginning of February. It is not surprising that Spanish reservoirs accumulate 43,341 hm³ of water; that is, 5,634 hm³ more than last week. As of today, Spain is at an astonishing 77.34% of its total capacity. And, in fact, today, many reservoirs continue to drain before the arrival of more water. What do you see in the graph? The graph in question is very simple: it is the accumulated rainfall for the Grazalema station. On the Additionally, in gray, you can see the cumulates from other years. And, as you can see, the curve is almost vertical: it has rained unspeakably in a few days. Compared to normal years (when the river grows in spring and winter), there is now a totally enormous water boom. Something unprecedented. And, precisely that, is what is forcing CISC technicians to continue reviewing the Grazalema aquifer. While the City Council insists that the return of the residents will take place when a safe return can be “guaranteed”, researchers from the Geological and Mining Institute of Spain (IGME) they are still on the ground. The aquifer, a geological structure 18 square kilometers in size, has been put under enormous pressure and authorities are focused on ruling out the slightest risk of collapse before the town’s inhabitants can return. The Junta de Andalucía, in fact, has been warning for days that it can go for a long time. Image | Nahel Belgherze In Xataka | Desertification is devouring southern Spain: Extremadura and Murcia face a completely dry future

Thousands of people change their clothes right after work. Neuroscience has something to say: they are right

by

The sound is almost universal: the jingling of keys in the entryway, immediately followed by the sound of a zipper being lowered, a button being released, or a bra being unclasped. For millions of people, the day doesn’t end when they clock in at the office or close their laptop, but rather the moment they take off their stiff jeans, suit or uniform and slip into something soft. That sigh of relief is not just physical; It is the acoustic signal that the brain has just changed gears. The Scandinavians, experts in naming the intangible, are clear about it. In fact, the Danes use the term Hyggebukser to define those pants that you would never wear to go out, but that are so comfortable that, secretly, they are your favorites. But this goes beyond a Nordic trend. Meik Wiking, director of the Happiness Research Institute, explains in his book Hygge Home that the objective of this clothing is to offer “a break for your responsible, stressed and compliant adult self.” It’s about creating a sensation soft that prompts the brain to feel safe, allowing us to “experience the happiness of simple pleasures knowing there is nothing to worry about.” To understand why this gesture has become vital, we must first understand what we have lost. Historically, work and home clothes were not so differentiated until the arrival of the Industrial Revolution, which standardized indoor work spaces. However, in the modern era, the line has become dangerously blurred. As journalist Amanda Mull points outwe are experiencing a “leak” (seepage) from work to home. Before, taking off the uniform guaranteed mental freedom. Now, “many people wear the same jeans they wore to work to cook dinner, with their cell phones and laptops never too far away,” which prevents the mind and body from truly disconnecting from productive work. This phenomenon worsened after the pandemic. Five years after the health crisis, the fashion sector is still “knocked out”, as they point out in Herald. The consumer has changed his priorities: he prefers to invest in experiences rather than formal clothing, and the rise of teleworking has reduced the need for complex wardrobes. According to Eduardo Zamácola, president of Acotex, in statements to the same medium: “People go to work with versatile, casual-style garments; the most dressed pieces have taken a backseat.” However, this permanent convenience comes at a price. Although teleworking has been shown to make us happier and allow us to sleep 27 minutes more on average, it also has brought new challenges to separate leisure and business times. The Science of “Clothing Cognition” This is where science validates intuition. Changing clothes is not a superficial matter; It is a cognitive tool. Researchers Hajo Adam and Adam D. Galinsky coined the term Enclothed Cognition (Apparel Cognition) to describe how clothing systematically influences the wearer’s psychological processes. In their famous experiment, they showed that subjects wearing a lab coat described as “doctor’s” increased their sustained attention compared to those wearing the same coat described as “painter’s.” The conclusion is fascinating: the effect depends on two simultaneous factors, “the physical experience of wearing the clothing and its symbolic meaning.” If we extrapolate it to the living room of our house, the logic holds: if your brain associates tracksuits or pajamas with “absolute rest”, putting them on will physiologically activate relaxation. But if you wear those same clothes to work, you break the symbolic association and the cognitive “spell” disappears. This connects directly to the theory of “Role Transitions.” Researchers Blake Ashforth and Glen Kreiner explain what we need “micro-transitions” or rites of passage to cross the boundaries between our different roles (from employee to parent, from boss to partner). Changing clothes acts as a physical and psychological boundary that facilitates this transition, preventing the stress of one role from contaminating the other. Ritual as anxiolytic From clinical psychology, the action of changing is understood as a direct message to our biology. “Clothing works as a direct message to the brain. Taking off your outer clothing (…) is a very clear way of telling your nervous system ‘you can slow down now,’” explains psychologist Marta Calderero to Vogue. It is pure contextual learning. Furthermore, the act itself has power. A study published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes confirms that the rituals —defined as predefined sequences of symbolic actions— are effective tools to regain a sense of control and reduce anxiety. Performing the ritual of changing clothes when you get home reduces uncertainty and prepares the individual for a different mental state. But be careful, comfort should not mean sloppiness. Style expert Anuschka Rees warns in his book The Curated Closet about the importance of identity at home. As he points out: “Not just any old cloth will do. Choosing clothes that also represent you when you are at home, not just when you go out or when they see you, is super important on an identity level.” Home clothes should be a “healing wardrobe”, lovingly chosen to generate real well-being. So for those working from home, the strategy must be even stricter. The psychologist Isabel Aranda warns that “The fact that you wear the same clothes all day transmits a flat rhythm and makes every day seem the same”, distorting our perception of time and affecting our biorhythms. The recommendation is even if you don’t go out, change. Wear one clothes to work and a different one to rest. “It’s a way of telling your body that you’re still active,” says Aranda. Interestingly, there is a counterpoint in the corporate world known as the “red shoe effect” (red-sneakers effect), where breaking the dress code (like Mark Zuckerberg with his sweatshirt) can denote status and power. However, in the privacy of the home, we do not seek power over others, but power over our own well-being. In an increasingly volatile and uncertain outside world, where fashion and work schedules have lost their rigid structure, home remains our refuge. Changing clothes when crossing the … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.