They owe you a day of rest

The Supreme Court has made it clear that holidays are not days of rest. They are different rights. Therefore, if a holiday coincides with your day of restthe company has to give you another additional day off. For years it has been common that, if a holiday coincided with, for example, a Saturday, that day of rest was lost. A Supreme Court ruling has considered that loss of a holiday “does not conform to the law.” Therefore, the employee must be able to enjoy both rights: to weekly rest and to enjoy official holidays. The injustice: that holidays coincide with your rest. The High Court ruled in this sense in a ruling from July 2024which establishes that workers who work from Monday to Sunday and have a fixed day of rest during the week have the right to an additional day when that rest coincides with a work holiday. This resolution corrects the previous criteria of the Social Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid in response to the demand of the workers of a business that opened from Monday to Sunday with rotating shifts, in which the staff’s breaks did not always coincide with the weekend. This meant that, if an employee was assigned, for example, Mondays as a day of rest, and it coincided with one of the 14 holidays recognized by law, that employee would lose either a holiday or a holiday, while his colleagues (with other days of rest) did enjoy both. On holidays you also rest. The usual practice to date was that, if the holiday coincided with the assigned day of rest during the week, the employee “lost” that day since, in reality, that rest was also occurring. However, the Supreme Court ruling reinforces that the 14 annual holidays recognized by law must be enjoyed in their entirety, without overlapping with the minimum weekly rest to which workers are also entitled, thus separating both rights and forcing the company to compensate the employee with another additional day off. Weekly and holiday rest are not the same. The doctrine of the Supreme Court is based on article 37.2 of the Workers Statutewhich indicates that “work holidays will be paid and non-recoverable.” That is, they cannot replace or be a replacement for any other type of rest. In practice, the court considers that allowing a holiday to overlap with the day of rest creates comparative grievances between people with different calendars within the same company. While some enjoy the 14 legally recognized holidays plus their weekly rest, others end up with fewer days off per year just because their day of rest coincides with the holiday. If both coincide, another day must be assigned. Based on this doctrine, if a national, regional or local holiday coincides with the assigned day of rest, the company must grant you an additional day off on another date. This compensatory day does not have to be the one immediately following the holiday, but rather must be set by mutual agreement, respecting the work calendar and ensuring that the holiday is not lost. For companies, this forces them to review quadrants and calendars in sectors that open every day, such as commerce, hospitality or certain essential services, where it is common to work on Sundays and holidays. How it affects you if the holiday falls on a weekend. In a classic weekday from Monday to Friday, if a holiday falls on a Saturday, the new jurisprudence prevents that holiday from simply “disappearing.” The company has to compensate with an additional day of rest. According to the article 47 of Royal Decree 2001/1983 that regulates the effective enjoyment of days of rest, when for organizational reasons the day of rest cannot be enjoyed, the company “will be forced to pay the worker for the hours worked” or to grant an alternative compensatory rest. That is, since the holiday must be taken because it is not recoverable, the day of rest is not “lost”, but must be compensated with another day or paid with a 75% increase if not enjoyed. In Xataka | If you can’t stand your boss anymore, you can resign, but you need to give advance notice of voluntary resignation: how and when to give it Image | Pexels (Leeloo The First)

Today we know how to solve crimes with scientific precision. And we owe it all to a lady with a dollhouse

You imagine the scene and smile. It is perfect to become the seed of a script that ends up winning an Oscar. You, along with dozens of other male criminology students in the room, are greeted by a woman in her 50s who looks like an endearing grandmother. You go to the next room and in it you find a doll house which, they order you, you have 90 minutes to examine. “They sent me here because they told me it would be a training visit,” you protest internally. When you look at the recreation you begin to perceive the macabre aura of the event. The mental image of what a toy house must be is broken inside you when you see that the cloth and porcelain romper is a headless prostitute thrown on the bathroom of a room to which over the years, you notice, the same squalor that has characterized the life of its guest has been attached. There’s more: one thing catches your attention, just one of hundreds. Some lines drawn in chalk on the miniature ironing board in the corner of the room. They mark the price that the utensil must have had when they bought it several years ago. You look at the whole and the level of detail The entire room is such that you start to get dizzy from the puzzle you have to solve. But there is no room to be stunned. The strange grandmother at the beginning had already warned you: you have 90 minutes and there is not a single one to lose. Frances Glessner Lee, dollhouses and the true origin of CSI Frances Glessner Lee, whom we know today as “the mother of forensic science,” he didn’t have it easy to get to where he did. If it were not for a concatenation of circumstances, it is likely that this police branch would have lost one of its most valuable and, of course, curious pedagogical milestones that we have known. Born in Chicago in 1878, Lee was the daughter of John Jacob Glessner, owner of the successful International Harvester company. Motivated by her childhood and teenage readings of Sherlock Holmes, she longed to dedicate herself to the exciting world of homicide investigation. At the end of the 19th century, the typical thing for society ladies was not to go to Harvard and then dedicate themselves to solving crimes, but get married and start a family. They forced this on him when he was 20 years old. He divorced and waited for his father and brother to die so he could inherit the family fortune and finally be able to make his own decisions. In all that time his concerns never went away. He studied criminology in Boston, He donated part of his inheritance to Harvard to open a brand new forensic medicine department there and he got to work. At 52 years old. Throughout her life, Lee founded the Harvard Medical School and served as an advocate for absolute rationalization in police investigation. among many other thingsbut the great work of his life was another: his Limited studies of unexplained deathsa series of 19 dioramas or small miniature doll houses that represented complex crime scenarios that would be analyzed by future students of Criminology or Forensic Investigation. As a socialite, Lee used her money and social skills to make your way into the world of men and convince them to participate in your proposal. The cottage seminar by day, opulent parties at the Ritz Carlton by night. Fourteenth State Police Homicide Investigation Seminar, November 17-22, 1952, at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Harvard Medical School. Read to the right. Harvard Medical Library and Francis A. Countway Library of Medicine. Complete photograph of your death: every object around you counts If something stands out all the biographies of Lee It is his unhealthy passion for detail. The passages about his works are an endless collection of nouns and adjectives. The cans of food in the cupboards, the fogged-up mirrors, the half-peeled potatoes, the overflowing ashtrays, the unmade beds, the open oven faucets, the pieces of wood under the nails, the violet stains observable on the subject’s face. The backyards and fire escapes hidden from view of investigators and that Mrs. Lee ordered from specialized carpenters just so that no element of the room imagined in her mind escaped her control. Only one thing escaped him: it is not possible to distinguish rigor mortis in a doll. For all this only Lee can know how many months or years was able to dedicate to each of the jewels in his gloomy collection, which cost as a result of 3,000 or 4,000 dollars of those of that time piece by piece and that involved both work and love: all the textile elements that we see in the dioramas were made by her herself. The Bounded Studies are not only a pedagogical tool, but also a theoretical proposal on the tangible, material aspect that surrounds the reality of human death. As if each object, each frayed blanket and each photograph on the front page of the newspaper that has the figure of a murdered man at its feet, also became part of the same concatenation of events that led to his death. Pure chaos theory applied to forensic architecture. As we have learned later, the houses became so complicated that many students were not able to find the appropriate solution as to how the hypothetical crime had occurred, but rather that they were simply left unable to give a single answer. A pedagogical legacy still to be resolved Of the 18 dioramas that Mrs. Lee made, we only know the answer to 13 of them. Over the years, no one has been able to solve five of these simulations that are still considered some of the most arduous homicide scenes in history. Its creator took the secret of those five rooms to the grave: she agreed if the participant proposed the correct … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.