SEAT threatens 1,500 layoffs in Martorell

The European car industry faces an uncertain future. In the roderas of the complicated path of electrification of its catalog, the obstacles of the Chinese electric car have been crossed and, now, the US tariff threats. In that scenario, the European Union has imposed an additional tariff of 20.7% to electric vehicles manufactured in China. The bad news is that this climb has not only affected Chinese manufacturers cars. Seat has been trapped In the midst of this regulation with the Tavascan cupra. The Tavascan coupra shoots. He Cupra tavascan, He was the first electric “rebel” brand of Seat. The Cupra Electric Model It is assembled In the factory that Volkswagen has in Hefei (China). Therefore, even if it is a European brand, the same tariffs are applied as to the rest of Chinese brands. That has made its cost, which already assumed a 10% tariff already existing, you have to add an additional 20.7% that the EU has imposed to cars manufactured in China that entered into force at the end of 2024. This raises the total tax at 30.7%, which seriously affects the profitability of this model whose price ranges between 41,000 and 53,000 euros. 1,500 jobs at stake. The domino effect of the fall in the profitability of the model that was going to mark the passage of the company’s electrification, has caused the company to rethink the strategy by reducing the production of cars in its Martorell factory. Wayne Griffiths, CEO of Seat, assured To the agency Reuters That, if these tariffs are not reduced to Tavascan before March 2025, the company would be forced to cut 1,500 direct jobs and up to 10,000 indirects related to suppliers of the Catalan factory. This figure doubles the initial estimates of the unions. Matías Carnero, president of UGT of Catalunya pointed out In an interview for Eldiario.es that “were in danger between 600 and 700 jobs” due to tariffs. EMISSION OBJECTIVES add more tension. Seat’s situation is aggravated with the need to fulfill Pollutant emission objectives established by Brussels. This directive forces SEAT to reduce vehicle production with combustion engines and reconsider its commercial strategy given the economic unfeasibility of its electrical models by tariffs. In this context, the company is negotiating with the European authorities to make the emission regulations more flexible and mitigate the economic impact and avoid more labor cuts. “We don’t have much time. We need to reach a solution in the first quarter.” Griffiths pointed out in statements to Reuters. “We cannot solve it overnight,” said the SEAT manager, highlighting that to comply with the regulations, they had to develop synthetic fuel engines. A new stick on the wheels. Seat did not come from marking its best financial figures, so the impact of tariffs is not the only challenge that arises in the future of Seat. In the third quarter of 2024, sales had already fallen 4%, attributed to macroeconomic factors such as global instability. The company had already announced Reduction of about 90,000 units in the Martorell plant, which represents a 17% cut in its production The Catalan factory is a key piece for Seat, since it manufactures models such as the Formentor, León and Arona coupra, in addition to the Audi A1. The brand assured in its Annual 2023 report produce more than 443,400 units in that factory. However, economic difficulties have already led Seat to apply different rounds of layoffs since 2022. If an agreement with the EU is not reached, the dismissals will continue in the Seat’s flagship factory. In Xataka | Volkswagen has saved the furniture, but not to its template: 35,000 layoffs in Germany to continue manufacturing Image | SEAT

Trump orders federal workers back to office or threatens layoffs

In one of his first actions as president of the United States, Donald Trump issued an executive order ending remote work for all federal employees, a measure aimed at reducing the federal workforce through attrition. The White House directed all US government departments and agencies in the executive branch to end remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work full time. Department heads may exempt some workers from this requirement, but in very specific cases. The executive order was one of multiple directives aimed at the 2.3 million-person federal workforce that, along with the return-to-the-office mandate, includes a hiring freeze, revamped hiring rules and other measures to make it more easy to fire high-level career employees. The White House said the measures were necessary to limit what Trump and his supporters consider a “deep state” that fought against his actions during the president’s first term. “There have been numerous well-documented cases of career federal officials resisting and undermining the policies and directives of their executive leadership.”states one of the executive orders signed by the president on Monday night “Therefore, the principles of good administration require that measures be taken to restore accountability to career officials,” he continues. According to the Office of Management and Budget, about 1.1 million federal civilian employees, that is, 46% of the civilian workforce, were eligible for some form of teleworking. Of those, approximately 228,000 workers, or 10% of the total workforce, had fully remote positions with no obligation to go to an office. Union reaction The return-to-office directive is expected to face a fight from federal unions, some of which have remote work written into their contracts. A union representing government workers criticized the mandate as representing a return to the patronage system thatthat oversaw the federal workforce until the end of the 19th century. “Every American has a stake in ensuring that federal employees remain free to carry out the mission of the agencies that employ them without fear of political interference,” Everett Kelly, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement. (AFGE), which represents 800,000 workers in the federal government and the government of the District of Columbia. Kelly, whose union represents employees of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies, also called Trump’s directives “a blatant attempt to corrupt the government.” federal law by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.” The National Treasury Employees Union filed a lawsuit against the president’s “Schedule F” executive order, a directive that makes it easier for the Trump administration to fire career government employees. Trump’s order is “contrary to the intent of Congress,” according to the complaint filed Monday night in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Keep reading: • Vivek Ramaswamy gives up his mission to try to save the government millions of dollars• Trump sets a date for charging 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada• Trump’s insistence on increasing defense spending to 5% worries NATO

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.