The hatred of Middle Internet

If you have been watching the networks this weekend, surely you have seen The video in which a tennis player gives his cap to a child, but the man next to him rises from his hands. What followed was a good example that when the Internet is organized, you can get almost what you propose. What happened. It happened during the US Open that is being held in New York. Last Thursday, after the match against Russian Karen Khachanov, Polish tennis player Kamil Majchrzak approached the stands and began to sign autographs for his fans. One of them was a child of about 10 years who asked for his cap, to which the tennis player agreed. He did not give him time to smile: the man next to him snatched it and, making deaf ears to the kid’s complaints, puts it in a bag that his wife carried. The two smile proud, without being aware that everything has been recorded. The tennis player did not realize and continued signing, leaving the child without a gift. Fountain: X Internet detectives to rescue. The video It quickly went viral And the answer was swift. Outraged, many people began to investigate To identify man. On the other hand, another initiative was launched to try to find the child. After watching the video, the tennis player himself published in Your Instagram account A call to meet with the kid and be able to give him the cap that had been removed in front of his noses. Caught. On Saturday 30, two days after the incident, man was identified. This is Piotr Szczerek, a Polish millionaire and owner of the Drugbruk paving company. In addition to innumerable publications shaving your behaviorInternet found another way to make him pay his bad gesture: Fry the company to negative reviews. We do not know what your score was before, but currently Drugbruk has 1.4 on Google, A 2 in Tustpilot and a 1.4 in goworka Polish review site. There have also been users who They have sent critical messages through the company’s contact mailbox. The wave of criticism has made both Szczerek and his wife deactivate his accounts on social networks, according to The Sunday Times. This sounds to us. Although nothing to do with the fact of the theft of the cap, it reminds us of the case of Andy Byron, CEO of Astronomer, to whom the KISS-CAM From a Coldplay concert he presented while he had an adventure with its HR director. The parallels are clear: the identification of the protagonists thanks to the networks, the fierce criticisms (which in the case of Byron They flowed into their resignation), that both are millionaires and have a company … but above all the fact that the protagonists did not expect to be recorded. There is even another resemblance: in both cases letters of apology have been published of the two protagonists who have turned out to be false (as of this publication, Szczerek has not pronounced on the controversy). Happy end. After the publication of the tennis player, thanks to the networks He could locate it and met him. The player posted an image with the boy, called Brock, carrying a cap very similar to the one that took him a few days ago. In the end the child has been the best standing of this whole story. In Xataka | Millions of people are hooked right now to an Olympic Games where cats compete. Cats made with ia

We have been making the most horrendous crimes in entertainment years. We have said enough with ‘the hatred’ by José Breton

The José Bretón case, resurrected years after his conviction because of the publication of the Luisgé Martín ‘El Odio’ bookhas taken a new turn. On the one hand, The Prosecutor’s Office has appealed against the publication of the book And he accuses Anagrama of not facilitating the book, as was his obligation to arrive. And anagram, almost simultaneously, has decided to paralyze the distribution indefinitely. This extraordinary event generates countless questions: why ‘hate’ and not other previous books? What does the case of José Breton have particular, why is he considered culturally unacceptable? Will the True Crime To the Spanish from now on? It will be unpublished. The book that reconstructs the crime of José Breton, which murdered his two children in 2011, will finally not reach bookstores. Anagrama has published a New statement in which he states that “voluntarily, he remains in his decision to respect the request for the precautionary measures requested by the Prosecutor’s Office to paralyze the distribution of the work.” They also regret the pain that the information about the publication may have caused to the mother, Ruth Ortiz, and ensure that works such as ‘hate’ require a double dose of responsibility and respect. Reaction against. Anagrama has encountered a strong reaction to ‘hate’: not only In social networks and in The bookstores themselves There have been movements against the book, but opinioners of every sign have manifested In favor and against of the edition. Undoubted issued a few days agoand in which they claimed their right to publish ‘hate’. If the murders themselves opened at the time the debate and the condemnation of vicaria violence that Breton had exercised over his wife, this book has done so with a much more complex theme: the freedom of the press and expression in front of the right to the honor of those affected by the text. Voice to the murderer. It is indisputable that ‘hate’ makes something rare: give voice to the murderer. But it is not absolutely unpublished: innumerable documentaries that interview prison murderers have done so previously, and documentaries as the very prestigious’The Act of Killing‘They have won all their fame precisely because of the reflection on the criminal personality that arouse the first -person reflections of the genocides that appear in it. And ‘Hate’, in addition, it is not a film or a podcast, but a book, which paradoxically should dress of “legitimacy” the experiment, or at least, of an intellectual alibi of which the same product would lack if it were, for example, for example, for example, A television report. Hate is not an exceptional case. The authentically unique thing of the case is that this book has marked a red line that did not exist with comparable works. Manuel Jabois”s book see you in this life or in the other ‘entered the Asturian plot of 11M giving voice to criminals, and has recently been adapted on a television series. Recent Netflix series, like those of the anthological ‘Monster‘ either ‘The body in flames‘They describe the facts from the point of view of the murderers. Innumerable podcasts, starting with the most popular ‘Criminopathy‘They describe crimes with great detail and make all possible efforts to enter the murderer’s mind. Even if they are accused of morbid, nobody talks about withdrawing them. What has different ‘hate’? I hate hate. Possibly what has made the difference and has made the observation of ‘hate’ and its legal process into something unheard of and with very few precedents in Spain It is the fear that society has had to identify with the murderer. The coverage of Alcàsser casefor example, he focused on the victims because the criminals, even when there were defendants, always remained involved in the mystery. However, and as much as the author of ‘El Odio’, Luisgé Martín, has insisted that His intention was to generate the opposite effect To bleach, the fear of an understanding of the reasons for the murderer has caused the rejection of society. Header | Anagram In Xataka | The ‘True Crime’ pending black Spain: the cases that television fiction have not yet dared to play

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.