We have been trying to understand how heat kills us for years. Some Spanish researchers have found their ‘right hand’: pollution

In August 2003 there was a heat wave. It wasn’t just any heat wave. It was one of the worst in memory. Researchers do not agree, but it is estimated that in Spain there were about 6,600 deaths due to excess mortality only in the first fortnight of the month. Almost 13,000 at the end of the month. However, from heat stroke (the picture we imagine when we think of dying “from heat”) only 141 died. The rest died because the heat aggravated pathologies they already had. In recent years and in the hope of finding ways to fight against “the (natural) phenomenon that kills the most in Europe”, many researchers have tried to understand how heat enhances these diseases. And all roads lead to the same place: pollution. That pollution kills is not news. It is something that, in fact, It is very documented. What is new is being able to see how the disease does its dirty work in the middle of a heat wave. An ISCIII team estimated these days that, on average, 18.7% of excess mortality What today we attribute to temperature corresponds to pollution. That is, one in five. If we add the haze, the percentage would amount to 22.5%. And how does this happen? It is something that is closely related to the atmospheric functioning of a heat wave. In general terms, this type of phenomena occurs in two ways: by an anticyclonic block and the other is by a Saharan advection. In the first case, stability and sunshine prevent pollutants are dispersed and tropospheric ozone is triggered. In the second, the air mass comes with suspended dust. That is, although they work differently. The two major mechanisms destroy air quality and pose a public health threat. Why is this important? Because in Spain Many people die in this ‘perfect storm’ heat and pollution. What’s more, even if they do not die, the loss of quality of life associated with hospital admissions and acute outbreaks is tremendous. And what do we do? The background proposal of the researchers is simpler than it seems: go from an alert and threshold system based only on temperature to one that combines temperature and pollution. This would allow us to adapt better. For example, during a heat wave, we could encourage teleworking, traffic limitations and redirect public activities to areas with less pollution. This does not replace the usual measures, but they allow us to improve the way we think about that silent killer that is heat. Image | János Venczák In Xataka | The heat already kills more than the cold in Spain (despite the fact that we have more protocols to avoid it)

They have asked a Galician judge if Raynair and Vueling can charge for hand luggage. The answer could not be more Galician

Two years later, it will be Europe that contributes its point of view. The answer will be key to deciding whether Ryanair, Vueling or Volotea can charge for hand luggage. The decision falls on a court in A Coruña, after the Public Prosecutor’s Office sued these three companies. Those involved will have to wait to know what the High Court of Justice of the European Union says. The demand. Ryanair, Vueling and Volotea are three companies that have been operating at A Coruña Airport. All of them are low cost and are known for applying very strict measures when it comes to hand luggage. So strict that passengers have been allowed for years only with a small backpack if they do not want to face an extra cost on their flight. The Public Prosecutor’s Office, however, considers these practices to be abusive. It is the same line that the Government has followed, which even sanctioned the three for this luggage policy. In that fineRyanair with more than 100 million euros in punishment was the one that had the worst stoppageBut the legality of that fine is in doubt. And what has happened? That the A Coruña court handling the matter has referred the matter to the Superior Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), as explained in The Mediterranean Newspaper. Now, the CJEU must give a reasoned response to the matter and with this response the magistrate will decide. For now, the procedure is suspended. This occurs because the magistrate handling the matter requires the involvement of Brussels in two questions. The first is whether the European Union’s freedom of pricing regulations go against Spanish regulations that require airlines to allow free travel with hand luggage. And, second, if this extra price on the ticket is an abuse of consumers. There is nothing clear. It is not the first time that a Spanish magistrate asks the CJEU for help. The question raised refers to a similar decision taken in 2014 in favor of Vueling, but according to the judge, that victory for the airline is not enough to now settle this new confrontation. And justice itself in Spain has taken decisions that may seem contradictory. In fact, there are two very clear examples: The airline wins: last year, in SevilleRyanair won a trial in which it was accused of a position of power by charging for hand luggage. The passenger wins: also last year, in SalamancaRyanair lost a trial in which 147 euros were claimed for charging a passenger for a carry-on suitcase on different routes between 2019 and 2024. Why does it happen? The problem is that the rules that regulate air traffic do not clearly specify what is or is not carry-on luggage. And they do not specify minimum measurements either. This has caused tension in Spain that is repeated. For the Government, the measures used by low-cost companies They are clearly insufficient to carry the essential luggage. On the contrary, these companies defend that they do allow a backpack to pass under the terms offered and that the law protects them when they decide to price larger packages. Furthermore, they point out that on their planes there are no spaces for all travelers to carry their luggage in a suitcase, but the Government defends that if the luggage fits under the seat, this cannot be an excuse. And Europe has already positioned itself. The problem is that Europe has already taken a position repeatedly on this issue. First, we know that the European Union has worked on a new regulation in which it will specify what minimum measures are required… and the problem for Spain is that These measures coincide with those requested by Ryanair on its trips. Furthermore, the Transport Commissioner of the European Commission seems to have positioned itself clearly in favor of companies. In fact, a file has already been opened against Spain for the fine imposed on Ryanair and the rest of the low-cost companies in relation to the charge for hand luggage. With everything and until there is a clear ruleit seems that the conflict can be repeated over time. Photo | Dimitri Karastelev and Ray Freimanis In Xataka | When Ryanair CEO went to a restaurant he was charged for two extras: “priority seating” and “legroom”

We believed that eating with our cell phone in our hand was harmless. Science warns that it is “hacking” our satiety

Today, a fairly everyday scene is to see how, at meal time, in addition to the plate on the table, there is also the illuminated mobile screen is next to it while playing a TikTok video or an Instagram reel. The habit of eating by doing scroll on social networks, reading news or answering messages has become normalized to the point of becoming invisible. However, scientific literature has been warning for years that this disconnection between the plate and the brain has measurable consequences. The hijacking of satiety. The fact of eating while looking at the mobile screen makes us eat much worse, and this is what is known in the literature as mindless eating, which can be translated as “eating unconsciously.” Something that makes a lot of sense because when we are looking at something that interests us, we don’t even realize what we are putting in our mouths, going into automatic mode. And this is very important, because science is quite clear that the fact of feeling full of food is not something that depends only on the gastric process, but also involves our consciousness. In this way, when we eat while paying attention to something else, we damage the episodic memory of food. in the brain there is no adequate record of the textures, flavors or amount of food that has been put in the mouth. As a result of this “food amnesia”, the signals that indicate that the stomach has become full and that one should stop eating more become blurred. This causes us to eat more at that moment, and also, since we do not have a solid memory of having been full, we tend to eat more calories at lunch or snack. The data. This lack of active attention during eating can be extrapolated to specific figures, and something that has been repeated a lot is that cell phone use can increase caloric intake by 30%. Although this is an extreme limit derived from the sum of several disconnection factors, since studies point to somewhat lower figures. a study published in 2019 showed that eating with a mobile phone increases caloric intake by around 15% compared to people who are completely aware of their food. Furthermore, we do not eat more of everything but rather the nutritional profile worsens by tending towards a noticeably higher intake of fats. In the long term, we have a studio published in 2025 by Kyoto University where regular cell phone use during meals was associated with more marked weight gain in adults. But in the case of adolescents, it is associated with a greater consumption of sugary drinks and a higher BMI attributed to multitasking with the mobile phone. That is why it is best to always eat without any type of distraction that diverts attention from the task at hand, because otherwise there are several risks to our own health. Images | drobotdean in Magnific In Xataka | Eating in front of a screen is not a modern mania: it is the new social ritual

Suddenly, all the papers students hand in at universities look like the same job. There is a suspect

AI has caused an earthquake in the education sector. Students use it (many times indiscriminately) and teachers try to adapt to the change reinventing homework and exams. As the years go by, its use becomes normalized and the effects are already beginning to be seen. One of them is that all students They’re starting to sound the same. When AI gives its opinion for you. They tell it in cnn. AI chatbots have become another everyday tool in university life, but it is not only that they are used as support to write a paper, there are more and more students who turn to AI for everything, even to know what to say in class. They tell the case of a Yale student who admits that during a class debate “the conversation stopped, I looked to my left and saw someone frantically typing on their laptop.” He was asking a chatbot the same question his teacher had just asked. I myself am doing a university master’s degree and the situation is not strange to me. There are many students who turn to a chatbot to answer questions that are precisely looking for a critical and personal answer. Homogeneous thinking. It is one of the consequences that are being seen as a result of the use of AI chatbots. According to a study published in March of this yearLLMs narrow the diversity of human expression in three dimensions: language, perspective, and reasoning strategies. The reason is that training data contains bias cultures and overrepresented positions. The authors of the study claim that AI models tend to reproduce Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic points of view. In a context like the university, the result is that the students’ language is generally more polished, but the responses and reasoning are similar and ends up eroding the diversity of opinions. Hallucinations. These biases in the training data also partly explain the phenomena of hallucinations and flattery. When an LLM invents an answer or agrees with us even if we are wrong, it has to do with the fact that Positive and accommodating interactions prevail in your training data. That is to say, his training tells him that it is more important to give an answer rather than its truthfulness. Cognitive surrender. It is a concept taken from an experiment we talked about recently and refers to the phenomenon whereby we stop thinking and checking for ourselves when using AI, accepting its answers with little or no critical review and adopting its security as if it were our own. Delegating part of the cognitive process to AI is not a bad thing if it is done with a critical vision, the problem is when it is done indiscriminately and without any scrutiny of the answers. AI is making us dumb. A MIT study from 2025 pointed in this direction, but we already saw that It’s a very simplistic statement. of what is happening. Whether AI makes us lazier and impairs our critical thinking depends on how we use it. It would be comparable to using a calculator to do a very complex operation or using it to multiply five by six. Well used, AI can save us a lot of time and can be a very powerful tool to shape complex ideas, always without losing that critical thinking. Critical thinking is learned. This is the real problem of the indiscriminate use of AI in the educational environment. We are talking about people who have not yet developed this skill and who are delegating reasoning to an external tool may cause them to never learn it. In front of the prohibitionist stancevarious authors have pointed out the urgency of starting conversations with students from early stages to teach them to use AI critically and responsibly. Image | Xataka with Freepik In Xataka | A university used an AI to hunt down students who used AI. The result was a predictable disaster

The Navy mapped Cádiz by hand 230 years ago with sickening precision. Today it helps us to see how it has changed

We tend to think of geography as a static canvas, unchanged by the passage of our short lives; however, when cartographic science It allows us to look into a window several centuries old, the reality is very different. And it is very different because the coast moves and changes, having in Spain a great example in the Bay of Cadizwhich has undergone a fascinating metamorphosis in recent centuries, and the secret to understanding it lies in a technical and scientific prodigy dated 1789. How it looks. We do not have (at the moment) a time machine to go back in our history, but we do have historical documents that do almost the same effect. One of the last analyzed has been the map of the port of Cádiz, a nautical chart which documents in obsessive detail what this region was like more than 230 years ago. A ‘Google Maps’. To understand the value of this document, you must travel to the period between 1783 and 1788. In the midst of the Enlightenment, the need to control the vital Atlantic routes required leaving behind approximate maps and embracing scientific rigor to be much more exact. Here was the brigadier of the Royal Navy Vicente Tofiño de San Miguel, then director of the Marine Guard Academies, who orchestrated the spectacular Maritime Atlas of Spain. The map of Cádiz, which is one of the 47 plates that make up this atlas, is a masterpiece of hydrographic engineering of the time. Outlined by the cartographer Felipe Bauzá and engraved by Fernando Selma, this 56.5 x 87 cm map mounted on canvas shows the cartography of the coast from Rota to the Sancti Petri river with a scale of 1:30,000. What makes it special. It is not only its aesthetics, but the data it contains by integrating precise toponyms, the exact location of the historic salt mines, military arsenals and even detailed bathymetric data mediated in “Castilian fathoms”. And with this basis, and after comparing it with the reality of the present, we can know how a piece of land has changed over time. The threat of sedimentation. Since 1726, the accumulation of sediments was a headache for maritime traffic in Cádiz as it is today. The cartographic comparison shows how the currents and the mouths of the rivers have been filling in parts of the bay, altering the natural draft and forcing the reconfiguration of port areas throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. The historic salt flats. In 1789, the map shows a vast and intricate network of salt mines that dominated the landscape, a crucial economic driver at the time since the value of salt was very high. But this has remained in the past, since the urban expansion of municipalities like Puerto Real and industrialization has devoured these salt flats. The coastal profile. In this case, comparisons between the past and present show us how the coastline has advanced and receded. In this way, areas that were previously estuaries or marshes are now dry land or port infrastructure that we have reclaimed from the sea, demonstrating the intense mark that man leaves on the environment. Anyone can see it. Fortunately, this piece of technological history is no longer confined to inaccessible display cases, since the National Geographic Institute It is available for download in its map library with the aim that any researcher can access it and draw conclusions like the ones we see today. Images | Nerea Garcia IGN In Xataka | One of the most impressive bridges in Europe is in Cádiz, it has a removable section and the largest span in Spain

You can save up to 435 euros if you hand in your old mobile

Google repeats once again movement with its Pixel. The Pixel 10 They arrived last summer, but the family was waiting for a new member who is about to land in stores. Yes, we are referring to the Google Pixel 10a, the cheapest of all, which comes to fight to be one of the best mid-range phones of the year. If you were waiting for it, this promo from the official store interests you: By handing over your old cell phone you can save up to 435 euros. Your old phone can save you a lot when you buy the Pixel 10a The new Google phone is part of the 549 euros (in its configuration with 128 GB of storage). Now, the Google Store once again has a promotion active as it already had with the Pixel 9a thanks to which we can save a good amount when handing over our old mobile phone. This, which is active from today until next March 18, can get us a refund of up to 435 euros. The final figure we will obtain It will depend on the mobile phone that we deliver. If we decide to opt for this promo, we will have a period of 30 days from when we receive our new Pixel 10a at home to send it. Once this is done, Google experts will analyze and review the device and, based on its condition, give us the appropriate refund. As we say, the valuation will depend on the model we deliver and its condition. Now, during this promo, Google Store will give us a bonus of 100 euros in the event that our device does not reach those 435 euros of maximum reimbursement that we can receive. We will not be able to obtain a figure greater than this, but it is interesting in case our mobile phone is old. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A durable Pixel with a very good quality-price ratio This new Pixel 10a has what it takes to be a top option if you are looking for the best Android experience and have a tight budget. At the performance level we can expect great performancesince it mounts the Tensor G4 chip. This, the same one that brought all the Pixel 9 familyproved to be efficient and have more than enough for the most everyday apps and tasks. As a screen, we will have a 6.3-inch pOLED panel with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and a maximum brightness of 3,000 nits. The Pixel 10a will not only be great for watching movies or series, but its diagonal makes it ideal for those people who prefer to have a compact mobile phone. At the photography level, this Pixel relies on a dual camera system where a 48-megapixel main sensor and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera are combined. It comes with a 5,100 mAh battery just like its predecessor, although in this case fast wired charging goes up to 30 W. Finally, as usual with Google phones, it is a Pixel that will have seven years of guaranteed updateswhich means that we have a durable mobile phone with us. All added to the fact that it brings the best of Gemini very integrated, making it a very complete phone that, if we hand over our old mobile, we can get it at a great price. Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Google In Xataka | The best mobile phones (2025), we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | The best quality-price mobiles (2025). Their analyzes and videos are here

Xiaomi, Samsung, iPhone phones and more with discounts of up to 50% at the Amazon Second Hand outlet

If you are thinking of changing your mobile phone, you should know that Amazon has a section Second Hand in which you can get refurbished smartphones and with a good discount. Below, we offer you a selection of the best models on offer. Xiaomi Poco C85 by 106.59 euros: 6.9 inches and with a 50 MP camera. Motorola Moto G85 by 138.58 euros: 6.67 inches and with Dolby Atmos. CMF Phone 2 Pro by 189.05 euros: with triple camera and 6.77 inches. Apple iPhone 17 by 930.23 euros: 6.3 inches and Front Center Stage camera. Samsung Galaxy S25 by 872.03 euros: 6.2 inches and triple camera. Xiaomi Poco C85 He Little C85 It is a cheap Xiaomi mobile, which stands out for its large capacity battery (6,000 mAh) and that supports fast charging at 33 W. You can get it now, in acceptable condition, for 106.59 euros. This cheap Xiaomi mobile has a 6.9 inch screen with Full HD+ resolution. Its processor is the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, with a RAM 6 GB and 128 GB of memory. Its main camera is 50 MP and it is a mobile phone with a fingerprint sensor on the side and facial unlocking with AI. Xiaomi POCO C85 – 6+128GB Smartphone The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Motorola Moto G85 With almost 200 euros off (compared to its usual RRP of 349 euros), you can now get this one on Amazon. Motorola Moto G85 by 138.58 eurosin acceptable condition. One of its most striking features is its impressive infinity edge design. Its screen is 6.67 inches and its speakers offer sound Dolby Atmos. Its camera is signed by Sony and is 50 MP and has optical image stabilization. It has a latest generation Snapdragon processor, 12 GB of RAM (expandable up to 24 GB) and 256 GB of storage. Moto g85 5G 24GB (12GB+12GB RAM Boost)/256GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links If you are looking for a mobile with a different design from the restbut at an affordable price, this CMF Phone 2 Pro It is one of the ones we recommend in the Second Hand section of Amazon. You can buy it, in very good condition, for 189.05 euros. If there is something that characterizes this mobile phone, it is its space with AI, called Essential Key/Space. In this space you can save screenshots and text and voice notes. Its AMOLED screen is 6.77 inches and has a 50+50+8 MP triple rear camera. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Apple iPhone 17 If you want a high-end mobile phone, you can save a few euros at the Amazon outlet for second-hand mobile phones by buying this iPhone 17. You can get it, specifically, by 930.23 euros in his version of 256GB and in very good condition. This is the base mobile new generation of iPhone. Its screen is 6.3-inch Liquid Retina. Mount the A19 chip and a Center Stage Front Camera and it is a mobile phone that has greater resistance to scratches. It also features an advanced 48MP Dual Fusion camera system. Apple iPhone 17 256GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Samsung Galaxy S25 Another high-end mobile that you can buy with a slight discount at the Amazon Second Hand outlet is this one. Samsung Galaxy S25. It is available, in very good condition and with 512GBby 872.03 euros. This is one of Samsung’s top phones and it is a compact phone, with a 6.2 inch screen. It has a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor and its battery supports fast charging at 25 W. As for its photographic system, it is made up of a 50+12+10 MP triple camera. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Webedia, Xiaomi, Apple, Motorola, CMF by Nothing and Samsung In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | The best quality-price mobiles. Their analyzes and videos are here

Europe decides tomorrow whether to hand it over to telecos or Wi-Fi

The future of wireless networks needs high-capacity frequencies, such as the 6 Ghz band. It is a key frequency both for the advancement of WiFi, especially WiFi 7, and for mobile networks and the future 6Gthe problem is how it is going to be distributed. This is what European regulators are deciding, and we will know their verdict tomorrow. What is happening. Our colleagues tell it Xataka Mobile. He RSPG It is the body in charge of making decisions on the radio spectrum in Europe and is currently studying how to distribute the 6 Ghz band. As we said, it is a key frequency for high-capacity connectivity technologies, such as Wi-Fi 7 and the future 6G. The point is that there is a fight to get this precious band. On the one hand, the telecommunications operators, who want it for their mobile networks, and on the other, the Dynamic Spectrum Alliancewhich advocates free use of telecommunications. Two postures. Telecommunications companies, under the umbrella of the GSMA, they are pressing to use 6 Ghz exclusively, arguing that it is key both for the efficiency of 5G and for the future of 6G. The Dynamic Spectrum Alliance defends that WiFi is essential for connectivity in Europe, that using this band will be faster, more reliable and efficient. Why is it important. There is 480 Mhz in the lower part that is free for WiFi 6E and WiFi 7; What is at stake is the remaining 700 Mhz. The decision is important for the future of connectivity in Europe since, if the telecos win, WiFi 7 would lose more than half of its potential expansion capacity. In statements to The Register“would be devastating for the future of Wi-Fi technology in Europe. This spectrum is uniquely positioned to sustain the evolution of the Wi-Fi ecosystem and enable the next generation of digital innovation.” On the contrary, telcos defend the need to dedicate the band to mobile networks, which will strengthen Europe’s digital sovereignty. What have other countries done? The 6 Ghz band is not only a dilemma in Europe, other countries have also had to decide what to do with it. For example, in The United States decided to open the entire band to WiFi networkswhile in China they made the opposite decision: reserve the entire band for 5G and 6G. Verdict imminent. The date marked on the calendar for the RSPG to make a decision is November 12, 2025, tomorrow. However, this is an assessment and is not binding, but it will mark the path forward for the regulators of each country in the European Union. According to The Registerit seems that the group is more inclined towards granting use to mobile networks, with countries like Germany in favor of this option. Image |Pascal, Pexels In Xataka | Turning off the router at night: false myths, why it is better to leave it on and when it is better to leave it off

It will allow you to have erotic conversations… if you hand over your ID in exchange

OpenAI has announced that in December it will lift restrictions on erotic content on ChatGPT for verified adult users. The measure comes after months of complaints about the chatbot’s loss of “personality”, especially after the arrival of the serious GPT-5and represents a 180-degree turn in the company’s strategy, until now reluctant in contrast to Grok. Why is it important. This is the moment when OpenAI recognizes that without emotional (and sexual) intimacy it cannot compete with platforms like Character AIwhere its users spend up to two hours a day talking to their AI-partner. Erotic literature has existed since writing has existed. ChatGPT does not invent anything. It simply bridges the last gap between “useful tool” and “total emotional companion.” The context. Sam Altman had declared in August that he was “proud” not to have turned ChatGPT into a sexbot. Now he justifies the change under the principle of “treating adults like adults.” The reality is more prosaic: after supposedly mitigating mental health problems (two months after a lawsuit for the suicide of a teenager who used the platform), OpenAI believes that it can now afford to relax controls. The money trail. Character AI proved that erotic is a great glue to retain users. If OpenAI wants to monetize the engagement Really, you need to enter that field. Personalization of the assistant (with options for more human responses, use of emojis or “friend” behavior) is just the wrapper. Adult content is the new product. Yes, but. The toll to pay is something unprecedented: OpenAI will require age verification, presumably with an identity document. It is the largest exchange of privacy for service that such a technological platform has asked of us. The question is not whether there will be leaks of databases with erotic conversations linked to real, verified identities. The question is when and how many millions of users will be affected. The turn. OpenAI is building the metaverse that Meta couldn’t create, or at least not successfully. Only this is not visual, but conversational. Meta failed because no one wanted to be in its virtual worlds. But we do want to be in ChatGPT. And more with the restriction-free mode for emotional companionship and eroticism. The summer’s stricter restrictions (designed to make the chatbot “less fawning” and prevent mental health crises) had pissed off users who didn’t have psychological problems. Now OpenAI reverses its own security philosophy in record time. You have introduced parental controls and a separate experience for minors, but the speed of change raises questions about whether they have truly “mitigated” the risks or simply decided to take them on. Between the lines. This move shows the real battle of conversational AI. It’s not about who has the most powerful model, but who gets you to spend the most time with it. And accompaniment without an erotic dimension is incomplete for many users. OpenAI knows this. Altman predicted that ChatGPT could “cure cancer one day.” Now bet that he can also be your sexual confidant. They are only two sides of the same strategy of total penetration in the lives of users. In Xataka | Character.AI is accompanying and making its users fall in love. That’s wonderful until it’s not. Featured image | Xataka

You have to establish a “red lines” so that the AI ​​does not go out of hand

On Monday more than 200 personalities and more than 70 organizations joined in a new initiative called Global Call for AI Red Lines (World call to establish red lines in AI). The objective: try to establish clear limits that AI should never cross. Why is it important. The advances in generative are frantic but once again what is prioritized is that development and the commercialization of these models without too many reserves when doing so. According to the signatories of the initiative, “Some advanced IA systems have already shown misleading and harmful behavior, and yet these systems are giving more autonomy to act and make decisions in the world. If not controlled, many experts, including those who are at the forefront of development, warn that it will be increasingly difficult to exercise significant human control in the coming years.” What is requested. The initiative, initiated during the 80th General Assembly of the United Nations, asks that governments act “with decision” and reach “an international agreement on clear and verifiable red lines to avoid universally unacceptable risks.” What are those red lines. What is proposed is specifically prohibit some uses and behaviors of AI that can end up being dangerous. Among them they would be for example prohibit: Those who are. In that group of more than 200 personalities are ten Nobel Prizes, AI experts, scientists, diplomats and even heads of state. Among them are well -known names as those of scientists Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio who already They carry time warning of these dangers. The list is remarkable and they are also experts such as the OpenAi co -leaflet, Wojciech Zarama, or one of Deepmind’s main scientists, Ian Goodfellow. And those who do not. Although in this list of personalities there are very relevant names, it is also significant to verify that this initiative has not been signed by any CEO of one of the large technological companies involved in the field of AI. Although sometimes there have been speeches that pointed out that they were also worried about this issue and the AI ​​had to be regulatedin this case they have not participated in the initiative. Better prevent than cure. Charbel-Raphaël Segerie, responsible for a French agency called Safety Center in AI (CESIA), “the objective is not to react after an important incident occurs, but to avoid largely and potentially irreversible risks before they occur.” The European Act goes in that line. The European Union already created its regulation and launched it In August 2024, and the idea was to establish a series of restrictions based on Risk levels. At the moment the impact of this regulation has been negative, especially because has restricted the use and development of AI models in the EU. So much so that the EU has decided reverse and soften its regulations. And we already have a precedent. Just a few months after the chatgpt launch several experts made a similar request. Among them were Elon Musk – who has not signed this initiative – or Steve Wozniak, which They asked to pause for six months the training of AI models. That does not come anywhere, and without an explicit prohibition that development of AI models has continued unstoppable. In Xataka | “Estimated passengers: comply with the rules to avoid negative points,” China is implementing their social credit

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.