The CEO of Ryanair is clear about how he would govern a country. We are lucky that it doesn’t.

Michael O’Leary has spent decades building a reputation based on provocation and irreverence. The CEO of Ryanair has not only built Europe’s largest low-cost airline based on surcharges on your services and open confrontation with clients, unions and regulators. He has also turned each interview into a showcase of extreme opinions that rarely leave anyone indifferent. The last of them, granted to the Financial Timesis especially revealing. In it, O’Leary explains bluntly how he would run a country if he had the chance. To no one’s surprise, his approach is not too far from what has been applying for years at Ryanair: treat everything as a balance of results, eliminate what is considered “inefficient” and assume political wear and tear as inevitable collateral damage. Govern a country as if it were Ryanair. O’Leary doesn’t hesitate when asked about his vision of power. As he explains, if he had to govern a country he would do it exactly the same as his airline. Aggressively cutting public spending and, especially, social benefits. “I would run it like Ryanair, I would cut it big… I would cut benefits big. Get a job!” he says without nuance in the interview. Even when he recognizes that there are people who cannot work, his conclusion remains the same and he would not hesitate to reduce this aid. “Are there people who cannot work at all? Yes, but it would also cut their benefits,” said the controversial manager, who maintains an extreme vision of the minimum State, where the social protection network is perceived more as a cost than as a collective investment. Millionaire politicians to attract talent. The most striking part of the interview comes when O’Leary addresses salary of the politicians. There are no cuts on the horizon. For the Irish manager, one of the big problems in current politics is the lack of talent, and the solution is to pay politicians as if they were senior managers. His idea is that “If you are prime minister or a minister, you should earn at least one million pounds a year”, which is equivalent to 1,152,900 euros at the exchange rate. Very far from the 93,145.20 euros that are assigned as salary to the President of the Government in Spain, or 182,400 euros gross per year who receives the President of the Republic in France. “Politicians must be paid much better, although saying so is political suicide,” giving Singapore as an example, where senior public officials receive very high salaries to attract the most talented profiles in the private sector to politics and reduce incentives for corruption. Zero personal affinity with Trump. O’Leary’s interview Financial Times It also leaves room for his relationship with Donald Trump. O’Leary recounts a direct call from the then-candidate in 2016, in which Trump insisted for almost an hour on increase flights from Ryanair to airports close to its golf courses in Scotland and Ireland. The current president of the United States even offered him accommodation in one of his hotels. O’Leary’s response to Trump’s offer was to avoid at all costs approaching any politician. “No, no way. It’s not my style,” the executive concluded, making it clear that personal harmony with Trump never existed, although both share a very similar vision of the world as a place where everything is negotiated. The same approach you apply to your passengers. O’Leary’s ideas on how to govern are consistent with the decisions he has made at Ryanair during the years who runs Ryanair. From defending the charge for using the bathroom on board to imposing increasingly complex surcharges for luggage or boarding passes. Everything responds to one income maximization logic and reduce costs, even if that means a more hostile experience for the customer. Their inflexibility with refunds is another example. In the interview he remembers the case of a passenger stabbed in an attack on a train in the United Kingdom who tried to cancel a flightbut did not obtain a refund for the ticket. “If the company had offered him one, the doors would have been opened to other demands for reimbursement,” said O’Leary, for whom the company’s efficiency and profitability always come before empathy. An old idea with dubious results. The proposal to manage a country as if it were a company is neither new nor exclusive to O’Leary. Elon Musk already defended openly that approach from the DOGE who led in the first months of the Trump administration. The result was especially negative for the cooperation policy and the operation of the US administration. Trump himself has applied this logic of business negotiation to international and economic policy with the imposition of tariffs as a negotiation weapon. The results, at least so far, do not seem to be giving the best fruits for the United States economy. In Xataka | When Ryanair CEO went to a restaurant he was charged for two extras: “priority seating” and “legroom” Image | Flickr (Polish presidency of the Council of the EU 2025)

There are those who use chatgpt to create a vacation plan. Swedish prime minister uses it to govern

Ulf Kristersson, Prime Minister of Sweden and leader of the country’s conservative coalition, He has publicly recognized that consults artificial intelligence tools such as Chatgpt and Mishwner (Mistral European chatbot) to obtain “second opinions” in its government decisions. A statement that has unleashed a political and academic storm about the risks of using AI in such critical sectors as public and citizen management. In the focus. In An interview With the Dagens Industri Economic newspaper, Kristersson not only admitted their personal use of these tools, but also revealed that their collaborators also employ them in their daily work. “I use it quite often, even if it is to obtain a second opinion” said the prime minister. Apparently, Kristersson claims to use the tools to ask things like “What have others done? Or should we think just the opposite?”, He explained about the questions he asked. A devastating reaction. The Actonbladet newspaper accused directly to Kristersson having “fallen into the psychosis of the AI of the oligarchs.” Meanwhile, some experts have shown concern about security and democratic implications. Simone Fischer-Hübner, researcher and computer expert at the University of Karlstad, warned about the dangers of introducing sensitive information in Chatgpt: “You have to be very careful.” The warning makes sense, since although the company has security and privacy measures, any conversation we have with the chatbot ends on OpenAi servers. Therefore, it is not a very safe approach, especially if we talk about such a critical use as in the political dome. Beyond security. Virginia Dignum, professor of artificial intelligence responsible at the University of Umeå, assures that AI cannot offer significant opinions about political ideas, since it simply reflects the biases of those who developed it. “The more it depends on AI for simple things, the greater the risk of excess confidence in the system. It is a slippery slope,” he warned. And he finished with a phrase that has turned the world around in networks and media: “We do not vote for Chatgpt.” A defense that does not convince. Kristerson spokesman Tom Samuelsson tried to minimize controversy ensuring that the prime minister does not handle sensitive information through these platforms and that he uses them “more as a general reference.” However, Jakob Ohlsson, an expert in AI, Point out that even seemingly harmless information can reveal patterns of government strategic thinking to technology companies in charge of this type of systems. It is these types of examples that show us The great adoption that have had these types of systems, regardless of the sector in which they work. Cover image | Solen Feyissa and Anders Wiklund/AP In Xataka | OpenAi has just kick the AI board. Your new model is free and can be downloaded to use from the laptop

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.