films

3.6 million people watched the Goya gala. Only a small part went to see the nominated films

by

The gala of the Goya 2026 has scored a 26% screen share, its best figure since 2020 and the second highest since 2010, in a context of television consumption down. Paradoxically, this massive attention contrasts with a box office that remains stagnant and with an audience that prefers to see Spanish cinema on television platforms and events rather than in theaters. Technology and new consumer habits explain this gap. The figures. The broadcast of the gala on RTVE’s La 1 brought together an average of 2,396,000 viewers and reached a 26% share. In his analysisVertele emphasizes that linear television consumption has been significantly reduced in the last decade, with fewer people watching DTT at the same time than in 2010. That the gala reaches percentages comparable to fifteen years ago in an ecosystem fragmented by streaming and delayed viewing platforms suggests that the Goya remains an event capable of bringing together a mass audience in real time, in the style of a sporting event. These good figures are part of five consecutive years of growth for the gala in audiences, with an increase of 1.6 share points and 56,000 viewers compared to the 2025 edition. However, the majority of the films that competed for the award that night had not managed to recover their investment in theaters. Less box office. According to the official data published by the ICAASpanish theaters closed 2024 with 72.9 million spectators and a collection of 484.6 million euros, figures that represent a 5% decline in attendance compared to the previous year. The share of national cinema within this shrinking market was around 18.65%. But that percentage is not sustained by the auteur films that dominate the Goya nominations, but rather the exact opposite: family comedies and commercial thrillers. This can be applied to the big winners of this editionwhich we summarize in this table. All of them enjoyed subsidies between one million (except Sorda, with 800,000 euros) and 1,200,000. That is to say, they are films highly valued on the awards circuit, rather than by the general public. In this way, the market bifurcates, and the cinema that really fills theaters, such as the family comedies by Santiago Seguraare left out of the Goya. QUALIFICATION BUDGET COLLECTION SIRAT 6.5 million euros 2.87 million euros Maspalomas 5 million euros 716,000 euros Deaf 2 million euros 735,000 euros Sundays 4.7 million euros 3.7 million euros dinner 5 million euros 716,000 euros The captive 9.8-15 million euros 5.2 million euros lto Spanish exception. It is not something that happens in all countries: in France, the eternal model in which we want to see ourselves, French films raised 44% of the year’s box office. But at the same time, the three most watched French titles of the year (a comedy with disabled actors, an epic adaptation of Alexandre Dumas and a romantic drama) are films that also aspire to the Césars, their equivalent to our Goyas. Subsidies are also comparable in quantitybut here the number of releases has skyrocketed (168 in 2016, 364 in 2025), while the collection has decreased (from 111.5 to 85.6 million in the same period). And yet… the Goya audience demonstrates every year that there is interest in the industry. There is a potential audience that debates whether ‘Sirat’ deserved to win more awards than ‘Los Domingos’, but they did not go to the cinema for the premiere of ‘Sirat’. The hinge of the platforms. Three weeks after its very limited theatrical release, ‘The Snow Society’ landed on Netflix: in its first eleven days accumulated 51 million views and closed the first half of the year with 103 million views, becoming Netflix’s third most viewed film globally. The fact that he had that success right after leaving the theater sums up the problem. In October 2025 Netflix advertisement that they would spend one billion euros on Spanish production between that year and 2028. All this in Tres CantosNetflix’s largest production space in the entire European Union. Since its arrival in Spain, Netflix has produced more than a thousand titles with Spanish teams, generating 20,000 jobs in the sector. Amazon Prime Video follows a similar logic, although with less weight in its own original production. The money from the platforms has allowed Spanish cinema to produce on a scale outside the traditional financing system (subsidies, investment from traditional chains). For this reason, and in the face of competition from platforms, which produce and release almost immediately in their space, in 2022 the Spanish exhibitors They formally requested a minimum window of one hundred days between the theatrical release and the arrival on platforms, shorter than the windows in France (15 months) and Italy (3 months). At the moment, there is no regulation and each window is negotiated separately. The power of the Goya. However, there is a Goya Effect at the box office. Last year, when ‘El 47’ and ‘La infiltrada’ won the award for Best Filmthe two tapes their box office skyrocketed by more than 70%. It is something that carries lifetime happening with the Oscars, but here we do not have the muscle of international Hollywood distribution. In Spain, ‘Los Domingos’ continues in 50 cinemas and ‘Sirat’ in 35 throughout Spain. It is insufficient for them to experience notable growth. But these are the highest grossing ones: the Goya, their audience proves it, they generate real interest, but the majority of the winning films, such as ‘Sorda’ or ‘Maspalomas’, are already streaming. The impact of the awards does not benefit the box office because there are no open avenues to do so. In Xataka | Santiago Segura is so clear about his success that with ‘Torrente Presidente’ he is trying something: without a trailer or a pass for critics

The Goya and almost all the nominated films, on Movistar Plus+. It has no permanence and you can share it with whoever you want.

by

The month of February ends with the Goya Awards gala. This 40th edition is being held in Barcelona, ​​but you can watch it without leaving your couch with Movistar Plus+: a streaming platform that only costs 9.99 euros per month and has no permanence. What if what interests you are only the movies? You also have almost all of them in the platform catalog. Monthly subscription to Movistar Plus+ The price could vary. We earn commission from these links ‘Sirat’ or ‘Los Domingos’ are just examples of everything Movistar Plus+ has to offer Movistar Plus+ is a platform that we can contract regardless of the operator we are, so it does not matter if we do not have anything else from this company. Furthermore, since it has no permanence, you can try it for a month and, if it doesn’t convince you, unsubscribe. All without forgetting that you can share the account with a friend or family membersince it supports two simultaneous plays. Goya’s turn. Right now (and until next March 3) we have an active channel focused on these awards. There we can see the gala live, which will begin with a special preview at 7 p.m. After this, we will have the red carpet and at 10 p.m., the entire gala. Now it’s the nominees’ turn. On this platform we will be able to see many of them, among which ‘Sundays‘with 13 nominations,’Sirat‘ with 11 nominations and ‘Maspalomas‘ with 9 nominations. To these we must add others of many carats such as ‘Los Tigres’‘La Cena’ or ‘Very Far’, among others. Beyond movies, we also have series and a lot of football. That includes LaLiga matches such as the upcoming Real Oviedo-Atlético de Madrid (February 28) or Athletic-Barcelona (March 8), but also the semifinals of the Copa del Rey or Champions League matches. Everything together forms a great offer that, as we said above, costs 9.99 euros per month or 99.90 euros If we opt for its annual subscription, which is cheaper in the long run. Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Movistar Plus+ In Xataka | Mega-guide to set up a home theater: projector, screen, sound system and more In Xataka | The best streaming platforms 2025 | Comparison of Disney+, Netflix, HBO Max, Prime Video, Movistar Plus+, Filmin, Apple TV, SkyShowtime and Rakuten TV: catalog, functions and prices

The Nazis produced 1,200 films. 44 of them remain prohibited and guarded by the German Government to this day.

by

In the Faculty of Information Sciences of the Complutense University of Madrid An optional subject is taught called History of informative and documentary cinema. A few years ago, the teacher who taught that class had the habit of giving his students fragments of ‘The triumph of the will‘, the documentary that Leni Riefenstahl directed about the Nazi party congress in Nuremberg, in 1934. She always added that she only showed those fragments because, if she put it in its entirety, she feared that we would want to join the party. ‘Triumph of the Will’ is one of the more than 1,200 films that the Ministry of Propaganda German, under the command of Joseph Goebbels, produced to spread Nazi ideals, anti-Semitism and to justify the Second World War. When the war ended, the Allies banned about 300 of them, and 44 are still on that list in charge of the German government. Why are these movies banned? Those forty-four were the subject of a documentary a few years ago, ‘Forbidden Films’which not only explained what kind of tapes they were and what they were about, but also asked whether they should no longer be banned and what legacy they might have left, 70 years after the end of the war. Your director, Felix Moellerproduced it in the face of disinterest of German youth about the history of the Nazis and the rise of the extreme right in Europe, and the documentary shows the reactions of different people when watching some of these films. Because the German government does allow their exhibition, but for educational purposes and with an expert in the room to explain and contextualize them. In the trailer you can already see some of these opinions, from those who are surprised because these films have good technical quality and are entertaining, to those who think that some of them should remain prohibited because they were, at the time, Nazi symbols, such as ‘The Jew Süss‘, which was probably the most successful of all the productions promoted by Goebbels. ‘The Jew Süss’ was the second film adaptation of the life of Joseph Süss Oppenheimer, financial advisor to the Duke of Württemberg during the 18th century and who was accused of fraud, bribery, treason and even illicit relations with several ladies of the court, and executed for these crimes. His story had been treated in books and even in plays that generally focused on it as a great human tragedy. But Goebbels saw that he could present Süss as a arrogant jew who infiltrated the Germans to take away what was theirs. He already had the most important piece in his cinematic anti-Semitic propaganda. ‘The Jew Süss’ was a great popular success. It was screened at the 1940 Venice Film Festival, receiving good reviews for its technical workmanship, reviews that did not seem to be aware of the ultimate objective of the film. Goebbels himself wrote in his diary about the film that it was “an anti-Semitic film of the kind we could only wish for. I’m very happy about it.” Good but dangerous movies In 1994, the film critic Roger Ebert wrote about one of those 44 banned Nazi films, ‘Triumph of the Will’, that “we would all have reflected on the received opinion that the film is good but evil, and that writing about it raises the question of whether quality art can be in the service of evil.” Ebert asked himself the same question with ‘The Birth of a Nation’, RW Griffith’s film that is considered one of the founding works of cinema and, at the same time, deeply racist. Those films, at the time, were not considered that way. Luis Buñuel himself stated in his memories that, in 1935, no one in Hollywood thought that ‘Triumph of the Will’ was dangerous because there were too many regional dances and too many songs for its propaganda message to be taken seriously. The Second World War drastically changed that perception, but until then, the productions of the Ministry of Propaganda Germans used entertaining stories to convey their ideals. They portrayed the British as cruel inventors of concentration camps or justified the invasion of Poland by showing the Poles persecuting the German minority living there. They could be full of stereotypes, historical manipulations and blatant attempts to “brainwash” their viewers, but they were well produced and shot and were very successful at the time. For all these reasons, they remain prohibited. But should they continue to be? In ‘Forbidden films’ there are scholars who claim that these films clearly show what should not be repeated in the future and that, therefore, their access to them should not be restricted, while former members of neo-Nazi parties point out another reason for them to be removed from the “black list”: “When something is prohibited, it becomes interesting. Prohibiting things makes them fascinating and taboo because if it is prohibited, it must be true to a certain extent.” Other Banned Non-Nazi Films Nazi ideological propaganda is the reason why these 44 films remain banned in Germany, which also has a great controversy over the passage to public domain of ‘Mein Kampf’but throughout the history of cinema there have been films that have also been included in “blacklists” for reasons that can range from accusations of obscenity to, directly, blasphemy. Or it could have happened to them like ‘The great dictator‘, the satire that Charles Chaplin made of Hitler and Mussolini, in 1940, and which was banned in Argentina precisely for that parody, since Germany had been an ally of Juan Domingo Perón. It was even on the verge of not being shown in the United Kingdom because, when filming was announced, the country was trying to appease Hitler in his expansionist desires for Europe. When it was released, however, the British were already at war with the Germans and there was no reason for its censorship. You don’t have to go to China or countries with fundamentalist regimes to find the most … Read more

In 1995 ‘Toy Story’ forever changed the way animated films are made. He did it with rudimentary computers

by

Seen today, ‘Toy Story’ It remains as fresh, fun and surprising as it was in its day. That the later films of Pixar have drawn, to a greater or lesser extent, from its aesthetics, its plot structure and its characters, demonstrates the extent to which the company’s first film was influential and foundational in many ways. And that is taking into account that, technologically, its creative process has lost all traces of sophistication, and today it is a relic of the past like the first attempts at other techniques such as the rotoscope or the stop motion. As an example, this video that dates back to the time of filming but which had not been seen much until recently, and in which Pete Docter, the film’s animation supervisor, describes the rudimentary techniques with which the characters in the film were brought to life, based on the recording of the original voice. Their explanations and images attest to the way almost intuitive that they had to animate, and how perhaps the image that many people have of computer animation as something completely automated and where there is no human participation is absolutely wrong. We must add to this that Docter, in addition to being an animator in ‘Toy Story’, would write the basic story of almost all Pixar moviesthe script for ‘Delverso’ and ‘Up’ and he would direct those same ones and ‘Monstruos SA’. That is to say, apart from knowledge about the creative procedure in the technical part, he is also a key name in the most primitive section of the genesis of the film, where the ideas, the design of the characters and the very threads of the story emerge. In the video he explains how, based on sound, they sketch a series of movements on paper, a procedure that obviously has much more to do with traditional animation than with nothing programmatic. From there they go to a stand-in of Woody, that is, a character “made only with geometric shapes”, to save time on technical issues. In those days it was unthinkable to animate in real time with finished characters. From there, and with extreme precision, it moves the elbow, wrist, fingers… and finally, separately, all the facial animations. The interesting thing is what Docter adds later and that makes clear his interest not only in the technical section of this type of animation, but also in its creative and expressive twists and turns: “If you can make this model act, function and communicate without any type of facial expressions, then you have done a good job.” It’s a perfect example of why ‘Toy Story’ still works and exciting: because it does not remain a technical exhibition in which it was a pioneer, becoming the first computer-animated feature film, but there is a traditional creative work supporting it all. The rendering that gave life to the toys The key to Toy Story’s animation is RenderMan, Pixar’s proprietary 3D rendering software that it developed since the mid-1980s. In addition to using it in its own films, the company makes it available to third parties, as it did, with the software still in its infancy, in films such as ‘The Abyss’ in 1989 (in the scene of the water tentacle that gave the film an Oscar) or ‘Terminator 2’ in 1991 and its liquid metal effects. What RenderMan does It is managing issues such as lighting and volumes realistically, even on computers as primitive as those available in the early 1990s. The success of ‘Toy Story’ made the tool ubiquitous in productions that played a historic part in the birth of computer special effects in cinema. Even today, ‘Toy Story 4’ has been made with an updated version of RenderMan which, of course, manages aspects such as light and shadow projections in an infinitely more realistic way than in the first film. The importance of RenderMan is essential to understand even the origin of the company, because Pixar was born as a division of Lucasfilm that ended up becoming a software company that made short films to advertise the power of its products. After winning an Oscar with the short ‘Tin Toy‘ -shot with the Menv software, also from Pixar-, the decision made by the co-founder of the company Ed Catmull – the original core along with John Lasseter and the screenwriters Andrew Stanton and the aforementioned Docter -, who always had the ambition to make the leap to the feature film, was to make a half-hour Christmas special. In it, a ventriloquist doll made an unlikely couple with the metal ‘Tin Toy’ doll. ‘Tin Toy’ was not short on ambition (things appeared in it that had literally never been seen on that scale, such as textures of different materials such as wood or fabric, or shadows of different intensity), and part of that ambition would be transferred to ‘Toy Story’. For example, Catmull – like the rest of the animators – would provide a character to the dolls that appear hidden under the sofa. It was an elephant, which he designed by introducing Bézier curves by hand, as coordinates, into the programming language. The primitive concept of the metal dummies and the ventriloquist did not prosper, but Pixar ended up with a contract with Disney for 26 million dollars to make three feature films. They decided to extend the story of the toys that come to life from the short, and once again we can see Pixar’s desire for technology and ingenious concepts to come together in the same way: since visually they could not afford sophisticated and realistic animations with the software they used, they would animate toys, which would intuitively have robotic and rigid gestures and behaviors if they came to life. The ventriloquist dummy became Woody because the CEO of Disney at the time, Michael Eisner, had a bad feeling for puppets. Small calculation errors The first problem that Pixar encountered after starting production in 1993 was the equipment they believed was necessary to complete … Read more

one of the most influential films of the 21st century

by

It has been almost two decades since the premiere of ‘The Holiday‘, one of the Christmas movies par excellence and feel good movie manual. There are several points that catapult certain stories as a Christmas reference and this work by Nancy Meyers (‘You to London and I to California’, ‘When you least expect it’) meets all the requirements. The story of two women who, when their love relationships implode, decide to take a 180-degree turn in their lives and exchange homes during the Christmas holidays is the starting point to wrap you in all the Christmas syrup required. It is more than natural that you enjoy ‘Home Alone’, ‘Polar Express’ or ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ but the truth is that a rom com It competes like no other genre for the title of Christmas phenomenon and helps you enter the new year with the necessary energy. Story of a “Christmas movie” It is easy to review all the characteristics that have made ‘The Holiday’ a must-see Christmas event and one of the most influential romantic comedies of the 21st century. The main asset and what makes it the icon it is today is its more than successful cast. Kate Winslet, Cameron Diaz, Jude Law, Jack Black… All of them do that thing that is so unpleasant in an actor of “playing themselves”, or at least, how we viewers think they are. Its special touch, which provides fresh air and differentiates it from the rest of rom coms Christmas is its goal character. The continuous mentions of the film industry, the world of scriptwriting, premieres and having cameos from stars such as Dustin Hoffman enriches the traditional journey that the protagonists take in this archetype of films. It is mandatory that a romantic comedy and a Christmas movie be cheesy, there is no other option and that is what we are looking for, but if we want to introduce cheesiness with taste, that is where things get complicated. ‘The Holiday’ achieves the most difficult thing and is the best example of handling tenderness with just the right amount of corniness. It does not only achieve this with its main love stories, but with another essential piece: Arthur. Having in your cast a film figure like the great Eli Wallach (‘The Godfather. Part III’; ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’; ‘The Magnificent Seven’…) and giving him the place he deserves with a twist to his filmography is worthy of admiration. The actor carries the weight of the plot more tender. A love story that endures over the years and loss, which speaks of the physical and mental vulnerability of old age and the importance of surrounding yourself with a circle of support. Here is the great story of ‘The Holiday’, everything that involves the protagonists. And the journey and purpose of the characters goes through their love relationships, but in reality it is not the only thing that defines them. It is at this point that on many occasions, we notice the difference between a good romantic comedy script and just another “afternoon movie.” If we pay attention to the relationship that Iris (Kate Winslet) establishes with Arthur (Eli Wallach) and the bond they create, we get a much more complete portrait of the character and personality of the character and with this, our own connection with the film and the plot increases. We suffer much more with the treatment she receives from her ex-partner, that neglect ends up feeling like her own and the feelings on the surface come with the famous speech about heartbreak that no one but Kate Winslet can make. “What I’m trying to tell you is that I understand what it’s like to feel like the smallest, most insignificant and pathetic being in humanity and what it’s like to feel pain in parts of your body that you didn’t even know you had (…)” – Winslet’s monologue in ‘The Holiday’ So the romantic element does not fade, but the plot of Graham’s daughters (Jude Law), the parallelism with Amanda’s childhood (Cameron Díaz) or that beautiful friendship between Iris and Arthur ends up completely rounding off this Christmas icon. The sweet spot of Christmas fantasy Furthermore, as we have already touched on previously, talking about Christmas movies and what they reveal about you‘The Holiday’ and that particular “Choose your own love story” allows it to reach different types of audiences. While many people pine for Jude Law, the handsome stereotype movie who is also an exemplary father, others decide to opt for the sweetness and kindness of Jack Black. The slow-burning ending of Iris and Miles’ story is its true story. couple goals and perhaps something much more credible than those declarations of love in minute one of Graham and Amanda. One of the biggest challenges that this type of film faces is the fantasy/reality balance. As a general rule, the public wants to immerse themselves in a fantasy that accompanies the seasonal spirit and helps them forget about daily life for at least two hours, but at the same time, they need a certain connection to get involved in a story that, after all, talks about feelings. And here ‘The Holiday’ once again passes with flying colors. We can fantasize and dream about that luxury house in Los Angelesthe cozy English cottage from a story during a Christmas full of love and magic, or if we go very crazy, that Hollywood pays tribute in life to a great screenwriter as happens with Arthur, but at the same time the rawness of heartbreak or disappointments in personal or work relationships connects us with real life and fully links us with the story. Nor can we ignore one of the fundamental elements that give the package to ‘The Holiday’, and that is that music does not only play an important role during the beautiful scene in which Miles creates a piece of music inspired by Iris. To top it all off, the soundtrack is by Hans Zimmer, … Read more

James Cameron has always played heads or tails with his films. Cinema has returned him a fortune of 1.1 billion

by

Imagine shooting movies that cost hundreds of millions, dive into the impossible and play it all on one card: that the public likes them. James Cameron has done it for four decades and that bet on heads or tails in each film has helped him enter a select club: that of the billionaires list Forbes. At 71 years old, the director of titles such as Titanic and Avatar has achieved an estimated net worth of $1.1 billion, thanks to a balance between box office revenue, profit-sharing agreements and the exploitation of licenses for his most profitable franchises. Some hard beginnings. Cameron’s path was neither immediate nor easy. Before becoming a successful name in Hollywood, he worked as a truck driver and production assistant with modest salaries. His first feature film as a director, ‘Piranha II: The Vampires of the Sea’ in 1982. A creative setback that hardly brought him any income, but it helped him gain a foothold behind the cameras. The real turning point in his career came with ‘Terminator‘ in 1984. The filmmaker claimed that he had dreamed the apocalyptic story during a feverish night and, to ensure creative control, he sold his script for one dollar, a bet that resulted in a “low-budget” film ($6.4 million), but which represented a return of $78 million at the box office and the definitive boost for his career as a director. There is no easy movie: everything is heads or tails. Camerón risked his salary to carry out the project the way he wanted, and he came out of that adventure very well. That triumph led him to continue risking immediate benefits in exchange for control and participation in future income. In ‘Risky lies’the director went overboard with the production budget, becoming the first film to exceed $100 million. To avoid ceding creative control, Cameron renegotiated his agreement with FOX, allowing the studio to recoup its investment by ceding part of its profits to him. Finally, it was not necessary since the film grossed $378 million worldwide. Another example of this dynamic was ‘Titanic. When the budget exceeded $200 million, Cameron voluntarily gave up his salary as director and producer. The studio, resigned to rising costs, prepared for a financial debacle. However, the result was a success that grossed more than $1.8 billion at the box office and more than $800 million in VHS sales, making Cameron one of the highest-paid filmmakers of his generation after receiving a percentage of the profits. Avatar and his great gold mine. However, despite having a track record full of titles that are already part of the history of cinema, its real gold mine It’s the saga ‘Avatar‘. The first film, released in 2009, grossed nearly $3 billion worldwide and generated more than $350 million directly for Cameron from its box office rights, physical sales and licensing fees. Your producer, Lightstorm Entertainmenthas contributed to his fortune with parallel income derived from the saga through theme parks, merchandising and technological agreements. The sequel’Avatar: The Sense of Water’ It totaled more than 2.3 billion at the box office, with Cameron obtaining around 250 million dollars for its box office and production rights. Just a few days before the premiere of the third installment with ‘Avatar: Fire and Ashes’Forbes already takes its box office success for granted and estimates that Cameron could add at least $200 million more to his pre-tax assets if the film meets commercial expectations, as it did. the second installment of the saga. A legacy that goes beyond money. Throughout his career, Cameron has been known for both his perfectionism and his willingness to give up short-term benefits in order to maintain creative control or improve the end result. That approach has led him to technological and business projects outside of cinema: from immersion in digital effects with ‘Terminator’, to underwater exploration after ‘Titanic’ and the environmental activism at the end of the first installment of ‘Avatar’. Cameron doesn’t usually talk about wealth. In a recent interview with Puck, the director said that “I wish I were a billionaire.” According to Forbes, his salaries as a director, participation in the profits of his productions, income from theme park and toy licenses and the value of his production company, raise James Cameron’s fortune to over $1.1 billion. At least until the premiere of his new installment of ‘Avatar’. In Xataka | The “100 billion dollar club” has added a new member: for the first time, the new member is a woman Image | The Walt Disney Company, Flickr (SMPTE)

Hollywood is using AI in absolutely all aspects of films production. And it is fatal to hide it

by

Each new news about the advances of AI in Hollywood is received with a mixture of expectation and fear. How many jobs will it cost? How much work will you save? Is it the result of a sensible analysis of the needs of the U industry Another form of producers to chain cuts In all the links of the chain? What we know is that this arrival is inevitable. What perhaps we did not know is that it has long come, and Hollywood is trying to keep the secret as long as possible. Studies for AI. Currently, According to Vulturethere are a hundred studies in Hollywood that work exclusively with AI. He has especially called the attention of the press, for having a popular name on board, Asteria Film, co -founded by actress and producer Natasha Lyonne, protagonist of ‘Poker Face’. which will direct a first film generated entirely by Ia. Der time, their backs are covering: They assure that they are an “ethical” study and that all the material with which they train their artificial intelligences is licensed. That is, they are working on tools that through a Prompt They generate images, but to feed only on material for which the corresponding rights have been paid. The authors. Little by little, Hollywood is turning to these tools. Darren Aronodsky He reached an agreement with Deepmindfrom Google. James Cameron, with Stability ai. And that is the following point that Hollywood has to reach: convincing the public and the ecstptics that AI can also be a tool for authors, and not just the industry. In Vulture, Lyonne said that “I am a filmmaker who does not want technicians to decide the future of the environment. We need a kind of 95 dogma for the AI ​​era”, referring to the movement led by Lars von Trier in the nineties, who talked about undressing the cinema of every artifice. Lyonne states that he wants to delve into the “idea that the artist is the first, before he becomes an industry rule not to do so.” The clash between artists and studies can be monumental, but it is clear that we will attend something that will determine the future of entertainment. How much money is saved? This is one of Hollywood’s most important issues, in the end we are talking about production and limiting expenses. According to Industry experts like Abe Rose or as has been spoken in Tables of specialists in the subject in CannesHollywood could save between 20% and 50% in traditional productions, and up to 90% on projects very supported by AI, especially in visual effects. The potential savings for the film and TV industry in the US is estimated at 15,000 million dollars between 2024 and 2026, only in terms of production and post-production. James Cameron himself He talked about a 50% cut of budgets in the blockbusters. The beginnings of AI. Already in the last decade, AI began to be used as a tool that attended very specific aspects of production: optimization of the planning of filming schedules, allocation of resources and equipment management … in general, it helped reduce dead times and improve efficiency. At the same time, in the editing department It was used To select Tomas automatically and for simple but very laborious tasks such as synchronizing audio and video. The preambles. In the last five years, the use of AI has increased exponentially, especially in the technical section and in all phases of production. For example, in preproduction: There is a long list of tools that attend or directly replace humans. LTX Studio It is able to make a complete pre -production combining very different tools on a platform. But there are also specialized ones: Filmustage Plan the movie, Boards does the Storyboards and Long.ai Analyze the possible impact of the film, which facilitates production tasks. Filming In this phase are the ingredients that are most known: control of cameras and drones, intelligent lighting and, above all, virtual sets with Tools such as StageCraft that generate real -time scenarios, integrating real actors and digital funds, often projecting the scenarios and their modifications for the interpreters to react. It is where the most colorful revolutions are taking place and what the media dedicates the most, but they are only the tip of the iceberg. After Effects. Also in postproduction AI is replacing many tasks that were previously routine or repetitive. There is much talk about how tools such as Deepmotion or Ziva Dynamics are entering the effects and animation section as an elephant in a pot, but there is much more: audio and video synchronization, color correction with tools such as tools such as Colourlab.Aidubbing (even in his first steps, but with tools such as Deepdub and his Imperceptible Lip synchronization work steps are being taken in directions that are not precisely free of controversy) and, of course, the soundtracks that Platforms As amper Music they cover in more modest budget productions. Legal issues. But … we hadn’t remained that Much of the strikes In Hollywood they had been convened to combat these types of uses that put the work of creators and jobs at risk? Yes and no. Between 2023 and 2024, Hollywood lived one of the greatest labor crises in its recent history due to the advance of AI. The main unions (WGA, of screenwriters, and SAG-AFTRA, of actors) collided against the Alliance of Film and Television Producers (AMPTP). The WGA began its strike in May 2023, to which The actors joined in Julyparalyzing Hollywood For six months. The agreement that was reached significantly restricted the use of AI, especially taking into account the claims of the producers: with it the generative AI is prohibited so that the producers generate a script without the contest of a screenwriter, or replicate the image of an actor without permission, but its use is allowed as tools that assist the technicians. To put it otherwise: as long as there is a human union, the tools can … Read more

13 films and premiere series to see in June 2025 in Netflix, Prime Video, HBO Max and Streaming

by

The overwhelming heat that has unleashed a few weeks just wants, let’s recognize it, to slide into a house with all the blinds and choked to series and films as if there were no tomorrow. There are some recommendations among the premieres of streaming so that this healthy and commendable activity is not made. Mikaela The hyperactive Daniel Calparsolo (last year premiered ‘Assault on the Central Bank’ and ‘El Correo’, and this 2025 still has ‘Salvador’) lands on Netflix with this film, after just a couple of months of his passage through cinemas. Antonio Resines is the great claim of this thriller in which on the eve of Reyes an unprecedented snowstorm Asola Spain. On a collapsed highway, a group of robbers takes the opportunity to assault a armored van, which will face the unexpected couple that form a veteran and desperate policeman and a young woman trapped without wanting to in a counterreloj persecution. The survivors From Jane Harper’s sales success, we have here a splendid youth mystery of summer atmosphere. We moved to a quiet coastal town, where fifteen years ago, the death of three young people hit all who lived there. Now, a new murder unleashes a new avalanche of questions: Does this new death have something to do with the tragic past? The squid game – T3 The conclusion of Netflix’s great success is just around the corner, in a third and last season that continues linearly what we saw in the second. We will see what was the failed rebellion headed by Gi-Hun and how he is forced to participate again in the violent contest. Also, with the identity of the leader of the organizers of the Game revealed, the balance of suspicions and threats that the game keeps up will change. Predator: murderer of murderers An anthological animation film that continues to prolong the mythology of ‘Predator’, recently revived by Disney thanks to the unexpected success of ‘Predator: the dam’. In this case we will see, with its consequent deployment of ultraviolence Cartoon, three warriors from three eras (a Vikinga and its young son, a ninja of feudal Japan and a pilot from World War II) who face the final hunter. Ironheart More franchises of the Disney factory, in this case of Marvel, which after ‘Daredevil’ is very thoroughly in the Lore Of the movies, with a character we have only seen fleetingly in the sequel of ‘Black Panther’. With the production of Ryan Coogler, director of the films of the Wakandian hero and now again in the candlestick thanks to the great ‘Sinners’, we will know the story of a young gifted who is prepared to load with the legacy of Iron Man. The Killer The total masterpiece of the action cinema led by John Woo in 1989 receives a new version signed by its own creator. And it’s not bad: it moves the action to Paris and makes a few changes both in the narrative approach and in the main cast. We will meet Zee (Nathalie Emmanuel), a lethal killer who refuses to kill a young singer who is blind in a shooting, which unleashes a chain of betrayals and faces her to her own past … already an implacable police inspector. Leaving the romantic tone, Woo brings a more worthy proposal that continues its own legacy. June 24 in Skyshowtime Chespirito: without wanting If we say Roberto Gómez Bolaños, he will possibly sound at all. If we say ‘El Chavo del Ocho’ or ‘El Chapulín Colorado’, no doubt yes: these comedies that swept the world where Spanish spoke became a star to their interpreter and screenwriter, who had a career full of shadows. This biographical series enters its triumphs and failures, portraying a time when television was very different from now. Mountainhead Jesse Armstrong, the multipremized creator of ‘Succession‘, Write and direct this original film for HBO with a cast headed by Steve Carell. He tells how a very powerful group of billionaires thanks to their creations linked to high technology meet to ski just when an international crisis explodes due to the misinformation generated by AI and disseminated by the social network of which one of them is creative. Apparently they have remained to reconnect after years without seeing, but everyone has a hidden agenda. The nameless New version of Ramsey Campbell’s novel that already inspired one of the modern classics of Spanish horror cinema, ‘Los Name’ by Jaume Balagueró. On this occasion we will have the story in Miniseries format, which will allow to develop more thoroughly the arterer’s story of a woman who, years after losing her daughter in a traumatic way, discovers that it is possible that she can stay alive. TEKEPHONIC CALLS WITHOUT EXPLANATION They will lead her to contact the inspector who took the case in her day, and to let a strange sect could be behind everything. June 26 at Movistar Plus+ The tutoring The protagonist of ‘The worst person in the world’ shows again with a unique interpretation for a very unique thriller awarded in Cannes and that raises a very interesting moral enigma: a 6 -year -old boy is accused of transferring certain limits with a classmate. Nobody knows exactly what has happened, so the school’s address summons parents to discuss the subject, who puts it on the table a series of issues such as child sexuality or violence at certain ages where everything is taboo. Daniela Forever Nacho Vigalondo’s latest film is a strange but exciting love story that attacks with a science fiction excuse topics such as duel or obsession. The protagonist, after losing his girlfriend, is invited to be part of a clinical trial that will allow him to control his dreams. When he discovers that he can see her again every night and resume her relationship where she had stayed, everything acquires such romantic as sinister dyes. And will get many more dangerous. Smoke Fire is the great intangible protagonist of this criminal series based on real … Read more

It is one of the most chilling horror films in recent years, almost nobody has seen it and you have it in prime video

by

There are countless horror cinema subgenres, as of any other variant of the fantastic. There are more trotted and frantic films, there are those that are betting on a more murky and rested atmosphere. There are films that derive from previous successes, others that dare to go into unpleling territory. Not all are for all tastes, and clearly ‘Ritual from beyond‘(Depressant Spanish title for the much more lyrical’ to Dark Song ‘), than You can see in Prime Videoit is of that last species. ‘Ritual of the beyond’ has a rhythm and development that will not possibly interest all fans. But if the occult, dark atmospheres, low intensity horror and uncommon messages interest you, ‘ritual of beyond’ is for you. He writes and directs Liam Gavin, who has not signed anything else apart from a couple of chapters of ‘The curse of Bly Manor’ in Netflix In ‘Ritual from beyond’ we will meet a woman who rent a house isolated from everything. His only company in an increasingly suffocating and strange series of days will be a occultist who must help her make a long, dangerous and strenuous ritual to be able to contact her deceased son. But both have secrets that can endanger the purpose of that isolation. It is a classic plot structure (a couple of characters locked in a space that will oppress them more and more until they put their integrity and sanity at risk) that, however, takes a series of unexpected paths. With a meticulous and almost documentary description of the ritual that awaits boththe film builds an atmosphere of threat and an increasingly demential rhythm that turns this film into a hidden jewel of the genre. That everyone will not like, without a doubt, but that will obsess those who connect with their brave proposal. In Xataka | In 2024 Nicolas Cage, in 2025 Stephen King. The revolutionary horror cinema returns with a new epic of humor and gore

The director of ‘Rogue One’ signed one of the best science fiction films in recent years, and now comes to Prime Video

by

After spending less than a year for Disney+, ‘The Creator‘, the magnificent futuristic dystopia of Gareth Edwards, Reach Prime Video. The Amazon platform can provide a tremendous impulse to this film that, Despite the praise received with its premiere in 2023he punctured at the box office. This relegated to a secondary role both in the awards season, where its excellent technical invoice should have been recognized, as in the public reception. Edwards has a very peculiar vision of the genre, a very unique eye for drama and intimate, which has been reflected in his films even for successful franchises: ‘Godzilla’ and ‘Star Wars: Rogue One’, two productions found A similar balance between the show and the small -scale emotion. In that sense, where ‘The Creator’ finds more similar is in the director’s first movie, the excellent ‘monsters’. In ‘The Creator’, Edwards enters an iconic science fiction issue, artificial intelligences, classic since Asimov wrote their robots stories, but with a fiercely modern perspective: in a war between the human species and artificial intelligences, an exagent of the special forces is recruited to locate and execute the creator, a mysterious architect of the AI ​​that has developed a devastating weapon end to war and mean the victory of the machines. He must prevent it. The film is raised as an empathetic approach to the other, to the IAS that in this case are far from being like Skynet, no matter how much they face humans with virulent violence. The great mystery of ‘The Creator’ is precisely what are the last intentions of that creator, and everything is raised in a devastating war environment, with special effects that, despite its modesty (or precisely thanks to it) They work much better than that of so many Blockbusters. An essential event for lovers of the genre. Header | Disney In Xataka | ‘The Creator’ is the science fiction film of the year. And also a declaration of war to clonic franchises https://www.xataka.com/streaming/pelicula-ciencia-ficcion-importante-2023-esta-disney-sus-sugerentes-predictions-ia

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.