We have been failing with New Year’s resolutions for decades. Science says it’s because we don’t know how to “cheat”

January starts with a predictable ritual: paying gym membership, fill the fridge with kale or buy paintbrushes for a new hobby. It is the “clean slate effect” that defines Professor Katy Milkman. Human beings do not perceive time linearly, but rather like chapters of a novel. The New Year is the “Black Friday” of new beginnings; a symbolic border that makes us believe that the “me” of last year—the one who didn’t know how to draw a line without looking like a preschooler—has finally died. In fact, 4,000 years ago the Babylonians they already made promises at the Akitu festival to appease their gods. The difference is that they sought to avoid divine wrath and we simply sought to avoid the guilt in the mirror. The autopsy of a failure foretold. Despite our enthusiasm, the statistics are devastating. According to the media Selphonly one in five people manages to stick to their long-term resolutions. Most of us throw in the towel before the month is over, because we always make the same mistake: wanting to be a different person overnight. We want to eat healthy, meditate, travel and be experts in some subject, all at the same time. The problem is that we focus obsessively on the result (losing 10 kilos) and not on the process (enjoying the taste of a new recipe). Added to this is what psychologist Kimberley Wilson describes how the danger of “forbidden words”. Using terms like “always” or “never” puts us in an “all or nothing” trap. If work gets complicated on a Wednesday and you can’t go to paint or eat a pizza, you feel like the entire year is a failure. It’s tunnel vision that ignores that life is, by definition, unpredictable. Furthermore, today we have a new enemy: metrics. As behavioral experts saywe have gone “from enjoyment to performance.” We no longer read for pleasure, but to update the counter. goodreads; We do not run for health, but to not break the streak of Strava. This culture of productivity applied to leisure turns our hobbies into a second working day. If the app says we haven’t complied, guilt appears. The science of “traps”: The method of temptation. What if the key to compliance was not military discipline, but rather being a little “cheatful”? Katy Milkman, behavior change expert, confesses her own trick in an interview with the Washington Post: he “temptation bundling” (temptation pairing). When he was a student, he hated exercising but loved Harry Potter. His solution was to allow himself to listen to the audiobooks of the saga only while he was at the gym. “It made me want to go to work out,” he explains. It’s basically using a guilty pleasure to “bribe” our brain into a healthy habit. This idea is complemented by the “Habit Stacking” (habit stacking). Instead of reaching for willpower you don’t have, “glue” your new purpose to something you already do automatically. Want to learn that paint stroke? Do a five-minute sketch right after your morning coffee. Want to finish that Pinterest scarf? Do ten rows while watching your favorite Netflix series. You don’t add effort, you just take advantage of the architecture of your current routine. Less “goals”, more “values”. From Harvard University, Dr. Aisha Usmani suggests that we see change as “shaping a sculpture”: It is done by removing pieces of stone little by little, not all at once. Cognitive science tells us that if you want to paint, don’t set out to do one canvas a day; Start with one a week. And above all, align your goals with your personal values, not with external pressure. If crochet stresses you, perhaps it does not respond to your value of “creativity”, but rather to an aesthetic imposition. According to Usmani, We must ask ourselves every day: “Is this still important to me?” If the answer is no, adjusting course is not failure, it is being flexible. Self-compassion as a strategy. We cannot forget the weight of the treatment we give to ourselves. As the psychologist Ángel Rull explains in his columnmany resolutions are born from “being fed up with oneself” and not from self-care. If you join the gym because you hate your body, there is a good chance you will quit. If you do it to feel more energetic, the commitment changes. Another interesting note is how we talk about our setbacks. A recent study highlights the difference between saying that we didn’t “have time” and that we didn’t “make time.” While the first sounds like an external excuse, the second implies active control over our agenda: if we didn’t do it today, we can decide to do it tomorrow. According to this research, focusing the cause of failure on external factors and not on our lack of will is the best lifesaver for our confidence. A more human 2026. In short, we are not computers that restart on January 1st. The real change is not about saturating our to-do list, but about transforming initial fatigue into real self-care. If this year you want to start lifting some weights or for your painting stroke to gain firmness, science gives you permission to be a strategist: combine effort with pleasure through temptation bundlingopt for small things—because a page read will always be better than an abandoned book—and accept that perseverance necessarily includes days of hiatus. In the end, perhaps the best resolution for this year is not to become an “optimized” version of ourselves, but to stop treating ourselves as a defective project that must be fixed by decree. The key to success this year lies not in military discipline, but in the ability to begin to see ourselves as someone who is simply trying to live with a little more presence, realistic tools and, above all, a little less guilt. Image | freepik Xataka | Neither board games nor karaoke: ‘Word on Beat’ is the new king of the living room and proof that we prefer rhythmic chaos

The AI has converted work interviews into a cheat circus. So companies are returning to the face -to -face

The virtual work interviews They are already normal in job search processes. The problem is that in certain areas, such as software and programmers engineers, candidates usually take advantage of AI tools to cheat. The trend is so worrying that some companies are already returning What always worked: Interviews in person. Google wants to meet you in person. SUCTAR PICHAI, CEO of Google, He explained in June In the Lex Friedman podcast that renewal of the company’s policies at the time of Hire certain profiles. “We are making sure that we introduce at least one round of the candidate for the candidates, just to ensure that the fundamental aspects are fulfilled.” Return to the face -to -face. Pichai’s message is the same as They are adopting other companies such as Apple, goalCisco or the consultant McKinsey, who are among a growing number of companies that are recovering the interviews face to face with the candidates in various stages of the selection process. Mike Kyle, from the Coda Search/Staffing Employment Agency, explained how the quota of companies that have the requirement to make face -to -face interviews has become 30%, when in 2024 it was only 5%. If you want what salary I offer you, I need to meet you. That return to face -to -face interviews usually also focus on the last part of the selection process, but in reality it can occur at any time. If you do not present yourself physically at some point in that process, You won’t know what conditions (Salary included) offers you the company. Cheat programmers. As we said, that is especially true for profiles such as programmers. During some phases of the interviews, real -time sessions usually consider in which candidates must solve a programming problem. In virtual interviews, what has happened is that the interviewees cheat And they use AI to solve the problem, which is not clear whether or not those candidates meet the requirements. AI has become a problem. The resurgence of interviews in person tries to mitigate the problem that AI has raised. Companies that offer jobs have ended up using AI systems for Filter candidateswhich usually flood those offers because they also use AI to generate their CVS adapted to each position and automate the request for various positions quickly. THE ART OF THE TRAPS A few months ago we counted how a student managed to overcome a Amazon technical interview Thanks to the use of AI. That gave him a disturbing idea, because he created a startup called Cluelly to help others do the same or to make exams. One that in fact advertises with an unusual message: “Cheat everything.” The idea seems to have liked, because the investment firm A16z has already injected 15 million dollars In the project. Deepfakes that are interviewed for you. That is a good example of a dangerous trend. It is not that candidates try to deceive companies about their real capacities thanks to AI: there are people who are using these methods much more worrying. The FBI already warned in 2023 of a fraud that involved thousands of North Koreans that simulated being North Americans seeking to work remotely in US companies. His way of doing so was really striking and complex. Be careful with murmuring. Companies that use virtual interviews in their selection processes are also paying special attention to these traps. In fact, some try to detect them by monitoring indications that can aim at fraud: muttering out of the screen or typing and then pauses before answering (waiting to see what the chatgpt tells them on duty to read that answer) It is usually a clue to hunt checkery. Image | RAD MINE In Xataka | Hide the holes in the curriculum of an intermittent work career: the art of not deceiving without telling the whole truth

Whole China is of exams. So AI companies are laying their chatbots so that students do not cheat

In Spain the students recently passed By the Pau test (Before EBAU, EVAU or Selectivity), and now something similar is happening in China, where Chinese students face Gaokao (高考), the National Access to University Exam. And they do it with an almost obligatory novelty. Nothing to cheat with chatbots from AI. The most popular chatbots in China Like Qwenfrom Alibaba, have temporarily deactivated functions such as image recognition. They have done it precisely to prevent such characteristic from being used as a modern “chop” To help them during these tests. Impartiality in the tests. The same has happened with Yuanbao (Tencent) and Kimi (MoNshot), two other popular chatbots in China, which have also deactivated that image recognition characteristic. When trying to use this function, they indicate In Bloombergthe text “appears” to guarantee the impartiality of the university access tests, this function cannot be used during the test period. “ An exam in which the future is played. The Gaokao was held for the first time in 1952 as part of the reform of the then newly created People’s Republic of China. The access processes to universities changed during Mao Zedong’s mandate, but in 1977 Deng Xiaoping recovered them and have continued to be used until today. There are 16 provinces with personalized exams, but in all cases the conclusion is the same: these tests determine the immediate future of students In the academic aspect. Designed and printed in jail. Gaoako access tests are so important that they are designed under strict security by a small team of teachers. These professionals are sent to isolated site of Beijing as military facilities or prisonswhere they make the questions. They cannot leave those locations until the tests are performed, but it is also that most exams are printed within prisons and each “printing” is protected 24 hours a day by cameras and guards. Even its transport to the centers is done with security measures that one would expect in money transports from banking entities, for example. Everything to prevent the questions from leaking. Scratch note. Chatbots are presented as a spectacular help for these students, and students – and their parents – know it. The note of these exams determines whether the student may or may not access the best careers and university institutions, and that also depends on their future positions, salaries and even their social mobility. Competitiveness is also huge: More than 13 million students They are presented to these tests this year. To achieve better notes, all kinds of solutions are used, from particular teachers to these attempts to cheat. Of photo recognition, nothing. The tests have taken place from 7 to today, June 10. The Alibaba chatbots (Qwen) and bytedance (Doubao) offered the Image recognition for AI until last Monday. However, according to Bloomberg if a user asked for the solutions to a problem in a paper that was taken a photo, Qwen replied that the service was temporarily disabled. In Doubao the message indicated is that this request “did not meet the rules.” AI is fine to learn, but not for exams. In Beijing they launched recently A plan to integrate the teaching of AI at school. Although this type of discipline in classrooms is being tried, one thing is that they learn to use it and another very different that students take it to cheat in these tests. In fact a new set of standards Published by the Ministry of Education of China last month established that students should not use the content generated by the response in their duties or in the aforementioned exams. The objective: that they do not depend too much on artificial intelligence. Image | 绵 绵 In Xataka | The 100 best universities in the world excluding those of the US, exposed this graphic revealing

They are being used to cheat and steal information

Surely this situation is familiar: You have a PDF file and you need to turn it into .doc To edit it in Word. An option would be to pay the Premium version of Adobe Acrobat, which allows you to do it, but most likely we seek to “convert PDF to Word” into Google, we access an online tool and upload the PDF without the slightest prevention. Well, this action, so innocent in appearance, can end up regular, as they have warned from the FBI. What happened. The FBI office in Denver has issued an official statement in which they claim that their agents “are increasingly detecting Related scams With free online document conversion tools. “The modus operandi is relatively simple:” criminals use free tools for online document conversion to load malware in victims computers, giving rise to incidents such as ransomware. “ How do they. From the agency they explain that cyberdelicuents are using free conversion or unloading tools. Although they do not give concrete names, they do notice that the attack vector can be a website that promises to convert a PDF to Word or Combine several images in PDFor a tool to download videos and/or convert MP4 into MP3. It is easy to imagine examples of these tools. They work, but they go with a bug. These tools can work and comply with what is promised, but nothing guarantees that the returned file is not infected. PDFs can contain malwaresuch as a JavaScript code that exploits vulnerability or sets a process through commands on our PC. An MP3 can also be infected, although not infecting itself, but exploiting vulnerability in a player, for example. That is, the options are varied. In an online file converter you have to take into account which files returns us and what we do with those we have uploaded Who is looking at. Beyond returning an infected file, these tools can obtain valuable information from us another way: seeing the files we have uploaded. If we have uploaded a PDF with our mail and telephone number (we think of a CV), it is possible that whoever is behind the malicious website uses this information for little lawful purposes. Let’s not talk about bank information, passwords, photos in which we leave, etc. The importance of going with an eye. It should be noted that not all online tools are malicious, much less. That a website has a privacy policy where they clearly explain what they do with your files, contact information and that is known is already a good indicative. When in doubt, it is always a good idea to pass the files generated by a platform as Virustotal. Cover image | NaO Triponez and Markus Spiske edited by Xataka In Xataka | If you use cable headphones, you are vulnerable: they are a caramel for hackers

This is how bracelets with stickers came to cheat half the world

We are in 2009. Slovakia joins the euro zone, The name of Satoshi Nakamoto It begins to resonate in certain forums, the first Metro line from Andalusia is inaugurated in Seville, Spain gets gold in the Eurobasket and half -world dolls dress with miraculous bracelets called Power Balance. These bracelets, whose price was just 30 euros, promised to improve strength, balance and flexibility thanks to holograms that fixed our biocampus. They also turned out to be a millionaire scam. Power Balance’s story goes back to 2007, when the Josh and Troy Rodarmel brothers founded the company in California. Although the concept was not new, the two brothers developed a marketing campaign that worked perfectly, starting with Give your first 50,000 bracelets in the US Open of Surfing of 2007. Power Balance bracelet | Image: Wagner Bonifacio Leite In just a few months, these bracelets began arriving at personalities dolls such as Michael Jordan, Cristiano Ronaldo, Leonardo DiCaprio and even Shaquille O’Neal, which It appeared on video saying “I don’t give many testimonies, but this does work.” The Power Balance arrived throughout the world, Spain included. Until Infanta Elena had one. In 2010, the company reported some Sales worth $ 35 millionnothing wrong for a product without any scientific basis. Various studies They began to demonstrate that these products were useless, thus arriving the beginning of the end of the company. The key was, undoubtedly, the placebo effect, but that there was a hologram that balanced and isolated frequencies to improve our body was simply false. At the end of 2010The company had to admit that its products were not based on scientific evidence. In 2011, she was sentenced for fraud and forced to pay 57 million dollars. That led Power Balance to bankruptcy. Finally, the company was sold in 2012 to a Chinese company for eight million dollars. The original founders disregard them completely, but the product is still sold today (only without announcing effects of any kind). Cover image | Xataka In Xataka | The Bank of Spain alerts a malware capable of “capturing bank credentials.” His name: Trickmo

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.