usatoday24

“Women continue to look for answers outside the health system”

by

For decades, the menopause It has been a topic relegated to the private sphere and, too often, silenced in medical consultations. Given the lack of accessible clinical information, the Internet has become the great refuge for many women who need to resolve their concerns and do not know where to turn. However, what search engines return has changed drastically: health has given way to marketing. What has been seen. A new study published in JAMA has put figures on this phenomenon by analyzing search patterns in Google Trends over two decades in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Based on all this information, researchers have detected an increase of between 15 and 20 percentage points in searches aimed at commercial products and services. That is why the internet is no longer just a place to search for the meaning of a symptom; It is an immense showcase of payment solutions. The health system. This commercial shift in search engines does not occur in a vacuum, but, as Nuria Marín, a menopause specialist, points out, in his analysis for the Science Media Center Spain, the massive increase in these searches reflects a worrying reality: there are fundamental needs not covered in the traditional health system. Women turn to the Internet because they do not find the time, specialized management or comprehensive answers to their routine consultations. However, the study of JAMAdespite being published in a high-impact journal, has a methodological limitation that Marín highlights: Google Trends is an algorithmic and “blind” tool. It does not tell us the age, biological sex, or exact menopausal status of the person typing, which prevents us from establishing direct cause-and-effect relationships at a clinical level. The misinformation. The real problem with seeking answers to questions about our own health is that the algorithm rewards economic profitability over scientific rigor. This means that when a patient searches for information about menopause, she enters a digital ecosystem full of interests. Here is a 2025 study published in B.M.J. revealed that 77.2% of online content on hormone replacement therapy to ‘treat’ menopausal symptoms presented commercial conflicts of interest. But even worse is that 67.2% of the medical claims on these pages They openly contradicted official clinical guidelines based on medical evidence. The quality of the information is quite doubtful, since it was seen that 35% of the websites on menopause had some type of medical quality certification, and more than half required a level of reading comprehension much higher than that recommended for health dissemination. Side B. Not all of the technological landscape is negative, but we have tools that, when designed based on scientific evidence and not aggressive marketing, prove to be a great support for women. Here we have, for example, mobile apps to monitor symptoms which point out that women can see their physical symptoms reduced due to the very fact that the patient structures what is happening to her. That is why the challenge we have ahead of us right now is to offer access to this type of tools and to destigmatize menopause in society. Images | Pexels In Xataka | You get up, you get a cup of hot water, you drink it: more and more people are embracing Chinamaxxing

Anthropic’s AI already writes 80% of its own code because it was inevitable that AIs would improve themselves

by

“As of May 2026, more than 80% of the code we integrate into the Anthropic codebase was created by Claude.” Those who reveal this information are two Anthropic researchers who have published one of the most revealing texts about the present and future of the company’s AI models. One that tells us about a fascinating and disturbing concept in equal parts called recursive self-improvement. Code multiplier. The impact of these agentic programming tools on the work of Anthropic engineers is being spectacular. According to internal Anthropic data from May 2026, this autonomous code generation has caused an Anthropic engineer to produce eight times more lines of code per quarter today than during the 2021-2025 period. Anthropic’s human programmers they no longer program– Direct and review AI-generated code. A frenetic evolution. The changes we have experienced have been fascinating, they explain in Anthropic. Between 2021 and 2023, engineers wrote all code by hand on their computers. In 2024 they started using chatbots to generate small snippets of code that they then copied and pasted. In 2025, agents capable of work autonomously on entire files. Longer time in a row. According to the METR benchmark which measures the ability of AI to complete complex tasks, in 2022 GPT-3.5 could barely last about 35 seconds operating autonomously without making serious errors. By mid-2026 Claude Opus 4.6 is already capable of working 16 hours in a row on complex tasks. At Anthropic they point out that the length of tasks that an AI model could undertake doubled every seven months, but now it doubles every four. If this trend continues, “tasks that take a person days could be automated with AI. By 2027, AI systems could be able to work on tasks that take a person weeks.” Superhuman performance. Industry benchmarks are being “saturated” by new AI models, which already reach almost 100% of the possible score in many of them. For example SWE-bench, which measured the models’ ability to program, was almost is surpassed for the most recent models. In 2025 Claude pus managed to optimize the code they gave him by making it ran 3x faster. In April 2026 Claude Mythos Preview already achieved a 52x speedup of that code. AI that improved itself. This concept of recursive self-improvement presents a scenario in which an AI model generates data, corrects its own failures, and trains itself continuously. This opens the door to exponential growth in its capabilities, but at the same time reopens a debate on the risks that this type of evolution generates. Source: Anthropic infinite loop. Traditionally, human engineers analyzed the responses of a model, cleaned the data, and adjusted parameters to create the next version of that model. With recursive self-improvement AI takes on that role and evaluates its own performance, generating more complex problems to test itself and generating synthetic data for your next generation. Danger. This autonomy implies a potential risk: that humans lose control of where the AI ​​goes. That we do not know or can assure if it is aligned with our ethics and ideals. The biaseshowever small, can be amplified with this type of iterative process, but the model itself may have mutated its original ethical reasoning mechanisms and security protocols to become something totally unpredictable. The Terminator scenario. Isolation and arbitration. To avoid these risks, at Anthropic they implement this evolution in isolated environments to then verify that everything works as it should. In addition, the company uses independent evaluation models that act as independent arbiters that audit these models. that evolve by themselves. They do this by checking each change in the code to prevent its impact from being harmful to the system or to those who use it. The new bottleneck is the human being. The Amdahl’s law is a formula that is used to find the maximum performance improvement of an information system when only a part of that system is improved. At Anthropic they point out how as AI continues to write more and more code, the real bottleneck is the human being who has to review that code. In Xataka | Anthropic is one step away from being worth as much as Samsung. And what the market is buying is not Claude

recycle statues of emperors

by

In the British Museum it is preserved a bust from the 1st century of the emperor Vespasian with a fascinating secret. In reality it does not show us Vespasian, but rather Nero. Or at least it was until a sculptor took out his chisel to alter the features of Nero, one of the rulers with worst reputation of Rome, and resemble those of Vespasian. It is not a unique case. We preserve many other imperial busts that initially portrayed one leader and over time were ‘re-sculpted’ to give him the appearance of another. One word: re-carve. Some time ago, archaeologists Francesca Bologna and Raffaella Bucolo set themselves a task that was as fascinating as it was complicated: to better understand when, how and, above all, why the recarving, the Roman practice of ‘re-carving’ sculptures of emperors to alter their appearance. That what was initially a bust of Caligula or Nero became another of Claudius or Vespasian, to name two real examples. One figure: 2,028. To better understand this habit, they analyzed 2,028 works, sculptures of Roman emperors made over three centuries, between 27 BC and 285 AD The exhibition is interesting not only because of the broad period it covers. The researchers also wanted to include a broad list of heroes, ranging from Gaius Julius Caesar Augustusfounder of the Roman Empire, until beyond Marcus Aurelius Claudius Gothicusnoting in each case the new and ‘recycled’ pieces. Their conclusions have been collected in a paper recently published in Journal of Roman Archeology. Why did they do it? The million dollar question. When answering it, the experts have raised above all a question of time and resources. That is, Roman sculptors would use ancient busts for a strictly practical reason and in order to reuse their materials and cut delivery times. In your article Bologna and Bucolo point out, however, that the phenomenon was probably much more “complex” and was influenced by both strictly technical and other “ideological” aspects. One of the first conclusions that both experts obtained is that the recarving It was not always practiced with the same frequency nor was it equally supported in all corners of the vast Roman Empire. For example, during the time of the Antonines The ‘recycling’ of busts was abandoned for a very simple reason: during that time (2nd century AD) fashion led rulers to wear thick beards and voluminous hair, an aesthetic very different from their dynastic predecessors. Julio-Claudiana and Flavia. Is that important? Yes. Because it is one thing to remove excess marble and another (very different and more unfeasible) to create it where there is none. As the sculptures of previous emperors did not leave enough material to recreate those beards and thick hair, the ‘re-sculpture’ was temporarily abandoned “for mainly technical reasons” during the Antonine era. Nor was it very common in periods of crisis in which emperors quickly succeeded one another on the throne, leaving no room for sculptors to ‘recycle’ the busts that were saved from pickaxe or mutilation. It matters who… and where. one of the conclusions The most surprising things that archaeologists have come to is that the ‘recycling’ of busts was not equally frequent throughout the Empire. Bologna and Bucolo calculate that of all the sculptures they analyzed, only 8% It shows signs of having been ‘re-sculpted’ to alter its identity. That is the general percentage, but it does not mean that it is extendable to the entire territory of the Empire. In the city of Rome it was somewhat higher (11%) and in other regions, such as Asia Minor or North Africa, it did not even reach 5%. If there is a territory that stands out, however, for the frequency of recarving It’s Iberiawhere that data shoots up to 19%. The unknown. That makes Hispania the region in which more likely it was that a sculpture of a fallen emperor passed through the workshop to be altered. Especially during the years of the Julio-Claudian and Flavian dynasties. The reason? One possibility is the different tunes of local elites. For example, there were portraits of Caligula that were converted into others of Augustus, a previous emperor of happier memory. The data from Rome, Africa and Asia Minor also have different explanations: the influence of political propaganda, the abundance of marble and specialized workshops or the existence of artisans. The punishment of punishments. One of the most interesting ideas that the researchers come up with is that the ‘recycling’ of busts connects with a well-known practice in Rome, the damnatio memoriae. The term may not sound familiar to you, but it means “condemnation of memory” and experts equate it with a kind of “posthumous cancel culture”. What does that mean? That when you wanted to punish a public official there was a particularly effective way to do it, even more bloody than simple execution: his mark was erased from history in a way so evident, so manifestly intentional, that it made it clear to future generations that that character should be reprobated. That is to say, his name was not suppressed in a discreet way, but in such a way that the void it left was clear. The case of Crispus. In an article published in 2024 in The ConversationMichael Hanaghan, of the Australian Catholic University, shares an illustrative example: in 326 AD the Emperor Constantine had his son Crispus executed, supposedly upon learning that he had seduced Constantine’s own wife… and at the time Constantine’s stepmother. Crispus. Although he was his firstborn, Constantine wanted to give him an exemplary punishment. And that didn’t just happen because of its execution. The name of Crispus was removed of monuments such as a preserved landmark in Brescia that Hanaghan came across during a visit to a museum. “This is not a secret erasure of someone’s name, but a public display of erasure.” “Clear memory”. Bologna and Bucolo point out that this practice is behind at least certain cases of ‘recycling’ of Roman busts. Its purpose was “to erase … Read more

TSMC chairman challenges Chinese chipmakers

by

TSMC leads the integrated circuit manufacturing industry overwhelmingly. The current market share of this Taiwanese company is approximately 70%, according to the consulting firm TrendForce. Samsung is the second largest producer of chips for third parties, although with a market share of 7.2% is positioned very far from the leader of this industry. And the Chinese company SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp) is hot on his heels in third position with a share of 5.32%. However, there was a time when Intel dominated the semiconductor industry with a force comparable to that currently held by TSMC. Its rise to leadership began with the 1981 agreement with IBM to supply the processor for the original PC, making the x86 architecture the standard. de facto of personal computing. Over the next three decades, Intel set the pace of technological development in the semiconductor industry, but its decline began in 2015 when it began accumulating delays in the transition to the most advanced nodes. In 2010, probably few analysts in this sector would have predicted that TSMC would take over from Intel both from a technological point of view and from a strictly commercial perspective. Its market share of 70% says it all. Now it is the Chinese chip manufacturers who are slowly beginning to intimidate. SMIC, as we have just seen, is already hot on Samsung’s heels in the fight to manufacture semiconductors for third parties. And Hua Hong and Huawei are pushing harder and harder. So much so, in fact, that TSMC shareholders are starting to get restless. Huawei wants to change the rules of the game that TSMC is winning CC Wei, the current president of TSMC, has assured that his company “is not afraid” of competition from China. This assertion is not accidental. In fact, this executive spoke these words in response to a shareholder’s question during the annual meeting that was held just a few hours ago. wei has pointed out that competition has been a constant throughout the company’s forty years of history. And it’s true. But it is also true that no company has led the chip sector forever. Fairchild Semiconductor, Texas Instruments, NEC, Toshiba, Hitachi, and, of course, Intel, have led. And all of them have fallen. If we look towards China, the companies that seem to worry TSMC the most are SMIC and Huawei. In fact, their alliance has allowed SMIC to manufacture 7nm integrated circuits using the equipment deep ultraviolet photolithography (UVP) of ASML and without the need to resort to the most advanced machines of extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Also, as we told you last week. Huawei has presented a new scaling law and a new chip architecture capable, on paper, of taking its semiconductors to a lithographic process node equivalent to 1.4 nm by 2031. Huawei’s plan is to continue improving the performance and density of its chips despite the restrictions At the moment the most advanced integrated circuits that TSMC, Intel or Samsung produce are 2 nm. Huawei’s plan is to continue improving the performance and density of its chips despite restrictions that limit China’s access to the most advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment. And the heart of their strategy is the “tau scaling law.” This principle seeks to reduce the time it takes for signals and data to travel through computer chips and equipment. It proposes a paradigm shift that replaces the traditional geometric miniaturization of transistors with temporal scaling (τ), hence its name. It seems like a very complicated strategy, but it’s actually reasonably simple. We can easily understand what it is by referring to this example. Let’s imagine that we have a city (the chip) with many buildings (transistors) connected by roads (wires). Moore’s Law says: “Make buildings smaller to fit more in the same space“. Huawei, however, proposes: “buildings can no longer be much smaller, so instead let’s make cars (electrical signals) travel faster on the roads, and redesign the urban layout so that they travel less distance.” τ (tau) is, precisely, the time it takes a car to go from one building to another, and Huawei’s bet is to reduce it as much as possible. Huawei’s LogicFolding architecture plays an essential role in this approach. And, if we continue with our example, it proposes a new design of the roads on which cars circulate, so that the chip will perform better without the need to build smaller buildings. Huawei has anticipated that its next generation of Kirin chips, which will arrive next fall, will be the first to implement the LogicFolding architecture. Whatever its Chinese competitors do, TSMC will continue to do very well in the short and medium term. But in the long term his current leadership is not guaranteed. Image | TSMC More information | SCMP In Xataka | The condemnation that afflicts China: after decades of manufacturing a competitive desktop processor, it is six years behind

This is the Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete

by

The robot vacuum cleaners What we are seeing in 2026 has little to do with those of a few years ago. This becomes especially clear when we take a look at the high-end ones. and there we can place the new Dreame X60 family. In fact, we already have the Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete available in Spain and the best thing is that it has arrived at a discount: it costs 1,299 euros (its RRP is 1,499 euros). In addition, 20 advance buyers of this new Dreame vacuum cleaner will be able to take home a Cyber free, an accessory that attaches to the robot vacuum cleaner and makes it capable of climbing stairs. Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete Robot Vacuum Cleaner The price could vary. We earn commission from these links It has double-jointed arms that reach all corners When we think of a robot vacuum cleaner, perhaps a simple device comes to mind that vacuums the floor (and may also mop), but struggles to reach complicated areas such as corners and also overcome obstacles. Those that are high-end are designed to overcome all this and the Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete also does the same. But it goes a step further in some features. This vacuum cleaner has two arms. This is something that is already present in other vacuum cleaners, but the novelty is that these Dreame robot arms They have double joints: a first part that is an “elbow” and the other that is the brush or mop. Thus, the robot can clean at very large angles, which will allow it to reach corners, skirting boards or even under furniture. The X60 Pro Ultra Complete has a system called AI OmniSight 3.0 that will prevent him from banging his head on the furniture. It uses dual cameras with 120 degrees of vision and AI to detect and avoid obstacles. It also has a blue light system that will allow you to detect transparent elements that are not so easy to see, such as liquids. Another point in which this Dreame robot also stands out is when it comes to overcoming obstacles of up to 10 centimeters. In this way, it will move and be able to avoid small steps or rugs, elements that can prevent a complete cleaning of your house. And there is plenty of autonomy for this: offers 232 minutes per charge. To all of the above we must add that it has a base that will empty the vacuum cleaner automatically, so we can go up to 100 days without doing too much maintenance. In fact, when with several tanks, one even dedicated for a cleaning solution. It also cleans the mops with hot water, making it really low maintenance. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: dreame x60 pro ultra complete offer ✅ THE BEST It is capable of reaching the most difficult corners: Its double-jointed arms allow the robot to reach difficult corners or even avoid furniture legs. Good guidance system and to overcome obstacles: A robot like this one from Dreame doesn’t bang its head on furniture. It is capable of identifying and avoiding obstacles of all kinds. It requires very little maintenance: Its base means that there is almost no maintenance required, which is very convenient. ❌ THE WORST High price despite the discount: It has a 200 euro launch discount, although it is a robot vacuum cleaner with a high price. 💡 BUY IT IF… You want a robot vacuum cleaner that requires little maintenance and is capable of vacuuming a large house, even reaching difficult corners. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… Do you prefer a cheaper option from Dreame itself or from another manufacturer. You may also be interested iRobot Robot vacuum cleaner and floor mop with Wi-Fi Roomba Combo j7+ automatic self-emptying – Retractable lifting cloth – Smart navigation – Object recognition – recharge and resume The price could vary. We earn commission from these links roborock Robot Vacuum Cleaner QV 35A Set, 8000Pa Suction, Two Liftable Spin Mops, Anti-Tangle Brushes, Reactive Technology for Obstacle Avoidance, Navigation and Mapping, White The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Dreame In Xataka | Best robot vacuum cleaners in quality price. Which one to buy based on use and six recommended models In Xataka | Best upright vacuum cleaners. Which one to buy based on use and six recommended models

Space data centers seem crazy. They make a lot more sense than it seems

by

“Space, the final frontier” became a classic pop culture phrase thanks to the series Star Trek. Now there are those who complete it with “… data centers”, because that is what Elon Musk certainly wants to achieve, and he has a plan to achieve it. At first glance it seems crazybut it turns out that the idea is not at all crazy. Free cooling, nothing. As explained in a very deep report in Semianalysismany analysts support the idea by defending erroneous premises. The space, for example, does not offer free cooling. Since there is no atmosphere, heat is not dissipated by convection, and huge and expensive thermal radiators are necessary. Solar energy is also interrupted in low orbits (LEO), so satellites must be placed in sun-synchronous orbits, a resource that is beginning to become saturated. The current cost does not compensate. The analysis carried out in this study for the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for a currently standard 30.5 kW cluster (with two servers with 16 Nvidia B300 GPUs) does not add up. Deploy this infrastructure In space it is necessary to invest 4.1 million dollars, when doing the same on Earth costs 1.4 million dollars. Space data centers are currently 260% more expensive than on the planet’s surface. Bad business. Space transportation makes everything more expensive. He biggest problem What affects these costs is the costs of transporting the material to space. In that proposed example, of the $3.1 million total cost of space infrastructure, $1.6 million is due to launch. But there is also the problem of the useful life of this data center: on Earth these facilities pay for themselves in 15 years, but in space wear and radiation in orbit reduce the operational life of the particular satellite to only five years, which multiplies those capital expenses dedicated to the project almost by 20. The first bottleneck is the chips. Even solving these problems, the main obstacle is simply semiconductor manufacturing capacity. The demand for TSMC’s N3 wafers and the supply of HBM memories is much higher than the supply even without this idea of ​​​​space data centers. That would add even more demand to an absolutely saturated system. But there is also the (lack of) energy. The reason why Musk wants to promote this idea as soon as possible is that obtaining power supply for terrestrial data centers is increasingly complicated. Thus, getting a connection to the electrical grid in Virgnia (USA) already takes seven years. Companies are creating their own power generation plants to solve this problem. Even so, according to the study, it will become increasingly more expensive to access this supply: they estimate that the cost of “terrestrial energy” will be above 20 million dollars per MW when this decade ends. That’s why Terafab. To solve this first bottleneck, Elon Musk has launched its colossal Terafab project in Austin. It is a huge chip manufacturing factory that will need 10 GW of electrical power to produce one million semiconductor wafers each month. The plan takes into account that 80% of the chips produced are destined precisely for space data centers. Starship changes the equation. But Starship stands in front of all these problems. SpaceX hopes to be able to reduce launch costs significantly in the coming years, going from the current $1,400-1,800 per kilo for the Falcon 9 to just $250 per kg for the Starship. This, together with the improvement in radiator and solar panel technology, will reduce the cost gap with terrestrial infrastructure. Now it is 260% more expensive, but at the beginning of the next decade it will be only 30% more expensive and will achieve economic parity by 2040. But. The accounts could therefore come out in the medium term, but it is necessary to take into account other factors as the so-called long-term computing cost. On Earth, between 3% and 6% of GPUs in data centers fail each year and require manual replacement by a technician. In space that option disappears, so it is necessary to oversize the satellites with 20% chips to provide redundancy and thus absorb potential radiation failures. In Xataka | Aragón is quietly becoming a data center “powerhouse” – now it has taken a crucial step

“How do I turn off post-workout effort ratings on Apple Watch?”

by

One of the directions that smart watch manufacturers are following to make their products more useful for our daily lives is to guide us in helping us with our exercises and workouts. But what happens if in their desire to give us all the information they end up bothering us? Sometimes they may show summaries related to our training which we prefer to deactivate. This is one of the questions that a xatakero asked us in our Discord who decided to take advantage The Officeone of the advantages of Xataka Xtraour subscription to access exclusive newsletters, raffles, promotions and other exclusive advantages. In this case, what we offer is a direct line with us to resolve questions like this. The xatakero who consulted us told us that his Apple Watch makes effort evaluations every time he finishes an exercise, and that he could not find the option to deactivate them. This is what I answered myself, and that, being an editor at Xataka Basics, I am very used to solving and guiding these types of problems. The question Hello. I need help setting up something on the Apple Watch. When I released the watch I configured a lot of aspects, as we all have done. One of them is the assessment of effort after performing an exercise (for example: after doing 30′ on a stationary bike). Well, it turns out that it becomes very difficult to make an assessment every time you finish the exercise. How can I eliminate that step and have the exercise end without further ado, without asking for an evaluation of the effort? Thank you. Our response Effort summaries are a relatively new option with which the Apple Watch tells you whether you have exercised hard or it was a lighter workout. The option to disable them is a little hidden, but we still gave it to you. The option that must be deactivated is “Effort reminder”. You will find it in the app watch of the iPhone where you configure the Apple Watch. Within this application, enter the section trainingwhich appear with the icon of a running person. Once you are inside, go to the section Reminders and deactivate the option Effort reminder. Do you have more questions like this? The subscribers of Xataka Xtra You can send us your questions and our team will respond personally. And if you are already a subscriber, remember this advantage and that you can ask us whenever you want.

Western scientists have been debating the origin of Kamo’oalewa for years. China went looking for him

by

If everything goes according to schedule, the Chinese Tianwen-2 mission will be about to arrive at Kamo’oalewa, the co-orbital object on Earth to which it is heading to discern once and for all whether it is an asteroid or a lunar fragment. Actually this It is not the only coorbital on our planet. There are other objects that take exactly the same time as us to go around the Sun, so they can be said to be our traveling companions. However. z Kamo’oalewa has been one of the best characterized since it was discovered in 2016. Since then, European and American scientists have been striving to find out its origin, leaving the balance more tilted on some occasions towards the lunar fragment and on others towards the asteroid. But it is clear that to have a definitive answer we need to analyze samples of its surface. In order to obtain them, China jumped to the rescue. A mission to answer once and for all. The Tianwen-2 mission was launched in May 2025 bound for Kamo’oalewa. In the next few days it should reach the satellite, to start taking samples next month. The samples will later make the return journey and land on our planet in 2027 so that scientists at the Chinese Academy of Sciences can investigate them. Then we will finally know where our traveling companion comes from. Two hypotheses, many changes of opinion. Kamo’oalewa was first observed in April 2016, thanks to the Pan-STARRS telescope at the Haleakala Observatory in Hawaii. That same year, a team of European scientists made his first characterization. Thanks to them we had very specific information about this object. For example, its orbit was calculated and its thermal inertia was analyzed. That is, the speed with which its surface responds to changes in temperature. After that characterization, further investigations were carried out at the Arizona Planetary Science Institute. From those analyzes two hypotheses emerged for its origin: it could be an asteroid that escaped from the asteroid belt or a fragment of the Moon that jumped from there due to a large impact. This last hypothesis arose from spectroscopic observations made with the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) and the Lowell Discovery Telescope (LDT). The spectra indicated that this object is very rich in silicates, like the lunar samples collected on the Apollo missions. In addition, there was a reddish band that seemed to correspond to the spectrum of lunar soil that has received many impacts from micrometeorites and solar wind. The first hypothesis returns. This same year, a team of European scientists has carried out a new study in which the probabilities of both hypotheses are analyzed. Clearly, the asteroid option wins over the lunar fragment option. China to the rescue China to the rescue. As Tianwen-2 approaches Kamo’oalewa, Chinese scientists have begun to make their own characterizations from a distance. For example, a study was recently published in which they compared the spectrum they measured in Arizona with that of a chondrite bombarded by laser. The chondrites They are rocky asteroids that have impacted the Earth in the form of meteorites. Laser bombardment mimics the effects of several million years of impacts. When analyzing the spectrum of this manipulated chondrite, they saw a reddish band very similar to that of Kamo’oalewa. Therefore, it is possible that it is an asteroid rich in silicates. There doesn’t have to be just them. on the moon. Specifically, they believe that it may be from the Flora family, coming from the asteroid belt. The hypothesis that is winning. Currently the asteroid hypothesis wins, although there will be no clear answer until the Tianwen-2 samples reach Earth. After many debates by scientists from Europe and the United States, the answer will be brought by a Chinese ship. This, once again, shows us how important it is to work as a team to answer the big questions of the Universe. Image | 中国新闻社 In Xataka | There is a silent race to take over the Moon’s waves: dozens of companies have claimed part of its spectrum

How to send a fake or nearby location on WhatsApp

by

Let’s explain to you how to send a fake location in WhatsApp. With this, you can meet someone without revealing where you live exactly, simply doing it somewhere close. You will also be able to send it a place with another context, such as an area where you want to travel or something similar. We are going to tell you three things you can do. You can do the first two on Android and on the iPhone, also on WhatsApp Web and on the desktop, and is to send nearby locations or directly any other custom location you want. Then we will tell you another trick to be able to fake your own location if you use an Android mobile. Send a nearby fixed location To send a nearby fixed location, the first thing you have to do is enter the chat with the person you want to send it to. Then, click on the add element button, which on Android has a paperclip icon and on the iPhone a +. In the menu that opens, Click on the location option that will appear to you. This will open a screen with the map. In it, above you have the map with your location and nearby location pointsand below you have the list of nearby locations. Here, you just have to Click on the nearby location you want and you will send it. Send a custom fixed location To send a personalized location, the first thing you have to do is enter the chat with the person you want to send it to. Then, click on the add element button, which on Android has a paperclip icon and on the iPhone a +. In the menu that opens, Click on the location option that will appear to you. This will open a screen with the map. In it, Write the location you want in the search enginewhether close or not. The results will appear both on the map and in the list, and you will only have to click on the location you want. You can also navigate the map without using the search engine, and thus find a fixed location that you want. When you find it, click on it and you can share it. This gives you complete flexibility to share any location. Use a GPS app to send fake locations On Android you have alternatives to send totally fake locations without them having to be close to you. For that, first you have to download an app to fake your GPSas Fake GPS. Find it and install it on your mobile. Now, you have to activate Android developer optionsentering About my phone in the settings and clicking ten times on the build number. Within the options for developers, go to the bottom and click on the option Choose app to simulate locationand you will enter a screen where you can choose the Fake GPS that you just installed. Now, open the Fake GPS application and choose the location you want to pretend you are in. To do this, you have to put the pin in the place you want, and then click on the play button at the bottom right. Now, with the steps that we have told you before, enter the chat you want, and click on the option to send location. By doing so, simply press the button Send my current location. If you’ve done everything right, The location you send will be the one you have activated in Fake GPS instead of your real one. In Xataka Basics | How to know if they are spying on your WhatsApp using WhatsApp Web

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.