They have rewarded them with 5.3 million dollars

The artificial intelligence drivers They have not been warning that this technology The world will change at levels of what did the arrival of electricity or internet. Two 21 -year -old girls named Chungin “Roy” Lee and Neel Shanmugam have created an AI tool to “cheat in everything.”

With her, Lee surpassed a technical test without problems In the selection process For practices on Amazon, but it also cost him the expulsion from Columbia University for “having cheated.”

Now, Shanmugam and Lee have created A startup To develop their “cheat” tool of AI and some investors have believed that their idea was so brilliant, that it was worth giving it a vote of confidence. A vote of 5.3 million dollars, nothing less.

A “help” of AI

Such and as he collected CNBCLee was a student at Columbia University who was looking to do practices in some technological. The student considered that the technical test during the interview was a proceeding completely unnecessary for the position he was running.

Therefore, he decided to create a tool based on AI that he called Interview Coder. This tool was installed in the browser and analyzed everything that happened on the user’s screen, passing totally unnoticed by the interviewer.

In this way, the AI ​​tool offered solutions to the programming problems that were raised during the test and answered questions so that Roy Lee did not have an immediate answer. With that help, Lee got practices on Amazon.

According to The published By the University newspaper of the University of Columbia, Lee and his partner Neel Shanmugam were expelled as a disciplinary action for using Interview Coder in their work interviews. Something that the university considered as unusual, as can be seen from the disciplinary document that the student himself made public In his X profile.

Far from hiding their invention and outside the ethical dilemmas that the tool raised for the university, the young people obtained unexpected success with their application, which in principle was sold for a quota of between 25 and 60 dollars per month and openly promoted it on social networks.

Given their success, both ex -studies constituted a startup called Cluely to develop the project professionally.

They are not traps, it is the future

Despite the controversy arising from ethical interpretations about the use of the AI ​​tool, Roy Lee and Shanmugam’s vision seems to have excited investors. As read confirmed Since their LinkedIn profile, the capital funds Abstract Ventures and Susa Ventures have supported the project with an initial investment of 5.3 million dollars.

The reasons are explained by their founders in a manifesto published on the Cluely page. “Every time technology makes us smarter, the world panic. Then adapt. Later it is forgotten. And suddenly, it is normal,” wrote the creators of the application.

The financial support of these investors reveals that they share the idea that the use of AI to expedite processes It should not be considered cheatbut a natural evolution towards greater efficiency at work.

In their manifesto, the ex -studies emphasize that AI is not a trap, but a tool to obtain better results faster, equating its use to the calculators, the spelling concealer and even Google.

The ethical debate about AI

The case of Lee and Shanmugam reflects the ethical dilemma that is slowing down the adoption of AI at workwhere employees still feel that when using AI to expedite their productive processes They are cheating.

However, as the founders of Cluelly highlight, today nobody questions the use of calculators to solve complex operations on a day -to -day basis or the use of Google to look for information quickly. Surely, that idea is the one that has led investors to deposit their trust (and their money) in the idea that Cluely proposes. When that “normality” that reads and Shanmugam arrives in their manifesto, they will be there to collect the benefits.

Without a doubt, the difference could be in context. It is reasonable that the use of calculators, spelling or Google correctors is limited, when it is about evaluating real knowledge that they have. Using it during an examination of mathematics or language, whose objective is to see the ability to perform the calculation process or the knowledge of grammar and spelling, would be to make an ethical use of these tools.

The same could be said of a technical test in a job interview.

In Xataka | Someone used AI to overcome an interview on Amazon. His success has made Google see his candidates face to face

Image | Cluely