who pays for chatgpt without knowing how to use it thoroughly

For two years, Openai has offered Its payment users A supermarket of models. Those that it offers now:

• GPT-4O
• O3
• O4-mini
• O4-mini-High
• GPT 4.5
• GPT 4.1
• GPT-4.1-mini

Many variants, each with their strengths and its weak points, their ideal uses. But also, for many users, with confusion as a common denominator. How many users really understood when it was better to use a reasoning model in front of a faster and more conversational? How many knew, or even knew that “they should know”?

That selectable model was a poorly resolved complexity symptom. Even Altman himself admitted that they needed to improve it. It is easy to observe in our environment: people paying chatgpt plus to use it without limits or by the promise of a more advanced modelbut without knowing that the model you have to choose it. GPT-4o by default and P’alante.

Image: Xataka.

There it enters GPT-5. Or rather, the new idea of “GPT-5 as a system”, not as a model. A system that automatically encrupates each Prompteach question, each task, towards the most appropriate type of processing. It is a paradigm shift: The choice disappears as a load and becomes invisible intelligence.

Altman was clear when this year anticipated at the beginning of the year: “We want AI to simply work.” GPT-5 responds to that. Eliminates the cognitive weight that supposed to decide among seven different models. Returns to chatgpt The original “magic”: You write something, and what you expect to happen. Not what you have had to optimize.

If something has been clear in these years is that a good part of the users are not intensive and experts, but rather applicants. People who pay, but not to experiment with technical parameters. They pay for not having to do it. They intuit the potential, but they neither know nor want to learn to squeeze it: they want something that works in the best possible way, but without complications.

GPT-5 is the perfect model for that profile. The user who intuits that chatgpt can be very valuable, but he has no time – desire – to become a Engineer of Prompts. Someone who does not differentiate a generative reasoning model or want to learn it. That he only wants, when writing, something intelligent, useful, relevant happens.

And that is where Openai has given in the nail. He has understood that the vast majority of their users are not dumb, but are already somewhat saturated by decisions, and that they appreciate that a technology is responsible for one for them, without spoiling the result. GPT-5 is not smarter because you think more: it is because you know when to think more, and when not to do it.

The history of technology is full of transitions like this.

1. First, sophistication as a synonym for control. Dials to turn, ports to choose from, manuals to read.
2. Then, magic: instantaneous matches, cars that slow down us, automatic brightness.

GPT-5 belongs to that second category.

His ideal user is not the engineer, nor the writer, nor the programmer obsessed with the precision of the model. It is the average user, the one who simply wants something that works wellthat he adapts, that he does not ask for explanations. He who pays without knowing, but finally begins to get what he pays.

In Xataka | I have tried the new OpenAI models. It has been a small odyssey with prize: I have a chatgpt at home

Outstanding image | Xataka with Mockuuuups Studio